How can we share & unshare documents (pdf) in corda? Actually i am looking for something where documents can be shared and then revoked later. similar to this in video.
https://marketplace.r3.com/solutions/dreamzchain-kyc
I would like to suggest you to take look at the Blue Catalyst project by Capgemini: https://www.bluecatalyst.io/
They are the most up to date KYC projects that we have worked with.
Related
I provide some training content (video) on my app and I want to ensure that the content cannot be played from anywhere else (i.e. only available to devices that have downloaded and installed my app). The videos themselves can be stored in either my google cloud or aws.
Is this security capability available from firebase? Is there any code / documentation that may point me in the right direction? My searches so far have been fruitless but I must admit I don't even know what this type of security feature would be called.
Thank you in advance,
Andres
There is no DRM functionality provided by any product in the Firebase platform.
I am trying to figure out what is the exact difference between a document management system and archives management system? For example, what is the difference between Alfresco and Archivesspace (http://www.archivesspace.org/)?
Can Alfresco function as an archives management tool? What is the difference between the two? I read there is a record management module in Alfresco, is this what is meant by archives management?
Can Alfresco be used as an Archives Management System? Yes, of course. One real world example of this is the New York Philharmonic. They digitized their musical scores and associated artifacts going back to 1842 and then made them available online for researchers. Here is a video about it.
At its heart, Alfresco is a repository that allows you to capture any type of file, secure those files, route those files through workflows, search across the files, and associate metadata with each file. What I've just described are what most people would consider the basic set of functionality present in any worthwhile document management system.
Now, what makes that specific to archival purposes? I'm not an archivist. That's a highly-specialized field. One thing that is missing from my list of functionality above is "capture" or how the artifacts you are archiving will get into the system. This depends on exactly what it is you are archiving. One might use document scanners or high-end photography equipment, for example. None of that is addressed by Alfresco. You'll have to use third-party hardware and software and then integrate it, although many integrations exist between Alfresco and third-party capture vendors.
So I would say, yes, Alfresco can be used for archives management. But perhaps more importantly than considering whether or not a piece of software can be given a label, you should be thinking about how your users will use the software and what it is they need to get done. Then focus on how each of the packages you are evaluating can be used to achieve those goals to try to figure out whether or not each package will be a fit.
The difference is that ArchivesSpace is an 'archives information management system', whereas Alfresco is a full 'content management system', which means that it can manage any type of content.
What ArchivesSpace is:
ArchivesSpace Version 1.0 was completed in August 2013. It includes basic functionality for accessioning, processing, description, digital object description, and authority control workflows for archival material, as well as for searching descriptions and exporting metadata objects such as EAD, MARCXML, MODS, Dublin Core, METS, and CSV.
http://www.archivesspace.org/developmentplan
As for Alfresco:
The Alfresco One platform allows organizations to fully manage any type of content from simple office documents to scanned images, photographs, engineering drawings and even large video files.
http://www.alfresco.com/products/one/aws?utm_expid=11184972-12.IcCW-3j6RMavigPGfjODyw.1&utm_referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alfresco.com%2F
What the difference ultimately comes down to is not what it can store but what functionality you get in addition. ArchivesSpace seems to be a simple implementation of a document storage system that stores documents in collections with associated metadata. Alfresco also offers workflows, custom actions, previews, sites, wikis etc.
If your specific use case is related to archiving off documents specifically and you want something that will already be good at this then go ahead and use ArchivesSpace, if not, or if you want to expand the system out in future, then Alfresco will likely be able to do more but will likely take more effort to configure to your specific use case as you will have to create a custom content model and such.
Alfresco Records Management is for managing documents that will likely have some legal significance, such as court papers, official government department responses etc, and as such their creation and destruction need to be closely managed. As far as I can see this is not something ArchivesSpace can do.
(Full disclosure: I work for an Alfresco partner)
Here's what I am actually trying.
I created a task using Producteev. and shared this on FBwall.
my friends can view it and comment.
Would it be possible to use graph api create an application that will allow me to share data from the application onto FB.
Thanks
Sun
Try ShareKit, which encapsulates everything you are looking for. If you are only interested in facebook, then you will want to remove references to the other services. But it's easy to include this into you program, and I recommend you try it to see how it works.
You will need to provide some application ID information to initialize it for facebook. go the the facebook developers site and obtain those.
We have a Web login feature. We will offer Free calls to a large campaign.
Scenarios:
Because of free calls, we will offer a unique file to be downloaded and stored
After a week or month we will call them and offer them our desktop application to scan and see how trusted, the user is
If we dont find the same file again, we will never start business and more our own statistics
Based on that report we want to do some follow ups campaign
We can do this with cookies but we want user experience and trust analysis
Example:
if you play a music in youtube.com, without notice your file is actually in /tmp/Flash....flv with lot of data on it.
Question:
How can i do the similar using Flex/Flash from the web browser ? Please kindly advise to any link or existing resource..
Thanks in advance.
You cant write file on Client PC trough Flash.
You can use Shared Object which are very similar to Normal Files and they will not be deleted in most cases.
http://learn.adobe.com/wiki/display/Flex/Shared+Objects
Claudio
In short, you can't. Flex in the browser doesn't have any filesystem access.
The only ways to store persistent data from the browser with Flex are through cookies, browser hacks like the evercookie and local shared objects.
We need to develop an application to sell music online. No need to specify that all will be done quite legally and in so doing, we have to plan an interface to pay artists. However, we are confronted with a question: What is the best way to store music on the server? Should we save it on server's disk from a HTTP fileupload? Should we save via FTP or would it be wiser to save it in the database? No need to say that we need it to be the most safiest as possible. So maybe an https is required here. But, we what you think is the best way? Maybe other idea? Because in all HTTP case, upload songs (for administration) is quite long and boring, but easly linkable to a song that admin create in his web application comparativly to an FTP application to upload song on server and then list directory in admin part to link the correct uploaded song to the song informations in database.
I know that its maybe not quite clear, it's because i'm french but tell me and I will try to explain part that you don't understand.
I've used Krystalware's SlickUpload ASP.NET control in the past to take care of the uploading part for you (you can use the in built control if you want to but this has a lot of the nifty ajax-style features done for you and is quite cheap).
Edit:
[I would not advocate storing the music file itself in the database. Much better [in my humble opinion] only to store the location of the file in the database. If you use one of the cloud services listed below then the location might simply be an HTTP link]
I'd also seriously consider using a cloud storage service for storing the music files. Something like Amazon S3 or Rackspace Cloud Files. CloudFiles is good because, if you wish, you can also enable CDN delivery (Content Delivery Network) which means your users can access the uploaded music tracks much faster than if served off your local web server, for instance.
Hope this helps,
Richard.