When used in where clause
select * from tableA where col like 'value' || col = val ;
select * from tableA where col like 'value' or col = val ;
I experience two different behaviors:
Both 1 & 2 work the same in version ( 10.2.14 )
Only 2 works as expected in version ( 10.3.22 )
I tried to look at release log for 10.3.22 but nothing was mentioned regarding the change to logical OR. Has anyone faced the issue if so just want to confirm there are changes between different versions of Maria DB ?
or its somethign else i shuld be looking at ?
Check that if you have the PIPES_AS_CONCAT SQL_MODE set in the 10.3.22. If not, show the data that is giving you trouble.
Related
According to all examples my query should be executing. I am trying to update new column on my table with the last 4 digits of the phone number like so :
UPDATE users
SET users.phone_last_4 = t.lastFour
FROM
(
select substr( phone_number, -4) as lastFour from users
) t;
Also tried this:
UPDATE users
SET users.phone_last_4 = t.lastFour
FROM
(
select substr( phone_number, -4) as lastFour from users
) AS t;
Both fail with same error :
near ".": syntax error: UPDATE users
SET users.
What could I possibly do wrong here?
SQLite does not support joins for the UPDATE statement and also this syntax containing FROM .
In your case I can't see why you need it.
Just do:
UPDATE users
SET phone_last_4 = substr(phone_number, -4)
The application I'm working on can run on English or French. There is an interactive report that runs fine in English but when the app was ran in French an ORA error occurs saying that one of the columns isn't a valid identifier. When I went to check the debug logs, the resulting SQL when ran in French looks like an older version compared to the resulting SQL when ran in English.
--Original Source
SELECT ...
CASE
WHEN (dependant_pkg.get_dependant_id (ee.memb_id, '0') IS NULL OR ee.re_enrolment_dt >= TRUNC (SYSDATE))
and (( SEC_USER_EXTERNAL_PKG.get_info_vc(:g_user_id,'entity_type_code') = 'AC' ) or not (:g_user_type = 'GR' and :g_brand_code = 'HB' ))
THEN ... --codes
END link,
ee.empl_contact_email
FROM empl_enrol ee, company c
WHERE ...
--FRENCH
SELECT ...
CASE
WHEN (dependant_pkg.get_dependant_id (ee.memb_id, '0') IS NULL OR ee.re_enrolment_dt >= TRUNC (SYSDATE))
and not (:g_user_type = 'GR' and :g_brand_code = 'HB') --! missing/different condiition
THEN ... --codes
END link
--missing column
FROM empl_enrol ee, company c
WHERE ...
--ENGLISH
SELECT ...
CASE
WHEN (dependant_pkg.get_dependant_id (ee.memb_id, '0') IS NULL OR ee.re_enrolment_dt >= TRUNC (SYSDATE))
and (( SEC_USER_EXTERNAL_PKG.get_info_vc(:g_user_id,'entity_type_code') = 'AC' ) or not (:g_user_type = 'GR' and :g_brand_code = 'HB' ))
THEN ... --codes
END link,
ee.empl_contact_email
FROM empl_enrol ee, company c
WHERE ...
Decided to actually post an answer so you could mark this solved.
Apex creates duplicate applications for different languages, thats why translations are mostly done after the app is completed. So you might just be changing the default app, but if you switch the language to french, it reverts to the older version.
You will need to republish the translated app.
(Using Oracle 11.2)
I have a rather complicated SQL with something like
wm_concat( distinct abc )
that is expected to return some varchar2(4000) compatible result.
It causes ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes in my select used in some coalesce( some_varchar_col, wm_concat( ... ) ).
So I tried casting it via two different methods:
dbms_lob.substr( ..., 4000 ) -- L) tried even with 3000 in case of "unicode byte blow-up"
cast( ... as varchar2(4000)) -- C) tried even with 3000 in case of "unicode byte blow-up"
(The are used in a view, but playing around with it suggests, it is not related to the views)
Depending on the column and other operators I either get N) no result or O) ORA-22922:
select * from view_with_above_included where rownum <= 100
N) My Eclipse Data Explorer JDBC connection returns without any result (no columns without results, no (0 rows effected), only the query time statistics). (It could be an internal exception not treated as such?)
O)
ORA-22922: nonexistent LOB value
ORA-06512: in "SYS.DBMS_LOB", line 1092
ORA-06512: in line 1
Strangely the following test queries work:
-- rownum <= 100 would already cause the above problems
select * from view_with_above_included where rownum <= 10
or
select * from view_with_above_included
but looking at the actual aggregated data does not show aggregated data that would exceed 1000 characters in length.
Luckily, it works with the listagg( ... ) function provided since 11.2 (we are already running on), so we did not have to investigate further:
listagg( abc, ',' ) within group ( order by abc )
(Where wm_concat(...) is, as one should know, some internal and officially unsupported function.)
a rather nice solution (because it is not so bloated) to implement the distinct functionality is via self-referencing regexp functionality which should work in many cases:
regexp_replace(
listagg( abc, ',' ) within group ( order by abc )
, '(^|,)(.+)(,\2)+', '\1\2' )
(Maybe/Hopefully we will see some working listagg( distinct abc ) functionality in the future, which would be very neat and cool like the wm_concat syntax. E.g. this is no problem since a long time with Postgres' string_agg( distinct abc )1 )
-- 1: postgres sql example:
select string_agg( distinct x, ',' ) from unnest('{a,b,a}'::text[]) as x`
If the list exceeds 4000 characters, one cannot use listagg anymore (ORA-22922 again).
But luckily we can use the xmlagg function here (as mentioned here).
If you want to realize a distinct on a 4000-chars-truncated result here, you could outcomment the (1)-marked lines.
-- in smallercase everything that could/should be special for your query
-- comment in (1) to realize a distinct on a 4000 chars truncated result
WITH cfg AS (
SELECT
',' AS list_delim,
'([^,]+)(,\1)*(,|$)' AS list_dist_match, -- regexp match for distinct functionality
'\1\3' AS LIST_DIST_REPL -- regexp replace for distinct functionality
FROM DUAL
)
SELECT
--REGEXP_REPLACE( DBMS_LOB.SUBSTR( -- (1)
RTRIM( XMLAGG( XMLELEMENT( E, mycol, listdelim ).EXTRACT('//text()')
ORDER BY mycol ).GetClobVal(), LIST_DELIM )
--, 4000 ), LIST_DIST_MATCH, LIST_DIST_REPL ) -- (1)
AS mylist
FROM mytab, CFG
I want to create a new calculated member in OLAP Cube to count the number of distinct clients, I'm trying to write this expression, but i don't know how to make it in MDX:
Distinct count ([DIM.Clients].[CuNumber], where Sum([Measures].[QQT - FACT Ventes] >=1)
Any help please !
Thanks!
Hi thank you for replies,
I spent couple of days trying to make the query work, but without big progress.
First, I ran an SQL query on my datawarehouse to know what result should I get on my OLAP Cube,
this is my SQL query:
use [Warehouse]
select count(*) as count_row
From
(Select F.FaCunumberX
from [dbo].[Dim_FaClients] F
inner join [dbo].[FACT_Ventes] V on F.[SK_FAClients] = V.SK_FaClients
inner join [dbo].[Dim_Date] D on D.SK_Date = V.SK_Date
where
D.Year = '2014'
Group by F.FaCunumberX
having SUM(V.QQT) >= 1) test
the result I got is : 26026
On my OLAP Cube I tried several queries, but I didn't get the same result
this is some of the expressions that I tried :
WITH SET MySet AS
(Filter({[DIM FA Clients].[FaCuNumberX].[FaCuNumberX]}*{([Dim Date].[Year].&[2014],[Measures].[QQT - Fact Ventes])},[Measures].[QQT - Fact Ventes]>1 or [Measures].[QQT - Fact Ventes]=1)
MEMBER MEASURES.SETDISTINCTCOUNT AS
DISTINCTCOUNT(MySet)
SELECT {MEASURES.SETDISTINCTCOUNT} ON 0
FROM [CubeAll]
the result I got with this one is : 31575
I tried also this expression :
DistinctCount(Filter([DIM.Clients].[CuNumber].[CuNumber].Members,
[Measures].[QQT - FACT Ventes] >= 1
)
)
the same result : 31575
sincerely, I don't see what I'm missing on my expressions.
Thank's for your help !
This would be something like
DistinctCount(Filter([DIM.Clients].[CuNumber].[CuNumber].Members,
[Measures].[QQT - FACT Ventes] >= 1
)
)
See the documentation of Filter and DistinctCount for details.
---- Done with Symfony2.3.1 and Doctrine2 ----
Sorry, i hope i was not too stupid to find a suitable solution for my problem. I try to build a Query for hours.
SELECT * FROM product
WHERE product_id in
(
SELECT product_id from (
SELECT count(*) as result_amount, product_id FROM product_x_attribut
JOIN productattribut on productattribut_id = productattribut.id
WHERE (
productkey = "price" and
stringType = "premium"
) or (
productkey = "size" and
stringType = "S"
)
GROUP BY product_id
HAVING result_amount = 2
) as temp
)
GROUP BY product_id
ORDER BY p0_.name ASC
This is the SQL which works fine in phpmyAdmin.
This can be seen like
Select * from abc where abc.x in ( Select * from ( select * from ) as abcd )
So there is one core query, i call it subSubQuery, the second query around the core will be called subQuery and the outer Query is just the outer Query, no a Subquery.
I could build the subSubQuery with Doctrine2.
But i cannot built the subQuery like this
Select product_id from ( $subSubQuery->getQuery()->getDQL() )
I want to do the subQuery like this
$subQuery = $repositoryProduct->createQueryBuilder('product');
$subQuery->add('select', 'product_id');
$subQuery->add('from',$subSubQuery->getDQL() );
// However to set an alias is a miracle for me, this didnt work off course
$subQuery->add('as','tmp' );
This is the subQuery.
I also cannot build the outer Query
Select * from abc where abc.x in ( $subQuery->getQuery()->getDQL() )
I want to do this like this
$query->where(
$query->expr()->in('product.id', $subQuery->getDQL() )
);
But i try to build this with Doctrine2 like this:
I am so down, i tried ->getSQL(), ->getDQL(), i tried as much as i was able to detect as a suitable tiny step to a solution for this problem and i has tried as much keyword in google as my finger were able to write... I hope someone could help me to find a solution...
Thanks a lot to each helpful advise.
I know that statements like this work:
$qbGames->andWhere($qbGames->expr()->in('game.id',$qbGameId->getDQL()));
Your question is kind of hard to follow. Consider using pastebin to show all your mappings as they currently exist. And then maybe presenting a simplieid query?
My $qbGameId query was built with:
$qbGameId = $em->createQueryBuilder();
$qbGameId->addSelect('distinct gameGameId.id');
$qbGameId->from('ZaysoCoreBundle:Event','gameGameId');
// Assorted joins and where conditions