complex nested list to a clean matrix in R? - r

I have struggled for two days longs to find a way to create a specific matrix from a nested list
First of all, I am sorry if I don't explain my issue correctly I am one week new to StackOverflow* and R (and programming...)!
I use a file that you can find there :
original link: https://parltrack.org/dumps/ep_mep_activities.json.lz
Uncompressed by me here: https://wetransfer.com/downloads/701b7ac5250f451c6cb26d29b41bd88020200808183632/bb08429ca5102e3dc277f2f44d08f82220200808183652/666973
first 3 lists and last one (out of 23905) past here: https://pastebin.com/Kq7mjis5
With rjson, I have a nested list like this :
Nested list of MEP Votes
List of 23905
$ :List of 7
..$ ts : chr "2004-12-16T11:49:02"
..$ url : chr "http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/seance_pleniere/proces_verbal/2004/12-16/votes_nominaux/xml/P6_PV(2004)12-16(RCV)_XC.xml"
..$ voteid : num 7829
..$ title : chr "Projet de budget général 2005 modifié - bloc 3"
..$ votes :List of 3
.. ..$ +:List of 2
.. .. ..$ total : num 45
.. .. ..$ groups:List of 6
.. .. .. ..$ ALDE :List of 1
.. .. .. .. ..$ : Named num 4404
.. .. .. .. .. ..- attr(*, "names")= chr "mepid"
.. .. .. ..$ GUE/NGL:List of 25
.. .. .. .. ..$ : Named num 28469
.. .. .. .. .. ..- attr(*, "names")= chr "mepid"
.. .. .. .. ..$ : Named num 4298
.. .. .. .. .. ..- attr(*, "names")= chr "mepid"
then my goal is to have something like this :
final matrix
First I would like to keep only the lists (from [[1]] to [[23905]]) containing $vote$+$groups$Renew or $vote$-$groups$Renew or $vote$'0'$groups$Renew. The main list (the 23905) are registered votes. My work is on the Renew group so my only interest is to have a vote where the Renew groups exist to compare them with other groups.
After that my goal is to create a matrix like this all the [[x]] where we can find groups$Renewexists:
final matrix
V1 V2 (not mandatory) V3[[x]]$voteid
[mepid==666] GUE/NGL + (mepid==[666] is found in [[1]]$vote$+$groups$GUE/NGL)
[mepid==777] Renew - (mepid==[777] is found in [[1]]$vote$-$groups$GUE/NGL)
I want to create a matrix so I can process the votes of each MEP (referenced by their MEPid). Their votes are either + (for yea), - (for nay) or 0 (for abstain). Moreover, I would like to have political groups of MEP displayed in the column next to their mepid. We can find their political group thanks to the place where their votes are stored. If the mepid is shown in the list [[x]]$vote$+$groups$GUE/NGL she or he belongs to the GUE/NGL groups.
What I want to do might look like this
# Clean the nested list
Keep Vote[[x]] if Vote[[x]] list contain ,
$vote$+$groups$Renew,
or $vote$-$groups$Renew,
or $vote$'0'$groups$Renew
# Create the matrix (or a data.frame if it is easier)
VoteMatrix <- as.matrix(
V1 = all "mepid" found in the nested list
V2 = groups (name of the list where we can find the mepid) (not mandatory)
V3 to Vy = If.else(mepid is in [[x]]$vote$+ then “+”,
mepid is in [[x]]$vote$- then “-“, "0")
)
Thank you in advance,
*Nevertheless, I am reading this website actively since I started R!

You can see that the 'votes' sublist is composed of three items a list of member numbers stored within what I think are party designators. Here's how you might "straighten" the positive voter 'memids' by party:
str( unlist( sapply(names(jlis[[1]]$votes$'+'$groups), function(x) unlist(jlis[[1]]$votes$'+'$groups[[x]]) ) ) )
Named num [1:104] 28268 4514 28841 28314 28241 ...
- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:104] "ALDE.mepid" "ALDE.mepid" "ALDE.mepid" "ALDE.mepid" ...
You get a named numeric vector with 108 entries. Perhaps this will demonstrate what sort of terminology to use in better describing your desired result. (Just giving a partial schema for the desired result leaves way too much ambiguity to support a fully formed request.)
I do NOT see the number 23905 anywhere in what I downloaded from your link. We are clearly looking at different data. I see this for the timestamp: chr "2004-12-01T15:20:31". I'm not going to cut you any slack for not knowing R, since the task needs to be fully explained in a natural language. I will cut you slack regarding grammar if English is not your native tongue, but you definitely need to make a better effort at explication. This is what I see for the names with the votes$'+'$groups sublists of the first three items, but since RENEW is not in any of them there's not a lot that could be demonstrated about picking items:
> names( jlis[[1]]$votes$'+'$groups)
[1] "ALDE" "GUE/NGL" "IND/DEM" "NI" "PPE-DE" "PSE" "UEN"
> names( jlis[[2]]$votes$'+'$groups)
[1] "GUE/NGL" "IND/DEM" "NI" "PPE-DE"
> names( jlis[[3]]$votes$'+'$groups)
[1] "ALDE" "GUE/NGL" "IND/DEM" "NI" "PPE-DE" "PSE" "UEN" "Verts/ALE"
Furthermore, when I looked at all of the possible votes values using this method (for all three of the items you made available) I still see no RENEW names.
sapply( jlis[[1]]$votes[c("+","-","0")], function(x) names(x$groups) )
After second edit: Here's the next step of isolating those votes that contain a "Renew` value. I'm assuming that its possible to have a "Renew" value in only one of the three possible 'votes' values (+,-.0). If not (and there are always "Renew" values in each of them when there is one in any of them) then you might be able to simplify the logic. We make three logical vectors:
sapply( seq_along(MEPVotes) , function(i){ 'Renew' %in% names( MEPVotes[[i]]$votes[['0']][['groups']]) } )
#[1] FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE
sapply( seq_along(MEPVotes) , function(i){ 'Renew' %in% names( MEPVotes[[i]]$votes[['+']][['groups']]) } )
#[1] FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE
sapply( seq_along(MEPVotes) , function(i){ 'Renew' %in% names( MEPVotes[[i]]$votes[['-']][['groups']]) } )
#[1] FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE
And then wrap them in a matrix call with 3 columns and take the maximum of each row (the maximum of c(TRUE,FALSE) is 1 and then convert back to logical.
selection_vec = as.logical( apply( matrix( c(
sapply( seq_along(MEPVotes) , function(i){ 'Renew' %in% names( MEPVotes[[i]]$votes[['0']][['groups']]) } ),
sapply( seq_along(MEPVotes) , function(i){ 'Renew' %in% names( MEPVotes[[i]]$votes[['+']][['groups']]) } ),
sapply( seq_along(MEPVotes) , function(i){ 'Renew' %in% names( MEPVotes[[i]]$votes[['-']][['groups']]) } ) ),
ncol=3 ), 1,max))
> selection_vec
[1] FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE

Related

jsonlite array of arrays

when using jsonlite to import a json that has an array inside other array I get an undesired unnamed list. Exemple below:
myjson=jsonlite::fromJSON('{
"class" : "human",
"type" : [{
"shape":"thin",
"face":[{"eyes":"blues","hair":"brown"}]
}]
}')
str(myjson)
List of 2
$ class: chr "human"
$ type :'data.frame': 1 obs. of 2 variables:
..$ shape: chr "thin"
..$ face :List of 1
.. ..$ :'data.frame': 1 obs. of 2 variables:
.. .. ..$ eyes: chr "blues"
.. .. ..$ hair: chr "brown"
I would like to access the "eyes" field as below (however it doesn't work):
myjson[["type"]][["face"]][["eyes"]]
NULL
Instead, I need to add "[[1]]" in order to make it works:
myjson[["type"]][["face"]][[1]][["eyes"]]
[1] "blues"
Any ideas how could I format the json to get rid of this unnamed list?
The thing is, unnamed lists are used whenever there is a JSON vector [{}, {}, ...]. The fact that your first vector is turned into a named list and the second, inner one, is turned into an unnamed list is because jsonlite::fromJSON has arguments simplifyDataFrame = TRUE and flatten = TRUE by default, which have this behavior. I haven't looked into the source code, but it seems that the simplification involved (transforming a vector with only one element into a named list) only simplify the top-level objects.
A work around is to apply a function that turns any unnamed list with only a single object into the object itself.
my_json <- lapply(my_json, function(x) {
if (is.list(x)) # if element is a list, replace it with its first element
return(lapply(x, function(y) {
return(y[[1]])
}))
else
return(x)
})

Five figures summary with dbplyr

I have 4 years experience using R but I am very new to the Big Data game as I always worked on csv files.
It is thrilling to manipulate large amount of data from a distance but also somehow frustating as simple things you were used to are to be rengineered.
The task I am struggling right now is to have a basic 5 figure summary of a variable:
summary(df$X)
Some context, I am connected with impala, these lines of codes work fine:
library(dbplyr)
localTable <- tbl(con, 'serverTable')
localTable %>% tally()
localTable %>% filter(X > 10) %>% tally()
If I just write
localTable
instead, RStudio gets stuck/takes a lot of time so I suppress it with the task manager.
Coming back to my current question, I tried to have a 5 figure summary in these ways:
summary(localTable$X) #returns Length 0, Class NULL, Mode NULL
localTable %>% fivenum(X) #returns Error in rank(x, ties.method = "min", na.last = "keep") : unimplemented type 'list' in 'greater'
also building a custom summary() with summarise
localTable %>% summarize(Min = min(X),
Q1 = quantile(X, .25),
Avg = mean(X),
Q3 = quantile(X, .75),
Max = max(X))
returns me a SYNTAX ERROR.
My guess is that there is a very trivial missing link between my code and the server in form of a data structure, but I can't figure it out what.
I tried as well to save localTable$x to a in-memory variable with
XL <- localTable$X
but I always get a NULL
On the graphical side, using dbplot, if I try
library(dbplot)
localTable %>% dbplot_histogram(X)
I get an empty graphic.
I thought about leveraging the 5 figures summary in the boxplot function, ggplotbuild(object)$data likewise so to speak, but with dbplot_boxplot I get the error could not find function "dbplot_boxplot".
I started using dbplyr as I am quite fluent with dplyr and I don't want to write queries in SQL with DBI::dbGetQuery, but you can suggest other packages like implyR, sparklyR or the such, as well as tutorials on the subject as large, as the ones I found are quite basic.
EDIT:
as requested in a comment, I add the result of
str(localTable)
which is
List of 2
$ src:List of 2
..$ con :Formal class 'Impala' [package ".GlobalEnv"] with 4 slots
.. .. ..# ptr :<externalptr>
.. .. ..# quote : chr "`"
.. .. ..# info :List of 15
.. .. .. ..$ dbname : chr "IMPALA"
.. .. .. ..$ dbms.name : chr "Impala"
.. .. .. ..$ db.version : chr "2.9.0-cdh5.12.1"
.. .. .. ..$ username : chr "User"
.. .. .. ..$ host : chr ""
.. .. .. ..$ port : chr ""
.. .. .. ..$ sourcename : chr "impala connector"
.. .. .. ..$ servername : chr "Impala"
.. .. .. ..$ drivername : chr "Cloudera ODBC Driver for Impala"
.. .. .. ..$ odbc.version : chr "03.80.0000"
.. .. .. ..$ driver.version : chr "2.6.11.1011"
.. .. .. ..$ odbcdriver.version : chr "03.80"
.. .. .. ..$ supports.transactions : logi FALSE
.. .. .. ..$ getdata.extensions.any_column: logi TRUE
.. .. .. ..$ getdata.extensions.any_order : logi TRUE
.. .. .. ..- attr(*, "class")= chr [1:3] "Impala" "driver_info" "list"
.. .. ..# encoding: chr ""
..$ disco: NULL
..- attr(*, "class")= chr [1:4] "src_Impala" "src_dbi" "src_sql" "src"
$ ops:List of 2
..$ x : 'ident' chr "serverTable"
..$ vars: chr [1:157] "X" ...
..- attr(*, "class")= chr [1:3] "op_base_remote" "op_base" "op"
- attr(*, "class")= chr [1:5] "tbl_Impala" "tbl_dbi" "tbl_sql" "tbl_lazy" ...
Not sure if I can dput my table as it is sensitive information
There are quite a few aspects to your post. I am going to try and address the main ones.
(1) What you are calling localTable is not local. What you have is a local access point to a remote table. It is a remote table because the data is stored in the database, rather than in R.
To copy a remote table into local R memory use localTable = collect(remoteTable). Use this carefully. If the table is many GB in the database this will be slow to transfer into R. Also if you collect a database table that is bigger than the ram avaialble to R then you will receive an out of memory error.
I recommend using collect for moving summary results into R. Do the processing and summarizing in the database and just fetch the results into R. Alternatively, use remoteTable %>% head(20) %>% collect() to copy just the first 20 rows into R.
(2) The tableName$colname will not work for remote tables. In R the $ notation lets you access a named component of a list. Data.frames are a special kind of list. If you try data(iris) followed by names(iris) you will get the columns names of iris. Any of these can be accessed using iris$.
However as your str(localTable) shows, localTable is a list of length 2 with the first named item src. If you call names(localTable) then you will receive two names back, the first of which is src. This means you can call localTable$src (and as localTable$src is also a list you can also call localTable$src$con).
When working with dbplyr R translates data manipulation commands into the database language. There are translations defined for most dplyr commands, but there are not translations defined for all R commands.
So the recommended approach to access just a specific column is using select from dplyr:
local_copy_of_just_one_column = remoteTable %>%
select(required_column) %>%
collect()
(3) You have the right approach with a custom summary function. This is the best approach for producing the five figure summary without pulling the data into local memory (RAM).
One possible cause of the syntax error is that you may have used R commands that do not have a translation into your database language.
You can check whether a command has translations defined using translate_sql. I recommend you try
library(dbplyr)
translate_sql(quantile(colname, 0.25))
To see what the translation look like.
You can view the translation of an entire table manipulation using show_query. This is my go-to approach when debugging SQL translation. Try:
localTable %>%
summarize(Min = min(X),
Q1 = quantile(X, .25),
Avg = mean(X),
Q3 = quantile(X, .75),
Max = max(X)) %>%
show_query()
If this does not produce valid SQL then executing the command will error.
One possible cause is the Min and Max have special meanings in SQL and so might produce odd behavior in your translation.
When I experimented with quantile it looks like it might need an OVER clause in SQL. This is created using group_by. So perhaps you want something like the following:
localSummary = remoteTable %>%
# create dummy column
mutate(ones = 1) %>%
# group to satisfy over clause
group_by(ones) %>%
summarise(var_min = min(var),
var_lq = quantile(var, 0.25),
var_mean = mean(var),
var_uq = quantile(var, 0.75),
var_max = max(var)) %>%
# copy results from database into R memory
collect()

as.matrix(A$mat) for a given list A

I have n matrices of which I am trying to apply nearPD()from the Matrixpackage.
I have done this using the following code:
A<-lapply(b, nearPD)
where b is the list of n matrices.
I now would like to convert the list A into matrices. For an individual matrix I would use the following code:
A<-matrix(runif(n*n),ncol = n)
PD_mat_A<-nearPD(A)
B<-as.matrix(PD_mat_A$mat)
But I am trying to do this with a list. I have tried the following code but it doesn't seem to work:
d<-lapply(c, as.matrix($mat))
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Here is a code so you can try and reproduce this:
n<-10
generate<-function (n){
matrix(runif(10*10),ncol = 10)
}
b<-lapply(1:n, generate)
Here is the simplest method using as.matrix as noted by #nicola in the comments below and (a version using apply) by #cimentadaj in the comments above:
d <- lapply(A, function(i) as.matrix(i$mat))
My original answer, exploiting the nearPD data structure was
With a little fiddling with the nearPD object type, here is an extraction method:
d <- lapply(A, function(i) matrix(i$mat#x, ncol=i$mat#Dim[2]))
Below is some commentary on how I arrived at my answer.
This object is fairly complicated as str(A[[1]]) returns
List of 7
$ mat :Formal class 'dpoMatrix' [package "Matrix"] with 5 slots
.. ..# x : num [1:100] 0.652 0.477 0.447 0.464 0.568 ...
.. ..# Dim : int [1:2] 10 10
.. ..# Dimnames:List of 2
.. .. ..$ : NULL
.. .. ..$ : NULL
.. ..# uplo : chr "U"
.. ..# factors : list()
$ eigenvalues: num [1:10] 4.817 0.858 0.603 0.214 0.15 ...
$ corr : logi FALSE
$ normF : num 1.63
$ iterations : num 2
$ rel.tol : num 0
$ converged : logi TRUE
- attr(*, "class")= chr "nearPD"
You are interested in the "mat" which is accessed by $mat. The # symbols show that "mat" is an s4 object and its components are accessed using #. The components of interest are "x", the matrix content, and "Dim" the dimension of the matrix. The code above puts this information together to extract the matrices from the list of "nearPD" objects.
Below is a brief explanation of why as.matrix works in this case. Note the matrix inside a nearPD object is not a matrix:
is.matrix(A[[1]]$mat)
[1] FALSE
However, it is a "Matrix":
class(A[[1]]$mat)
[1] "dpoMatrix"
attr(,"package")
[1] "Matrix"
From the note in the help file, help("as.matrix,Matrix-method"),
Loading the Matrix namespace “overloads” as.matrix and as.array in the base namespace by the equivalent of function(x) as(x, "matrix"). Consequently, as.matrix(m) or as.array(m) will properly work when m inherits from the "Matrix" class.
So, the Matrix package is taking care of the as.matrix conversion "under the hood."

Can't write data frame to database

I can't really create a code example because I'm not quite sure what the problem is and my actual problem is rather involved. That said it seems like kind of a generic problem that maybe somebody's seen before.
Basically I'm constructing 3 different dataframes and rbinding them together, which is all as expected smooth sailing but when I try to write that merged frame back to the DB I get this error:
Error in .External2(C_writetable, x, file, nrow(x), p, rnames, sep, eol, :
unimplemented type 'list' in 'EncodeElement'
I've tried manually coercing them using as.data.frame() before and after the rbinds and the returned object (the same one that fails to write with the above error message) exists in the environment as class data.frame so why does dbWriteTable not seem to have got the memo?
Sorry, I'm connecting to a MySQL DB using RMySQL. The problem I think as I look a little closer and try to explain myself is that the columns of my data frame are themselves lists (of the same length), which sorta makes sense of the error. I'd think (or like to think anyways) that a call to as.data.frame() would take care of that but I guess not?
A portion of my str() since it's long looks like:
.. [list output truncated]
$ stcong :List of 29809
..$ : int 3
..$ : int 8
..$ : int 4
..$ : int 2
I guess I'm wondering if there's an easy way to force this coercion?
Hard to say for sure, since you provided so little concrete information, but this would be one way to convert a list column to an atomic vector column:
> d <- data.frame(x = 1:5)
> d$y <- as.list(letters[1:5])
> str(d)
'data.frame': 5 obs. of 2 variables:
$ x: int 1 2 3 4 5
$ y:List of 5
..$ : chr "a"
..$ : chr "b"
..$ : chr "c"
..$ : chr "d"
..$ : chr "e"
> d$y <- unlist(d$y)
> str(d)
'data.frame': 5 obs. of 2 variables:
$ x: int 1 2 3 4 5
$ y: chr "a" "b" "c" "d" ...
This assumes that each element of your list column is only a length one vector. If any aren't, things will be more complicated, and you'd likely need to rethink your data structure anyhow.

R dataframe define column names at creation

I get monthly price value for the two assets below from Yahoo:
if(!require("tseries") | !require(its) ) { install.packages(c("tseries", 'its')); require("tseries"); require(its) }
startDate <- as.Date("2000-01-01", format="%Y-%m-%d")
MSFT.prices = get.hist.quote(instrument="msft", start= startDate,
quote="AdjClose", provider="yahoo", origin="1970-01-01",
compression="m", retclass="its")
SP500.prices = get.hist.quote(instrument="^gspc", start=startDate,
quote="AdjClose", provider="yahoo", origin="1970-01-01",
compression="m", retclass="its")
I want to put these two into a single data frame with specified columnames (Pandas allows this now - a bit ironic since they take the data.frame concept from R). As below, I assign the two time series with names:
MSFTSP500.prices <- data.frame(msft = MSFT.prices, sp500= SP500.prices )
However, this does not preserve the column names [msft, snp500] I have appointed. I need to define column names in a separate line of code:
colnames(MSFTSP500.prices) <- c("msft", "sp500")
I tried to put colnames and col.names inside the data.frame() call but it doesn't work. How can I define column names while creating the data frame?
I found ?data.frame very unhelpful...
The code fails with an error message indicating no availability of as.its. So I added the missing code (which appears to have been successful after two failed attempts.) Once you issue the missing require() call you can use str to see what sort of object get.hist.quote actually returns. It is neither a dataframe nor a zoo object, although it resembles a zoo-object in many ways:
> str(SP500.prices)
Formal class 'its' [package "its"] with 2 slots
..# .Data: num [1:180, 1] 1394 1366 1499 1452 1421 ...
.. ..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
.. .. ..$ : chr [1:180] "2000-01-02" "2000-01-31" "2000-02-29" "2000-04-02" ...
.. .. ..$ : chr "AdjClose"
..# dates: POSIXct[1:180], format: "2000-01-02 16:00:00" "2000-01-31 16:00:00" ...
If you run cbind on those two objects you get a regular matrix with dimnames:
> str(cbind(SP500.prices, MSFT.prices) )
num [1:180, 1:2] 1394 1366 1499 1452 1421 ...
- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
..$ : chr [1:180] "2000-01-02" "2000-01-31" "2000-02-29" "2000-04-02" ...
..$ : chr [1:2] "AdjClose" "AdjClose"
You will still need to change the column names since there does not seem to be a cbind.its that lets you assign column-names. I would caution about using the data.frame method, since the object is might get confusing in its behavior:
> str( MSFTSP500.prices )
'data.frame': 180 obs. of 2 variables:
$ AdjClose :Formal class 'AsIs', 'its' [package ""] with 1 slot
.. ..# .S3Class: chr "AsIs" "its"
$ AdjClose.1:Formal class 'AsIs', 'its' [package ""] with 1 slot
.. ..# .S3Class: chr "AsIs" "its"
The columns are still S4 objects. I suppose that might be useful if you were going to pass them to other its-methods but could be confusing otherwise. This might be what you were shooting for:
> MSFTSP500.prices <- data.frame(msft = as.vector(MSFT.prices),
sp500= as.vector(SP500.prices) ,
row.names= as.character(MSFT.prices#dates) )
> str( MSFTSP500.prices )
'data.frame': 180 obs. of 2 variables:
$ msft : num 35.1 32 38.1 25 22.4 ...
$ sp500: num 1394 1366 1499 1452 1421 ...
> head(rownames(MSFTSP500.prices))
[1] "2000-01-02 16:00:00" "2000-01-31 16:00:00" "2000-02-29 16:00:00"
[4] "2000-04-02 17:00:00" "2000-04-30 17:00:00" "2000-05-31 17:00:00"
MSFT.prices is a zoo object, which seems to be a data-frame-alike, with its own column name which gets transferred to the object. Confer
tmp <- data.frame(a=1:10)
b <- data.frame(lost=tmp)
which loses the second column name.
If you do
MSFTSP500.prices <- data.frame(msft = as.vector(MSFT.prices),
sp500=as.vector(SP500.prices))
then you will get the colnames you want (though you won't get zoo-specific behaviours). Not sure why you object to renaming columns in a second command, though.

Resources