Since AppCenter retiring at the end of this year, I have started migrating to Azure-Notification-Hub.
But the documentation for notification-hub is not clear at all. Especially the documentation for Xamarin.Android. It does not match with their latest SDK.
In the latest (version 1.1.1) azure-notification-hub SDK for Android (or Xamarin.Android) there's no need to implement FirebaseMessagingService. NotificationHub.Start() method registers the device in the Notification-Hub. A device registered with this way gets notifications without any problem.
NotificationHub.Start(Application, <HubName>, <ConnectionString>);
Addition tags to existing NotificationHub instance are also straightforward with the new SDK.
NotificationHub.AddTag("username:user123");
But in Registration Management official doc states that devices can register with the notification-hub either from client-side or from server-side. Is it necessary to use one of those methods if my app registered with the notification-hub using the NotificationHub.Start() method? Or do I missing something?
Also, when I was using the AppCenter, I have used the AppCenter-InstallId to target a specific device.
With that in mind is it possible to use the NotificationHub.InstallationId to use as a tag (eg: "handle:<devce's InstallationId>") to send device-specific notifications?
Is it necessary to use one of those methods if my app registered with the notification-hub using the NotificationHub.Start() method?
When you invoke NotificationHub.start(Application, ...), the Android SDK will listen for changes like added tags, new FirebaseMessagingService tokens, etc. Anytime it detects a change, it will invoke an InstallationAdapter to inform a backend of the new details.
The default InstallationAdapter will send an PUT request to the Azure Notification Hubs backend as documented here. This is what is created by NotificationHub.start(Application, string, string); for people who are not hosting their own backend, this is a sensible default.
If you have your own backend where you track devices, or you're just looking to keep your credentials server-side, you can swap out the InstallationAdapter to be a class that invokes your API. All you need to do is implement the InstallationAdapter interface and initialize the SDK by calling NotificationHub.start(Application, InstallationAdapter).
If you use the NotificationHub.start(...) methods as indicated above, there is no further registration action required.
With that in mind is it possible to use the NotificationHub.InstallationId to use as a tag (eg: "handle:<devce's InstallationId>") to send device-specific notifications?
Yes! This documentation walks you through how to use the special tag format $InstallationId:{YOUR_TAG_ID} to target a specific device.
When you've used NotificationHub.start(), if you do not specify an InstallationId, it will generate one for you.
Question about setting the InstallationId and/or UserId. If I'm using Microsoft.Azure.NotificationHubs.Client, which makes more sense to do.
Should I set the InstallationId via the $InstallationId Tag (see here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/notification-hubs/notification-hubs-push-notification-registration-management#installations) or via implementing the InstallationEnrichmentAdapter and set it via a call to installation.InstallationId = in the EnrichInstallation method?
Additionally, the Microsoft.Azure.NotificationHubs.Client.Installation class provides a UserId property that can be updated too.
I'm also moving my push notifications from AppCenter to Azure Notification Hub and want to reuse my existing AppCenter InstallId.
i am able to add tags and userid as below(java)
NotificationHub.start(this.getApplication(), BuildConfig.hubName, BuildConfig.hubListenConnectionString);
NotificationHub.setInstallationId("123");
Set<String> tags = new HashSet<>();
tags.add("role_memeber");
NotificationHub.setUserId("123");
NotificationHub.addTags(tags);
sdk: com.microsoft.azure:notification-hubs-android-sdk:1.1.6
i'm writing to you to ask a little support about an action that we are currently developing using Action Builder and webhook library #assistant/conversation for Nodejs.
In particular, we would invoke our webhook's logic using the device location.
We have understand that we must ask the user permission to access on device location using something like this:
https://developers.google.com/assistant/actionssdk/reference/rest/Shared.Types/PermissionValueSpec
but in all Github examples provided by Google nothing is specified.
Furthermore, we tried to integrate the PermissionValueSpec in a slot using the notification actions.type.Notifications, but the returned value of that slot is
PermissionLocation --> ALREADY_GRANTED without any other information about the device coordinates.
We've read a lot of documentation and also looked for some example to support our develop but nothing was found.
How we can get the current device location?
Thank you in advance!
First, thanks Hasura for incredible good product! I love it.
I have issue with derive action with Hasura Console. My use case:
I enable anonymous role for subscribe function (everybody can send email to subscribe)
I have configured permission on my subscribe table, everything is fine.
I want to validate the user input on server side, for example, validate email format. I have followed by this guide about derive action. I found no mistake here.
But I got the error "Type query_root must define one or more fields." when I hit "Derive action" at the first time.
According to this question, as I understand, I need to have object type for root query.
Of course, I will have object type for root query eventually. I can work around by giving some dummy queries for anonymous role. But I do not like that cheat anyway.
Any idea on that? Any help will be highly appreciated.
Edited:
My related current version:
Hasura 1.3.2
One click deployment using Docker on Digital Ocean.
How to get a list of active workflows/tasks of current user in Alfresco by JavaScript API ?
It is require to create a rule which will write active tasks to the some file and hang/attach this rule to/on a folder.
Yes it is possible to get the list of workflows.
You can do that with the following api.
GET /alfresco/service/api/task-instances?authority={authority?}&state={state?}&priority={priority?}&pooledTasks={pooledTasks?}&dueBefore={dueBefore?}&dueAfter={dueAfter?}&properties={properties?}&maxItems={maxItems?}&skipCount={skipCount?}&exclude={exclude?}
GET /alfresco/service/api/workflow-instances/{workflow_instance_id}/task-instances?authority={authority?}&state={state?}&priority={priority?}&dueBefore={isoDate?}&dueAfter={isoDate?}&properties={prop1, prop2, prop3...?}&maxItems={maxItems?}&skipCount={skipCount?}&exclude={exclude?}
Note: You can set your own parameters according to your requirements in the request
See the documentation.
What is the best practice way to handle changes to configuration parameters (kept in yml) that have to happen at runtime?
I am working on a site where the owner wants to change various settings in his admin back end.
For example, enabling/disabling the confirmation email and link sent by FOS User bundle when a new user registers for an account.
Thanks for your time
For those operations you need the use Compiler Pass.
https://symfony.com/doc/current/service_container/compiler_passes.html
Here sample Custom Compiler pass;
https://symfony.com/doc/current/components/dependency_injection/compilation.html#creating-separate-compiler-passes
Here is a good example for compiler passes; ( Usually using with service tags )
https://symfony.com/doc/current/service_container/tags.html