I am adherent of Action Class approach using instead of Controller. The explanation is very simple: very often Controller includes many actions, when following the Dependency Injection principle we must pass all required dependencies to a constructor and this makes a situation when the Controller has a huge number of dependencies, but in the certain moment of time (e.g. request) we use only some dependencies. It's hard to maintain and test that spaghetti code.
To clarify, I've already used to work with that approach in Zend Framework 2, but there it's named Middleware. I've found something similar in API-Platform, where they also use Action class instead of Controller, but the problem is that I don't know how to cook it.
UPD:
How can I obtain the next Action Class and replace standard Controller and which configuration I should add in regular Symfony project?
<?php
declare(strict_types=1);
namespace App\Action\Product;
use App\Entity\Product;
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager;
use Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\Configuration\Method;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;
use Symfony\Component\Routing\Annotation\Route;
class SoftDeleteAction
{
/**
* #var EntityManager
*/
private $entityManager;
/**
* #param EntityManager $entityManager
*/
public function __construct(EntityManager $entityManager)
{
$this->entityManager = $entityManager;
}
/**
* #Route(
* name="app_product_delete",
* path="products/{id}/delete"
* )
*
* #Method("DELETE")
*
* #param Product $product
*
* #return Response
*/
public function __invoke(Request $request, $id): Response
{
$product = $this->entityManager->find(Product::class, $id);
$product->delete();
$this->entityManager->flush();
return new Response('', 204);
}
}
The question is a bit vague for stackoverflow though it's also a bit interesting. So here are some configure details.
Start with an out of the box S4 skeleton project:
symfony new --version=lts s4api
cd s4api
bin/console --version # 4.4.11
composer require orm-pack
Add the SoftDeleteAction
namespace App\Action\Product;
class SoftDeleteAction
{
private $entityManager;
public function __construct(EntityManagerInterface $entityManager)
{
$this->entityManager = $entityManager;
}
public function __invoke(Request $request, int $id) : Response
{
return new Response('Product ' . $id);
}
}
And define the route:
# config/routes.yaml
app_product_delete:
path: /products/{id}/delete
controller: App\Action\Product\SoftDeleteAction
At this point the wiring is almost complete. If you go to the url you get:
The controller for URI "/products/42/delete" is not callable:
The reason is that services are private by default. Normally you would extend from AbstractController which takes care of making the service public but in this case the quickest approach is to just tag the action as a controller:
# config/services.yaml
App\Action\Product\SoftDeleteAction:
tags: ['controller.service_arguments']
At this point you should have a working wired up action.
There of course many variations and a few more details. You will want to restrict the route to POST or fake DELETE.
You might also consider adding an empty ControllerServiceArgumentsInterface and then using the services instanceof functionality to apply the controller tag so you no longer need to manually define your controller services.
But this should be enough to get you started.
The approach I was trying to implement is named as ADR pattern (Action-Domain-Responder) and Symfony has already supported this started from 3.3 version. You can refer to it as Invokable Controllers.
From official docs:
Controllers can also define a single action using the __invoke() method, which is a common practice when following the ADR pattern (Action-Domain-Responder):
// src/Controller/Hello.php
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;
use Symfony\Component\Routing\Annotation\Route;
/**
* #Route("/hello/{name}", name="hello")
*/
class Hello
{
public function __invoke($name = 'World')
{
return new Response(sprintf('Hello %s!', $name));
}
}
Related
I would like use 2 repository for 1 entity.
The reason is : I have 2 bundles, both bundle use the same entity. I wish to separate both functionalities.
Sometimes I need specific queries into bundle.
It is possible to have 1 repository into a bundle and a second repository in the other one ?
Maybe it's a wrong way ?
If someone have an idea.
Thx !
2019 Update
I'd create 2 repositories. It makes no sense to add all methods to one repository, just because they share the entity. We could end up with 30 methods per repository this way.
First repository
namespace App\Repository;
use App\Entity\Post;
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityRepository;
final class FrontendPostRepository
{
/**
* #var EntityRepository
*/
private $repository;
public function __construct(EntityManagerInterface $entityManager)
{
$this->repository = $entityManager->getRepository(Post::class);
}
/**
* #return Post[]
*/
public function getAll(): array
{
// ...
}
}
...and 2nd repository
namespace App\Repository;
use App\Entity\Post;
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityRepository;
final class AdminPostRepository
{
/**
* #var EntityRepository
*/
private $repository;
public function __construct(EntityManagerInterface $entityManager)
{
$this->repository = $entityManager->getRepository(Post::class);
}
/**
* #return Post[]
*/
public function getUnpublished(): array
{
// ...
}
}
You can read more about this concept and whys in How to use Repository with Doctrine as Service in Symfony post
Well I don't really know it's a good practice but you can create a repository without linked entity (I mean, not with ORM annotation)
So I just create this in my service.yml :
renting.metadata.car:
class: Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadata
arguments: [ %car% ]
And this :
repair.repository.car:
class: carRepository
arguments: [#doctrine.orm.entity_manager, #renting.metadata.car]
That's works
Am using symfony framework for my application. And to save records in database I want call the $this->getDoctrine()->getManager(); method in my entity class. But when I did that it gave me the error:
Call to undefined method getDoctrine(),
Can some one tell me what is the right way to do this.
My entity class is like:
namespace Acme\SuperbAppBundle\Entity;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Container;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
class Users
{
/**
* #var integer
*/
private $id;
/**
* #var string
*/
private $firstName;
/**
* #var string
*/
/**
* Get id
*
* #return integer
*/
public function getId()
{
return $this->id;
}
/**
* Set firstName
*
* #param string $firstName
* #return Users
*/
public function setFirstName($firstName)
{
$this->firstName = $firstName;
return $this;
}
/**
* Get firstName
*
* #return string
*/
public function getFirstName()
{
return $this->firstName;
}
function __construct($firstName){
$this->setFirstName($firstName);
}
function save(){
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$em->persist($create);
$em->flush();
}
}
And my controller method is like:
public function test(){
$create = new Users('Rajat');
$create->save();
}
Your save method is attempting to call
$this->getDoctrine();
Whereby $this is the current Class, and any other Class it inherits. As it stands, your current Class, User, is standalone, and does not have a getDoctrine() method. If your Class were to extend the Controller Class, it would have access to that method:
class User extends Controller
I believe this simple fix will work, although it probably doesn't make real sense for it to extend Controller, as it is a User Entity, and unrelated to a Controller. A preferred, more advanced method, would be to inject the Doctrine service into the User class.
Ok, first of all Doctrine Entities :
Handle the entity generation and configuration
Declare the operations on the setters and getters.
If you wana save an object into your entity there it's your User, you have two way to store this user:
One:
You can use entity manager to store a user and the entity will help you to create the right object using the seters and getters:
use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\Controller;
use PATH\TO\Users;
class ExampleController extends Controller
{
public function examplefunction()
{
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$entity = new Users();
$entity->setFirstName('Rajat');
$em->persist($entity);
$em->flush();
}
}
The other way is to create this entry using QueryBuilder but it's a bad way in your case.
Oh, i forgot please delete the save method in your entity Doctrine manager allready implement it.
Your controller probably doesnt extends Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\Controller ...
You should have controller defined like this example:
use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\Controller;
class DefaultController extends Controller
{
}
Entity class does not extends ContainerAware / Controller, so you can't call $this->getDoctrine()->getManager(). I don't think your Entity class should extend to a Controller. Because your entity class will become a controller instance just because you want to access the doctrine manager. That's a not good practice. What you can do is inject doctrine manager to your Entity class through services.
I wrote a blog few weeks ago regarding injecting services container and accessing through constructor. You can inject doctrine entity manager in the same way you inject services container. You can take a look at that if you like :- http://anjanasilva.com/blog/injecting-services-in-symfony-2/
Here's a nice question regarding injecting doctrine manager. Make sure you read the answer as well. :- Symfony 2 EntityManager injection in service
And another nice tutorial on injecting custom repository manager instead of injecting the whole entity manager. Which I believe even a good solution. :- http://php-and-symfony.matthiasnoback.nl/2014/05/inject-a-repository-instead-of-an-entity-manager/
Hope this helps to increase your understanding about Symfony 2.
Cheers!
I am using the FOSRestBundle to create a REST application but since REST features is only a part, I am also using some of Symfony2 built-in automation tools to generate my CRUD code. Everything works fine but I am unable to correctly map the route and I will appreciate some insight and example on how to do this manually. I have read the manual route definition in the FOS manual stating to use the given annotations but how do I do this since the CRUD code created by Symfony2 uses a different annotation?
Here is an example:
class UserController extends Controller
{
/**
* Lists all User entities.
*
* #Route("/", name="user")
* #Method("GET")
* #Template()
*/
public function indexAction()
{
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$entities = $em->getRepository('CompanyWebServicesBundle:User')->findAll();
return array(
'entities' => $entities,
);
}
FOSRest manual gives the annotation for GET as
use FOS\RestBundle\Controller\Annotations\Get;
/**
* GET Route annotation.
* #Get("/likes/{type}/{typeId}")
*/
When I use the route as /index, it gives me an error and my route definition in config.yml is:
index:
type: rest
resource: Company\WebservicesBundle\Controller\UserController
How can I fix this problem?
If I were you, I would create separate bundles for your REST controllers and your generic CRUD controllers. This will make things easier to maintain (in my opinion). For example, create a AcmeMainBundle and a AcmeRestBundle, and then create a separate class to actually perform the actions that you will call from both bundles. Something like this:
// src/Acme/MainBundle/Crud/User.php (create this folder structure)
class User{
private $em;
public function __construct($em){
$this->em = $em;
}
public function getUser($id){
return $this->em->getRepository('AcmeMainBundle:User')->find($id);
}
}
Then:
// src/Acme/MainBundle/Controller/UserController.php
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Acme\MainBundle\Crud\User;
class UserController extends Controller {
public function getAction($request){
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$getUser = new User($em);
$user = $getUser ->getUser($request->query->get('user_id'));
// return response
}
}
And then:
// src/Acme/RestBundle/Controller/UserController.php
use FOS\RestBundle\Controller\Annotations as Rest;
use FOS\RestBundle\Routing\ClassResourceInterface;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
class UserController extends Controller implements ClassResourceInterface {
/**
* #Rest\View()
*/
public function getAction($id){
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$getUser = new User($em);
$user = $getUser ->getUser($id);
// return using the default format defined in config.yml
return array(
"success"=>'true',
"user" => $user
);
} // get_user [GET] /users/{id}
}
Please note that using the ClassResourceInterface means your method names will be used to generate the routes. see FOSRestBundle Docs for more info on that.
You can do something similar to this for all your CRUD, that way you keep your routes separate and maintainable, but still have a single code base to update.
I'd like to use, something like:
$em = $this->getEntityManager();
Inside a Entity.
I understand I should do this as a service but for some testing purposes, I want to access it from an Entity.
Is it possible to achieve that?
I've tried to:
$em = $this->getEntityManager();
$profile_avatar = $em->getRepository('bundle:Perfils')->findOneByUser($this-getId());
But isn't working.
Fatal error: Call to undefined method
Proxies\webBundleEntityUserProxy::getEntityManager() in
/opt/lampp/htdocs/web/src/Pct/bundle/Entity/User.php on line
449
Why am I trying to do it this way?
I've 3 kinds of users: Facebook, Twitter and MyOwnWebsite users. Each of them have differents avatar which links facebook's profile, twitter's or otherwise, if its myownwebsite user, I retrieve the avatar from a URL in a database. For now, I don't want to create a service, because I'm just trying to make it working, to test it, not to create a final deployment. So this is why I'm trying to call Entity manager from an Entity. I don't want, by now, to modify configuration files, just this entity.
As pointed out (again) by a commenter, an entity manager inside an entity is a code smell. For the OP's specific situation where he wished to acquire the entity manager, with the least bother, a simple setter injection would be most reliable (contrary to my original example injecting via constructor).
For anyone else ending up here looking for a superior solution to the same problem, there are 2 ways to achieve this:
Implementing the ObjectManagerAware interface as suggested by https://stackoverflow.com/a/24766285/1349295
use Doctrine\Common\Persistence\ObjectManagerAware;
use Doctrine\Common\Persistence\ObjectManager;
use Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\ClassMetadata;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
/**
* #ORM\Entity
*/
class Entity implements ObjectManagerAware
{
public function injectObjectManager(
ObjectManager $objectManager,
ClassMetadata $classMetadata
) {
$this->em = $objectManager;
}
}
Or, using the #postLoad/#postPersist life cycle callbacks and acquiring the entity manager using the LifecycleEventArgs argument as suggested by https://stackoverflow.com/a/23793897/1349295
use Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Event\LifecycleEventArgs;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
/**
* #ORM\Entity
* #ORM\HasLifecycleCallbacks()
*/
class Entity
{
/**
* #ORM\PostLoad
* #ORM\PostPersist
*/
public function fetchEntityManager(LifecycleEventArgs $args)
{
$this->setEntityManager($args->getEntityManager());
}
}
Original answer
Using an EntityManager from within an Entity is VERY BAD PRACTICE. Doing so defeats the purpose of decoupling query and persist operations from the entity itself.
But, if you really, really, really need an entity manager in an entity and cannot do otherwise then inject it into the entity.
class Entity
{
private $em;
public function __contruct($em)
{
$this->em = $em;
}
}
Then invoke as new Entity($em).
Best way is to use Life Cycle: #ORM\HasLifecycleCallbacks
And you can use the appropriate Event as you want to get result:
#postLoad
#postPersist
...
Calling the Entity Manager from inside an Entity is a bad practice! You should keep your entities as simple as possible.
For what purpose do you need to call the Entity Manager from an Entity?
What I think you should do is, instead of using the Entity Manager inside your entity, is to create a custom repository for your entity.
In your entity ORM file, add an entry as follows (or in your entity class annotations if not using YML):
App\Bundle\Profils:
# Replace the above as appropiate
type: entity
table: (your table)
....
repositoryClass: App\Bundle\CustomRepos\ProfilsRepository
# Replace the above as appropiate.
# I always put my custom repos in a common folder,
# such as CustomRepos
Now, create a new PHP class that has the namespace above:
//Your ProfilsRepository.php
<?php
namespace App\Bundle\CustomRepos;
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityRepository;
class ProfilsRepository extends EntityRepository
{
/**
* Will return the user url avatar given the user ID
* #param integer $userID The user id.
#return string The avatar url
*/
public function getUserProfile($userId)
{
$em = $this->getEntityManager();
$qb = $em->createQueryBuilder();
$qb->select... (your logic to retrieve the profil object);
$query = $qb->getQuery();
$result = $query->getResult();
return $result;
}
}
Finally, in your Controller:
// Your controller
<?php
namespace <class namespace>;
...
use App\Bundle\CustomRepos\ProfilsRepository;
use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\Controller;
...
class YourClassNameController extends Controller
{
public function yourAction()
{
$userId = <get the user ID>;
// Pass the name of your entity manager to the
// getManager function if you have more than one and
// didn't define any default
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$repo = $em->getRepository('Profils');
$avatar = $repo->getUserProfile($userId);
...
}
}
You need to set the services.yml with:
services:
your_service_name:
class: AppBundle\Controller\ServiceController
arguments: [ #doctrine.orm.entity_manager ]
You need to set also the Controller with the following constructor:
public function __construct(\Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager $em)
{
$this->em = $em;
}
and use $this->em in the controller
(for example $connection = $this->em->getConnection();)
I've defined a route in my app routing file:
RouteName:
pattern: /some/route
defaults: { _controller: MyAppBundle:Controller:action }
In a controller I can use:
$this->get('router')->generate('RouteName');
How would I simply access that from a fresh class I create, for example a view class that doesn't extend anything:
namespace My\AppBundle\View;
class ViewClass {
public function uri()
{
return getTheRoute('RouteName');
}
}
You need to inject "router" service into your ViewClass. Eg. in place where your define your ViewClass service:
viewclass.service:
class: Namespace\For\ViewClass
arguments:
router: "#router"
and then in your constructor:
public function __construct(\Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Routing\Router $router)
{
$this->router = $router;
}
The clue is in how the $this->generateUrl() method works in Controllers. See:
/**
* Generates a URL from the given parameters.
*
* #param string $route The name of the route
* #param mixed $parameters An array of parameters
* #param Boolean $absolute Whether to generate an absolute URL
*
* #return string The generated URL
*/
public function generateUrl($route, $parameters = array(), $absolute = false)
{
return $this->container->get('router')->generate($route, $parameters, $absolute);
}
So you'll need to define your class as a service and inject the #router service. Either that or have your class implement ContainerAwareInterface, but the first method would definitely be better.
You should register your class as a service and insert the router as a dependency.
See the chapter on the service container in the excellent symfony2 docs.
If you're not familiar with the concepts of the service container and dependency injection, you might feel a bit overwhelmed. However, try your best to understand it because it is a essential part of the symfony2 architecture.
You could pass the entire container from your controller to your view class on instantiation. This is NOT BEST PRACTICE and not recommended.
class View
{
protected $container;
public function __construct(\Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Container $container)
{
$this->container = $container;
}
}
Then in your code you could use
$this->container->get('router')->generate($route, $parameters, $absolute);