I am trying to add a group as a member to another group in AEM using workflow, but it is not adding and moreover it is not throwing any error.
Map<String, Object> subServiceParameters = new HashMap<>();
subServiceParameters.put(ResourceResolverFactory.SUBSERVICE, GlobalConstants.SERVICE_USER_MAPPER_NAME);
ResourceResolver resourceResolver = resourceResolverFactory.getServiceResourceResolver(subServiceParameters);
UserManager userManager = workflowSession.adaptTo(ResourceResolver.class).adaptTo(UserManager.class);
Group group = (Group) userManager.getAuthorizable("COMPANY_ADMINISTRATORS");
group.addMember(userManager.getAuthorizable("COMPANY_TAG_ADMINISTRATORS"));
Session session = resourceResolver.adaptTo(Session.class);
session.save();
I was using workflowsession to create usermanager object whereas i was saving the jcr session, because of this my code was not working. Please use the below line for user manager rest all working fine.
UserManager userManager = resourceResolver.adaptTo(UserManager.class);
Related
I would like to create different consumer groups dynamically for my kafka listener, therefore I have given up the standard way with #KafkaListener and went throw the manual
way with a ContainerProperties which is working fine like the example below.
However I can't use setRecordFilterStrategy because it is only present in the kafka listener
version ConcurrentKafkaListenerContainerFactory.
Do you know a way to do it or another to have dynamic consumer group and the possibility to use record filter strategy at the same time ?
Regards,
Luc
Map<String, Object> consumerConfig = ImmutableMap.of(
BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG, "brokerAddress",
GROUP_ID_CONFIG, "groupId"
);
DefaultKafkaConsumerFactory<String, String> kafkaConsumerFactory =
new DefaultKafkaConsumerFactory<>(
consumerConfig,
new StringDeserializer(),
new StringDeserializer());
ContainerProperties containerProperties = new ContainerProperties("topicName");
containerProperties.setMessageListener((MessageListener<String, String>) record -> {
//do something with received record
}
ConcurrentMessageListenerContainer container =
new ConcurrentMessageListenerContainer<>(
kafkaConsumerFactory,
containerProperties);
container.start();
See FilteringMessageListenerAdapter. So, you provide your MessageListener and some RecordFilterStrategy.
More in docs: https://docs.spring.io/spring-kafka/docs/current/reference/html/#filtering-messages
I have previously worked with Membership through "System.Web.Security.Membership"
Here, you can do the following:
var currentUser = Membership.GetUser();
var otherUser = Membership.GetUser(username);
...giving you a MembershipUser.
Now, with Identity, I can find a load of ways to get the current logged in user.
But no way to get another user.
I can use:
var userStore = new UserStore<IdentityUser>();
var userManager = new UserManager<IdentityUser>(userStore);
var user = userManager.Find(username, password);
But that takes both username and password, with no overload for just username.
How do i get the IdentityUser from only a username?
Almost every answer I find is connected to MVC.
This is for a WCF service, where authorization is made using Identity. And in some cases the user is getting to the site from an other site with a generated "token" - an encrypted string, containing the username. From here, user is logged in and a session-cookie is set, depending on users settings.
Also, is there a shorter way to get UserInformation?
"var currentUser = Membership.GetUser(username);"
is much more convenient than
"var user2 = (new UserManager((new UserStore()))).Find(username, password);"
UserManager has UserManager<TUser>.FindByNameAsync method. You can try using it to find user by name.
I want to add a custom type of currency in Corda. How do I do this?
For example: I want to introduce a currency called "egy" whose value is 1egy=2$.
To create a new token, you can use the TokenSDK to help.
The following lines create a new token.
TokenType myTokenType = new TokenType("MyCoin", 4);
IssuedTokenType issuingToken = new IssuedTokenType(coinIssuer, myTokenType);
For the rest, you can use the built-in IssueTokens to help.
Amount<IssuedTokenType> issueAmount = new Amount(100, issuingToken);
FungibleToken myToken = new FungibleToken(issueAmount, receivingParty, null);
SignedTransaction stx = subFlow(new IssueTokens(ImmutableList.of(myToken), observers));
However, you will have to declare the linkage between other tokens yourself.
Having a problem with saving user changes to the database, like changing the person's name. I'm using the IdentityModel that is automatically created in a new VS2013 web project using individual authentication. Sadly, the template doesn't allow you to change any user information, other than changing roles. I'm looking around via google, I haven't found much. Anyone implement updating using the base identity code?
This is the closest thing I found:
Updating user data - Asp.net Identity
I haven't been successful at incorporating default template. I've just started using Identity this week, so it might be my lack of understanding that's the problem.
var updatedUser = new ApplicationUser
{
Id = model.UserId,
UserName = model.UserName,
CustomerId = model.CustomerId,
Email = model.EmailAddress,
FirstName = model.FirstName,
LastName = model.LastName,
PhoneNumber = model.PhoneNumber,
};
...
var result = await UserManager.UpdateAsync(updatedUser);
My UserManager is created like this:
return _userManager ?? HttpContext.GetOwinContext().GetUserManager<ApplicationUserManager>();
I get the following error in the browser:
Attaching an entity of type 'ApplicationUser' failed because another entity of the same type already has the same primary key value. This can happen when using the 'Attach' method or setting the state of an entity to 'Unchanged' or 'Modified' if any entities in the graph have conflicting key values. This may be because some entities are new and have not yet received database-generated key values. In this case use the 'Add' method or the 'Added' entity state to track the graph and then set the state of non-new entities to 'Unchanged' or 'Modified' as appropriate
Thanks
The problem I had was I creating an ApplicationUser and saved the object to the database. Since Identity uses Entity Framework under the covers, the entity state of the "updatedUser" object is Added. So Entity Framework tried to INSERT in to the Identity database, causing the conflict. So, you have to get the user and update the returned user object for Entity Framework to know that the entity state is Modified. Here's the working code:
var user = await UserManager.FindByIdAsync(model.UserId);
user.Email = model.EmailAddress;
user.CustomerId = model.CustomerId;
user.FirstName = model.FirstName;
user.PhoneNumber = model.PhoneNumber;
user.LastName = model.LastName;
var result = await UserManager.UpdateAsync(user);
You can also use the AuthContext and update the state to EntityState.Modified. Below is an example. This will allow you to only make one call to the DB instead of two.
AuthContext authContext = new AuthContext();
authContext.Entry(updatedUser).State = EntityState.Modified;
The system I am working on does not use standard ASP.NET Auth/ Membership facilities for logging users in/ out. Therefore after logging the user in I want to issue a new Session ID to the user in order to prevent Session trapping/ Hijacking. The problem i have is that although I have been able to successfully create a new session with a new ID and copy the various components to the newly created session eg. session["value"]. By the end of the code excerpt below the newly created session is the current HTTPContext's session, and has the session values that were copied accross. However after performing a Response.Redirect the new session is in action, but none of the session["values"] have persisted across the two requests. As you can see from the code below i've tried adding the values to a number of collections to avail.
Any help would be amazing!! Thanks in advance
bool IsAdded = false;
bool IsRedirect = false;
HttpSessionState state = HttpContext.Current.Session;
SessionIDManager manager = new SessionIDManager();
HttpStaticObjectsCollection staticObjects = SessionStateUtility.GetSessionStaticObjects(HttpContext.Current);
SessionStateItemCollection items = new SessionStateItemCollection();
foreach (string item in HttpContext.Current.Session.Contents)
{
var a = HttpContext.Current.Session.Contents[item];
items[item] = a;
}
HttpSessionStateContainer newSession = new HttpSessionStateContainer(
manager.CreateSessionID(HttpContext.Current),
items,
staticObjects,
state.Timeout,
true,
state.CookieMode,
state.Mode,
state.IsReadOnly);
foreach (string item in HttpContext.Current.Session.Contents)
{
var a = HttpContext.Current.Session.Contents[item];
newSession.Add(item,a);
}
SessionStateUtility.RemoveHttpSessionStateFromContext(HttpContext.Current);
SessionStateUtility.AddHttpSessionStateToContext(HttpContext.Current, newSession);
manager.RemoveSessionID(HttpContext.Current);
manager.SaveSessionID(HttpContext.Current, newSession.SessionID, out IsRedirect, out IsAdded);
return newSession.SessionID;
Maybe I'm missing something here but won't this work:
Session["mysession"] = mySessionObject;
Basically it appears it's not possible since you can only add session variables once there has been one round trip to the client to create the corresponding session cookie. Therefore I had to create the new new session (with new ID) so that by the time I came to adding session variables, the client cookie had the appropriate session id: annoying since this in reality is issuing the new session ID before the user is authenticated.
Interestingly, it seems a little strange that issuing a new Session ID is exactly what the standard asp.net authentication/ membership functionality does but is able to maintain session variables, and yet doing it manually it doesn't....are there some methods for this that are not being exposed to us mere developers maybe....