We have web apps (ASP.Net Core hosted by IIS) running on the customers' Computers (behind a NAT).
Cell phones or any other devices connected to the Internet should get access to the Web app.
Restrictions:
No public ip address.
We do not want to configure Dynamic DNS for the customers because hardware and software for internet access is not provided by us.
We want something like an http relay server to forward client requests to the according web apps and vice versa.
e.g.
www.example.org/c1 goes to the web app on the PC of Customer 1
www.example.org/c2 goes to the web app on the PC of Customer 2
or even better
c1.example.org/ goes to the web app on the PC of Customer 1
c2.example.org/ goes to the web app on the PC of Customer 2
What I evaluated so far:
Microsoft Azure Hybrid Connection:
I am still struggling to perform a login on the web app - The browser does not get the authentication cookie although other cookies seem to work fine.
The price tag is quite high and is difficult for us to bill the customers who are farmers and always urge to pay the least possible amount of money for anything.
RabbitMQ with ThinkTecture RelayServer (https://github.com/thinktecture/relayserver):
I could not get the RelayServer plugin to work yet.
Here is the error trace I get:
\RelayServer>Thinktecture.Relay.Server.exe start
[12:27:59 WRN] No SharedSecret or OAuthCertificate is configured. Please configure one of them. Continuing with a random value which will make all tokens invalid on restart.
[12:27:59 DBG] Using settings file. settings-file-name=C:\Users\schema\AppData\Local\Thinktecure\RelayServer\settings_443.config.json
[12:27:59 DBG] Loaded setting from file. origin-id=ecf0e337-c111-450a-b802-384df2fbce76
[12:27:59 INF] Configuration Result:
[Success] Name TTRelayServer
[Success] DisplayName Thinktecture RelayServer
[Success] Description Thinktecture RelayServer Process
[Success] ServiceName TTRelayServer
[12:27:59 INF] Topshelf v4.1.0.172, .NET Framework v4.0.30319.42000
[12:27:59 DBG] Starting TTRelayServer
[12:28:10 ERR] The service failed to start.
System.ServiceProcess.TimeoutException: Der Vorgang wurde nicht abgeschlossen, da der Timeout abgelaufen ist.
bei System.ServiceProcess.ServiceController.WaitForStatus(ServiceControllerStatus desiredStatus, TimeSpan timeout)
bei Topshelf.Runtime.Windows.WindowsHostEnvironment.StartService(String serviceName, TimeSpan startTimeOut)
bei Topshelf.Hosts.StartHost.Run()
RabbitMQ is up and running and I was playing around successfully implementing a couple of tutorials.
Questions:
Suggestions would be most appreciated for good and easy to setup alternatives which are free or not too expensive.
If anybody has experiences with ThinkTekture RelayServer you are welcome to share your thoughts as well.
There is a way to achieve this using Premium Functions along with its VNET Integration feature.
But this would require a link between the VNET on Azure and your on-premises network with something like a Site-to-Site (S2S) VPN or ExpressRoute which both come with a cost especially if there isn't one yet.
If this is acceptable, Premium Functions are indeed a way to approach this. There is an official tutorial that covers this. For reference, the steps to get this up an running are
Create a Premium Function App
Connection Function App to the virtual network (which already has a S2S or Express Route setup)
Create a Function Proxy to access your internal web app
Related
I have implemented a web service using ASP.NET WebAPI framework.
The response time is faster in my local system (target framework4.5) that deploying to the server.
After deployment to Windows2012R2 IIS8.5, a response takes about 30 seconds for each request. I have tried the sample web service without any data retrieval from database. This also takes about longer time. I installed Fiddler and identified that TTFB took about 26 seconds.
I created the web service using this url:
https://www.c-sharpcorner.com/article/create-simple-web-api-in-asp-net-mvc/
Even displaying "welcome" message itself takes about 30 seconds.
Any thoughts on where to look to investigate the performance issue?
Here is sample code as in URL
namespace Demo1.Controllers
{
[System.Web.Mvc.SessionState(System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateBehavior.Disabled)]
public class DemoController : ApiController
{
public string Get()
{
return "Welcome To PARIS Web API";
}
public List<string> Get(int Id)
{
return new List<string> {
"Data1",
"Data2"
};
}
}
}
Performance of compiled code on two different servers is almost always related to the physical resources that have been made available at the time to code runs.
Keep in mind that we as developers usually code on PCs with far better specs than the servers we deploy to!
For API deployments, it is common to deploy to cloud or minimal servers that have either reduced CPU or Core counts, or the resources available to your deployed app have been restricted to allow for the server to run multiple apps.
Sometimes to reduce costs we deploy to servers with the resources that we think our app needs, without remembering that the OS of that server will have basic requirements that will need to be met.
You have already isolated the issue about the available bandwidth between the deployed server and the database, for other punters keep this in mind as a potential bottleneck, keep your database close to your APIs.
If every request to a simple site is slow, check the logs on the slow server, look for errors or indications of slow starts, or that the app is restarting for every request. It is common and we accept slow cold starts of our web apps, but the web app should remain alive between requests, even if it is session/state less.
It would help to know if you are deploying to a physical server, virtual machine, cloud app service or a container host, if the server is in the cloud or on the ground and if you known the general bandwidth available from the server?
Just spit-balling, this was an old .Net gotchya: Check that your server or firewall is not blocking outbound internet calls!
Due to low level calls in .Net trying to perform SSL Certificate Revocation checks your code may wait at startup trying to make external calls. This post discussed options to disable that. Something to try if all else fails.
I need your help with a Kerberos double hop issue I have... After reading many posts online on the topic, I still cannot understand what is wrong is my setup. Here is the setup I use:
Client PC
Web server hosting a simple ASMX web service
Web server hosting SharePoint 2013
see diagram
All servers are trusted for delegation, everyone is on the same domain (no forest) and no load-balancing is used. Each web server uses IIS 7.5 and each app pool is setup with a domain service account.Each service account is trusted for delegation.
Important note: both web services are accessed via a DNS entry (HOST records):
http://mywebservice/ for the middle server
http://sharepoint/ for the Sharepoint server
I also setup IIS on the web server (Server 1) to use the app pool credentials "useAppPoolCredentials=True" and left the kernel on.
So far, I have the following SPNs setup:
Server 1: HOST/Server1; HOST/Server1.domain.com; HTTP/mywebserice; HTTP/mywebservice.domain.com
Server 2: HOST/Server2; HOST/Server2.domain.com
Service1:
Service2:
I have tried many permutations betweens the various SPNs with no luck so far :(
At the moment, I can connect to the web service (Server1) using Kerberos, but then "NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON" is passed to Sharepoint server.
Can anyone help me figure out what is the correct setup?
Thanks for your help.
I finally managed to get it working. To do so, I used DelegConfig web app (by brian-murphy-booth) available here. It confirmed that my setup was initially incorrect and helped me identify what needed changing.
Here is my final setup - see diagram:
Web service server: Only SPN for HOTS/Server1 + Trusted for Kerberos delegation
Sharepoint server: Only SPN for HOST/Server2 + Trusted for Kerberos delegation
Service account 1 (for web service app pool): Added SPN for HTTP/mywebservice
Service account 2 (for sharepoint app pool): Added SPN for HTTP/sharepoint
Few things you have to be careful with here:
If you are using DNS entries, register the SPNs against the DNS name, not the IP
Make sure your DNS entries are records of type "HOST (A)" and not "CNAME"
Always register SPNs against the simple name (i.e. HTTP/sharepoint) and the FQDN (i.e. HTTP/sharepoint.domain.com)
Leave some time for the AD changes to be replicated to all Domain controllers (if applicable) - That was my downfall!! I was too quick to test after an change and it never worked... Waiting 15-20 minutes after a change helped me fine tune my setup and understand exactly what was wrong
Make sure you have no SPNs in duplicate! To check, open an command prompt and run the command "setspn -x". It will list all duplicate SPNs in your AD.
I know there are many posts out there about this topic, but none of them actually describe in one diagram the ideal setup for a given configuration. So I thought I would post this answer to my own question; hoping it will help somebody with this nightmare of Kerberos double hop issue.
Thanks a lot to brian-murphy-booth for his wonderful tool! If you read this, you are my saviour mate!
(This is a question about a vague problem. I try to present all relevant data, in the hope that someone has helpful information; apologies for the long description.)
Our web app
We have a .NET 4 web application running in IIS 7.5 accessing Active Directory and a SQL Server database.
This web application is running under a virtual 'app pool identity', by setting the Identity of the application's application pool to ApplicationPoolIdentity. A concise description of virtual identities can be found in a StackOverflow answer, and the blog post to which it refers: an app pool identity is just an additional group which is added to the web application's worker processes which is running as 'network service'. However, one source vaguely suggests that "Network Service and ApplicationPoolIdentity do have differences that IIS.net site documents do not publish." So a virtual identity might be more than just an additional group.
We chose to use ApplicationPoolIdentity, as opposed to NetworkService, because it became the default in IIS 7.5 (see, e.g., here), and per Microsoft's recommendation: "This identity allows administrators to specify permissions that pertain only to the identity under which the application pool is running, thereby increasing server security." (from processModel Element for add for applicationPools [IIS 7 Settings Schema]) "Application Pool Identities are a powerful new isolation feature" which "make running IIS applications even more secure and reliable. " (from IIS.net article "Application Pool Identities")
The application uses Integrated Windows Authentication, but with <identity impersonate="false"/>, so that not the end user's identity but the virtual app pool identity is used to run our code.
This application queries Active Directory using the System.DirectoryServices classes, i.e., the ADSI API. In most places this is done without specifying an additional username/password or other credentials.
This application also connects to a SQL Server database using Integrated Security=true in the connection string. If the database is local, then we see that IIS APPPOOL\OurAppPoolName is used to connect to the database; if the database is remote, then the machine account OURDOMAIN\ourwebserver$ is used.
Our problems
We regularly have issues where a working installation starts to fail in one of the following ways.
When the database is on a remote system, then the database connection starts to fail: "Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON'. Reason: Token-based server access validation failed with an infrastructure error. Check for previous errors." The previous error is "Error: 18456, Severity: 14, State: 11." So it seems that now OURDOMAIN\ourwebserver$ is not used anymore, but instead anonymous access is attempted. (We have anecdotal evidence that this problem occurred when UAC was switched off, and that it went away after switching on UAC. But note that changing UAC requires a reboot...) A similar problem is reported in IIS.net thread "use ApplicationPoolIdentity to connect to SQL", specifically in one reply.
Active Directory operations through ADSI (System.DirectoryServices) start to fail with error 0x8000500C ("Unknown Error"), 0x80072020 ("An operations error occurred."), or 0x200B ("The specified directory service attribute or value does not exist").
Signing in to the application from Internet Explorer starts to fail, with HTTP 401 errors. But if in IIS we then put NTLM before Negotiate then it works again. (Note that access to AD is needed for Kerberos but not for NTLM.) A similar problem is reported in IIS.net thread "Window Authentication Failing with AppPool Identity".
Our hypothesis and workaround
At least the AD and sign-in problems always seem to go away when switching the application pool from ApplicationPoolIdentity to NetworkService. (We found one report confirming this.)
Page "Troubleshooting Authentication Problems on ASP Pages" has some suggestions related to primary vs. secondary tokens, and what I find encouraging is that it links the first two of our errors: it mentions NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON access, and AD errors 0x8000500C and "The specified directory service attribute or value does not exist".
(The same page also mentions ADSI schema cache problems, but everything we can find on that topic is old. For now we consider this to be unrelated.)
Based on the above, our current working hypothesis is that, only when running under a virtual app pool identity, our web application (IIS? worker process?) suddenly loses its primary token, so that IIS only has a secondary token, so that all access to Active Directory and SQL Server is done anonymously, leading to all of the above errors.
For now we intend to switch from ApplicationPoolIdentity to NetworkService. Hopefully this makes all of the above problems go away. But we are not sure; and we would like to switch back if possible.
Our question
Is the above hypothesis correct, and if so, is this a bug in IIS/Windows/.NET? Under which circumstances does this primary token loss occur?
Through Microsoft Support I found out that we ran into the issue described in Microsoft Knowledge Base article KB2545850. This only occurs when ApplicationPoolIdentity is used. It occurs very easily, namely, after the machine account password is changed (which by default happens automatically every 30 days), and then IIS is restarted (e.g., through iisreset). Note that the problem goes away after a reboot, according to Microsoft and our observations.
According to Microsoft it is not possible to check if your Windows/IIS has gotten into this state.
Microsoft has a hotfix attached to this KB article. There is no indication when that hotfix will be rolled into an official delivery, and the hotfix is already 10 months old. In our specific case, we decided to switch to NetworkService instead.
See https://serverfault.com/a/403534/126432 for my comments on the same problem/solution.
Using the hotfix you linked to allowed me to get ApplicationPoolIdentity working as the docs say it should. This hotfix doesn't specifically describe a solution for accessing network resources as NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON, but it's related to the computer password changing. Bottom line is that it worked for me, at least so far.
This is also relevant for Umbraco using Active Directory authentication.
From time-to-time you may get this exception:
Configuration Error
The specified directory service attribute or value does not exist
This is apparently caused by the problem outlined here. A reboot invariably fixes it.
I have an ASP.NET MVC intranet site that uses Windows Authentication (Kerberos) exclusively with pass-through authentication. It is setup to use an app pool (v4/integrated) that uses the Network Service identity. The web site provides a pretty UI on top of a network share that is hosted on another machine (SAMBA NAS box). Occassionally (and usually when someone hasn't accessed the site for a while), clients are getting a 401 authorization error at the point the MVC code is trying to get directory info (System.IO.Directory.GetLastWriteTime) on the remote UNC share. The event log on the IIS machine captures a security audit failure at this same point in time:
+ System
- Provider
[ Name] Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing
[ Guid] {54849625-5478-4994-a5ba-3e3b0328c30d}
EventID 4625
Version 0
Level 0
Task 12544
Opcode 0
Keywords 0x8010000000000000
- TimeCreated
[ SystemTime] 2012-03-17T00:43:50.522Z
EventRecordID 398873
Correlation
- Execution
[ ProcessID] 696
[ ThreadID] 792
Channel Security
Computer lvtloweb1.acme.com
Security
- EventData
SubjectUserSid S-1-0-0
SubjectUserName -
SubjectDomainName -
SubjectLogonId 0x0
TargetUserSid S-1-0-0
TargetUserName
TargetDomainName
Status 0xc000006d
FailureReason %%2304
SubStatus 0xc0000133
LogonType 3
LogonProcessName Kerberos
AuthenticationPackageName Kerberos
WorkstationName -
TransmittedServices -
LmPackageName -
KeyLength 0
ProcessId 0x0
ProcessName -
IpAddress -
IpPort -
The weird thing is that if you sit and refresh the page over and over, it usually get's past the 401 error in about a minute. Anybody got any ideas on how to troubleshoot such a problem? Oh yeah, the IIS machine is hosted in a VM. The guest OS is Windows Server 2008 Enterprise 6.0.6002 Service Pack 2.
Keith,
Being that it appears to happen most after the user has been idle, I'm leaning towards some kind event (i.e. a session timeout) that might invalidate the credentials for your server. I'm assuming one server since you didn't mention any web farm.
A part of me thinks you've likely hammered the session timeout angle. Unless you felt safe trusting that the users would 'auto authenticate' and timing out mid operation wouldn't cause it to fail. That said, I'm not sure I'd completely trust that is the case. To at least eliminate this possibility I would add a routine that logs information about the current session/credentials before that operation is started. Even though the user is "always logged in" assuming they are on their computer I've seen weird issues with VPNs, proxy servers, server double hops, IE configurations for 'trusted zones' and 'intranet' settings. Even a computer suddenly having its route to the server changed could cause issues. I'm not sure the network emulation on a VM would play a part, but who knows.
Here is a 'starter' article regarding IE and it's complex approach to authentication and the role it plays as the client application accessing your Intranet MVC app. (It pays to dig deep on how IE auto-magically authenticates in a Windows AD environment.)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/258063/en-us
Here is a related problem someone had due to a double-hop causing 401s. I've also included a link to another good 'starter page' on investigating these types of issues.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/sqlreportingservices/thread/6d1604e5-e739-41e4-89a5-c6681bff2e61
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/06/13/understanding-kerberos-double-hop.aspx
Sorry if anything above you already knew or for the general nature of my response. It's tough without actually having network access or being able to add logging to your code. I hope I've pointed you in the right direction.
The setup: 2 web servers and a seperate state server
I have two production web servers in a load balanced configuration. The ASP.NET web app they host shares state (like a web farm) using this line in their web.configs:
<sessionState mode="StateServer" stateConnectionString="tcpip=9.9.9.9:42424" cookieless="false" timeout="60"/>
9.9.9.9 is the IP of the machine the asp.net session state service is running on (ok it's not 9.9.9.9 really, changed to protect the innocent). It's a third machine (the database server, actually.
It worked fine until...
The error: website down!
Suddenly the site went down, just showing a generic asp.net error page ('turn custom errors off to see this error' or whatever).
The app's log recorded the actual error message:
An unhandled exception occurred Unable to make the session state request to the session state server. Please ensure that the ASP.NET State service is started and that the client and server ports are the same. If the server is on a remote machine, please ensure that it accepts remote requests by checking the value of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\aspnet_state\Parameters\AllowRemoteConnection. If the server is on the local machine, and if the before mentioned registry value does not exist or is set to 0, then the state server connection string must use either 'localhost' or '127.0.0.1' as the server name.
So it appears that the web app was unable to contact the state server (9.9.9.9).
I "tried turning if auf and then onnegen" - restarting the state server fixed the problem.
Why?
I really want know what happened and why so I can prevent it happening again.
So far all I have are two theories:
A windows update, to .net framework 4, was applied around that time on the state server. So maybe the update did something to the asp.net state service? The windows event viewer showed that .net 4 had logged a warning around then:
Updates to the IIS metabase were aborted because IIS is either not installed or is disabled on this machine. To configure ASP.NET to run in IIS, please install or enable IIS and re-register ASP.NET using aspnet_regiis.exe /i.
Some kind of temporary network problem between the prod web sites and the state server? They do sit right next to each other in the same physical rack though.
??? Any other ideas, anyone?
Anyone seen this before, or able to correct me on anything?
Has this happened since? The easy answer is that the problem was with the db server, not the web app. Are there any relevant errors in the log on the db server?
The fact that both apps threw an error indicates that a common resource was the problem. We chased a similar issue for a good solid week awhile back, and eventually found a faulty fiber channel gadget. (that's below my OSI level, not sure about the details).
Start–> Administrative Tools –> Services
Right-click over the ASP.NET State Service and click “start”
It is working fine We need to follow the steps
Had a similar issue before when our Infrastructure team tried sneaking in an install of 3.5 when they forgot to install it on our Production box. Not bouncing a server after a framework update is just going to cause all kinds of weird problems.