I need to add Uno.Core and System.Core assemblies to the excluded assemblies list before I am able to successfully run my application in InterpreterAndAOT mode. What impact does that have on performance? Why would these assemblies need to be excluded from the AOT build process?
I am getting the following error when not excluding Uno.Core and System.Core:
Uno.UI.js:111 Uncaught RuntimeError: memory access out of bounds
at <anonymous>:wasm-function[55825]:0x13bc653
at <anonymous>:wasm-function[104503]:0x25e36ce
at <anonymous>:wasm-function[124001]:0x2e2c077
at <anonymous>:wasm-function[42762]:0xd6a039
at <anonymous>:wasm-function[60154]:0x15b59de
at dynCall_iii (<anonymous>:wasm-function[151630]:0x342a152)
at invoke_iii (http://localhost/dotnet.js:12348:12)
at <anonymous>:wasm-function[18564]:0x60ef1e
at dynCall_iiii (<anonymous>:wasm-function[151631]:0x342a160)
at invoke_iiii (http://localhost/dotnet.js:12337:12)
This is a mono issue that has probably been fixed recently.
You may want to try using a recent experimental build of the Uno.Wasm.Bootstrap package and try again.
Related
In an ASP.NET project I'm getting the error while publishing
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Community\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v16.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets(1485,19):
Error MSB4064: The "SourceRootPath" parameter is not supported by the "TransformXml" task.
Verify the parameter exists on the task, and it is a settable public instance property.
What does it mean and what could cause it occur? I got it after migrating packages.config to PackageReference.
I discovered that this problem would only occur when there was a web.config transformation being done at publish time. Transformations at build time would not suffer from this error. So I took the following steps to make the web.config transformation be done at build time.
When trying to open an older solution in VS2017 there is an old Unit Test project that is giving me a problem when building.
I keep getting the following error when building this test project:
Could not load file or assembly 'file:///C:\Projects\MyProj\Test\DAL\UnitTestProj\Microsoft.VisualStudio.QualityTools.UnitTestFramework.dll' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
I checked the project's references and it appears to be referencing Microsoft.VisualStudio.QualityTools.UnitTestFramework.dll. Additionally there are no code errors. How could I ever figure out if it is one of its dependencies that it can't find?
I had a similar issue (with the additional message The "BuildShadowTask" task failed unexpectedly) with a project originally developed with VS2010, and got to spend the last few hours learning about yet another legacy facet of the build process.
There is a good chance that you are dealing with private accessor files (.accessor), which were deprecated in VS2012 (original source). This was foreshadowed in an announcement from the VS2010 team that they were no longer working on these features.
There is also a chance you're just dealing with erroneous refs to the wrong version of UnitTestFramework, but a NuGet restore should fix this. If not, see this GitHub thread for a possible fix (manually change the ref to the public folder), or move to the new MSTest.TestAdapter and MSTest.TestFramework packages (see MSDN support thread).
Solutions
A. Edit the unit test .csproj and change the item Include references from Shadow => None:
<Shadow Include="Test References\namespace.accessor" /> to
<None Include="Test References\namespace.accessor" />
B. Better yet, simply delete all the .accessor files from the unit test project's Test References folder.
Ideally, you would also rewrite your unit tests to remove references to private methods, either by re-architecting to separate concerns or by changing properties to internal and using "friend" with the InternalsVisibleToAttribute.
For those who need to continue supporting testing of private methods for some reason, the same post provides the following suggestions to the logical question "What is available for me then?":
For those who wish to continue testing internal APIs, you have three options:
Use the Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.PrivateObject class to assist in accessing internal and private APIs in your code. This is found in the Microsoft.VisualStudio.QualityTools.UnitTestFramework.dll assembly.
Create a reflection framework that would be able to reflect off your code to access internal or private APIs.
If the code you are trying to access is internal, you may be able to access your APIs using the InternalsVisibleToAttribute so your test code can have access to the internal APIs.
However, there is not any good replacement for Code Generation for the new features added by the lanugage teams. You may create the TestMethod stubs and then remove the internal code. You only need to keep the stub itself.
Further reading / sources that helped me piece this together:
VS 2005 ASP.NET explanation of accessors
2008 blog article explaining how to work around this for build servers
MSDN forum thread with discussion on accessor purposes, implementations, and workarounds. Start about 1/3 down.
MSDN BaseShadow docs
MSDN PrivateObject class
Right click the project references folder. Add reference > Assemblies > extensions. Check Microsoft.VisualStudio.QualityTools.UnitTestFramework 10.1, and uncheck any older version.
This is related to Visual studio Enterprise 2015, add new load test was failing: and spiting as "Unable to find assembly 'Microsoft.VisualStudio.QualityTools.LoadTest, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"
Due to Assembly installed in public assemblies shows as version 10.0.0.0 which is missed in GAC,
GAC had only 10.1.0.0. Once GAC updated with 10.0.0.0 and restart VS 2015. should resolve the issue similar to this.
Some more detail for better reasoning, System Assembly path and project path
DLL path
......\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\Common7\IDE\PublicAssemblies\Microsoft.VisualStudio.QualityTools.UnitTestFramework.dll
.CSProj reference version
I had a same issue while I was upgrading project to .Net4.8 in Visual studio 2022 earlier we were using Visual studio 2017.
Error:
The "BuildShadowTask" task could not be loaded from the assembly ***\Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.BuildShadowsTask.dll. Could not load file or assembly 'file:///***Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.BuildShadowsTask.dll' or one of its dependencies.
Solution : I removed ".accessor" files from project as that is being used for accessing private methods(most probably accessor is depricated). Then we used "PrivateObject" class for accessing private members in UnitTest.
Later we updated Unit Test case. Code references could be found from below articles.
Unit test private methods?
Unit Testing: Exposing Private Members
I had a similar issue (compile project in server Jenkins)
Solution:
Include VS.QualityTools.UnitTestFramework to reference project, whit Pakage Manager:
PM>NuGet\Install-Package VS.QualityTools.UnitTestFramework -Version 15.0.27323.2
https://www.nuget.org/packages/VS.QualityTools.UnitTestFramework
Try to fully uninstall Visual Studio 2017 (not repair). Then download the latest version and install it. Remember to check if MSBuild is added to installation files. Remember to delete folder inside Documents: Documents\Visual Studio 2017. In my case, this simple solution fixed all errors.
see screenshot for the express version:
I have an Azure function (in Visual Studio), that triggers correctly an Service Bus event. In its run-method I want to call a method in a custom assembly. This works ok, until I use any method that uses Dynamics CRM assemblies. (I have tried both the assemblies from the downloadable sdk and the nuget package. I get the exact dll it asks for in the error message.
As soon as I call the my method I get the error below. I can run this exact method from a console app. (my custom assembly is a standard (not core) class library...
Additional information: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk, Version=8.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
This is not an answer, but rather an advice to anyone getting this problem (and its also a rant).
Avoid Azure functions at all cost and use "web jobs" instead when you can. After doing this with webjobs it was as simple as it should be, I have spent a week with different Azure-function-related problems
Cons with Azure functions:
Dynamic crappy scripting language (.csx), which gives you mysterious runtime error messages refering wrong places
Lock-in to azure platform
The usage on the browser editor is a joke unless its a really simple method and the error messages there comes up over and over again in least most annoying way (second to popups) and make you spread out your code
Pros:
Maybe you get a pad on the head from your MS-indoctinated architect for using the latest technologies so he might be able to squeeze in the word "Microservices" on some powerpoint presentation.
I am using a COM dll in my .Net web application. This works fine on multiple different machines.
However on one particular machine I get the following error:
Unable to cast COM object of type 'CServer.CApplicationClass' to interface type 'CServer.ICApplication'. This operation failed because the QueryInterface call on the COM component for the interface with IID '{CF0DFA28-046B-4C7D-8AA9-F4B7477D8CAE} ' failed due to the following error: Error loading type library/DLL. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80029C4A (TYPE_E_CANTLOADLIBRARY)).
I have registerd the dll using the regsvr32 command.
I have also created a COM+ application for this dll.
Running a search through the registry
I can find the key in numerous places.
I have also tried unregistering the dll and deleting all referneces on the computer to this dll. And afterwards re-adding the dll and re-registering it.
I have written a simple windows script file which tests the dll. This works fine. However the problem exists in my .net project which is running in iis.
Can anyone help me with this?..
If you need anymore info please leave a comment. Thanks.
I had a similar problem, with the "TYPE_E_CANTLOADLIBRARY" message.
Background:
I had a project which used Interop.ReferenceA.dll. This file was created using tlbimp ReferenceA.dll /out: Interop.ReferenceA.dll.
Solution:
When I took a look at ReferenceA.dll using RegDllView I noticed that ReferenceA.dll had a subclass, which was the IID shown in the error message.
I looked around in the source code of the subclass and noticed that it had a dependency to Interop.ReferenceB.dll.
Turns out that the subclass needed Interop.ReferenceB as a type-library to work. So I ran this:
regasm /tlb:Interop.ReferenceB.tlb Interop.ReferenceB.dll (the 32-bit version of regasm was used.)
And the error went away.
Make sure your AppPool is set to x86. Also make sure your assembly is targeting only x86.
I was having a similar issue. First got Access Denied, which after some looking around was resolved, only to be faced with this error message (TYPE_E_CANTLOADLIBRARY). Mind that I'm running a COM+ Component on Windows 7.
After some fruitless attempts which involved messing with the registry, my workmate and I found a way of getting it up and running:
1) Unregister your dll (regsvr32 -u dllname)
2) make sure your references to the dll are cleared up from registry (backup first)
3) Create an empty com+ application (server app) in Component Services
4) Copy the application id to the clipboard
5) go to "c:\program files (x86)\Complus applications" and create a folder with the id on your clipboard
6) copy your dll into that folder and register it
7) Go back to your Component Services and add the component to the app you created using the dll on "c:\program files (x86)\Complus applications{*app id*}"
that did it for me. Hope it helps.
I had a similar problem where the error was triggered on my PC but not on that of other developers.
It turns out that I had been testing an automatic build process on my PC that had updated the version number of the assembly, thus registering the TLB in the registry with a version number higher than the one we were normally using.
When trying to get the interface, the server was consistently using the wrong TLB information leading to the wrong assembly. Once I deleted the higher version entry in the registry, it worked fine.
Now we just have to ensure the build process is not going to cause that issue again. :)
I have several DNN modules that I wish to update silently, using the portal's built-in module upgrade facilities called from a separate application, in this case a Windows service. I was able to make it all work with version 4.3 of the portal by modifying the DNN source in key areas to allow DotNetNuke.dll to function outside of a web application. I'm now trying to do the same thing with the 4.9.0 source code and I'm having problems.
Everything works fine until DNN tries to read from the database. I have my Windows service project, the DNN library project, and several other related projects loaded in one VS solution (the additional projects are the same ones that are in the main solution file provided with the DNN source). I call PaInstaller.Install in my service to update each module. Execution gets to reflection.vb and then it tries to create a DotNetNuke.Data.SqlDataProvider object based on the type name. It raises an exception when calling System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetType. The exception says:
Could not load type 'DotNetNuke.Data.SqlDataProvider' from assembly 'System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a'
I read this to mean it simply couldn't locate the DotNetNuke.SqlDataProvider.dll assembly. What's strange is that assembly is in the Bin folder for the DNN library project, and I also have it in the folder where my Windows service is running. The actual SqlDataProvider project is also loaded in the solution. I can't for the life of me understand why the runtime environment can't locate the assembly.
Has anyone tried something like this before, or know what could cause an assembly not to be found while stepping through the DNN source? Am I better off using something other than BuildManager.GetType to get an instance of the SQL provider type?
Chris,
Honestly depending on your needs, I would look at doing this a different way, as this is going to be very fragile with each DNN upgrade that happens in the future.
I'd look more towards using the "bulk install" option that DNN already has. Have your service upload the module zips to the /install/modules folder, then from there, call /install/install.aspx?mode=installresources and you are done!
If you need a third party solution to parse the results, have your windows service go through and pull the HTML response and parse it to validate success.