Local server fails to start (Local FlyWhell) - wordpress

Local flywheel is not starting properly because it cannot open port 443 ("Heads-up!, Local's routing is having trouble starting" is the message).
I used netstats -o and nothing was using port 443.
The log from FlyWheel says:
bind() to 0.0.0.0:443 failed (10013: An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions)

try this
run CMD as admin
type net stop http

There is an easy solution...
Preferences> Advanced> Router Mode > Localhost
It will work then.
You can watch this too
Heads up! Local's router is having trouble starting - Solved

Related

web GRPC and Iroha (JS implementation for iroha)

I am trying to run this docker file https://gitlab.com/snippets/1713665
consoles
I have running iroha container as you can see in right console on 50051 port, but on running the above docker file for web GRPC then you can see in left console it is unable to make connection. as i have also tried with enabling and disabling the firewalls and also with opening the 50051 withudo ufw allow 50051 sudo ufw allow 50051 ...But in the end i have the same results
"Err: connection error: desc = "transport: Error while dialing dial tcp 127.0.0.1:50051: connect: connection refused". Reconnecting... system=system"
I have also posted this issue month ago but no once gave me any response, Thats why i am reposting with further elaboration
Try running the grpc web proxy, with the backend address as localhost, instead of whatever is default in the gitlab post.
ex. ./grpcwebproxy-v0.13.0-osx-x86_64 --backend_addr=localhost:50051 --run_tls_server=false
From the console logs, it looks like it is trying to connect to dev.localdomain:50051

Nginx gives a FormatMessage() error out-of-the-box on windows 10

I'm having trouble setting up nginx 1.13.5 on windows 10.
I downloaded the windows binary from the nginx site.
I ran the executable using the example config file and got the following error:
nginx: [emerg] bind() to 0.0.0.0:80 failed (10013: FormatMessage() error:(15100))
Google turned up empty.
No matter what I do the error doesn't go away and I cannot find any information about it.
I checked if anything was running on port 80 but nothing is.
I had a windows process (WAS) using port 80. Shutting it down fixed it.

Gitlab ports 80 & 8080 taken by a separate Gitlab instance?

I have Gitlab 8.6 running on an Ubuntu 14.04 server that seems to have gotten messed up. I consistently get a 502 error when accessing the site. The server likely has not been restarted since installing Gitlab initially, and a power outage caused the server to reboot. Now, I cannot start/restart Gitlab due to what appears to be port conflicts.
I installed Gitlab via source, I don't have any custom port configurations, and am using NGINX. nginx -t shows that the configuration appears to be correct syntax-wise.
When I run netstat -tupln, I see that Unicorn & a Gitlab instance is already running on :8080 and :80 respectively at boot up. I suspect that a 2nd instance of Gitlab was installed which is being run at boot and that is causing the proper instance to have port conflicts when I try to run it via service gitlab restart. I'm not even sure if that's possible, but I can't seem to figure out where to go from here. Every time I run sudo gitlab-ctl reconfigure or service gitlab start, it fails and the unicorn.stderror.log shows bind errors to the :8080 port. I tried moving the Unicorn service to :8081 as well, but I still receive the port binding error.
Does anyone know how I can detect if there are multiple Gitlab instances running, and maybe if there is a way to remove a duplicated one if it's possible? Thank you!
EDIT: Here is what is in the /etc/gitlab/gitlab.rb file. Everything else is commented out.
## Url on which GitLab will be reachable
external_url 'http://my-gitlab-instance.domain.com'
EDIT 2: My /home/git/gitlab/ directory is mapped to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce.git, and is on the 8-7-stable branch. gitlab-shell and gitlab-workhorse are on the correct versions according to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/update/8.6-to-8.7.md
EDIT 3: I have gotten to a point where the Gitlab seems to self-check okay by removing the gitlab-ce package (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab/issues/135), but the server returns a 404. NGINX, Unicorn, Sidekiq, and gitlab-workhorse all say that they're running. I see that unicorn.rb is listening on :8080, and nginx is listening on 0.0.0.0:80 and :::80. I guess now I'm troubleshooting this 404 and hopefully I will be back to my install-from-source.
What I have found is that there were 2 issues causing the errors I had.
First, I removed a "gitlab-ce" package that was installed, following the instructions here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab/issues/135. For some reason, when I restart the machine now I have to restart these services, in order, for Gitlab to run properly redis-server, gitlab, nginx. However, Gitlab does start responding properly after that.
Second, the 404 error was due to a different server that was also listening on that IP address, causing a conflict.
I will likely move to using the omnibus package on a fresh, new server going forward, but at least the immediate issues appear resolved. Thanks for your help, SLY!

Exposing localhost to the internet via tunneling (using ngrok): HTTP error 400: bad request; invalid hostname

From previous versions of the question, there is this: Browse website with ip address rather than localhost, which outlines pretty much what I've done so far...I've got the local IP working. Then I found ngrok, and apparently I don't need to connect via the IP.
What I am trying to do is expose my website running on localhost to the internet. I found a tool that will do this: ngrok.
Running the website in visual studio, the website starts up on localhost/port#. I run the command "ngrok http port#" in the command line. Everything seems to start up fine. I generate a couple of URLs, and the ngrok inspection url (localhost:4040) works.
The only problem is that when I go to the generated URLs, I get an HTTP error 400: bad request invalid hostname. This is a different error than when I run "ngrok http wrongport#", which is a host not found error...so I think something good is happening. I just can't tell what...
Is there a step I am missing in exposing my site to the internet via the tunneling service? If there is, I can't find it in the ngrok documentation.
Troubleshot this issue with ngrok. In the words of inconshrevable, some applications get angry when they see a different host header than expected.
Running the following command should fix the problem:
ngrok http [port] --host-header="localhost:[port]"
Depending on the version, you may also want to try:
ngrok http [port] --host-header="localhost:[port]"
Following command will fix the issue
ngrok http -host-header=localhost 8080
This didn't work for me.
you could do the following:
For IIS Express
In VS 2015:
Go to the .vs\config\applicationhost.config folder in your project
In VS 2013 and earlier:
Go to %USERPROFILE%\My Documents\IISExpress\config\applicationhost.config
Find the binding that says:
<binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="*:5219:localhost" />
For me it was a project running on port 5219
change it to
<binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="*:5219:" />
IIS Express will now accept all incoming connections on that port.
Disadvantage: you need to run IIS Express as admin.
or you could rewrite the host header in Ngrok:
ngrok.exe http -host-header=rewrite localhost:5219
For https this works:
ngrok http https://localhost:<PORT> --host-header="localhost:<PORT>"
UPDATED COMMAND FOR LATEST VERSION
Tested with: (Windows) (ngrok v3.0.5)
Use -- instead of -
ngrok http --host-header=localhost 8080
The simplest thing for me was using iisexpress-proxy + ngrok.
First I install iisexpress-proxy globally with npm
npm install -g iisexpress-proxy
Then I proxy my localhost with it. Say for instance my site is running on 3003.
iisexpress-proxy 3003 to 12345 where 12345 is the new http port I want to proxy to.
Then I can run ngrok on it.
./ngrok.exe http 12345
It just works! 😃
But I think it works only with http. Right now I don't use https to test, but even if it works, usually it's a lot of work as always.
For https this works:
ngrok http https://localhost:<PORT> --host-header="localhost:<PORT>"
Try with different locations from the Global infrastructure > Locations
ngrok http -region eu 8080
You can make a request and view any traffic passing through your tunnel using the ngrok traffic inspector at http://localhost:4040.
OR in command line
ngrok http -region eu 8080 --log=stdout
If one region fails then try with another.
ngrok runs tunnel servers in datacenters around the world. The location of the datacenter within a given region may change without notice (e.g. the European servers may move from Frankfurt to London).
us - United States (Ohio)
eu - Europe (Frankfurt)
ap - Asia/Pacific (Singapore)
au - Australia (Sydney)
sa - South America (Sao Paulo)
jp - Japan (Tokyo)
in - India (Mumbai)
First open ngrok configuration YAML file, run from terminal:
ngrok config edit
Example of yaml for localhost setup (client & server):
version: "2"
authtoken: {YOUR_AUTH_TOKEN_FROM_NGROK_WEBSITE}
tunnels:
client:
addr: 3000
proto: http
host_header: localhost
server:
addr: 4000
proto: http
host_header: localhost
Save the config file based on your client and server ports and run the following command:
ngrok start --all
This will make ngrok open a tunnel for all the configurations declared in the yaml file
Had IIS Express .net web API, had installed NGROK in docker (windows as a host)
Had "Bad Request" error, the next command worked for me:
docker run -it -e NGROK_AUTHTOKEN=<token> ngrok/ngrok --host-header=localhost:21852 http host.docker.internal:21852
As I understood later, --host-header needed because IIS Express refuses all requests from outside (must be "localhost:port
"), host.docker.internal I've used instead of localhost, because NGROK was running inside docker, while IIS Express was running on a windows host.
I had the same issue and used the following solution:
Make sure your application binding in your IIS is set to All Unassigned IP address
Run ngrok HTTP 127.0.0.1:173 --region=eu --hostname=yourcustomdomain.eu.ngrok.io
That's it. Works perfectly. This solution is also for paid pro accounts
Steps.
Run command on your console from ngrok.exe directory . ngrok http
port i.e ngrok http 80 https://www.screencast.com/t/oyuEPlR6Z Set
Ngrok url to your app .
It will create a tunnel to your application.
Thanks .

JNDI over HTTP on JBoss 4.2.3GA

I've got a remote server on eapps.com that I'm using as my "production" server. I have my own computer at home that I'm using as my "development" server. I'm trying to use JNDI over HTTP to do some batch processing. The following works at home, but not on the eapps machine.
I'm connecting to some EJBs (stateless session), and have my jndi.properties set to this:
(this is for the eapps machine)
java.naming.factory.initial=org.jboss.naming.HttpNamingContextFactory
java.naming.provider.url=http://my.prodhost.com:8080/invoker/JNDIFactory
java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=org.jboss.naming.client:org.jnp.interfaces
# timeout is in milliseconds
jnp.timeout=15000
jnp.sotimeout=15000
jnp.maxRetries=3
(this is for my machine at home)
java.naming.factory.initial=org.jboss.naming.HttpNamingContextFactory
java.naming.provider.url=http://localhost:8080/invoker/JNDIFactory
java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=org.jnp.interfaces
java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=org.jboss.naming.client
# timeout is in milliseconds
jnp.timeout=15000
jnp.sotimeout=15000
jnp.maxRetries=3
As I said, it works at home, but when I try it remotely, I get:
Can not get connection to server. Problem establishing socket connection for InvokerLocator [socket://my.prodhost.com:4446//?dataType=invocation&enableTcpNoDelay=true&marshaller=org.jboss.invocation.unified.marshall.InvocationMarshaller&socketTimeout=600000&unmarshaller=org.jboss.invocation.unified.marshall.InvocationUnMarshaller]
...
Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect
Am I doing something wrong here, or is it possibly a firewall issue? To the best of my knowledge, port 4446 is not blocked.
Are the differences in the jndi.properties intentional (at the java.naming.factory.url.pkgs property level)?
Also, can you run a netstat -a | grep 4446 on both machines and update the question with the output?
Update: If the netstat command didn't return anything for port 4446 (JBoss was running, right?), then the JBoss Remoting Connector for the UnifiedInvoker service is very likely not listening on your eApps host, hence the connection timeout. Maybe this service has been disabled by eApps, you should contact the support and discuss this with them.
Just in case, a sample Connector configuration can be found in the jboss-service.xml under the server node's conf directory. Maybe compare the remote one (if you have access to it) with your local file to confirm this (but if it's disable, there must be a reason, discuss it with the support).
And by the way, this is what I get when I run the netstat command with JBoss 4.2.3.GA started on my GNU/Linux machine (default configuration):
$ netstat -a | grep 4446
tcp 0 0 localhost:4446 *:* LISTEN

Resources