We are investigating how to integrate our app with Github Enterprise.
There are 2 different deployment models - 'Cloud' and 'On Premise'
I have been looking around but couldn't find the differences between the two.
Maybe there is no such difference
The basic difference is that GitHub Enterprise Server is software you deploy on a virtual machine you provision and control (on-premise here is a bit of a misnomer since your VM could be in AWS).
GitHub Enterprise Cloud, on the other hand, is an enterprise-level of service at GitHub.com.
You'll find more here.
Related
We are working with a client who is interested in developing a application using Corda Ledger. While in the initial phase of development to first rollout in to Production, client is looking to see the capabilities of Corda Ledger using its community version. Subsequent to first Production rollout when the capabilities of Corda are on the display with its own client, they want to look beyond making this solution a enterprise solution using by procuring Corda enterprise license.
I am not getting much help in forming a delineating line of difference between Community and Enterprise version of Corda.
**What are essential features which cannot be built using community version ?
**who governs Community version ?
**Is there any support provided for Community version ?
**Can we create a distributed architecture using Community version (Corda nodes located on different physical servers) ?
**Can we create Corda network using Docker containers using Community version ?
**Is there any detailed document to draw the lines between community and enterprise version ? **
I have worked on community version of Corda using it for developing PoC, Where all nodes are located on same server and were not truly distributedstrong text
Corda Open Source and Enterprise are functionally identical. What Enterprise offers extra is the non-functional stuff that is required for mission-critical enterprise applications, which includes performance, HA, HSM integration, Enterprise Database integration, 24 X 7 Support, etc.
The community version id developed primarily by R3, while we also accept and encourage community contribution to the Corda Open Source project.
There is no Official R3 Production Support for Open Source Corda, however, you could ask questions and ask for solutions to your problems on our public slack channel (stack.corda.net) and also here on StackOverflow.
You can operate a network of OS Corda with nodes on different servers without any problems.
I work for a small web startup. They have decided to use OpenStack as IaaS and then on top of it, cloudfoundry as PaaS. I am trying to learn about this technology stack. But I am really confused even after going through documentations and related materials on the web.
What do I want?
I have a web site, that currently runs on a RHEL system (aws instance), with
nginx as web server. I want to shift this to OpenStack-cloudfoundry
stack because the company's management has decided to do so. They also
want me to evaluate if I can put Docker to use anywhere.
From my understanding, OpenStack (Iaas) will provide me with all stuff related to hardware software needs, and cloudfoundry will help me on the development front.
Now, where does nginx (or any web server) come into the picture? Is it part of Openstack or Is it part of cloudfoundry?
On my aws RHEL system, Do I just install Openstack and Cloudfoundry, and then push my app and not at all bother about what happens beneath? I am really confused.. please help out.
And, Is there anywhere I can utilize Docker, in this setup?
You would generally not deploy OpenStack on top of AWS. OpenStack is similar to AWS in that it provides a service for you to create and destroy virtual machine instances, manage networking between and around your VMs, attach and detach block devices to instances, etc. In other words, both are services for managing "infrastructures", where "infrastructure" here means a virtualized datacenter, which at its core means a bunch of hardware running hypervisors that allow you regard the datacenter as a bunch of virtual machines that can be spun up and down on demand, rather than a bunch of "static" physical machines.
AWS is an Infrastructure-as-a-Service provided by Amazon, so you don't have to install AWS yourself, you can just start using it to provision VM instances within Amazon's datacenters. OpenStack is software you install yourself (or pay a vendor to manage for you) on hardware you own or pay for yourself, and once installed OpenStack provides a similar service/interface to AWS.
With a Platform-as-a-Service, you concern yourself more with your application code, and "just pushing it", and don't have to concern yourself as much with what's happening on the underlying machine. You don't have to worry as much about the underlying OS, making sure you have the right runtime and code dependencies of your application, generally don't have to care about the webserver that's serving your code, etc. And you get many more higher level features, e.g. easy ability to scale vertically or horizontally, dynamic routing, automatic log aggregation, automatic health management, etc.
As far as how nginx fits in, it depends how you're using nginx, and what kind of application you have. Cloud Foundry has few couple ways of dealing with applications.
One is the buildpack model, where you simply push your source code to the platform, and it will automatically detect the appropriate runtime and dependencies for your application. For instance, if your application is a Ruby application, it will automatically detect this, and by default automatically run the application using the WEBrick server. However, you can choose other Ruby webservers such as Phusion, Passenger, etc. [1]
If your application is primarily serving static content, it will use nginx as the webserver. [2]
Another is using Docker. You can deploy applications based on Docker images on Cloud Foundry, in which case you could have a container running nginx and your application inside the container, or not, it depends on whether you still need nginx. Pushing a docker application is as simple as:
cf push trainingwebapp --docker-image training/webapp -c 'python app.py'
Here, this uses the sample Hello World web app from the Docker documentation. [3]
[1] https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/buildpacks/ruby/ruby-prod-server.html
[2] https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/buildpacks/staticfile/index.html
[3] https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/containers/usingdocker/
I've seen this question but the answers are simply not good enough. I've searched the web and could find a clear listing of the main differences.
I am particularly surprised to see contradictions in the above link, that holds only 4 short answers.
So the question is, beyond support, what are (all) the differences between Alfresco Community and Enterprise editions (for the current versions of course)?
Are there functional or technical features that available in the Enterprise edition, that are not in the community edition?
I find it strange that it's so difficult to get a clear list. Looking at the forums to find this answer is not a serious option from a business perspective.
Until now, I found this link to be useful, but it's from 2009.
In particular, I find the platform support interesting, with the community edition supporting only lamp stuff:
Linux
MySQL
Tomcat
OpenLDAP
Firefox
And the enterprise edition supporting:
Windows
SQL Server
WebLogic, WebSphere
AD/Kerberos
IE and Safari
Apparently, these features are only available in the enterprise edition:
JMX monitoring
Runtime admininstration: What's that exactly? And what's in the community edition then?
Runtime indexing consistency check and update: What's in the community edition then?
High performance and availability: How is that implemented and what's in the community edition then?
Storage policies
Open source and proprietary technology stack support: which ones exaclty? Which ones are supported in the community edition?
If anyone could guide me towards serious documentation about these differences, that would be great.
I also went through the wiki but could not find an answer to my questions in there.
differences between Enterprise and Community vary in detail from version to version and are mainly visible for administrators. We see or maintain both flavors of Alfresco in midsize to very large environments and I would say it's more or less a question of taste and budget what the best decision / edition is for you. Excellent skills in infrastructure and java are highly advisable for both editions to run Alfresco in production.
The technical differences are not as dramatic as not being able to provide very similar functionality for the users - so if you're actually in a decision you should focus on a good technical partner, the support services and maybe the fact that you only get official patches in the Enterprise subscription, not on the Community. BTW Alfresco Enterprise is not Open Source but this is not a real point of interest for most end users. You can access the code as a subscription customer but it is not public available/accessible.
The main differences in features are already named more or less:
Administration
Enterprise has more views and setting in the admin web GUI. In Community you can access most configuration only from the command line. This may be a restriction but in real live Administrators prefer the command line and scripting automation.
Enterprise lets you change some Alfresco settings during runtime (most settings still require restart). Some can be change in the GUI and more in the jmx interface. Also you're able to stop and start subsystems like the CIFS protocol server. We use this feature to switch a system in read only mode. This point is meant with "runtime admininstration". Community requires restart of the service for most configuration changes. It is possible to work around this by advanced scripting like groovy or by implementing modules.
Indexing
Runtime indexing consistency check and update is not a self healing functionality as expected. You will have to learn (at least for now) that you have to recreate the Alfresco index from time to time even in Enterprise environments and that it is better to focus on good strategies how to speed recreation or how to setup standby indexes instead of hunting failed indexing transactions using the check and update methods. For major document model changes you need to recreate the index anyway.
High performance and availability
This is mainly the cluster and replication functionality which is no longer available in Community. It's similar to MS Clusters: It's a lot, lot work for very view more availability since some concepts are missing. The price is high in terms of complexity and can end up in loss of robustness. Even with enterprise support it's a hard job to keep a alfresco cluster running - so you need very good arguments why to go this way. But of course: its possible and available!
High performance: There shouldn't be any difference and if - I'm very curious about the explanation.
Technology stack
The main difference is the database support. In the Community you only can choose between MySQL and Postgres (No Oracle or MS SQL for Community). All other technologies are independent from Enterprise or Community (AD, Kerberos, OS, Browser, ...)
Java Container: I believe over 95% of all Alfresco installations run in tomcat. That's the configuration which is documented, tested and scales. Using WebLogic or WebSphere gives you no added value except new challenges - quite the contrary: You have to solve most issues for yourself and can't benefit from others experience.
Storage policies: I'm not pretty sure and should check in 4.2.x if the Content Store Selector / Storage policies is no longer available in the Community, but it was there in the 3.x versions.
[Edit]: storage policies have been removed in Community 4.2.x:
NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean named 'storeSelectorContentStoreBase' is defined
If there is a really need for this functionality someone may re-enable that feature by coding a module for Community.
Regards
This page explains the difference between the editions:
https://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Enterprise_Edition
This page is the canonical, comprehensive list of the differences.
If you are considering an Enterprise Subscription and you have a question that isn't answered by what you can find on that page, you should talk to your account rep.
Well, regarding JMX monitoring:
Runtime administration: Alfresco enterprise allows to perform certain actions on Alfresco subsystems without restarting the server. This allows you to be very fast during debugging/developing and also making changes in production environment. Also you can access the JMX interface that supports JMX Remoting.
There is no consistency check or update, until you restart the server (during the startup you have to validate/check/rebuild your indexes). There is an option in alfresco.global.properties (or the original repository.properties config file) for that. If you have some inconsistencies in the Alfresco Community index, you're gonna have a bad time xD.
Alfresco Enterprise has specific license for clustering your architecture, the Community edition doesn't support those systems. Replicate and cluster Alfresco is one of the main improvements in performance/scalability/availability you could achieve.
The storage policies allow you to use Content Store selectors in Alfresco Enterprise. You can manage a primary and a secondary file store, and map/connect these stores in your architecture. The Community Edition allows you only to use one content store at a time.
These include everything inside Alfresco (Spring Framework, Apache-Lucene/Solr, Tomcat, and so on), because with the Enterprise license you have also the full support with everything inside the Alfresco package. The difference is that the Community is based on daily builds, supported by community, and therefor not guaranteed. The Enterprise support helps you resolve many problems that you might encounter during developing and in production environment, not only Alfresco related, but also on some configurations on supported platforms (Windows/Linux), your web application servers, and so on.
Hope it helps.
I'm getting close to finishing a public-facing ASP.Net app and I'm starting to weigh deployment options. I'm an ASP.Net/SQLServer veteran but noob when it comes to Azure. I'm wondering how others have felt about the learning curve to effectively migrate a local dev ASP.Net/SQLServer apps into Azure cloud.
More specifically:
How steep is the learning curve towards understanding administration and programming concepts, and do you think it's worth the investment?
What is Microsoft's support like if I have catastrophic problems from my cloud infrastructure and my live site is down? My expectation is a large price tag for a not-so-urgent SLA.
Will my non-Azure ASP.Net app require significant modification and/or coupling to run in the Azure environment?
Thanks
I answered a similar question a while back, here. Azure has evolved since then:
Azure's AppFabric Cache is currently in CTP (community technology preview) and will go live some time later this year (sorry, I can't quote a date). With a single configuration change, you'll be able to enable the asp.net session state provider without changing any code, and have your session state available to all of your web role instances.
With Azure v1.3 which rolled out in November, you have have the ability to run tasks at startup with elevated privileges (e.g. to run an MSI to install some prerequisite control suite).
For monitoring, you can take advantage of Microsoft System Center, which now supports Azure directly. Alternatively, you can look into 3rd-party options such as AzureWatch.
With Azure's extra-small instance, you can run a site for approx. $44 monthly. You mentioned catastrophic failures and SLA. With Azure, you need a minimum of two instances for SLA to take effect (this is because your virtual machines are located in physically different areas of the data center, in separate fault domains). So you're looking at approx. $90 / month to run a site with 99.95% uptime. Only you can determine whether this is worth it to you. Yes, you can host with a simple hosting provider for significantly less (such as GoDaddy). However, if your site fails there, you have to wait for it to be detected and then installed on a separate box. Also, you share each server with potentially dozens of other tenants, which will impact your site's performance. With Azure, at most 8 tenants will occupy a box, depending on how many cores you configure your virtual machines to use. And it's incredibly simple to scale up or down to handle traffic increases and decreases.
My personal experience is that there isn't much documentation and you have to search through blogs / forums to find answers for more advanced questions. If you have a nicely design app then there shouldn't be much problem with porting - you can google for Azure version of ASP.NET providers, ie. membership.
The biggest disadvantage may be cost: you have to do your maths but for me it turned out that a VPS hosting is much cheaper than Azure.
I would say that unless you get considerable savings on infrastructure don't move to Azure for just the sake of doing it. A hosted server with SQL and IIS will give you less problems and a bit more freedom.
I see an excellent answer by David Makogon already. The following might be helpful for you as well. The last episode of the Connected Show podcast was about migrating Wold Maps to Azure. If you are considering moving to Azure it is certainly worth listening to, as they explain the challenges they faced during the migration.
You could give a look at Moving Applications to the Cloud on the Microsoft Windows Azure Platform in MSDN.
Cheers.
I recently took on the responsibility for managing our company's builds and releases. We ship our products as both a web service and as a licensed product that customers can install on their internal servers.
My job involves making sure QA has the builds they need for testing, which may come from the main development branch or feature-specific branches, depending on their current focus, and may be for one of two different products. It also means releasing our products internally for dogfooding, which means we deploy to an internal server. Finally, I cut official builds for our customers by creating new versions of the installer for those who install internally, and pushing updates to the website for our hosted customers.
So far, I've picked up the Pragmatic Programmers' Ship It! and Release It!, both of which seem useful. What other books I should pick up and read? Are there communities or well-known bloggers I should follow that deal specifically with the challenges of building, deploying and shipping web services to our own servers and to customers internal servers?
I really liked Pragmatic Project Automation
CM Crossroads is an excellent resource.