Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
why is there not a url such as :
https://console.firebase.google.com/u/0/project/axel-02/database/firestore/data~2Fusers
but for local developement. It would be for example :
https://localhost:9000/console.firebase.google.com/u/0/project/axel-02/database/firestore/data~2Fusers
I mean, the data viewer is usefull... but it s a pain that it does work with the emulator in local dev.
You can use the following third-party tool: https://github.com/ablehq/firestore-explorer.
The emulator suite is a pretty recent release, and there's a long list of features that would make it more useful.
If you think the product would benefit from having such an explorer built in, file a feature request with Firebase support or on the Github repo of the project.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I have an app in which the user should be able to store videos. I was wondering if Firebase or Sqlite would be better for the job. Please get back to me as soon as possible.
Unless the videos were really short then you wouldn't store them in a database. You would store them as files and store the path to the file in the database.
SQLite would be better if the data in the database is device specific and thus needed no syncing with other devices.
Firebase could be the choice if syncing the data across devices.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I had an app that used basic Firebase Analytics and AdMob. While I can't recompile the APK because I don't have the source code anymore. I was afraid that it might not be GDPR compliant, so I removed the ad-banner in the AdMob console and deleted the Firebase project. Now I don't see any data, but the code is still in the app.
Is this GDPR compliant?
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I have been reading a lot of articles in regards to security and other parties reverse engineering your app and then flooding your APIs etc.
For my current (nativescript) app I am using Firebase for Auth and then have my own API URL hardcoded into the app.
I am considering using Firebase Remote Config to retrieve my API URL and then setting it in the app. In order to not have my API URL exposed.
I was wondering if someone has done this before? And if this approach is a good or bad idea?
Thanks. Robert
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm implementing an Android app that collects data throughout the day. When the user returns home where there is internet connection, then the app will push data to backend.
I have been looking into Firebase for this. It has offline capabilities that would save data into disk in case there is temporary network interruptions.
My question is whether the offline feature fits with my scenario? Is the feature designed for short term interruptions, or works with any kind of interruptions?
It works with any kind of interruptions. So if you don't have an internet connection during the day, when you come back home in the evening, all the changes made when you were offline will be pushed to Firebase database.
To achieve this you need to use this line of code:
FirebaseDatabase.getInstance().setPersistenceEnabled(true);
Hope it helps.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I just wondered and start reading SQLite source code.
There weren't any fopen,fclose except logging functions.
I tried to track down sqlite3_open, sqlite3_prepare, I came into sqlite3parse and stuck.
There is fopen in
sqlite3MemdebugDump
sqlite3Memsys3Dump
sqlite3Memsys5Dump
sqlite3VdbeTransferError
which are debug functions.
Are they wrote their own disk handler?
(I always stunned how professional applications handle this kind of things.)
Summary: How SQLite handle files without fopen?
SQLite accesses files through its OS interface, which is implemented in the os_*.c files.