I use clist=ComputeTarget.list(workspace=ws) to find a list of compute target in the workspace, which looks like this:
[{
"id": "/subscriptions/94e14ad4-bf97-47e8-aae0-f9b85a7befa8/resourceGroups/.../providers/Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/workspaces/.../computes/std-ds3-v2",
"name": "std-ds3-v2",
"location": "southcentralus",
"tags": null,
"properties": {
"description": null,
"computeType": "ComputeInstance",
"computeLocation": "southcentralus",
"resourceId": null,
"provisioningErrors": null,
"provisioningState": "Succeeded",
"properties": {
"vmSize": "STANDARD_DS3_V2",
"applications": [
{
"displayName": "Jupyter",
"endpointUri": "https://std-ds3-v2.southcentralus.instances.azureml.ms"
},
{
"displayName": "Jupyter Lab",
"endpointUri": "https://std-ds3-v2.southcentralus.instances.azureml.ms/lab"
},
{
"displayName": "RStudio",
"endpointUri": "https://std-ds3-v2-8787.southcentralus.instances.azureml.ms"
}
],
...
...
}
}]
The clist object looks like a list of dictionary elements. I want to retrieve the dictionary element "name": "std-ds3-v2" dynamically, so I tried clist[0]['name'] but got this error:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-101-df855b4d0107> in <module>
----> 1 clist[0]['name']
TypeError: 'ComputeInstance' object is not subscriptable
How to retrieve "name": "std-ds3-v2" from the clist object?
Thank you.
>>> [x.name for x in ComputeTarget.list(workspace=ws)]
['aks-cluster', 'aks-a2-cluster', 'cpu-compute']
>>> list(ws.compute_targets.keys())
['aks-cluster', 'aks-a2-cluster', 'cpu-compute']
Related
I've been working on an issue and seem to be stuck, so asking on so in case anyone can help.
To describe the issue, I've got an existing Azure Key Vault setup, and wish to add a number of access policies to this resource group. It needs to be conditional as if the function name is "false" then that function should not be added to key vault access policy.
variable section:
"variables": {
"functionAccess": {
"value": [
{
"name": "[parameters('Function_1')]"
},
{
"name": "[parameters('Function_2')]"
},
{
"name": "[parameters('Function_3')]"
}
]
}
}
My Template :
{
"apiVersion": "2016-10-01",
"condition": "[not(equals(variables('functionAccess')[CopyIndex()].name, 'false'))]",
"copy": {
"batchSize": 1,
"count": "[length(variables('functionAccess'))]",
"mode": "Serial",
"name": "accessPolicies"
},
"name": "[concat(parameters('KeyVault_Name'), '/add')]",
"properties": {
"accessPolicies": [
{
"tenantId": "[subscription().tenantId]",
"objectId": "[if(not(equals(variables('functionAccess')[CopyIndex()].name, 'false')), reference(concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('functionAccess')[CopyIndex()].name), '2016-08-01', 'Full').identity.principalId, json('null'))]",
"permissions": {
"keys": [
"get",
"list"
],
"secrets": [
"get",
"list"
],
"certificates": [
"get",
"list"
]
}
}
]
},
"type": "Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/accessPolicies"
}
When I deploy my ARM template for the azure key vault I got this error message:
The language expression property '0' can't be evaluated, property name must be a string.
also tried below, but same error:
{
"apiVersion": "2018-02-14",
"name": "[concat(parameters('KeyVault_Name'), '/add')]",
"properties": {
"copy": [
{
"batchSize": 1,
"count": "[length(variables('functionAccess'))]",
"mode": "serial",
"name": "accessPolicies",
"input": {
"condition": "[not(equals(variables('functionAccess')[copyIndex('accessPolicies')].name, 'false'))]",
"tenantId": "[subscription().tenantId]",
"objectId": "[if(not(equals(variables('functionAccess')[copyIndex('accessPolicies')].name, 'false')), reference(concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('functionAccess')[copyIndex('accessPolicies')].name), '2016-08-01', 'Full').identity.principalId, json('null'))]",
"permissions": {
"keys": [
"get",
"list"
],
"secrets": [
"get",
"list"
],
"certificates": [
"get",
"list"
]
}
}
}
]
},
"type": "Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/accessPolicies"
}
There are a few options for dealing with filtering an array for copy operation. I deploy my ARM templates from PowerShell scripts and use PowerShell to setup parameter values. When I need special logic handle different inputs for different environments, I let PowerShell handle it.
If you must handle the filtering in ARM and you have the option to input a CSV list of functions, then perhaps the following will work. You can then use the functionAccessArray to iterate over in the copy operation.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
},
"variables": {
"functionAccessCsv": "Function-0,Function-1,false,Function-4,false,Function-6,Function-7",
"functionAccessFiltered": "[replace(replace(variables('functionAccessCsv'), 'false', ''), ',,', ',')]",
"functionAccessArray": "[split(variables('functionAccessFiltered'), ',')]"
},
"resources": [
],
"outputs": {
"functionAccessCsvFiltered": {
"type": "string",
"value": "[variables('functionAccessFiltered')]"
},
"functionAccessArray": {
"type": "array",
"value": "[variables('functionAccessArray')]"
}
}
}
The result:
I just had the same issue. By using an array parameter with a default value instead of a variable, I got it to work.
"parameters": {
"functionAccess": {
"type": "array",
"defaultValue": [
"value1",
"value2",
"value3"
]
}
}
I am preparing ARM template for "Schedule update deployment" in Update Management service. I want to add parameters like: "excludedKbNumbers" and "includedKbNumbers". I am deploying my templates using powershell. When I am passing KB numbers using mentioned parameters templates completed successfully. In case when I am putting KB number using one of the mentioned parameters, second is empty, template completed successfully. Problem is when I dont want to pass Included/Exluded KB numbers, in my powershell deployment command I am not putting parameter names "excludedKbNumbers" and "includedKbNumbers", and then I am receiving below error: "message": "{\"Message\":\"The request is invalid.\",\"ModelState\":{\"softwareUpdateConfiguration.properties.updateConfiguration\":[\"Software update configuration has same KbNumbers in
includedKbNumbers and excludedKbNumbers.\"]}}"
I am using this structure in my template json('null') and this is a problematic area.
extract from my template:
"parameters": {
"excludedKbNumbers": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "",
"metadata": {
"description": "Specify excluded KB numbers, required data structure: 123456"
}
},
"includedKbNumbers": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "",
"metadata": {
"description": "Specify included KB numbers, required data structure: 123456"
}
},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/softwareUpdateConfigurations",
"apiVersion": "2017-05-15-preview",
"name": "[concat(parameters('automationAccountName'), '/', parameters('scheduleName'))]",
"properties": {
"updateConfiguration": {
"operatingSystem": "[parameters('operatingSystem')]",
"windows": {
"includedUpdateClassifications": "[parameters('Classification')]",
"excludedKbNumbers": [
"[if(empty(parameters('excludedKbNumbers')), json('null'), parameters('excludedKbNumbers'))]"
],
"includedKbNumbers": [
"[if(empty(parameters('includedKbNumbers')), json('null'), parameters('includedKbNumbers'))]"
],
"rebootSetting": "IfRequired"
},
"targets": {
"azureQueries": [
{
"scope": [
"[concat('/subscriptions', '/', parameters('subscriptionID'))]"
],
"tagSettings": {
"tags": {
"[parameters('tagKey')]": [
"[parameters('tagValue')]"
]
},
"filterOperator": "All"
},
"locations": []
}
]
},
"duration": "PT2H"
},
"tasks": {},
"scheduleInfo": {
"isEnabled": false,
"startTime": "2050-03-03T13:10:00+01:00",
"expiryTime": "2050-03-03T13:10:00+01:00",
"frequency": "OneTime",
"timeZone": "Europe/Warsaw"
}
}
}
],
try doing this:
"excludedKbNumbers": "[if(empty(parameters('excludedKbNumbers')), json('null'), array(parameters('excludedKbNumbers')))]",
"includedKbNumbers": "[if(empty(parameters('includedKbNumbers')), json('null'), array(parameters('includedKbNumbers')))]"
We are seeing different behaviour when we create a workspace in the WebInterface versus when we create the same conversation via the API.
The JSON export for the dialognode is the same:
{ "type": "standard",
"title": "SmallTalk: weerbericht",
"output": {
"text": {
"values": [],
"selection_policy": "sequential" } },
"parent": "smalltalk_container",
"context": { "user_weer": "#weerbericht",
"user_location": "#plaatsnamen" },
"metadata": {
"_customization": {
"mcr": false } },
"next_step": { "behavior": "jump_to", "selector": "condition", "dialog_node": "node_33_1519129633532"
},
"conditions": "#ST_weersbericht",
"description": null,
"dialog_node": "node_9_1517408489377",
"previous_sibling": "node_3_1518680265483" },
But the behaviour is different, which can be explained when we look at the UI
there is a difference
This is the UI for the dialogNode created via the browser
This is the UI for the same dialogNode created via the API
One difference we found is the Multiple Reponse switch:
It should be OFF (image on the right) and as per the JSON (mcr:false).
But even when we switch it on manually, the context variables don't show.
What should I be looking for in the API to fix this ?
The dialog model for multiple condition responses is that the parent node needs to be either standard dialog node or frame. Now when adding a multiple condition response to this node (and hence making an MCR node out of that parent node) you need to add a dialog node with "type":"response_condition" under this node.
This is a way how to create multiple condition responses through the api.
To give you and example to create MCR node:
The JSON of dialog nodes that need to pushed through the API will look like:
{
"type": "standard",
"title": "mcr node",
"output": {
},
"parent": null,
"context": null,
"metadata": {
"_customization": {
"mcr": true
}
},
"next_step": null,
"conditions": "#book_flight",
"digress_in": "does_not_return",
"description": null,
"dialog_node": "node_8_1525086089064",
"digress_out": "allow_all",
"previous_sibling": null
},
{
"type": "response_condition",
"title": null,
"output": {
"text": {
"values": ["I see city entity!"]
}
},
"parent": "node_8_1525086089064",
"context": null,
"metadata": {
},
"next_step": null,
"conditions": "#city",
"description": null,
"dialog_node": "node_9_1525086100114",
"previous_sibling": null
},
{
"type": "response_condition",
"title": null,
"output": {
"text": {
"values": ["I don't see anything."]
}
},
"parent": "node_8_1525086089064",
"context": null,
"metadata": {
},
"next_step": null,
"conditions": "anything_else",
"description": null,
"dialog_node": "node_10_1525086122332",
"previous_sibling": "node_9_1525086100114"
}
We're trying to deploy an ARM template which deploys a Stream Analytics job with n Event Hubs outputs depending on an input parameter.
Right now we're having success with all but the listKeys() function inside the outputs property copy loop function which gets each Event Hub's primary keys:
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.EventHub/namespaces/eventhubs/authorizationRules', variables('clientEventHubNamespace'), parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id, variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')), '2015-08-01').primaryKey]"
We get the error:
17:44:31 - Error: Code=InvalidTemplate; Message=Deployment template
validation failed: 'The template resource
'tailor-router-axgf7t3gtspue' at line '129' and column '10' is not
valid: The template function 'copyIndex' is not expected at this
location. The function can only be used in a resource with copy
specified. Please see https://aka.ms/arm-copy for usage details..
Please see https://aka.ms/arm-template-expressions for usage
details.'.
However, if we change this to be a specific index:
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.EventHub/namespaces/eventhubs/authorizationRules', variables('clientEventHubNamespace'), parameters('clients')[0].id, variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')), '2015-08-01').primaryKey]"
it works.
Is copyIndex('propertyName') inside a listKeys() a supported function?
If not, is there a workaround that would achieve the same effect?
Kind regards,
Nick
Stream Analytics job resource definition:
{
"apiVersion": "2016-03-01",
"type": "Microsoft.StreamAnalytics/StreamingJobs",
"name": "[variables('routerStreamAnalyticsName')]",
"location": "[variables('location')]",
"dependsOn": [ "clientsEventHubCopy" ],
"tags": {
"boundedContext": "[variables('boundedContextName')]"
},
"properties": {
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('routerStreamAnalyticsSkuTier')]"
},
"outputErrorPolicy": "drop",
"eventsOutOfOrderPolicy": "adjust",
"eventsOutOfOrderMaxDelayInSeconds": 0,
"eventsLateArrivalMaxDelayInSeconds": 5,
"dataLocale": "en-US",
"compatibilityLevel": "1.0",
"inputs": [
{
"name": "input0",
"properties": {
"type": "stream",
"serialization": {
"type": "Avro"
},
"datasource": {
"type": "Microsoft.ServiceBus/EventHub",
"properties": {
"serviceBusNamespace": "[parameters('input0EventHubNamespace')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyName": "[parameters('input0EventHubSharedAccessPolicyName')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[parameters('input0EventHubSharedAccessPolicyKey')]",
"eventHubName": "[parameters('input0EventHubName')]"
}
}
}
}
],
"transformation": {
"name": "routing",
"properties": {
"streamingUnits": "[parameters('routerStreamAnalyticsSkuTier')]",
"query": "omitted"
}
},
"copy": [
{
"name": "outputs",
"count": "[length(parameters('clients'))]",
"input": {
"name": "[parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id]",
"properties": {
"datasource": {
"type": "Microsoft.ServiceBus/EventHub",
"properties": {
"serviceBusNamespace": "[variables('clientEventHubNamespace')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyName": "[variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.EventHub/namespaces/eventhubs/authorizationRules', variables('clientEventHubNamespace'), parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id, variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')), '2015-08-01').primaryKey]",
"eventHubName": "[parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id]"
}
},
"serialization": {
"type": "Avro"
}
}
}
}
]
}
},
Thanks for reporting this and sorry for the inconvenience.
I just talked to the ARM team, we had an issue when copyindex was inside the index tags eg 'array[copyindex()]'. It should be fixed now.
Let us know how it goes.
Thanks,
JS - Azure Stream Analytics
I am using https://www.npmjs.com/package/swagger and I am trying to create a config. I have such a part of my swagger.js
"dummy\/{id}\/related_dummies": {
"get": {
"tags": [
"RelatedDummy"
],
"operationId": "get_by_parentRelatedDummyCollection",
"produces": [
"application\/ld+json",
"application\/hal+json",
"application\/xml",
"text\/xml",
"application\/json",
"text\/html"
],
"parameters": [
{
"name": "id",
"in": "path",
"required": true,
"type": "integer"
}
],
"summary": "Retrieves the collection of RelatedDummy resources.",
"responses": {
"200": {
"description": "RelatedDummy collection response",
"schema": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"$ref": "#\/definitions\/RelatedDummy"
}
}
}
}
}
But when I run swagger validate swagger.js I keep getting this error:
Project Errors
--------------
#/paths: Additional properties not allowed: dummy/{id}/related_dummies
Results: 1 errors, 0 warnings
What could be the reason of the error? Thanks
The problem is that the path dummy/{id}/related_dummies doesn't begin with a slash.
To be recognized as a valid path item object, it needs to be /dummy/{id}/related_dummies.
Using the escaped syntax from your example, the name should be "\/dummy\/{id}\/related_dummies"
The relevant part of the Swagger–OpenAPI 2.0 specification is in the Paths Object definition.