I'm trying to create a Scripted Field like :
return doc[scripted_field_a].value+doc[scripted_field_b].value
how to access to scripted field value in painless script ?
Thank you for any help!
Put your script in field a to script b.
// use script of script field a put to a function to get value
int script_a() { return doc['x'] * 2; }
//main section of script b
script_a() + 2
Related
I have a Guidewire Gunit for a transformer in gosu which queries the system table to get a description for a result code which is working fine when run on the server but Gunit fails for the same.
I have tried the annotation #ServerTest for Gunit but that is failing as well.
The same code works fine in Gosu scratchpad.
PFA the code snippet as follows:
var resultCodes = Query.make(SystemTable).select().where(\elt -> elt.ResultCode == "AS01")
var description = ""
if(resultCodes != null && !resultCodes.isEmpty())
{
description = resultCodes.get(0).getFullDescription()
}
I'm getting the exception as follows :
java.lang.IllegalStateException: TableMetadataFactory cannot be used before it is started
Thanks,
Deepti
(Suggestion : )If your requirement is just to query based on some values.
Better dont use that .where() condition.
This is like SELECT * FROM <TABLE> and after getting all the data you are picking out your required result.
The best and the actual way is to use like
Query.make(TABLE_NAME).compare(TABLE_NAME#FIELD_NAME,Relop.Equals,"value_to_compare").select();
Query will be like
SELECT * FROM <TABLE_NAME> WHERE FIELD_NAME = FIELD_VALUE_TO_COMPARE;
While running Gunits, GW uses Shadow tables which will be basically empty.
Here if you are using OOTB entities, You can use Builder classes
or if you need to use some custom entities, use bundles to insert data first.
After inserting data into SystemTable (either using builder classes or bundles) run the below code.
var resultCodes = Query.make(SystemTable).compare(SystemTable#ResultCode ,Relop.Equals,"AS01").select()
foreach(result in resultCodes){
description = result.FullDescription
print("Output : "+description);
}
This happens when your RunLevel is set too low. Run levels below "NO_DAEMONS" will not load system tables. The default should be "NO_DAEMONS" so if you have an annotation on your test like this:
#RunLevel(gw.api.system.server.Runlevel.NONE)
either remove it or increase the level.
You can refactor your code like this:
uses gw.testharness.RunLevel
uses gw.api.database.Query
uses org.mockito.Mockito
uses gw.api.database.IQueryBeanResult
#RunLevel(NONE)
class StackOverflowTest {
function testDoQuery() {
var rs = Mockito.mock(IQueryBeanResult<SystemTable>)
var query = Mockito.mock(Query<SystemTable>)
Mockito.when(query.select()).thenReturn(rs)
var stackOverflow = Mockito.spy(new StackOverflow())
Mockito.doReturn(query).when(stackOverflow).getSystemTableQuery()
stackOverflow.doQuery()
Mockito.verify(stackOverflow, Mockito.times(1)).getSystemTableQuery()
Mockito.verify(query, Mockito.times(1)).select()
Mockito.verify(rs, Mockito.times(1)).iterator()
}
class StackOverflow {
function doQuery() {
var resultCodes = getSystemTableQuery().select().where(\elt -> elt.ResultCode == "AS01")
}
protected function getSystemTableQuery(): Query<SystemTable> {
return Query.make(SystemTable)
}
}
}
I have a very simple form created with Gravity Forms;
It submits two numbers and then redirects to a different result page.
How do I retrieve those two numbers on the result page?
add_filter("gform_confirmation_4", "custom_confirmation", 3, 4 );
function custom_confirmation($confirmation, $form, $lead, $ajax)
Gives a custom confirmation. Each field value can be retrieved by using $lead[{field ID}]
I have a solution for this based on using a combination of form submission hooks and the GForms API. It's a horrible plugin so I apologise for the messiness of the logic flow. It's important to use the framework methods rather than processing the data yourself since there are a good amount of hacks and shonky things going on in there to correctly match field IDs and so forth.
I will provide a solution to pass a submission from one form to pre-populate another. Changing the destination for POST data is pretty straightforward, they have an example for it on their gform_form_tag hook documentation page. Yes, that really is the only way of doing it.
Without further ado here is the code. I've set it up to work off form configuration to make things simpler for the end user, so it works like this:
Select "allow field to be populated dynamically" in your destination form field's advanced settings and choose a parameter name for each.
Add matching CSS classes on the source fields of the other form(s) to setup the associations.
Add a CSS class to the source forms themselves so that we can quickly check if the redirection is necessary.
.
$class = 'GForms_Redirector';
add_filter('gform_pre_submission', array($class, 'checkForSubmissionRedirection'), 10, 1);
add_filter('gform_confirmation', array($class, 'performSubmissionRedirection'), 10, 4);
abstract class GForms_Redirector
{
const SOURCE_FORMS_CLASS_MATCH = 'submission-redirect';
const DEST_PAGE_SLUG = 'submit-page-slug';
const DEST_FORM_ID = 1;
protected static $submissionRedirectUrl;
// first, read sent data and generate redirection URL
function checkForSubmissionRedirection($form)
{
if (false !== preg_match('#\W' . self::SOURCE_FORMS_CLASS_MATCH . '\W#', $form['cssClass'])) {
// load page for base redirect URL
$destPage = get_page_by_path(self::DEST_PAGE_SLUG);
// load form for reading destination form config
$destForm = RGFormsModel::get_form_meta(self::DEST_FORM_ID, true);
$destForm = RGFormsModel::add_default_properties($destForm);
// generate submission data for this form (there seem to be no hooks before gform_confirmation that allow access to this. DUMB.)
$formData = GFFormsModel::create_lead($form);
// create a querystring for the new form based on mapping dynamic population parameters to CSS class names in source form
$queryVars = array();
foreach ($destForm['fields'] as $destField) {
if (empty($destField['inputName'])) {
continue;
}
foreach ($form['fields'] as $field) {
if (preg_match('#(\s|^)' . preg_quote($destField['inputName'], '#') . '(\s|$)#', $field['cssClass'])) {
$queryVars[$destField['inputName']] = $formData[$field['id']];
break;
}
}
}
// set the redirect URL to be used later
self::$submissionRedirectUrl = get_permalink($destPage) . "?" . http_build_query($queryVars);
}
}
// when we get to the confirmation step we set the redirect URL to forward on to
function performSubmissionRedirection($confirmation, $form, $entry, $is_ajax = false)
{
if (self::$submissionRedirectUrl) {
return array('redirect' => self::$submissionRedirectUrl);
}
return $confirmation;
}
}
If you wanted to pass the form values someplace else via the querystring then you'd merely need to cut out my code from the callback and build your own URL to redirect to.
This is a very old question, now you can send it using a Query String on the confirmation settings.
They have the documentation on this link:
How to send data from a form using confirmations
Just follow the first step and it will be clear to you.
Ok I've used this in the past to get last editor and it works great when running on sites that use workflow but it doesnt return any users for sites that do not use workflow..
var contentWorkflow = contentItem.Database.WorkflowProvider.GetWorkflow(contentItem);
var contentHistory = contentWorkflow.GetHistory(contentItem);
if (contentHistory.Length > 0)
{
//submitting user (string)
string lastUser = contentHistory[contentHistory.Length - 1].User;
}
Can you reply with a way to get last editor of an item regardless of whether they use workflow or not?
Thanks
Try to use
contentItem.Statistics.UpdatedBy
You can check more members of the ItemStatistics class here.
I've just moved to web development and need to know how i can implement below requirement using asp.net and vb.net.
I have three fields in a form which are filled by users. Based on these three values, i need to auto-populate the 4th field. I have planned to implement this in the following way
Write a separate class file with a function to calculate the possible values for the 4th fields based on 1st 3 inputs. This function can return some where between 1-10 values. So I've decided to use drop-down for 4th field, and allow users to select the appropriate value.
Call the above function in onchange function of 3rd field and take and use the return values to populate the 4th field. I'm planning to get the return values in array field.(Does this need a post back?)
Please let me know how if there is better way to implement this.
Thanks.
You may want to consider doing this with Javascript. You could read and control the fields pretty easily with pure Javascript, or using a nice library like jQuery (my favorite). If you did it this way, no post-back would be required and the 4th field would update immediately. (Nice for your users)
You can also do it with ASP.NET for the most part. "onchange" in ASP.NET still requires Javascript as far as I know, it just does some of it for you. A post-back will definitely happen when you change something.
You need javascript or to set autopostback=true on your form elements.
From a user perspective the best thing is to use javascript to populate the field for display, BUT when the form is submitted use your backend function to validate it. This will make sure the user didn't change the value.
An easy way is to use jQuery for the UI (that way you don't have to worry about long winded javascript and deal with browser compatibility as it's already taken care of for you) and have it call to the server for the data. For the server, your easiest route is to return JSON for looping values.
Include your jQuery:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.3/jquery.min.js"></script>
Then add in a handle for the JavaScript:
<script type="text/javascript">
function autoPopulate() {
var value1 = $('#ddl1').val();
var value2 = $('#ddl2').val();
var value3 = $('#ddl3').val();
var url = 'path/to/your/file.aspx?value1=' + value1 + '&value2=' + value2 + '&value3=' + value3;
$.getJSON(url, function(data) {
data == null ? return false : data = eval(data);
var ddl = $('#ddl4')[0];
for (i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
var option = new Option(data[i][0], data[i][1]);
if ($.browser.msie) {
ddl.add(option);
} else {
ddl.add(option, null);
}
}
}
}
</script>
(Yes, I know I used a native loop but I'm little lazy here today :) )
Now, for your server side code you'll want your code your page to return data in the format of:
[['value1','text1'],['value2','text2'],['value3','value3']]
so something like:
<script type="vb" runat="server">
Private Sub Page_Init()
// get your data
// loop through it and add in values
// ex.
Dim result As String = "[" //start multi-dimensional array
For Each Item As String In data
result += String.Format("['{0}','{1}'],", _value, _text)
Next
result = result.SubString(0, result.Length - 1) // removes trailing comma
result += "]" // closes off m-array
Response.Write(result)
Response.Flush()
End Sub
</script>
I am attempting to copy a document in drive, edit it and mail it. Basically like a mail merge.
I take a template document, make a copy, edit the copy and then email it.
Unfortunately the edits are not complete before the email code runs, so the email attaches the copied document before the edits have been made. Is there a way around this?
//make a copy of the template
var templateCopy = DriveApp.getFileById(templateID).makeCopy('newFile', DriveApp.getFolderById(targetFolderID));
//select the contents of the template
var copyBody = DocumentApp.openById(templateCopy.getId())
//replace text: set the date
copyBody.replaceText("%DATE%",'today')
//send email - the email that arrives does not have the date substitution, it still contains the %DATE% tag
GmailApp.sendEmail(targetAddress, 'eggs', 'eggs', {attachments:[copyBody.getAs(MimeType.PDF)]});
edit regarding possible duplicate: SpreadsheetApp.flush() is not relevant as we are not working with a spreadsheet.
Answer:
Use the saveAndClose() method of DocumentApp to force changes before continuing.
More Information:
As per the Apps Script documentation:
Saves the current Document. Causes pending updates to be flushed and applied.
The saveAndClose() method is automatically invoked at the end of script execution for each open editable Document.
A closed Document can't be edited. Use DocumentApp.openById() to reopen a given document for editing.
Implementation:
function documentStuff() {
//make a copy of the template
var templateCopy = DriveApp.getFileById(templateID).makeCopy('newFile',
DriveApp.getFolderById(targetFolderID)
);
//select the contents of the template
var copyBody = DocumentApp.openById(templateCopy.getId());
//replace text: set the date
copyBody.replaceText("%DATE%",'today');
copyBody.saveAndClose();
sendMail(targetAddress, DocumentApp.openById(templateCopy.getId()));
}
function sendMail(targetAddress, file) {
//send email - the email that arrives does not have the date substitution
// it still contains the %DATE% tag
GmailApp.sendEmail(targetAddress, 'eggs', 'eggs', {
attachments: [
file.getAs(MimeType.PDF)]
}
);
}
Splitting the Document and Gmail methods into separate functions also can help with this issue.
References:
Class DocumentApp
.saveAndClose() method of DocumentApp Class