I response this error when get JSON data by retrofit.
List<NewLicense> result = null;
Call<List<NewLicense>> serviceResult = ShahrdariApp.getShahrdariWebService().getLicenses(Configuration.getInstance().getString(SharedPrefs.MAC_ADDRESS), id);
try {
Response<List<NewLicense>> response = serviceResult.execute();
result = response.body();
Log.d("responseCode", String.valueOf(response.code()) );
} catch (Exception e) {
exceptionHandling(e);
Log.d("responseCode", String.valueOf(e.getMessage()) );
}
return result;
I had the same issue and forgot to set the Project SDK added this and it resolved the issue.
Simply restarting the IDE via File -> Invalidate caches can often solve this issue.
I faced the message
Unable to evaluate the expression Cannot find source class for
java.util.List
in hovering a List field while debugging in IntelliJ IDEA 2022.1.3 (UltimateEdition).
Even though an SDK was assigned to my Project, it helped to visit
IDEA ->File ->Project Structure -> Platform Settings ->SDKs and re-assign the SDK already visible in the list.
Namely I assigned openjdk-1.8.0.302-1, applied "OK", after that it was possible to debug a List foo.
IDE restart after that may additionally be necessary.
Related
Below is a minimal example of the problem I am currently encountering:
using System.Net.WebSockets;
using AutoFixture;
using AutoFixture.AutoMoq;
using FluentAssertions;
using Xunit;
...
[Fact]
public void Test1()
{
var fixture = new Fixture().Customize(new AutoMoqCustomization() { ConfigureMembers = true });
var sut = fixture.Create<WebSocket>();
sut.Should().NotBeNull();
}
[Fact]
public void Test2()
{
var fixture = new Fixture().Customize(new AutoMoqCustomization() { ConfigureMembers = true });
var sut = new Mock<WebSocket>().Object;
fixture.Inject(sut);
sut.Should().NotBeNull();
}
...
When I run the first test, I get the following exception:
AutoFixture.ObjectCreationExceptionWithPath : AutoFixture was unable to create an instance from Moq.Mock`1[System.IO.Stream] because creation unexpectedly failed with exception. Please refer to the inner exception to investigate the root cause of the failure.
Inner exception messages:
System.BadImageFormatException: An attempt was made to load a program with an incorrect format. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007000B)
The second test succeeds.
I would like to be able to create an instance of a class using AutoFixture which takes a WebSocket as a constructor parameter, without the need to inject a mock object first (ultimately, so that I can use an AutoMoqData attribute, and get rid of some boilerplate). Have I got any misusage or misunderstanding going on here, or would this be better placed as a GitHub issue? In the interim, is there anything I can do to work around this issue?
You observe this issue because of the AutoFixture's factory discovery strategy. When you try to create an object of an abstract type, AutoFixture still inspects the type to find a static factory method to activate the object. In your particular case, the WebSocket type contains such methods, so some of them is used. It looks like it doesn't work well with auto-generated input values, so fails with an exception.
You can customize AutoFixture, to always mock the WebSocket type:
fixture.Register((Mock<WebSocket> m) => m.Object);
Just tested with the latest versions of products (AutoFixture 4.5.0, Moq 4.10.0) and it works like a charm.
I´m getting this error when procedure NotificationsRegistrationHandler is executed at application startup.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Object NotificationsRegistrationHandler only supports OFFLINE but is being called via RemoteApplicationServer
As documentation says:
If you have a completely offline application and you need this Registration Handler procedure to be generated offline exclusively, set Main property = False and Connectivity Support property = Offline
I have set my main SD object Registration Handler property to use this procedure.
I have also set the following properties on procedure NotificationsRegistrationHandler:
What it´s wrong with my code or configuration?
Thanks,
Rogelio Arosemena
Rogelio,
I think that this may be an issue with offline mode. We can check it out.
In the meantime, you could set to Connectivity Support = Online and this should fix your issue.
I found an alternative solution by creating an external object on Android to return One Signal Id. The code was:
OneSignal.idsAvailable(new OneSignal.IdsAvailableHandler() {
#Override
public void idsAvailable(String userId, String registrationId) {
try{
return userId;
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
return "";
}
}
});
Device registration on One Signal was ok on SD application. The problem was that procedure NotificationRegistrationHandler was never executed (offline or online), so we can't store DeviceToken on our table.
We will have to do the same for IOS with this code:
OSPermissionSubscriptionState status = OneSignal.getPermissionSubscriptionState();
status.getSubscriptionStatus().getUserId();
I want some kind of mechanism to have more information about a caught exception. (Specifically exceptions I throw myself to abort transactions) I've looked around and pretty much the only thing I could find was "Use the info log". This to me does not seem like a good idea. For one it is cumbersome to access and find the last message. And it is limited in size so at some point the new messages won't even show up.
So my idea is the following: Create a class NuException and pass an instance of that through all methods store an instance in the class where the work methods are located. When I need to throw an exception I call a method on it similar to Global::error() but this one takes an identifier and a message.
Once I reach my catch block I can access those from my object the class that contains the work methods similarly to how CLRExceptions work.
class NuException
{
"public" str identifier;
"public" str message;
public Exception error(str _id, str _msg)
{
//set fields
return Exception::Error;
}
}
class Worker
{
"public" NuException exception;
void foo()
{
throw this.exception.error("Foo", "Record Foo already exists");
}
void bar()
{
this.foo();
}
}
void Job()
{
Worker w = new Worker();
try
{
w.bar(ex);
}
catch (Exception::Error)
{
info(w.exception().message());
}
}
It works but isn't there a better way? Surely someone must have come up with a solution to work around this shortcoming in AX?
Short answer: yes.
While your "brilliant" scheme "works", it gets boring pretty fast, as you now must transport your NuException object deep down 20 level from the listener (job) to the thrower (foo). Your bar method and other middle men has no interest or knowledge about your exception scheme but must pass it on anyway.
This is no longer the case after the update.
There are several ways to go.
Use an observer pattern like the Event broker or in AX 2012 and newer use delegates.
Stick to the infolog system and you use an InfoAction class to peggy bag your information to be used later. It can be used to display a stack trace or other interesting information.
Use a dedicated table for logging.
The third way may seem impractical, as any errors will undo the insert in the log. This is the default behavior but can be circumvented.
MyLogTable log;
Connection con = new UserConnection();
con.ttsBegin();
log.setConnection(con);
... // Set your fields
log.insert();
con.ttsCommit();
Your way to go depends on circumstances you do not mention.
I want to declaratively turn on and off logger for my Flex application and it seems that my usual way of determining if it's debug mode or not works only sometimes. The code for it:
isDebugSWF = new Error().getStackTrace().search(/:[0-9]+]$/m) > -1;
Do you know a better way for it?
Edit:
I posted answer below.
The static property Capabilities.isDebugger in the flash.system.Capabilities class specifies if the Flash player installed is a debug version or not. It requires Flash Player 9 or AIR 1.0 as the minimum version.
Keep in mind though that debug Flash Player installers are publicly available, and that there is nothing stopping users from installing the debug version of Flash. If have something sensitive that you want to hide, using conditional compilation would be a better option.
The previous approach was based on great article . One of the comments suggested that in Release the stacktrace is null, so I modified it properly:
protected function configureLogger() : void
{
if(!isDebugPlayer()|| !isDebugBuild())
{
// stop logging
Logger.hide = true;
}
else
{
// resume logging
Logger.hide = false;
}
}
private function isDebugPlayer() : Boolean
{
return Capabilities.isDebugger;
}
/**
* Returns true if the swf is built in debug mode
**/
private function isDebugBuild() : Boolean
{
var stackTrace:String = new Error().getStackTrace();
if(stackTrace == null || stackTrace.length == 0)
{
//in Release the stackTrace is null
return false;
}
//The code searches for line numbers of errors in StackTrace result.
//Only StackTrace result of a debug SWF file contains line numbers.
return stackTrace.search(/:[0-9]+]$/m) > -1;
}
This way I can finally configure ThunderBoltAS3 logger depending on current build type.
Looks like you are looking for the same, as answered in another post. Look here: How can you tell programmatically if a Flex App is running in debug mode?
We are using conditional compilation at our project :
Adobe Documentation
Im trying to connect a Flash client to BlazeDS. There has been some success with this from others using the vanilla BlazeDS setup. However I'm using the new Spring BlazeDS Integration from springsource and running aground.
The flash client actually seems to be working in that I can see the correct data in the body of the returned object, but for some reason unknown it fails casting as an IMessage. It fails in PollingChannel.as on this line with the subject line error
var messageList:Array = msg.body as Array;
for each (var message:IMessage in messageList) <--
On application load I register a whole bunch of classes like so
registerClassAlias( "flex.messaging.messages.RemotingMessage", RemotingMessage );
registerClassAlias("mx.messaging.messages.IMessage", IMessage);
etc..
my code is basically
var channelSet:mx.messaging.ChannelSet = new mx.messaging.ChannelSet();
var channel:mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel = new AMFChannel("my-amf", "http://localhost:8400/SpringA/messagebroker/amf");
channelSet.addChannel(channel);
var consumer:mx.messaging.Consumer = new Consumer();
consumer.channelSet = channelSet;
consumer.destination = "simple-feed";
consumer.subscribe();
consumer.addEventListener(MessageEvent.MESSAGE, test);
private function test(event:IMessage)
{
trace("msg..");
// breakpoint never makes it here
}
I have a flex client which works 100% with same destination/channel.
The error in the title means that you, for some reason, got an object that is not implementing or extending the IMessage interface, therefore the loop can not cast it in this part:
for each (var message:IMessage in messageList){
Either you should somehow make sure that you don't add anything that is not extending or implementing IMessage, or check if the variable IS actually ext./imp. it. Also - if you want to do that, you will have to change the for each like this:
for each (var obj in messageList){
if (obj is IMessage){
var message:IMessage = obj as IMessage;
// DO STUFF HERE
}
}
Add this Object mapping:
registerClassAlias("flex.messaging.io.ObjectProxy", ObjectProxy);
If on your Java VO objects you have overridden the hashcode() method, this situation could happen.
Remove the hashcode() override (if you are able to).
See my blog for the backstory on how I discovered this. http://squaredi.blogspot.com/2013/12/remoting-landmine-without-stack-trace.html
I had the same error when trying to send an actionscript object to the backend. My problem was that my c# equivalent object was missing an public parameterless constructor.