I have a SQLite-Select statement like this to get the next available number:
SELECT IFNULL(MAX(current_nr)+1, 1) FROM rm_evaluation;
I already have a corresponding model in python peewee:
class RmRiskEvaluation(BaseModel):
...
current_nr = IntegerField(unique=True)
class Meta:
table_name = 'rm_evaluation'
But how can I express the SQL-statement from above.
=> Get the last number, add 1 to it and return the whole thang; if there is no last number at all, calculate with 1 beforehand.
If you weren't so lazy and had spent even a couple minutes reading the docs or searching, you would have found your answer.
fn.IFNULL(fn.MAX(RmRiskEvaluation.current_nr) + 1, 1)
Related
I'm new to progress 4GL. I'm trying to find last record from a table. But its causing performance issue. I directly copied my query here so it should be syntax error. Please help me to modify the logic or give me suggestion.
Note - Syntax(USE-SYNTAX) available only for following fields but not sure adding this to for last is good idea.
pc_domain,
pc_list_classification,
pc_list,
pc_curr,
pc_prod_line,
pc_part,
pc_um,
pc_start
for last pc_mstr no-lock
where pc_domain = global_domain
and pc_list_classification = 1
and pc_curr <> ""
and pc_part = b_ps_mstr.ps_comp
and pc_um <> ""
and (pc_start <= v_end[v_i]
or pc_start = ?)
and (pc_expire >= v_end[v_i]
or pc_expire = ?)
and (pc_amt_type = "L"
or pc_amt_type = "P"):
end.
if not available pc_mstr then
do:
for last pc_mstr no-lock
where pc_domain = global_domain
and pc_list_classification = 1
and pc_curr <> ""
and pc_part = b_ps_mstr.ps_comp
and pc_um <> ""
and (pc_amt_type = "L"
or pc_amt_type = "P"):
end.
end.
What do you mean with last? Do you mean LAST as in what Progress means:
LAST Uses the criteria in the record-phrase to find the last record in the table that meets that criteria. The AVM finds the last record before sorting.
Or do you mean something else? Like the last record created? Depending on what you mean you might have to do different things.
Some pointers about performance though:
Basically where clauses using = is good, >, <, >=, <=, BEGINS etc is decent and <>, NOT is BAD.
But it also boils down to what index you can use. You need to know about the indices of the table! But regardless of indices: those <> will make you unhappy. They will cause "table scans" (the entire table will be read).
<> "" could perhaps be replaced with > "" in this case - a little less evil.
Also you need to use () in a better way with those or's. Otherwise you might not get what you want. OR will win over AND so A AND B OR C really is run as (A AND B) OR C. Maybe you really ment A AND (B OR C) - in that case you need to use those ( ) wisely.
I am using the following measure (and a calendar table) to determine equipment uptime for a given hour of the day based on user input from a datetime slicer:
Selected Hour =
CALCULATE (
'UptimeView'[Uptime %],
FILTER (
'UptimeView',
'UptimeView'[LocalShiftDateHour] = SELECTEDVALUE ( 'CalendarTable'[DateTime] )
)
)
This is working just fine. The problem is that I also need this same calculation performed for each of the 12 hours prior to the selected hour. When I try to use the same formula but with one hour subtracted from the SELECTEDVALUE, like so...
S-1 =
CALCULATE (
'UptimeView'[Uptime %],
FILTER (
'UptimeView',
'UptimeView'[LocalShiftDateHour]
= SELECTEDVALUE ( 'CalendarTable'[DateTime] ) - ( 1 / 24 )
)
)
... I get blank cells in my table visualization, even though I know there is data for that hour:
Why does this happen? Any time I try to perform mathematical operations on the SELECTEDVALUE datetime value, it gives me blanks. But without using operations to manipulate it and just using the selected datetime itself, it works no problem. Is it not possible to subtract an hour from a SELECTEDVALUE datetime? If not, what workaround(s) should I try? (I have also attempted using -TIME(1,0,0) instead of -1/24 but that gave me blanks as well.)
Thanks in advance!!
I think the reason is that the subtraction you are operating isn't convenient to go row by row. Would you please try rather to put it as follows, and put the MAXX() function around the calculus you did, while adding another argument, which is the name of the table in which you want the subtraction to be performed:
S-1 =
CALCULATE (
'UptimeView'[Uptime %],
FILTER (
'UptimeView',
'UptimeView'[LocalShiftDateHour]
= MAXX('Replace_with_Tablename',SELECTEDVALUE(
'CalendarTable'[DateTime] ) - ( 1 / 24 ))
)
)
This is the trick I use. In fact, MAXX(tablename, expression) Evaluates an expression for each row of a table and returns the largest value.
Don't worry about the max, it doesn't have any effect on the result, since the max(one precise value in a precise row)= that same value
To show related Articles on a website, I need the Cast() function.
My Query looks like:
SELECT
*,
(CAST(a.uploader = ?1 AS UNSIGNED)
+ CAST(a.param2 = ?2 AS UNSIGNED)
...
) AS matches_count
FROM articles AS a
ORDER BY matches_count DESC
It counts the matches and sorts by the highest number of matches_counts.
The problem is, that there's no Cast() function built into doctrine.
After hours of trial and error I found an already available custom DQL Function:
https://github.com/beberlei/DoctrineExtensions/blob/master/src/Query/Mysql/Cast.php
I registered it inside my doctrine.yml.
But it doesn't work, because it expects Cast(X AS Y) and not Cast(Y $comparisonOperator X).
When I'am using this inside my repository, by example:
$this->createQueryBuilder('a, (CAST(author=25 AS UNSIGNED) AS matches_count)')
->getQuery()
->getResult()
;
I get this error, because it doesn't expect a comparison operator:
[Syntax Error] line 0, col 29: Error: Expected Doctrine\ORM\Query\Lexer::T_AS, got '='
Do you know how to maybe extend that class for and not Cast(Y $comparisonOperator X) instead of Cast(X AS Y)?
I didn't find any solution on the internet and tried it for hours.
Thank you in advance for taking the time to write an answer!
Update:
I changed line 37 in the above mentioned custom DQL class for Cast:
//old
//$this->fieldIdentifierExpression = $parser->SimpleArithmeticExpression();
//new
$this->fieldIdentifierExpression = $parser->ComparisonExpression();
and how to create the query:
$this->createQueryBuilder('a')
->select('a, (CAST(a.averageRating=:averageRating AS UNSIGNED) + CAST(a.author=:author AS UNSIGNED)) AS matches_count')
->setParameter('averageRating', $averageRating)
->setParameter('author', $author)
->orderBy('matches_count', 'DESC')
->getQuery()
->getResult();
and that seems to be it!
I hope its the right way of doing it, will help someone and that is the best way for this purpose.
To improve performance later, I plan to cache 10 ids of recommended articles for every single article page into its own table.
So it doesn't need to do the calculation on page load.
This table could get recreated every 24h via a cronjob.
ID | recommended_article_ids | article_id
1 | 10,24,76,88| 5
Feedback and tips are much appreciated!
this might look simple.. but dk how to do it
this is the information:
So.. i got the Cumulative Total using this function:
CumulativeTotal = CALCULATE(
SUM(vnxcritical[Used Space GB]),
FILTER(ALL(Datesonly[Date]),
Datesonly[Date] <= MAX(Datesonly[Date])))
But what i need is to get the differences between the dates, in the first date and the second the difference will be of 210. I need to get another column with that information. know the formula to do that?
ok..
So.. i used this:
IncrmentalValueTEST =
VAR CurrDate = MAX(vnxcritical[Date])
VAR PrevDate = CALCULATE(LASTDATE(vnxcritical[Date]), vnxcritical[Date] < CurrDate)
RETURN SUM(vnxcritical[Used Space GB]) -
CALCULATE(SUM(vnxcritical[Used Space GB]), vnxcritical[Date] = PrevDate)
and this is the result:
Ok, so this is is my data table:
You can see all the dates that i have for now, this is a capacity report for diferents EMC Storage Arrays, for diferentes Pools. The idea would be to have the knolwdge to review the incremental space used in a determinated portion of time.
allready tried another idea to get this, but the result was the same.. i used this:
Diferencia =
Var Day = MAX(Datesonly[Month])
Var Month = MAX(Datesonly[Year])
RETURN
SUM('Used Space'[used_mb])
- CALCULATE(
SUM('Used Space'[used_mb])
,FILTER(ALL(Datesonly[Date]),Datesonly[Date] <= Max(Datesonly[Date])))
But the return is the same.. "47753152401"
i'm using graphical filters, and other things to get a minimal view, because there are only 5 weekly reports and the sql database got more than 150.000 rows.
and this is the relation that i made with a only a table full of "dates" in order to invoke the function in a better way, but the result is the same..
Try something along these lines:
IncrmentalValue =
VAR CurrDate = MAX(Datesonly[Date])
VAR PrevDate = CALCULATE(LASTDATE(Datesonly[Date]), Datesonly[Date] < CurrDate)
RETURN SUM(vnxcritical[Used Space GB]) -
CALCULATE(SUM(vnxcritical[Used Space GB]), Datesonly[Date] = PrevDate)
First, calculate the current date and then find the previous date by taking the last date that occurred before it. Then take the difference between the current value and the previous value.
I'm learning LINQ, and I'm trying to figure out how to get all members with the last order failed (each member can have many orders). For efficiency reasons I'd like to do it all in LINQ before putting it into a list, if possible.
So far I believe this is the right way to get all the members with a failed order which joined recently (cutoffDate is current date -10 days).
var failedOrders =
from m in context.Members
from o in context.Orders
where m.DateJoined > cutoffDate
where o.Status == Failed
select m;
I expect I need to use Last or LastOrDefault, or possibly I need to use
orderby o.OrderNumber descending
and then get the First or FirstOrDefault as suggested in this stackoverflow answer.
Note that I want to look at ONLY the last order for a given member and see if that has failed (NOT just find last failed order).
Normally you would write something like:
var failedOrders = from m in context.Members
where m.DateJoined > cutoffDate
select new
{
Member = m,
LastOrder = m.Orders.OrderByDescending(x => x.OrderNumber).FirstOrDefault()
} into mlo
// no need for null checks here, because the query is done db-side
where mlo.LastOrder.Status == Failed
select mlo; // or select mlo.Member to have only the member
This if there is a Members.Orders relationship