I have encountered a fair amount of roadblocks in trying to establish a page break on every 3rd item_wrapper. My element structure and general styles are as such:
<div class='main_wrapper'>
<div class='main'>
<div class='main_details'>
<div class='main_items_container'>
<div class='main_items_wrapper'>
<div class='item_wrapper'>...</div>
<div class='item_wrapper'>...</div>
<div class='item_wrapper'>...</div>
<div class='item_wrapper'>...</div>
<div class='item_wrapper'>...</div>
<div class='item_wrapper'>...</div>
<div class='item_wrapper'>...</div>
<div class='item_wrapper'>...</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
.main_wrapper {
display: inline-block
}
.main {
position: relative
width: 100%
height: 100%
}
.main_items_wrapper {
display: flex
flex-direction: column
}
.item_wrapper {
display: block
}
The following is my initial solution:
#media print {
.main_items_wrapper:nth-child(3n) {
break-after: always
}
}
Please note that I have attempted to follow the recommendations of many posts - display, width, height, float, etc. Unfortunately, I just cannot get this to work. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
If you mean a horizontal line across the webpage as a page break, then you can use the hr tag. You can set the height and width to your specifications.
For some reason I can show the hr tag because it is producing a line here. Below is an example (gray line)
Well, it appears as though the flexbox associated with .main_items_wrapper was the problem. Certainly a lesson learned. Thank you to those that took the time to assist me.
Related
Is there a way to remove the whitespace above and below the headings of h1-h6? Margin and padding were not working.
Check this codepen.
Thank you!
<div class="background">
<h1>This is H1!</h1>
</div>
<div class="background">
<h2>This is H2!</h2>
</div>
<div class="background">
<h3>This is H3!</h3>
</div>
<div class="background">
<h4>This is H4!</h4>
</div>
<div class="background">
<h5>This is H5!</h5>
</div>
<div class="background">
<h6>This is H6!</h6>
</div>
the css is
.background {
background: orange;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
h1 {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
This will hide the white
<body style="background-color:orange;">
EDIT kevin beat me to it and his is better. lol
you're dividing the headers into sections! don't use the 'div' tag when all of the elements are going to have the same styles anyway!
<div style = "background-color:yellow">
<h1>This is H1!</h1>
<h2>This is H2!</h2>
<h3>This is H3!</h3>
<h4>This is H4!</h4>
<h5>This is H5!</h5>
<h6>This is H6!</h6>
</div>
note : the usage of "background-color" in the tag is the same as using css in your code. should fix your problem!
edit :
due to some confusion, the answer above is not what the Asker meant (see comments), so here's my new answer.
what you're aiming to do, can't be perfectly done (in my experience) but if you want; you can use boxes (images) in place of your actual headings.
or, use
<div class="background">
<h1 style = "transform : scale(1,1.65)">This is H1!</h1>
</div>
which is a little bit cheesy, and can't be maintained well (if the font changes, it no longer fits perfectly)
see : related
I have the following markup:
<div class="chat-area">
<div class="username-area">
</div>
<div class="message-area">
</div>
<div class="options-area">
</div>
</div>
<div class="chat-area">
<div class="username-area">
</div>
<div class="message-area">
</div>
<div class="options-area">
</div>
</div>
And I'm trying to alternate the background colours of username-area between #00A6FF and #27FF00. In my css I have:
.chat-area .username-area:nth-child(odd){
background-color: #00A6FF;
}
.chat-area .username-area:nth-child(even){
background-color: #27FF00;
}
But all the username-area divs are being set to #00A6FF. I tried using :nth-of-type and I've also tried using expressions (2n+1 and 2n+2) instead of 'odd' and 'even' but I'm having no luck figuring this out. I had a look at a few questions on this site but the solutions haven't helped or seem to be addressing issues that don't apply to my code, I think.
Just so that one:
.chat-area:nth-child(odd) .username-area{
background-color: #00A6FF;
}
.chat-area:nth-child(even) .username-area{
background-color: #27FF00;
}
#Marcos Pérez Gude was faster :)
Just give a turn to the ommelete :)
.chat-area:nth-child(odd) .username-area{
background-color: #00A6FF;
}
.chat-area:nth-child(even) .username-area{
background-color: #27FF00;
}
It's because the odd and even elements are .chat-area, not username-area.
I want to create alternating 100% colored blocks. An "ideal" situation is illustrated as an attachment, as well as the current situation.
Desired setup:
Currently:
My first idea was to create an div class, give it a background color, and give it 100% width.
.block {
width: 100%;
background: #fff;
}
However, you can see that this obviously doesn't work. It's confined to a container area. I tried to close the container and that didn't work either.
The container class is intentionally not 100% width. It is different fixed widths depending on the width of the viewport.
If you want to work with the full width of the screen, use .container-fluid:
Bootstrap 3:
<body>
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8"></div>
<div class="col-lg-4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12"></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Bootstrap 2:
<body>
<div class="row">
<div class="span6"></div>
<div class="span6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span8"></div>
<div class="span4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span12"></div>
</div>
</body>
QUICK ANSWER
Use multiple NOT NESTED .containers
Wrap those .containers you want to have a full-width background in a div
Add a CSS background to the wrapping div
Fiddles: Simple: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/ , Container borders: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/1/
HTML:
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 1</h2>
</div>
<div class="specialBackground">
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 2</h2>
</div>
</div>
CSS: .specialBackground{ background-color: gold; /*replace with own background settings*/ }
FURTHER INFO
DON'T USE NESTED CONTAINERS
Many people will (wrongly) suggest, that you should use nested containers. Well, you should NOT.
They are not ment to be nested. (See to "Containers" section in the docs)
HOW IT WORKS
div is a block element, which by default spans to the full width of a document body - there is the full-width feature. It also has a height of it's content (if you don't specify otherwise).
The bootstrap containers are not required to be direct children of a body, they are just containers with some padding and possibly some screen-width-variable fixed widths.
If a basic grid .container has some fixed width it is also auto-centered horizontally.
So there is no difference whether you put it as a:
Direct child of a body
Direct child of a basic div that is a direct child of a body.
By "basic" div I mean div that does not have a CSS altering his border, padding, dimensions, position or content size. Really just a HTML element with display: block; CSS and possibly background.
But of course setting vertical-like CSS (height, padding-top, ...) should not break the bootstrap grid :-)
Bootstrap itself is using the same approach
...All over it's own website and in it's "JUMBOTRON" example:
http://getbootstrap.com/examples/jumbotron/
This is how you can achieve your desired setup with Bootstrap 3:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row"> <!-- Give this div your desired background color -->
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
... your content here ...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The container-fluid part makes sure that you can change the background over the full width. The container part makes sure that your content is still wrapped in a fixed width.
This approach works, but personally I don't like all the nesting. However, I haven't found a better solution so far.
There is a workaround using vw. Is useful when you can't create a new fluid container.
This, inside a classic 'container' div will be full size.
.row-full{
width: 100vw;
position: relative;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
After this there is the sidebar problem (thanks to #Typhlosaurus), solved with this js function, calling it on document load and resize:
function full_row_resize(){
var body_width = $('body').width();
$('.row-full').css('width', (body_width));
$('.row-full').css('margin-left', ('-'+(body_width/2)+'px'));
return false;
}
In bootstrap 4, you can use 'w-100' class (w as width, and 100 as 100%)
You can find documentation here:
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/utilities/sizing/
If you can't change the HTML layout:
.full-width {
width: 100vw;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12">a</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">b</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 full-width">c</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">d</div>
</div>
</div>
Demo: http://www.bootply.com/tVkNyWJxA6
Sometimes it's not possible to close the content container.
The solution we are using is a bit different but prevent a overflow because of the
firefox scrollbar size!
.full-width {
margin-top: 15px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
position: relative;
width: calc(100vw - 10px);
margin-left: calc(-50vw + 5px);
left: 50%;
}
Here is a example: https://jsfiddle.net/RubbelDeKatz/wvt9253q
Instead of
style="width:100%"
try using
class="col-xs-12"
it will save you 1 character :)
Sorry, should have asked for your css as well. As is, basically what you need to look at is giving your container div the style .container { width: 100%; } in your css and then the enclosed divs will inherit this as long as you don't give them their own width. You were also missing a few closing tags, and the </center> closes a <center> without it ever being open, at least in this section of code. I wasn't sure if you wanted the image in the same div that contains your content or separate, so I created two examples. I changed the width of the img to 100px simply because jsfiddle offers a small viewing area. Let me know if it's not what you're looking for.
content and image separate: http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/2/
content and image in same div (img floated left): http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/3/
I would use two separate 'container' div as below:
<div class="container">
/* normal*/
</div>
<div class="container-fluid">
/*full width container*/
</div>
Bare in mind that container-fluid does not follow your breakpoints and it is a full width container.
I'd wonder why someone would try to "override" the container width, since its purpose is to keep its content with some padding, but I had a similar situation (that's why I wanted to share my solution, even though there're answers).
In my situation, I wanted to have all content (of all pages) rendered inside a container, so this was the piece of code from my _Layout.cshtml:
<div id="body">
#RenderSection("featured", required: false)
<section class="content-wrapper main-content clear-fix">
<div class="container">
#RenderBody()
</div>
</section>
</div>
In my Home Index page, I had a background header image I'd like to fill the whole screen width, so the solution was to make the Index.cshtml like this:
#section featured {
<!-- This content will be rendered outside the "container div" -->
<div class="intro-header">
<div class="container">SOME CONTENT WITH A NICE BACKGROUND</div>
</div>
}
<!-- The content below will be rendered INSIDE the "container div" -->
<div class="content-section-b">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
MORE CONTENT
</div>
</div>
</div>
I think this is better than trying to make workarounds, since sections are made with the purpose of allowing (or forcing) views to dynamically replace some content in the layout.
Though people have mentioned that you will need to use .container-fluid in this case but you will also have to remove the padding from bootstrap.
The following answer is not exactly optimal by any measure, but I needed something that maintains its position within the container whilst it stretches the inner div fully.
https://jsfiddle.net/fah5axm5/
$(function() {
$(window).on('load resize', ppaFullWidth);
function ppaFullWidth() {
var $elements = $('[data-ppa-full-width="true"]');
$.each( $elements, function( key, item ) {
var $el = $(this);
var $container = $el.closest('.container');
var margin = parseInt($container.css('margin-left'), 10);
var padding = parseInt($container.css('padding-left'), 10)
var offset = margin + padding;
$el.css({
position: "relative",
left: -offset,
"box-sizing": "border-box",
width: $(window).width(),
"padding-left": offset + "px",
"padding-right": offset + "px"
});
});
}
});
This must work (Mobile phone as well as Desktop screen):
class: alignfull and class: img-fluid will do the magic.
<div class="alignfull">
<img class="img-fluid" style="background-size: cover;
background-position: center ;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: auto;
min-width: 100%;
width: -moz-available; "
src="{{ $image->image }}" alt="An image">
</div>
I'm using foundation 3 to build a responsive website but I want to have the Footer and Navigation background width to occupy the entire width? I have named my rows as
class="row navigation"
class="row footer"
I tried looking for how to fix this but I'm out of options. I'm assuming it is a small fix in the foundation.css file but it's a bit too overwhelming at the moment as I'm new to it.
Any poiinters much appreciated.
I ran into the same problem yesterday. The trick is, for full width spanning blocks, you just keep them out of the row/column structure, since row/column will always apply the default padding. Keep your footers and headers on their own, and use row/column inside them.
<header>
This will span the full width of the page
</header>
<div class="row">
<div class="twelve columns">
This text will flow within all typical padding and margins
</div>
</div>
<footer>
This will span the full width of the page
<div class="row">
<div class="twelve columns">
This text will flow within all typical padding and margins
</div>
</div>
</footer>
What I have been doing is to add a custom class so that I can chain it with .row and override the max-width setting.
<div class="row full-width"></div>
.row.full-width {
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
I put width in here too to cover bases, but it is already declared in foundation.css so you can just omit it.
If you're using Zurb Foundation Framework, simply remove the row class and wrap the element in a class container that is 100% width. Now you probably want to center the stuff, use class centered like this:
<div class="container navigation">
<div class="centered">
Some navigation stuff
</div>
</div>
I completely disagree with the answer. You shouldn't have to use !important
Please refer to my article and demo at http://edcharbeneau.github.com/FoundationSinglePageRWD/
You should be able to get what you need from there. The demo is for 2.2 but is very similar in function to v3.
Foundation 6 supports this feature naturally with row expanded. code example:
<div class="expanded row">
...
</div>
Read more here: http://foundation.zurb.com/sites/docs/grid.html#fluid-row
Use "Section" as in:
<section>
<div class="row">
<div class="small-12 columns">
</div>
</div>
</section>
Then, assign an ID to the section and use that for your background.
This is in regards to Foundation 5. None of the answers given so far, provide edge-to-edge, full widths. That's because inner .columns add padding.
For a true edge-to-edge, full width content, add this to your CSS.
.row.full { width: 100%; max-width: 100%; }
.row.full>.column:first-child,
.row.full>.columns:first-child { padding-left: 0; }
.row.full>.column:last-child,
.row.full>.columns:last-child { padding-right: 0; }
Simply add .full class to a .row you wish to extend full width.
<div class="row full">
<div class="medium-6 column">This column touches Left edge.</div>
<div class="medium-6 column">This column touches Right edge.</div>
</div>
Just override the max-width property as max-width: initial;, for example,
.fullWidth {
width: 100%;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
max-width: initial;
}
<div class="row fullWidth"> </div>
this works for me :)
I know that there are already many answers, but I think I have something new to add in this topic if someone is using Foundation 5 and stumbled upon this question (like me).
As Foundation is using REM units, it would be best to alter .row class using them and by adding extra class, so you can have only selected rows full-width. For example by using .full class:
.row.full {
max-width: 80rem; /* about 90rem should give you almost full screen width */
}
You can see that it is used like this even in documentation page of Zurb Foundation (they altered .row class, though): http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/ (just look into page source code)
You really would want to keep the row class otherwise you lose a lot of the power of the grid system. Why not change the setting for $rowWidth from 1000 (default) to 100%. This can be found in the file foundation_and_overrides.scss
Just set the
$row-width: 100%;
http://foundation.zurb.com/forum/posts/927-full-width-layouts
I am not sure if I am missing something, but I had to add a .row div for the .centered to work. I can still style the .header to have a full width background in this case, but the .container method did not work for me.
<header class="header">
<div class="row">
<div class="centered">
Logo and stuff
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
Some navigation stuff
</div>
</header>
If you don't give it the "row" class and put columns inside it works on a 100% width
If you're using sass, this is a better way:
<div class="row full-width"></div>
.row{
&.full-width{
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%!important; //might be needded depending on your settings
&>.column:first-child,
&>.columns:first-child{
padding-left: 0;
}
&>.column:last-child,
&>.columns:last-child{
padding-right: 0;
}
}
}
yes, just use like this:
<div class="large-12 columns">
<h2>Header Twelve Columns (this will have full width of the BROWSER <---->></h2>
</div>
as the title says I'm having the problem with content getting hidden while scrolling/dragging the content when using the CSS property -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch.
For a basic understanding, here is my markup
<div class="page">
<div class="section_title">Title</div>
<div class="items">
<div class="item">...Text and Image...</div>
<div class="item">...Text and Image...</div>
<div class="item">...Text and Image...</div>
</div>
<div class="section_title">Title</div>
<div class="items">
<div class="item">...Text and Image...</div>
<div class="item">...Text and Image...</div>
<div class="item">...Text and Image...</div>
</div>
</div>
And the CSS:
.page {
width: 320px;
height: 366px;
overflow: scroll;
overflow-x: hidden;
-webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;
}
The code itself works good, I can scroll through the content but everything that is inside of a items div get's hidden while I'm scrolling/dragging. Anyone came across this issue and solved it or is it just standard behavior of Mobile Safari to save memory and there is nothing we can do about it?
Any help is appreciated :-)
Have you tried putting the elements into memory?
If not, try putting .items in memory using the css -webkit-transform: translate3d(0,0,0);
You may want to go higher or lower in the nesting depending on performance, ie applying the translate to .page or .item. This will increase the memory used which can get crashy but it helps the browser redraw everything.
Anyways, hope that helps!
This probably has to do with a bug in webkit.
If you have any "position: relative" or absolute your code should work just fine.