I'm trying to get all profiles using ~all option with this endpoint
https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/management/accounts/~all/webproperties/~all/profiles
It doesn't return all profiles due to ~all for accounts. If I include account ID instead of ~all, then it returns profiles based on that account id - which are missing when used with ~all option.
https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/management/accounts/89478503/webproperties/~all/profiles
Am I doing something wrong or is this GA API bug?
I sugst you look into using account summaries list
GET https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/management/accountSummaries
This will return all the account information for a user.
{
"kind": "analytics#accountSummaries",
"username": "me#gmail.com",
"totalResults": 15,
"startIndex": 1,
"itemsPerPage": 1000,
"items": [
{
"id": "59183475",
"kind": "analytics#accountSummary",
"name": "Cube Analytics",
"webProperties": [
{
"kind": "analytics#webPropertySummary",
"id": "UA-59183475-1",
"name": "Cube Analytics",
"internalWebPropertyId": "93305066",
"level": "STANDARD",
"websiteUrl": "XXXXXXX",
"profiles": [
{
"kind": "analytics#profileSummary",
"id": "115455750",
"name": "Alaternate",
"type": "WEB"
},
{
"kind": "analytics#profileSummary",
"id": "97191919",
"name": "All Web Site Data",
"type": "WEB"
},
{
"kind": "analytics#profileSummary",
"id": "178538323",
"name": "MobileView",
"type": "APP"
}
]
}, ]
}
By using this call you should only need to make one call and get all of the information back.
Related
I have used analytics.read in order to get user's sites and Google API response is:
{
"kind": "analytics#accountSummaries",
"username": "user#gmail.com",
"totalResults": 1,
"startIndex": 1,
"itemsPerPage": 1000,
"items": [
{
"id": "92159597",
"kind": "analytics#accountSummary",
"name": "MyNewDomain",
"webProperties": [
{
"kind": "analytics#webPropertySummary",
"id": "UA-92159597-1",
"name": "MyNewDomain",
"internalWebPropertyId": "236529827",
"level": "STANDARD",
"websiteUrl": "http://www.example.com",
"profiles": [
{
"kind": "analytics#profileSummary",
"id": "140745434",
"name": "All Web Site Data",
"type": "WEB"
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
Why there is no property related to domain status? How should I check whether domain is verified or not?
I tried to use siteverification scope for Google Verification API, it has the response that I need and it returns the list of verified domains but it has a scope of managing domains, so no one will actually grant access to our application in order to manage their domains and verify/un-verify domains.
Sample response:
{
"id": "string",
"site": {
"type": "string",
"identifier": "string"
},
"owners": [
"string"
]
}
How can I use analytics.read to get verified domains not unverified websites?
I was asked to store leads like below in Marketo's lead database through rest api "POST /rest/v1/leads.json".
{
"action": "createOnly",
"lookupField": "email",
"input": [{
"email": "kjashaedd-1#klooblept.com",
"firstName": "Kataldar-1",
"postalCode": "04828",
"property": [{
"type": "land",
"status": "available"
},
{
"type": "car",
"status": "sold out"
},
{
"type": "bike",
"status": "sold out"
},
{
"type": "laptops",
"status": "available"
}
]
},
{
"email": "kjashaedd-2#klooblept.com",
"firstName": "Kataldar-2",
"postalCode": "04828",
"property": [{
"type": "land",
"status": "sold out"
},
{
"type": "car",
"status": "available"
},
{
"type": "bike",
"status": "sold out"
},
{
"type": "laptops",
"status": "available"
}
]
}
]
}
Input field is not in flat json structure. What could be the best approach? Do I really need to use custom objects in this case? Can I dump "property" object as it is in the lead database and use velocity script to parse it ?
If 'Property' is a custom object, you'll want to call that separately for the record and associated the record with that object via the custom object API
So you can push (create) the record first and then associate (add) the custom object to the record.
You can create a List<Dictionary<string,object>> in C# and retrieve the data and then store it using Entity Framework.
I am considering .Net framework in this case
I am deploying an arm template that contains the following resources
Microsoft.Storage/storageAccount
Microsoft.Sql/servers
Microsoft.Sql/servers/auditPolicies
Now everything worked until I started changing the values for the auditPolicies object. Here are the steps I took until the InternalServerError occurred.
Added the auditState property and set its value to Disabled. Deployment Successful.
Changed the auditState property to Enabled. Deployment failed. Error states that the storageAccountName is required.
Added storageAccountName and set its value to the name of the storage account. Deployment failed. Error states that storageAccountKey.
Added storageAccountKey and set its value to key1 of the storage account's keys object. Deployment failed. Internal Server Error - "An Error has occurred while saving Auditing settings, please try again later". Additionally, the errors cause the deployment to run indefinitely. Though I am not concerned about that aspect.
The following is the complete template.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"app-name-prefix": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"app-locations": {
"type": "array",
"minLength": 1
},
"app-friendly-names": {
"type": "array",
"minLength": 1
},
"db-user-admin-username": {
"type": "securestring"
},
"db-user-admin-password": {
"type": "securestring"
},
"database-audit-enabled": {
"defaultValue": "Enabled",
"allowedValues": [
"Enabled",
"Disabled"
],
"type": "string"
},
"storage-kind": {
"defaultValue": "BlobStorage",
"allowedValues": [
"StorageV2",
"BlobStorage"
],
"type": "string"
},
"storage-sku": {
"defaultValue": "Standard_LRS",
"allowedValues": [
"Standard_LRS",
"Standard_ZRS",
"Standard_GRS",
"Standard_RAGRS",
"Premium_LRS"
],
"type": "string"
}
},
"variables": {
"db-service-name": "[concat(parameters('app-name-prefix'), '-database-service-')]",
"storage-name": "[concat(toLower(parameters('app-name-prefix')), 'auditstorage')]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "[concat(variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()])]",
"type": "Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts",
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('storage-sku')]"
},
"kind": "[parameters('storage-kind')]",
"apiVersion": "2018-02-01",
"location": "[parameters('app-locations')[copyIndex()]]",
"copy": {
"count": "[length(parameters('app-locations'))]",
"name": "storageCopy"
},
"properties": {
"supportsHttpsTrafficOnly": true,
"accessTier": "Hot",
"encryption": {
"services": {
"blob": {
"enabled": true
},
"file": {
"enabled": true
}
},
"keySource": "Microsoft.Storage"
}
}
},
{
"type": "Microsoft.Sql/servers",
"name": "[concat(variables('db-service-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()])]",
"apiVersion": "2014-04-01",
"location": "[parameters('app-locations')[copyIndex()]]",
"copy": {
"name": "databaseServiceCopy",
"count": "[length(parameters('app-locations'))]"
},
"properties": {
"administratorLogin": "[parameters('db-user-admin-username')]",
"administratorLoginPassword": "[parameters('db-user-admin-password')]",
"version": "12.0"
},
"resources": [
{
"type": "auditingPolicies",
"name": "Default",
"apiVersion": "2014-04-01",
"location": "[parameters('app-locations')[copyIndex()]]",
"properties": {
"auditingState": "[parameters('database-audit-enabled')]",
"storageAccountName": "[concat(variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()])]",
"storageAccountKey": "[listKeys(concat(variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]), '2018-02-01').keys[0].value]"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Sql/servers', concat(variables('db-service-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]))]",
"storageCopy"
]
}
]
}
]
}
What am I missing that will help resolve this issue? What do I need to do to stop this internal server error?
I have added the complete template as was requested by #Pete
I have found the answer after connecting with Azure Support.
The resource type: Microsoft.Sql/servers/auditingPolicies is no longer supported and in the next few weeks Azure Resource Manager will no longer support this completely.
This resource type refers directly to table auditing, which has been reported as being deprecated for blob auditing. Though the documentation at this time does not directly report it. The docs will be updated in the coming days after this post, by the owners.
To enable the auditing you need to use the Microsoft.Sql/servers/auditingSettings object. The documentation on this is coming and until it does you will be directed to documentation for the database version of this resource type Microsoft.Sql/servers/databases/auditingSettings.
Auditing settings work much like the Auto-Tuning advisors. You can set either server or database level settings. The server settings will be inherited by the database if the database has not been configured directly.
This is a sample of the auditingSettings object that I use instead of the auditingPolicies object above. It is nested just the same.
{
"apiVersion": "2017-03-01-preview",
"type": "auditingSettings",
"name": "DefaultAuditingSettings",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Sql/servers', concat(variables('db-service-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]))]",
"storageCopy"
],
"properties": {
"state": "Enabled",
"storageEndpoint": "[reference(concat('Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts', '/', variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]), '2018-02-01').primaryEndpoints.blob]",
"storageAccountAccessKey": "[listKeys(concat(variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]), '2018-02-01').keys[0].value]",
"storageAccountSubscriptionId": "[subscription().subscriptionId]",
"isStorageSecondaryKeyInUse": false,
"retentionDays": "30"
}
}
I have taken a deployment template from azure and added this to a deployment project in Visual Studio 2015. When the Resource Group is made and deployed, everything works well except for the Web Site connectionstrings.
I have TableStorage, DocumentDb, and Redis instances all being created by this and cannot figure out how to get the Primary Connection String and Primary Key of these items so that I don't have to go in by hand and add them.
looking at the ARM Template Functions ListKeys should do the trick, but after deployment the value is empty. Furthermore, trying a simple string (TestConnectionString) also adds the name, but not the value.
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"kind": "app",
"name": "[parameters('WebAppName')]",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('WebAppName')]",
"resources": [],
"siteConfig": {
"connectionstrings": [
{
"name": "DocumentDbKey",
"value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
{
"name": "TestConnectionString",
"value": "dummystring:pleaseignore;",
"type": "Custom"
}
]
}
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('docDbName'))]",
]
}
As your description we can use ARM Template Functions ListKeys to get the Keys. And we could use the following template code to set the connection string. I test Azure storage connection string and Document DB key, It works correctly for me , please have a try. The following is my detail steps:
1.Create Basic Azure Resource Group project with template WebApp
2.From demo remove the unnecessary resource.
3.Add the connection string setting
"resources": [
{
"name": "connectionstrings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "tomConnectionString"
},
"properties": {
"documentDB": {
"value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', variables('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
"storage": {
"value": "[concat('DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=',parameters('storageAccountName'),';AccountKey=',concat(listKeys(variables('storageAccountId'),'2015-05-01-preview').key1))]",
"type": "Custom"
}
}
}
]
Add the corresponding parameters or variables such as storage info or docDbName
Deploy the Website
Check the result from the portal
Full template code:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "S1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and instance size. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"storageAccountName": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "Storage Account to access blob storage."
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"webSiteName": "[concat('webSite', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]",
"docDbName": "tomdocumentdb",
"storageAccountId": "[concat(resourceGroup().id,'/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/', parameters('storageAccountName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "connectionstrings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "tomConnectionString"
},
"properties": {
"documentDB": {
"value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', variables('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
"storage": {
"value": "[concat('DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=',parameters('storageAccountName'),';AccountKey=',concat(listKeys(variables('storageAccountId'),'2015-05-01-preview').key1))]",
"type": "Custom"
}
}
}
]
}
]
}
Update:
We could get more useful info about ARM template from the azure resource.
I just had same problem, and it turns out the name of the property that holds the connection string should be named connectionString, so your siteConfig object should look like this:
"siteConfig": {
"connectionstrings": [
{
"name": "DocumentDbKey",
"connectionString": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
{
"name": "TestConnectionString",
"connectionString": "dummystring:pleaseignore;",
"type": "Custom"
}
]
}
When deploying the resources for my Function App with an ARM template like this
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"kind": "functionapp",
"name": "[parameters('appNameFunctions')]",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"location": "West Europe",
"tags": {},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('appNameFunctions')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('aspNameFunctions'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "appsettings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', parameters('appNameFunctions'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "fnAppSettings"
},
"properties": {
"AzureWebJobsStorage":"[concat('DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=',parameters('storageAccountNameFunctions'),';AccountKey=',listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts', parameters('storageAccountNameFunctions')), '2015-05-01-preview').key1)]",
"AzureWebJobsDashboard":"[concat('DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=',parameters('storageAccountNameFunctions'),';AccountKey=',listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts', parameters('storageAccountNameFunctions')), '2015-05-01-preview').key1)]",
"WEBSITE_CONTENTAZUREFILECONNECTIONSTRING":"[concat('DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=',parameters('storageAccountNameFunctions'),';AccountKey=',listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts', parameters('storageAccountNameFunctions')), '2015-05-01-preview').key1)]",
"WEBSITE_CONTENTSHARE":"[parameters('appNameFunctions')]",
"FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION":"~0.8",
"AZUREJOBS_EXTENSION_VERSION":"beta",
"WEBSITE_NODE_DEFAULT_VERSION":"6.5.0"
}
}
],
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('aspNameFunctions'))]",
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts', parameters('storageAccountNameFunctions'))]"
]
}
is it sufficient to just set FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION to the desired version and App Service automatically adjusts / loads the correct runtime or is there something else that needs to be adjusted or executed?
Yes, it is sufficient, and is exactly what the Portal does when you click the button to upgrade your app.
Another option is to set it to "latest", which means it will always use the very latest. Though the risk in doing that is to be affected by breaking changes.