I am currently working on a task that requires me to query a list of stocks from an sql db.
The problem is that it is a list where there are 1:n stocks traded per date. I want to calculate the the share of each stock int he portfolio on a given day (see example) and pass it to a new data frame. In other words date x occurs 2 times (once for stock A and once for stock B) and then pull it together that date x occurs only one time with the new values.
'data.frame': 1010 obs. of 5 variables:
$ ID : int 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
$ Date : Date, format: "2019-11-22" "2019-11-21" "2019-11-20" "2019-11-19" ...
$ Close: num 52 51 50.1 50.2 50.2 ...
$ Volume : num 5415 6196 3800 4784 6189 ...
$ Stock_ID : Factor w/ 2 levels "1","2": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
RawInput<-data.frame(Date=c("2017-22-11","2017-22-12","2017-22-13","2017-22-11","2017-22-12","2017-22-13","2017-22-11"), Close=c(50,55,56,10,11,12,200),Volume=c(100,110,150,60,70,80,30),Stock_ID=c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3))
RawInput$Stock_ID<-as.factor(RawInput$Stock_ID)
*cannot transfer the date to a date variable in this example
I would like to have a new dataframe that generates the Value traded per day, the weight of each stock, and the daily returns per day, while keeping the number of stocks variable.
I hope I translated the issue properly so that I can receive help.
Thank you!
I think the easiest way to do this would be to use the dplyr package. You may need to read some documentation but the mutate and group_by function may be able do what you want. This function will allow you to modify the current dataframe by either adding a new column or changing the existing data.
Lets start with a reproducible dataset
RawInput<-data.frame(Date=c("2017-22-11","2017-22-12","2017-22-13","2017-22-11","2017-22-12","2017-22-13","2017-22-11"),
Close=c(50,55,56,10,11,12,200),
Volume=c(100,110,150,60,70,80,30),
Stock_ID=c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3))
RawInput$Stock_ID<-as.factor(RawInput$Stock_ID)
library(magrittr)
library(dplyr)
dat2 <- RawInput %>%
group_by(Date, Stock_ID) %>% #this example only has one stock type but i imagine you want to group by stock
mutate(CloseMean=mean(Close),
CloseSum=sum(Close),
VolumeMean=mean(Volume),
VolumeSum=sum(Volume)) #what ever computation you need to do with
#multiple stock values for a given date goes here
dat2 %>% select(Stock_ID, Date, CloseMean, CloseSum, VolumeMean,VolumeSum) %>% distinct() #dat2 will still be the same size as dat, thus use the distinct() function to reduce it to unique values
# A tibble: 7 x 6
# Groups: Date, Stock_ID [7]
Stock_ID Date CloseMean CloseSum VolumeMean VolumeSum
<fct> <fct> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 1 2017-22-11 50 50 100 100
2 1 2017-22-12 55 55 110 110
3 1 2017-22-13 56 56 150 150
4 2 2017-22-11 10 10 60 60
5 2 2017-22-12 11 11 70 70
6 2 2017-22-13 12 12 80 80
7 3 2017-22-11 200 200 30 30
This data set that you provided actually only has one unique Stock_ID and Date combinations so there was nothing actually done with the data. However if you remove Stock_ID where necessary you can see how this function would work
dat2 <- RawInput %>%
group_by(Date) %>%
mutate(CloseMean=mean(Close),
CloseSum=sum(Close),
VolumeMean=mean(Volume),
VolumeSum=sum(Volume))
dat2 %>% select(Date, CloseMean, CloseSum, VolumeMean,VolumeSum) %>% distinct()
# A tibble: 3 x 5
# Groups: Date [3]
Date CloseMean CloseSum VolumeMean VolumeSum
<fct> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 2017-22-11 86.7 260 63.3 190
2 2017-22-12 33 66 90 180
3 2017-22-13 34 68 115 230
After reading your first reply, You will have to be specific on how you are trying to calculate the weight. Also define your end result.
Im going to assume weight is just percentage by total cost. And the end result is for each date show the weight per stock. In other words a matrix of dates and stock Ids
library(tidyr)
RawInput %>%
group_by(Date) %>%
mutate(weight=Close/sum(Close)) %>%
select(Date, weight, Stock_ID) %>%
spread(key = "Stock_ID", value = "weight", fill = 0)
# A tibble: 3 x 4
# Groups: Date [3]
Date `1` `2` `3`
<fct> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 2017-22-11 0.192 0.0385 0.769
2 2017-22-12 0.833 0.167 0
3 2017-22-13 0.824 0.176 0
Related
There are some similar questions, however I haven't been able to find the solution for my data:
ID <- c(27,46,72)
Gest1 <- c(27,28,29)
Sys1 <- c(120,123,124)
Dia1 <- c(90,89,92)
Gest2 <- c(29,28,30)
Sys2 <- c(122,130,114)
Dia2 <- c(89,78,80)
Gest3 <- c(32,29,30)
Sys3 <- c(123,122,124)
Dia3 <- c(90,88,89)
Gest4 <- c(33,30,32)
Sys4 <- c(124,123,128)
Dia4 <- c(94,89,80)
df.1 <- data.frame(ID,Gest1,Sys1,Dia1,Gest2,Sys2,Dia2,Gest3,Sys3,
Dia3,Gest4,Sys4,Dia4)
df.1
What I need to do is identify where there are any cases of gestational age duplicates (variables beginning with Gest), and then find the mean of the associated Sys and Dia variables.
Once the mean has been calculated, I need to replace the duplicates with just 1 Gest variable, and the mean of the Sys variable and the mean of the Dia variable. Everything after those duplicates should then be moved up the dataframe.
Here is what it should look like:
df.2
My real data has 25 Gest variables with 25 associated Sys variables and 25 association Dia variables.
Sorry if this is confusing! I've tried to write an ok question but it is my first time using stack overflow.
Thank you!!
This is easier to manage in long (and tidy) format.
Using tidyverse, you can use pivot_longer to put into long form. After grouping by ID and Gest you can substitute Sys and Dia values with the mean. If there are more than one Gest for a given ID it will then use the average.
Then, you can keep that row of data with slice. After grouping by ID, you can renumber after combining those with common Gest values.
library(tidyverse)
df.1 %>%
pivot_longer(cols = -ID, names_to = c(".value", "number"), names_pattern = "(\\w+)(\\d+)") %>%
group_by(ID, Gest) %>%
mutate(across(c(Sys, Dia), mean)) %>%
slice(1) %>%
group_by(ID) %>%
mutate(number = row_number())
Output
ID number Gest Sys Dia
<dbl> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 27 1 27 120 90
2 27 2 29 122 89
3 27 3 32 123 90
4 27 4 33 124 94
5 46 1 28 126. 83.5
6 46 2 29 122 88
7 46 3 30 123 89
8 72 1 29 124 92
9 72 2 30 119 84.5
10 72 3 32 128 80
Note - I would keep in long form - but if you wanted wide again, you can add:
pivot_wider(id_cols = ID, names_from = number, values_from = c(Gest, Sys, Dia))
This involved change the structure of the table into the long format, averaging the duplicates and then reformatting back into the desired table:
library(tidyr)
library(dplyr)
df.1 <- data.frame(ID,Gest1,Sys1,Dia1,Gest2,Sys2,Dia2,Gest3,Sys3, Dia3,Gest4,Sys4,Dia4)
#convert data to long format
longdf <- df.1 %>% pivot_longer(!ID, names_to = c(".value", "time"), names_pattern = "(\\D+)(\\d)", values_to="count")
#average duplicate rows
temp<-longdf %>% group_by(ID, Gest) %>% summarize(Sys=mean(Sys), Dia=mean(Dia)) %>% mutate(time = row_number())
#convert back to wide format
answer<-temp %>% pivot_wider(ID, names_from = time, values_from = c("Gest", "Sys", "Dia"), names_glue = "{.value}{time}")
#resort the columns
answer <-answer[ , names(df.1)]
answer
# A tibble: 3 × 13
# Groups: ID [3]
ID Gest1 Sys1 Dia1 Gest2 Sys2 Dia2 Gest3 Sys3 Dia3 Gest4 Sys4 Dia4
<dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 27 27 120 90 29 122 89 32 123 90 33 124 94
2 46 28 126. 83.5 29 122 88 30 123 89 NA NA NA
3 72 29 124 92 30 119 84.5 32 128 80 NA NA NA
I have studied prey deliveries in a breeding owl and want to score the number of prey items delivered during the night to the nestlings. I define night as from 21 to 5. How could I make a new data frame with number of prey each night per location ID based upon these 24/7 observation dataset? In the new data frame, I wish to have the following columns: ID (A & B), No_prey_during_night (the sum of prey items), Time (date, e.g. 4/6 to 5/6), there will be a unique row per night per ID.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y5VCoNWZCmYbyWCktKfMSBqjOIaLeumQ/view?usp=sharing. I have done it in Excel so far, but very time demanding. I would be happy to get help with a simple script I could use in R.
To take into account the fact that a night begins and ends on different dates, you could first assign all the morning hours to the prior day. The final label (the Time column in your question) then includes the next day. If the year of the data collection has a Feb 29, make sure the year is correct (I used 2022).
library(dplyr)
library(lubridate)
read.csv("Tot_prey_example.csv") %>%
mutate(time = make_datetime(year = 2022, month = Month, day = Day, hour = Hour),
night_time = if_else(between(Hour, 0, 5), time - days(1), time),
night_date = floor_date(night_time, unit = "day"),
night = Hour <= 5 | Hour >= 21) %>%
filter(night) %>%
group_by(ID, night_date) %>%
summarise(No_prey_during_night = sum(n), .groups = "drop") %>%
mutate(next_day = night_date + days(1),
Time = glue::glue("{day(night_date)}/{month(night_date)} to {day(next_day)}/{month(next_day)}")) %>%
select(ID, No_prey_during_night, Time)
#> # A tibble: 88 × 3
#> ID No_prey_during_night Time
#> <chr> <int> <glue>
#> 1 A 12 4/6 to 5/6
#> 2 A 22 5/6 to 6/6
#> 3 A 20 6/6 to 7/6
#> 4 A 14 7/6 to 8/6
#> 5 A 14 8/6 to 9/6
#> 6 A 27 9/6 to 10/6
#> 7 A 22 10/6 to 11/6
#> 8 A 18 11/6 to 12/6
#> 9 A 22 12/6 to 13/6
#> 10 A 25 13/6 to 14/6
#> # … with 78 more rows
Created on 2022-05-18 by the reprex package (v2.0.1)
You can do something like this:
library(dplyr)
library(lubridate)
read.csv("Tot_prey_example.csv") %>%
# create initial datetime variable, `night`
mutate(night = lubridate::make_datetime(2021, Month,Day,Hour)) %>%
# filter to nighttime hours
filter(Hour>=21 | Hour<=5) %>%
# flip datetime variable to the next day if hour is >=21
mutate(night = if_else(Hour>=21,night + 60*60*24, night)) %>%
# now group by the date part of `night`
group_by(ID,Night_No = as.Date(night)) %>%
# summarize the sum of prey
summarize(
No_prey_during_night = sum(n),
No_deliveries_during_night = sum(PreyDelivery)
) %>%
# replace the Night_No with a character variable showing both dates
mutate(Night_No = paste0(Night_No-1, "-", Night_No))
Output:
# A tibble: 88 × 4
# Groups: ID [2]
ID Night_No No_prey_during_night No_deliveries_during_night
<chr> <chr> <int> <int>
1 A 2021-06-04-2021-06-05 12 5
2 A 2021-06-05-2021-06-06 22 6
3 A 2021-06-06-2021-06-07 20 5
4 A 2021-06-07-2021-06-08 14 6
5 A 2021-06-08-2021-06-09 14 5
6 A 2021-06-09-2021-06-10 27 5
7 A 2021-06-10-2021-06-11 22 4
8 A 2021-06-11-2021-06-12 18 6
9 A 2021-06-12-2021-06-13 22 6
10 A 2021-06-13-2021-06-14 25 5
# … with 78 more rows
I am very, very new to any type of coding language. I am used to Pivot tables in Excel, and trying to replicate a pivot I have done in Excel in R. I have spent a long time searching the internet/ YouTube, but I just can't get it to work.
I am looking to produce a table in which I the left hand side column shows a number of locations, and across the top of the table it shows different pages that have been viewed. I want to show in the table the number of views per location which each of these pages.
The data frame 'specificreports' shows all views over the past year for different pages on an online platform. I want to filter for the month of October, and then pivot the different Employee Teams against the number of views for different pages.
specificreports <- readxl::read_excel("Multi-Tab File - Dashboard
Usage.xlsx", sheet = "Specific Reports")
specificreportsLocal <- tbl_df(specificreports)
specificreportsLocal %>% filter(Month == "October") %>%
group_by("Employee Team") %>%
This bit works, in that it groups the different team names and filters entries for the month of October. After this I have tried using the summarise function to summarise the number of hits but can't get it to work at all. I keep getting errors regarding data type. I keep getting confused because solutions I look up keep using different packages.
I would appreciate any help, using the simplest way of doing this as I am a total newbie!
Thanks in advance,
Holly
let's see if I can help a bit. It's hard to know what your data looks like from the info you gave us. So I'm going to guess and make some fake data for us to play with. It's worth noting that having field names with spaces in them is going to make your life really hard. You should start by renaming your fields to something more manageable. Since I'm just making data up, I'll give my fields names without spaces:
library(tidyverse)
## this makes some fake data
## a data frame with 3 fields: month, team, value
n <- 100
specificreportsLocal <-
data.frame(
month = sample(1:12, size = n, replace = TRUE),
team = letters[1:5],
value = sample(1:100, size = n, replace = TRUE)
)
That's just a data frame called specificreportsLocal with three fields: month, team, value
Let's do some things with it:
# This will give us total values by team when month = 10
specificreportsLocal %>%
filter(month == 10) %>%
group_by(team) %>%
summarize(total_value = sum(value))
#> # A tibble: 4 x 2
#> team total_value
#> <fct> <int>
#> 1 a 119
#> 2 b 172
#> 3 c 67
#> 4 d 229
I think that's sort of like what you already did, except I added the summarize to show how it works.
Now let's use all months and reshape it from 'long' to 'wide'
# if I want to see all months I leave out the filter and
# add a group_by month
specificreportsLocal %>%
group_by(team, month) %>%
summarize(total_value = sum(value)) %>%
head(5) # this just shows the first 5 values
#> # A tibble: 5 x 3
#> # Groups: team [1]
#> team month total_value
#> <fct> <int> <int>
#> 1 a 1 17
#> 2 a 2 46
#> 3 a 3 91
#> 4 a 4 69
#> 5 a 5 83
# to make this 'long' data 'wide', we can use the `spread` function
specificreportsLocal %>%
group_by(team, month) %>%
summarize(total_value = sum(value)) %>%
spread(team, total_value)
#> # A tibble: 12 x 6
#> month a b c d e
#> <int> <int> <int> <int> <int> <int>
#> 1 1 17 122 136 NA 167
#> 2 2 46 104 158 94 197
#> 3 3 91 NA NA NA 11
#> 4 4 69 120 159 76 98
#> 5 5 83 186 158 19 208
#> 6 6 103 NA 118 105 84
#> 7 7 NA NA 73 127 107
#> 8 8 NA 130 NA 166 99
#> 9 9 125 72 118 135 71
#> 10 10 119 172 67 229 NA
#> 11 11 107 81 NA 131 49
#> 12 12 174 87 39 NA 41
Created on 2018-12-01 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
Now I'm not really sure if that's what you want. So feel free to make a comment on this answer if you need any of this clarified.
Welcome to Stack Overflow!
I'm not sure I correctly understand your need without a data sample, but this may work for you:
library(rpivotTable)
specificreportsLocal %>% filter(Month == "October")
rpivotTable(specificreportsLocal, rows="Employee Team", cols="page", vals="views", aggregatorName = "Sum")
Otherwise, if you do not need it interactive (as the Pivot Tables in Excel), this may work as well:
specificreportsLocal %>% filter(Month == "October") %>%
group_by_at(c("Employee Team", "page")) %>%
summarise(nr_views = sum(views, na.rm=TRUE))
I am attempting to combine 2 rows into 1 row and select the value to keep depending on a different column.
ID score date std error
123 87 1/15/2018 5
123 92 1/15/2018 10
155 78 3/10/2018 8
155 82 1/15/2018 7
In the data set I only want 1 row per ID. When there are two different test scores I want to keep the score value with the corresponding test date that is closest to present day. If the date is the same then I want to take the test score with the smallest standard error.
End result would look like this:
ID score test date std error
123 87 1/15/2018 5
155 78 3/10/2018 8
Being going at it few a few hours and cannot seem to figure this out.
Thanks
arrange by date (descending order) and std error (ascending order) then take the first row from each group:
df %>%
arrange(desc(as.Date(date, '%m/%d/%Y')), std.error) %>%
group_by(ID) %>% slice(1)
# A tibble: 2 x 4
# Groups: ID [2]
# ID score date std.error
# <int> <int> <fct> <int>
#1 123 87 1/15/2018 5
#2 155 78 3/10/2018 8
I have a data frame (track) with the position (longitude - Latitude) and date (number of the day in the year) of tracking point for different animals and an other data frame (var) which gives a the mean temperature for every day of the year in different locations.
I would like to add a new column TEMP to my data frame (Track) where the value would be from (var) and correspond to the date and GPS location of each tracking points in (track).
Here are a really simple subset of my data and what I would like to obtain.
track = data.frame(
animals=c(1,1,1,2,2),
Longitude=c(117,116,117,117,116),
Latitude=c(18,20,20,18,20),
Day=c(1,3,4,1,5))
Var = data.frame(
Longitude=c(117,117,116,116),
Latitude=c(18,20,18,20),
Day1=c(22,23,24,21),
Day2=c(21,28,27,29),
Day3=c(12,13,14,11),
Day4=c(17,19,20,23),
Day5=c(32,33,34,31)
)
TrackPlusVar = data.frame(
animals=c(1,1,1,2,2),
Longitude=c(117,116,117,117,116),
Latitude=c(18,20,20,18,20),
Day=c(1,3,4,1,5),
Temp= c(22,11,19,22,31)
)
I've no idea how to assign the value from the same date and GPS location as it is a column name. Any idea would be very useful !
This is a dplyr and tidyr approach.
library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)
# reshape table Var
Var %>%
gather(Day,Temp,-Longitude, -Latitude) %>%
mutate(Day = as.numeric(gsub("Day","",Day))) -> Var2
# join tables
track %>% left_join(Var2, by=c("Longitude", "Latitude", "Day"))
# animals Longitude Latitude Day Temp
# 1 1 117 18 1 22
# 2 1 116 20 3 11
# 3 1 117 20 4 19
# 4 2 117 18 1 22
# 5 2 116 20 5 31
If the process that creates your tables makes sure that all your cases belong to both tables, then you can use inner_join instead of left_join to make the process faster.
If you're still not happy with the speed you can use a data.table join process to check if it is faster, like:
library(data.table)
Var2 = setDT(Var2, key = c("Longitude", "Latitude", "Day"))
track = setDT(track, key = c("Longitude", "Latitude", "Day"))
Var2[track][order(animals,Day)]
# Longitude Latitude Day Temp animals
# 1: 117 18 1 22 1
# 2: 116 20 3 11 1
# 3: 117 20 4 19 1
# 4: 117 18 1 22 2
# 5: 116 20 5 31 2