I'm trying to use Liip test bundle to load fixtures from code using the loadFixtures() method from FixturesTrait
However, I need to exclude the RESOURCE table that I don't want to be dropped in the process. If I understand correctly, this should be easy using the setExcludedDoctrineTables method according to the doc https://github.com/liip/LiipTestFixturesBundle/blob/master/doc/database.md
Unfortunately, when I run this code, the table RESOURCES gets dropped with all the others.
Can anybody see why ?
not sure if that's relevant but I'm using a mysql db in a separate docker container.
<?php
namespace App\Tests\Controller;
use Symfony\Component\Panther\PantherTestCase;
use Symfony\Component\Panther\Client;
use Facebook\WebDriver\WebDriverBy as By;
use Facebook\WebDriver\Exception\TimeoutException;
use Liip\FunctionalTestBundle\Test\WebTestCase;
use Symfony\Component\Panther\PantherTestCaseTrait;
use Liip\TestFixturesBundle\Test\FixturesTrait;
use App\Repository\UserRepository;
use App\DataFixtures\UserFixtures;
use App\DataFixtures\AccountFixtures;
abstract class AbstractPantherTest extends WebTestCase{
// use trait so we can combine Liip and Panther features
use PantherTestCaseTrait; // this is the magic. Panther is now available.
// provide fixtures loading feature
use FixturesTrait;
// #var Symfony\Component\Panther\Client
protected static $client;
//Initialize the test case
function setUp():void
{
static::bootKernel();
if(self::$client === null){
self::$client = self::createPantherClient(['browser' => PantherTestCase::FIREFOX]);
$this->setExcludedDoctrineTables(["RESOURCES"]);
$this->loadFixtures([
UserFixtures::class,
]);
// retrieve the test user
$userRepository = static::$container->get(UserRepository::class);
// retrieve the test user
$testUser = $userRepository->findOneByUsername('Administrator');
// simulate $testUser being logged in
self::doLogin($testUser->getUsername(), 'xxx');
}
}
}
Answering my own question as I just found out the issue. Sometimes a good night of sleep is all you need :)
So this code is actually working. The table RESOURCES got dropped because the setUp method was redefined in the concrete class implementing the test and that redefinition included another call to loadFixtures, but for a different data class and without the exclusion :
<?php
namespace App\Tests\Controller;
use App\DataFixtures\DiscountFixtures;
class DiscountControllerWebTest extends AbstractPantherTest
{
function setUp():void
{
parent::setUp();
$this->loadFixtures([
DiscountFixtures::class,
]);
}
Related
I want to reset my test database after each test but somehow can't find a way to do it. Can delete the data added in each test but I am pretty sure this is not the correct approach. What I have as test is simply this:
<?php
declare(strict_types=1);
namespace Tests\Unit\Entity;
use App\Repository\UserRepository;
use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Test\KernelTestCase;
use Tests\Shared\Factory\UserFactory;
final class UserTest extends KernelTestCase
{
public function testGettersReturnCorrectData(): void
{
self::bootKernel();
/** #var UserRepository $repo */
$repo = self::getContainer()->get(UserRepository::class);
$user = UserFactory::createUser();
$repo->add($user, true);
$this->assertSame($user->getEmail(), UserFactory::EMAIL);
$this->assertSame($user->getPassword(), UserFactory::PASSWORD);
$this->assertSame($user->getReferralCode(), UserFactory::REFERRAL_CODE);
}
}
The newly created user stays in the db. I am using MySQL test db because my production db will be MySQL and don't want to reach some corner cases because of the different dbs.
This is my env.test if needed.
# define your env variables for the test env here
KERNEL_CLASS='App\Kernel'
APP_SECRET='$ecretf0rt3st'
SYMFONY_DEPRECATIONS_HELPER=999999
PANTHER_APP_ENV=panther
PANTHER_ERROR_SCREENSHOT_DIR=./var/error-screenshots
DATABASE_URL="mysql://root:toma123#127.0.0.1:3306/api?serverVersion=5.7&charset=utf8mb4"
by the love of god, follow #craigh 's advice and look into foundry
https://symfony.com/bundles/ZenstruckFoundryBundle/current/index.html#database-reset
they do exactly that, and actually provide good stuff so you can build your test database inside each test case. Symfony's fixtures solution, in my subjective opinion, is worse than foundry.
I am using dingo/api in my api and I want to unit test the endpoint:
class MyApiTest extends TestCase
{
public function testEndpoint()
{
$dispatcher = app('Dingo\Api\Dispatcher');
$fake_token = 'cndksjonsdcnsod';
$dispatcher->header('Authorization', 'Bearer: '.$fake_token);
$dispatcher->version($version)->get('/my-endpoint');
}
}
In my app.php I have the following configuration:
'auth' => [
'jwt' => Dingo\Api\Auth\Provider\JWT::class,
],
Is there a way to mock/fake/set default values to the Dingo\Api\Auth\Provider\JWT provider of jwt authentication?
An approach that worked for me, is via testing the controller itself and mock JWT authentication service by bypassing the Dingo and any middleware used by routing itself.
Example:
Let us suppose we have the following controller:
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\App;
use Tymon\JWTAuth\Facades\JWTAuth;
class ProfileController extends Controller
{
public function getProfile(Request $request,$profile_id)
{
$user = JWTAuth::parseToken()->authenticate();
$language = App::getLocale();
// Do stuff Here
}
}
You can write a simple test:
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\App;
use Tymon\JWTAuth\Facades\JWTAuth;
// Set a test class for speed is ommited
public function testMyApiCall()
{
/**
* $user is an instance of a User
*/
JWTAuth::shouldReceive('parseToken->authenticate')->andReturn($user);
App::setlocale('el');
$request = new Request();
$request->initialize([],['token' => 'AAABBBCCC' ],[],[],[],[],[]);
$controller = new ProfileController();
// I ommit the profile_id value it is just a demonstration
$response = $controller->getProfile($request,$profile_id)
$response_dody = $response->getData(false);
// Perform assertions upon $response_dody
}
In our case we do not care about what routing is used and how it is set up. Therefore, are no mentioning any routing and anything regarding Dingo in this example, we just forget it.
Cons and pros
Though it is not a silver bullet, it is an approach that will give a reliable result focusing on the actual code. Keep in mind though that you bypass many middlewares that may you also want to test as well eg. Authentication ones.
On the other hand you are able to test the logic inside the controller, in cases where the logic is rather small to create a seperate class/method for it eg. selecting data from DB.
So my question is very specific but I couldn't figure out how to make it even after several months of reflection. The following topic will be about Symfony, Doctrine and generating fixtures on-the-go for the tests.
I want to generate fixtures on the go from a test. The goal is to provide a very specific set of fixtures for each tests using helpers without sacrify the readability. That is the goal, so my idea was to create a tests/Resources/EntityProxy which is a mirror of the src/Entity folder, containing the same amount of classes with the exact same name. Each EntityProxy extends from its related Entity, use a custom trait to fill the properties easily.
You guessed it, I want to only use in tests the EntityProxy and use it directly into the functions to tests them. And there is a major issue with that, as Doctrine doesn't recognize the EntityProxy as an entity even if it extends from a real Entity.
Is there a way to say to Doctrine to persist an EntityProxy as its extended Entity?
__
The following code is an example of what I want as en EntityProxy:
namespace Tests\Resources\EntityProxy;
class User extends App\Entity\User
{
use FixtureGenerationTrait;
public function static makeDefault(): self
{
return static::generate([
'username' => self::getFaker()->username,
'email' => self::getFaker()->email,
...
]);
}
public function static make(array $data = []): self
{
$entity = static::makeDefault();
$entity = static::setValues($entity, $data);
return $entity;
}
}
And can be used in the tests like following: User::make(['name' => 'John Wick']);
I am using Symfony version 2.7.6. I have created an entity named EmployeeBasicInfo having fields
firstname
lastname
identificationCode etc
I have created a callback function for validating Identification code in EmployeeBasicInfo entity itself which looks like
/**
* #Assert\Callback(groups={"edit_myinfo"})
*/
public function validateIdentificationCode(ExecutionContextInterface $context)
{
if ($this->getEmployeeFirstName() == 'fakename') {
$context->buildViolation('This name sounds totally fake!')
->atPath('employeeFirstName')
->addViolation();
}
}
and this callback function works properly
Actually I want such a callback functionality which checks identidfication code against database. I have added $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager(); inside the callback function and the error is like Attempted to call an undefined method named "getDoctrine" of class "XXX\EmployeeBundle\Entity\EmployeeBasicInfo".. Please advise me the effective way
Do not inject the EntityManager in your Entity. One basic concept of the DataMapper-Pattern is, that your entity does not have to know about your data source and its connectors.
I'd suggest to write a custom validation constraint, in which you inject the dependencies you need.
EntityManager, Repository to query, etc. Whatever service suits you.
Have a look at how to create custom constraint validators with dependencies
I would suggest you use a service to do this
class EmployeeUtility($connection)
{
public function __construct($conn) { $this->connection = $v; }
public function validateIdentificationCode($emloyeeId, $validationCode)
{
// Your code here
}
}
In your controller, you inject the service:
$employeeUtility = $this->get('employee.utility');
$employeeUtility->validateIdentificationCode(1,'GF38883dkDdW3373d');
Alternatively, add the code in a repository class.
Okay, so I'm not even sure how to ask this question (much less search for it). But in my system, I have a variable that forms a relationship for nearly every row. The user does not know it and it is set as a session variable each time a user logs in.
I need this variable to be available to Doctrine. It's not a default or static, so setting it in the class property isn't an option. Having it as a hidden form poses a security risk. I'm honestly at a loss. I've avoided the problem until I can't avoid it no more...
It'd accept a workaround for the time being. I really need to get this project launched as soon as humanly possible.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Even help explaining what I'm trying to accomplish would be appreciated!
While this doesn't resolve my issue entirely, this particular solution may help someone else in a similar predicament...
In order to inject (I use the term loosely) an object into my form data using a form extension and an event listener.
Extension:
<?php
namespace Acme\DemoBundle\Form\Extension;
use Symfony\Component\Form\AbstractTypeExtension;
use Symfony\Component\Form\FormBuilder;
use Symfony\Component\Form\FormEvents;
use Acme\DemoBundle\Form\EventListener\MyListener;
class FormTypeMyExtension extends AbstractTypeExtension
{
public function getExtendedType()
{
return 'form'; // because we're extending the base form, not a specific one
}
public function buildForm(FormBuilder $builder, array $options)
{
$listener = new MyListener($this->security, $this->em);
$builder->addEventListener(FormEvents::SET_DATA, array($listener, 'onSetData'));
}
}
Listener:
<?php
namespace Acme\DemoBundle\Form\EventListener;
use Symfony\Component\Form\Event\FilterDataEvent;
use Symfony\Component\Form\FormEvents;
use Symfony\Component\Security\Core\SecurityContext;
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager;
class MyListener
{
public function onSetData(FilterDataEvent $event)
{
// I use form.set_data because it has a method to set data to the form.
$form = $event->getForm();
$data = $event->getData();
// do things to the form or the data.
}
}
(Had some help from this site.)
That allows you to do anything to the form or form data to every form. Which is how I injected the object initially. My problem is the embedded forms apparently don't call setData() (presumably because the first object already has the other objects).
I've worked on this all day, so, if my answer is badly worded, complain and I'll fix it in the morning!