I'm working on a js widget, and I've come across a positioning problem, which I can't seem to solve with my limited geometry knowledge or by help of Wikipedia/google.
I have a quadrilateral rectangle, which is positioned at an angle. I know its two opposite vertexes and width/height ratio. And there's a point on it, which coordinates I also know.
I need to find how far (in %s of width/height) is that point from rectangle's sides. Is it possible to do so?
Having two corners P1 = (x1,y1) and P2 = (x2,y2) and point Q, you can find diagonal length
dx = (x2 - x1)
dy = (y2 - y1)
dlen = sqrt(dx^2 + dy^2)
and unit direction vector
dx = dx / dlen
dy = dy / dlen
and center of rectangle
cx = x1 + dx/2
cy = y1 + dy/2
Width and height (with known r = w/h ratio)
w = dlen / sqrt(1 + r^2)
h = w / r
Now we need direction of side of length w. Note that given information does not allow to choose exact rectangle orientation from two possible cases.
Angle between diagonal and side
sina = r / sqrt(1 + r^2)
cosa = 1 / sqrt(1 + r^2)
Side direction vector
wx = dx * cosa - dy * sina
wy = dx * sina + dy * cosa
and for the second orientation
wx' = dx * cosa + dy * sina
wy' = -dx * sina + dy * cosa
The second side vector
hx = -wy
hy = wx
Now we can find length of projection of point p onto sides W and H using dot product
qx = q.x - x1
qy = q.y - y1
qw = qx * wx + qy * wy
qh = qx * hx + qy * hy
The last values are coordinates in W-H basis, so value qw varies from 0 for points at the "left" to w for points at the "right" side. You can divide these values by w and h to get percent values.
Note again - there are two possible rectangles and correspondingly two positions of point Q
Related
I am trying to solve the following problem (I am using Matlab, though pseudo-code / solutions in other languages are welcome):
I have two circles on a Cartesian plane defined by their centroids (p1, p2) and their radii (r1, r2). circle 1 (c1 = [p1 r1]) is considered 'dynamic': it is being translated along the vector V = [0 -1]. circle 2 (c2 = [p2 r2]) is considered 'static': it lies in the path of c1 but the x component of its centroid is offset from the x component of c2 (otherwise the solution would be trivial: the distance between the circle centroids minus the sum of their radii).
I am trying to locate the distance (d) along V at which circle 1 will 'collide' with circle 2 (see the linked image). I am sure that I can solve this iteratively (i.e. translate c1 to the bounding box of c2 then converge / test for intersection). However, I would like to know if there is a closed form solution to this problem.
Shift coordinates to simplify expressions
px = p1.x - p2.x
py = p1.y - p2.y
And solve quadratic equation for d (zero, one, or two solutions)
px^2 + (py - d)^2 = (r1 + r2)^2
(py - d)^2 = (r1 + r2)^2 - px^2
d = py +/- Sqrt((r1 + r2)^2 - px^2)
That's all.
As the question title does not match the question and accepted answer which is dependent on a fixed vector {0, -1}, or {0, 1} rather than an arbitrary vector I have added another solution that works for any unit vector.
Where (See diagram 1)
dx, dy is the unit vector of travel for circle c1
p1, p2 the centers of the moving circle c1 and static circle c2
r1, r2 the radius of each circle
The following will set d to the distance c1 must travel along dx, dy to collide with c2 if no collision the d will be set to Infinity
There are three cases when there is no solution
The moving circle is moving away from the static circle. u < 0
The moving circle never gets close enough to collide. dSq > rSq
The two circles are already overlapping. u < 0 luckily the math makes
this the same condition as moving away.
Note that if you ignore the sign of u (1 and 3) then d will be the distance to first (causal) contact going backward in time
Thus the pseudo code to find d
d = Infinity
rSq = (r1 + r2) ^ 2
u = (p1.x - p2.x) * dx + (p1.x - p2.x) * dy
if u >= 0
dSq = ((p2.x + dx * u) - p1.x) ^ 2 + ((p2.y + dy * u) - p1.y) ^ 2
if dSq <= rSq
d = u - (rSq - dSq) ^ 0.5
The point of contact can be found with
cpx = p1.x + dx * d;
cpy = p1.x + dy * d;
Diagram 1
I come accross a math problem about Interactive Computer Graphics.
I summarize and abstract this problem as follows:
I'm going to rotation a 3d coordinate P(x1,y1,z1) around a point O(x0,y0,z0)
and there are 2 vectors u and v which we already know.
u is the direction to O before transformation.
v is the direction to O after transformation.
I want to know how to conduct the calculation and get the coordinate of Q
Thanks a lot.
Solution:
Rotation About an Arbitrary Axis in 3 Dimensions using the following matrix:
rotation axis vector (normalized): (u,v,w)
position coordinate of the rotation center: (a,b,c)
rotation angel: theta
Reference:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxnbGVubm11cnJheXxneDoyMTJiZTZlNzVlMjFiZTFi
for just single point no rotations is needed ... so knowns are:
u,v,O,P
so we now the distance is not changing:
|P-O| = |Q-O|
and directions are parallel to u,v so:
Q = O + v*(|P-O|/|v|)
But I suspect you want to construct rotation (transform matrix) such that more points (mesh perhaps) are transformed. If that is true then you need at least one known to get this right. Because there is infinite possible rotations transforming P -> Q but the rest of the mesh will be different for each ... so you need to know at least 2 non trivial points pair P0,P1 -> Q0,Q1 or axis of rotation or plane parallel to rotation or any other data known ...
Anyway in current state you can use as rotation axis vector perpendicular to u,v and angle obtained from dot product:
axis = cross (u,v)
ang = +/-acos(dot(u,v))
You just need to find out the sign of angle so try both and use the one for which the resultinq Q is where it should be so dot(Q-O,v) is max. To rotate around arbitrary axis and point use:
Rodrigues_rotation_formula
Also this might be helpfull:
Understanding 4x4 homogenous transform matrices
By computing dot product between v and u get the angle l between the vectors. Do a cross product of v and u (normalized) to produce axis of rotation vector a. Let w be a vector along vector u from O to P. To rotate point P into Q apply the following actions (in pseudo code) having axis a and angle l computed above:
float4 Rotate(float4 w, float l, float4 a)
{
float4x4 Mr = IDENTITY;
quat_t quat = IDENTITY;
float4 t = ZERO;
float xx, yy, zz, xy, xz, yz, wx, wy, wz;
quat[X] = a[X] * sin((-l / 2.0f));
quat[Y] = a[Y] * sin((-l / 2.0f));
quat[Z] = a[Z] * sin((-l / 2.0f));
quat[W] = cos((-l / 2.0f));
xx = quat[X] * quat[X];
yy = quat[Y] * quat[Y];
zz = quat[Z] * quat[Z];
xy = quat[X] * quat[Y];
xz = quat[X] * quat[Z];
yz = quat[Y] * quat[Z];
wx = quat[W] * quat[X];
wy = quat[W] * quat[Y];
wz = quat[W] * quat[Z];
Mr[0][0] = 1.0f - 2.0f * (yy + zz);
Mr[0][1] = 2.0f * (xy + wz);
Mr[0][2] = 2.0f * (xz - wy);
Mr[0][3] = 0.0f;
Mr[1][0] = 2.0f * (xy - wz);
Mr[1][1] = 1.0f - 2.0f * (xx + zz);
Mr[1][2] = 2.0f * (yz + wx);
Mr[1][3] = 0.0f;
Mr[2][0] = 2.0f * (xz + wy);
Mr[2][1] = 2.0f * (yz - wx);
Mr[2][2] = 1.0f - 2.0f * (xx + yy);
Mr[2][3] = 0.0f;
Mr[3][0] = 0.0f;
Mr[3][1] = 0.0f;
Mr[3][2] = 0.0f;
Mr[3][3] = 1.0f;
w = Mr * w;
return w;
}
Point Q is at the end of the rotated vector w. Algorithm used in the pseudo code is quaternion rotation.
If you know u, v, P, and O then I would suggest that you compute |OP| which should be preserved under rotations. Then multiply this length by the unit vector -v (I assumed u, v are unit vectors: if not - normalize them) and translate the origin by this -|OP|v vector. The negative sign in front of v comes from the description given in your question:"v is the direction to O after transformation".
P and Q are at the same distance R to O
R = sqrt( (x1-x0)^2 + (y1-y0)^2 + (z1-z0)^2 )
and OQ is collinear to v, so OQ = v * R / ||v|| where ||v|| is the norm of v
||v|| = sqrt( xv^2 + yv^2 + zv^2 )
So the coordinates of Q(xq,yq,zq) are:
xq= xo + xv * R / ||v||
yq= yo + yv * R / ||v||
zq= zo + zv * R / ||v||
I am trying to calculate coordinates of point P, which is x units distant from AB line segment and y units distant from BC line segment.
Edit:
I am trying to write code for general solution.
As parameters, I have three points (coordinates) A, B and C and also two values for distance x and y.
Let's translate all points A,B,C by (-BX, -BY) to set coordinate origin to B, new points are a, 0, c, and I would rename you distances to dc and da.
New coordinates
cy = CY - BY
cx = CX - BX
ay = AY - BY
ax = AX - BX
Then line 0c will have equation
(-cy * x + cx * y) / Sqrt(cx*cx +cy*cy) = 0
line 0a will have equation
(-ay * x + ax * y) / Sqrt(ax*ax +ay*ay) = 0
Let's lc = Sqrt(cx*cx +cy*cy) and la = Sqrt(ax*ax +ay*ay) (lengths of BC and BA segments)
If point p=(px, py) lies at dc distance from line 0c, and at da distance from line 0a, then
Abs(-cy * px + cx * py) = dc * lc
Abs(-ay * px + ax * py) = da * la
If your points always form counterclockwise order of BC, BP, BA rays, you may use this sign combination only and find single solution:
-cy * px + cx * py = dc * lc
-ay * px + ax * py = - da * la
Solve this linear system for px and py, in the end shift coordinates back by BX, BY
PX = px + BX
PY = py + BY
P.S. In extra case angle ABC=180 system has no solution for da<>dc or infinite number of solutions for da=dc
I'm looking for a non matrix solution (basic geometry) for how to calculate an absolute x,y position C(x,y) of a rotated offset position. I know the parent position A, the amount of x,y offset B, and the rotation T. In the image axis B is offset from A and rotated from A by T degrees. I need to know C x and y.
(I consider Bx, By as positive values, distances)
Let's find corner point at first:
Px = Ax + By * Sin(T)
Py = Ay - By * Cos(T)
Then find C point
Cx = Px + Bx * Cos(T)
Cy = Py + Bx * Sin(T)
And combine them:
Cx = Ax + By * Sin(T) + Bx * Cos(T)
Cy = Ay - By * Cos(T) + Bx * Sin(T);
I have a square bitmap of a circle and I want to compute the normals of all the pixels in that circle as if it were a sphere of radius 1:
The sphere/circle is centered in the bitmap.
What is the equation for this?
Don't know much about how people program 3D stuff, so I'll just give the pure math and hope it's useful.
Sphere of radius 1, centered on origin, is the set of points satisfying:
x2 + y2 + z2 = 1
We want the 3D coordinates of a point on the sphere where x and y are known. So, just solve for z:
z = ±sqrt(1 - x2 - y2).
Now, let us consider a unit vector pointing outward from the sphere. It's a unit sphere, so we can just use the vector from the origin to (x, y, z), which is, of course, <x, y, z>.
Now we want the equation of a plane tangent to the sphere at (x, y, z), but this will be using its own x, y, and z variables, so instead I'll make it tangent to the sphere at (x0, y0, z0). This is simply:
x0x + y0y + z0z = 1
Hope this helps.
(OP):
you mean something like:
const int R = 31, SZ = power_of_two(R*2);
std::vector<vec4_t> p;
for(int y=0; y<SZ; y++) {
for(int x=0; x<SZ; x++) {
const float rx = (float)(x-R)/R, ry = (float)(y-R)/R;
if(rx*rx+ry*ry > 1) { // outside sphere
p.push_back(vec4_t(0,0,0,0));
} else {
vec3_t normal(rx,sqrt(1.-rx*rx-ry*ry),ry);
p.push_back(vec4_t(normal,1));
}
}
}
It does make a nice spherical shading-like shading if I treat the normals as colours and blit it; is it right?
(TZ)
Sorry, I'm not familiar with those aspects of C++. Haven't used the language very much, nor recently.
This formula is often used for "fake-envmapping" effect.
double x = 2.0 * pixel_x / bitmap_size - 1.0;
double y = 2.0 * pixel_y / bitmap_size - 1.0;
double r2 = x*x + y*y;
if (r2 < 1)
{
// Inside the circle
double z = sqrt(1 - r2);
.. here the normal is (x, y, z) ...
}
Obviously you're limited to assuming all the points are on one half of the sphere or similar, because of the missing dimension. Past that, it's pretty simple.
The middle of the circle has a normal facing precisely in or out, perpendicular to the plane the circle is drawn on.
Each point on the edge of the circle is facing away from the middle, and thus you can calculate the normal for that.
For any point between the middle and the edge, you use the distance from the middle, and some simple trig (which eludes me at the moment). A lerp is roughly accurate at some points, but not quite what you need, since it's a curve. Simple curve though, and you know the beginning and end values, so figuring them out should only take a simple equation.
I think I get what you're trying to do: generate a grid of depth data for an image. Sort of like ray-tracing a sphere.
In that case, you want a Ray-Sphere Intersection test:
http://www.siggraph.org/education/materials/HyperGraph/raytrace/rtinter1.htm
Your rays will be simple perpendicular rays, based off your U/V coordinates (times two, since your sphere has a diameter of 2). This will give you the front-facing points on the sphere.
From there, calculate normals as below (point - origin, the radius is already 1 unit).
Ripped off from the link above:
You have to combine two equations:
Ray: R(t) = R0 + t * Rd , t > 0 with R0 = [X0, Y0, Z0] and Rd = [Xd, Yd, Zd]
Sphere: S = the set of points[xs, ys, zs], where (xs - xc)2 + (ys - yc)2 + (zs - zc)2 = Sr2
To do this, calculate your ray (x * pixel / width, y * pixel / width, z: 1), then:
A = Xd^2 + Yd^2 + Zd^2
B = 2 * (Xd * (X0 - Xc) + Yd * (Y0 - Yc) + Zd * (Z0 - Zc))
C = (X0 - Xc)^2 + (Y0 - Yc)^2 + (Z0 - Zc)^2 - Sr^2
Plug into quadratic equation:
t0, t1 = (- B + (B^2 - 4*C)^1/2) / 2
Check discriminant (B^2 - 4*C), and if real root, the intersection is:
Ri = [xi, yi, zi] = [x0 + xd * ti , y0 + yd * ti, z0 + zd * ti]
And the surface normal is:
SN = [(xi - xc)/Sr, (yi - yc)/Sr, (zi - zc)/Sr]
Boiling it all down:
So, since we're talking unit values, and rays that point straight at Z (no x or y component), we can boil down these equations greatly:
Ray:
X0 = 2 * pixelX / width
Y0 = 2 * pixelY / height
Z0 = 0
Xd = 0
Yd = 0
Zd = 1
Sphere:
Xc = 1
Yc = 1
Zc = 1
Factors:
A = 1 (unit ray)
B
= 2 * (0 + 0 + (0 - 1))
= -2 (no x/y component)
C
= (X0 - 1) ^ 2 + (Y0 - 1) ^ 2 + (0 - 1) ^ 2 - 1
= (X0 - 1) ^ 2 + (Y0 - 1) ^ 2
Discriminant
= (-2) ^ 2 - 4 * 1 * C
= 4 - 4 * C
From here:
If discriminant < 0:
Z = ?, Normal = ?
Else:
t = (2 + (discriminant) ^ 1 / 2) / 2
If t < 0 (hopefully never or always the case)
t = -t
Then:
Z: t
Nx: Xi - 1
Ny: Yi - 1
Nz: t - 1
Boiled farther still:
Intuitively it looks like C (X^2 + Y^2) and the square-root are the most prominent figures here. If I had a better recollection of my math (in particular, transformations on exponents of sums), then I'd bet I could derive this down to what Tom Zych gave you. Since I can't, I'll just leave it as above.