I am using SendEmailNotification via call to send email. It is throwing an error
"List of params for Method or activity that this step is calling— Property #baseclass.gmail is undefined."
This is when I used smtp.gmail.com as smtphodt. When I change it to smtp.yahoo.com it says "List of params for Method or activity that this step is calling— Property #baseclass.yahoo is undefined."
Help is appreciated!
This got solved by putting smtp.gmail.com in double quotes.
Related
While executing the above IIQ API it is throwing the error _Name not found and could not execute the query.
The reason is that ManagedAttribute doesn't have a name field. It has displayName, so instead of getObjectByName use context.search using queryOption on the basis of displayName.
I cant figure out why my insert query code located in server/main.js is causing this: TypeError: callback is not a function error message.
The following code is located at: server/main.js
var businessCard = [{PostedDate: moment().add(0, "days").format('MM/DD/YYYY'), sentBy: currentUserId, recipientName: recipientName }];
Next line is the insert query:
Messages.insert({businessCard: businessCard}, {multi:true});
When I run the code, no inserts into the Messages collection are carried out, neither do I get any error messages in the browser console,
however when I check the terminal I see the following error message:
When I comment out the insert query, the error message disappears, leading me to think there is something wrong in how I have written this insert code.
Kindly help me figure out what am doing wrong here.
Looking forward to your help
The error is because you use multi: true option, insert method does not have this option.
Whenever I launch my app, and click on login on the first few tries, the login will attempt a POST http to the server. However $http always (everytime) returns NULL on first try. sometimes after several few tries still NULL if done fast. But subsequently, its all ok.
I dont get it, why is $http returning error response NULL initially ??
Here is my login controller doing the http post
Login Controller (LoginCtrl)
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/771194bc5815e4ccdf38b57d6158853f
var req = {
method: 'POST',
url: baseURL,
data: postObject,
//timeout: 5000
};
err is NULL here:
}).error(function(err) {
I dont know if it is CORS but I'ved got this set in config.xml
<access origin="*" />
my config.xml
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/b2df3a857338d14ec3fcd6dda776e212
Any ideas ?
Im using ionic 1.7.14
on device iOS 9.3.1
UPDATE
I'ved put the problem code here. can logout first to goto login screen. enter in anything in username/password field, click login once failed, second or third try will be success.
https://github.com/axilaris/ionic_null_http_problem
some troubleshooting so far: i noticed the http post request is called twice. not sure why.
UPDATED the code using $http.post.then but still has the same effect
$http.post(baseURL, postObject).then(function successCallback(response)
response has NULL data --> Object {data: null, status: 0, config: Object, statusText: ""}
It is hard to diagnose having the above details only.
However the problem could be that your handler (login function) is triggered before digest cycle finished updating $scope.data.username and $scope.data.password and for the first tries it sends empty values for those to the server and works fine later.
You can run Safari web inspector to see what is sent to the server to prove this.
The fix may depend on how your view/template is coded. Can you please share it? Or, ideally, create a working sample at http://play.ionic.io/
Another option to fix could be to try to wrap your code related to http request into
$timeout(function() {
// your code goes here
});
or, consider using .$applyAsync() (see the docs for details)
This might help to fix the problem
You are probably getting this inconsistent behavior as you are using the 'success' promise method instead of 'then' (note that use of the success method has now been deprecated).
The key differences between these two methods are:
then() - full power of the promise API but slightly more verbose
success() - doesn't return a promise but offeres slightly more convienient syntax
as highlighted in this answer.
Hence in your scenario, instead of using 'success':
var req = {
method: 'POST',
url: baseURL + 'session/login',
data: postObject,
//timeout: 5000
};
$http(req).success(function(resp) {...
use 'then' along with angular's post shortcut method (you don't have to use this shortcut method, but I think it makes the code more succinct) e.g.:
$http.post(baseURL + 'session/login', postObject).then(function successCallback(response) {
// this callback will be called asynchronously
// when the response is available
}, function errorCallback(response) {
// called asynchronously if an error occurs
// or server returns response with an error status.
});
Using 'then' returns a promise resolved with a value returned from a callback, so it should give you a consistently valid result.
it was a timeout in app.js that caused it. was set to 1 second which gives it it arbitrary success rate.
config.timeout = 1000;
I am attempting to return an object from a AWS Lambda function instead of a simple string.
// ...
context.fail({
"email": "Email address is too short",
"firstname": "First name is too short"
});
// ...
I have already used the errorMessage for mapping error responses to status codes and that has been great:
// ...
context.fail('That "username" has already been taken.');
// ...
Am I simply trying to do something that the AWS API Gateway does not afford?
I have also already found this article which helped: Is there a way to change the http status codes returned by Amazon API Gateway?.
Update
Since time of writing, lambda has updated the invocation signature and now passes event, context, callback.
Instead of calling context.done(err, res) you should use callback(err, res). Note that what was true for context.done still applies to the callback pattern.
Should also add that with API Gateways proxy and integration implementation this entire thread is pretty much obsolete.
I recommend reading this article if you are integrating API Gateway with Lambda: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/apigateway/latest/developerguide/api-gateway-create-api-as-simple-proxy-for-lambda.html
Original response below
First things first, let's clear a few things up.
context.done() vs. context.fail()/context.success
context.done(error, result); is nothing but a wrapper around context.fail(error); and context.success(response);
The Lambda documentation clearly states that result is ignored if error is non null:
If the Lambda function was invoked using the RequestResponse (synchronous) invocation type, the method returns response body as follows:
If the error is null, set the response body to the string representation of result. This is similar to the context.succeed().
If the error is not null, set the response body to error.
If the function is called with a single argument of type error, the error value will be populated in the response body.
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/nodejs-prog-model-context.html
What this means is that it won't matter whether you use a combination of fail/success or done, the behaviour is exactly the same.
API Gateway and Response Code Mapping
I have tested every thinkable combination of response handling from Lambda in combination with Response code mapping in API Gateway.
The conclusion of these tests are that the "Lambda Error RegExp" is only executed against a Lambda error, i.e: you have to call context.done(error);or context.fail(error); for the RegExp to actually trigger.
Now, this presents a problem as, has already been noted, Lambda takes your error and sticks it in an object and calls toString() on whatever you supplied:
{ errorMessage: yourError.toString() }
If you supplied an error object you'll get this:
{ errorMessage: "[object Object]" }
Not very helpful at all.
The only workaround I have found thus far is to call
context.fail(JSON.stringify(error));
and then in my client do:
var errorObject = JSON.parse(error.errorMessage);
It's not very elegant but it works.
As part of my error I have a property called "code". It could look something like this:
{
code: "BadRequest",
message: "Invalid argument: parameter name"
}
When I stringify this object I get:
"{\"code\":\"BadRequest\",\"message\":\"Invalid argument: parameter name\"}"
Lambda will stick this string in the errorMessage property of the response and I can now safely grep for .*"BadRequest".* in the API Gateway response mapping.
It's very much a hack that works around two somewhat strange quirks of Lambda and API Gateway:
Why does Lambda insist on wrapping the error instead of just giving
it back as is?
Why doesn't API Gateway allow us to grep in the
Lambda result, only the error?
I am on my way to open a support case with Amazon regarding these two rather odd behaviours.
You don't have to use context.fail, use success but send different statusCode and an errorMessage, here is an example of how i format my output:
try {
// Call the callable function with the defined array parameters
// All the function called here will be catched if they throw exceptions
result.data = callable_function.apply(this, params);
result.statusCode = 200;
result.operation = operation;
result.errorMessage = ""
} catch (e) {
result.data = [];
result.statusCode = 500;
result.errorMessage = e.toString();
result.method = method;
result.resource = resource;
}
// If everything went smooth, send back the result
// If context succeed is not called AWS Lambda will fire the function
// again because it is not successfully exited
context.succeed(result);
Use the consumer logic to handle different errors case logic, don't forget that you pay for the time your function is running...
You should replace the use of your context.fail with context.done and use context.fail only for very serious Lambda function failures since it doesn't allow more than one output parameter. Integration Response is able to match mapping template by performing regex on the first parameter passed to context.done this also maps HTTP status code to the response. You can't pass this response status code directly from Lambda since it's the role of API Gateway Integration Response to abstract the HTTP protocol.
See the following:
context.done('Not Found:', <some object you can use in the model>);
and the Integration Response panel this setting:
You can replicate similar approach for any kind of error. You should also create and map the error model to your response.
For those who tried everything put on this question and couldn't make this work (like me), check the thedevkit comment on this post (saved my day):
https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=192918
Reproducing it entirely below:
I've had issues with this myself, and I believe that the newline
characters are the culprit.
foo.* will match occurrences of "foo" followed by any characters
EXCEPT newline. Typically this is solved by adding the '/s' flag, i.e.
"foo.*/s", but the Lambda error regex doesn't seem to respect this.
As an alternative you can use something like: foo(.|\n)*
I have a website that uses Meteor 0.9. I have deployed this website on OpenShift (http://www.truthpecker.com).
The problem I'm experiencing is that when I go to a path on my site (/discover), then sometimes (though not always), the data needed are not fetched by Meteor. Instead I get the following errors:
On the client side:
WebSocket connection to 'ws://www.truthpecker.com/sockjs/796/3tfowlag/websocket' failed: Error during WebSocket handshake: Unexpected response code: 400
And on the server side:
Exception from sub rD8cj6FGa6bpTDivh Error: Match error: Failed Match.OneOf or Match.Optional validation
at checkSubtree (packages/check/match.js:222)
at check (packages/check/match.js:21)
at _.extend._getFindOptions (packages/mongo-livedata/collection.js:216)
at _.extend.find (packages/mongo-livedata/collection.js:236)
at Meteor.publish.Activities.find.user [as _handler] (app/server/publications.js:41:19)
at maybeAuditArgumentChecks (packages/livedata/livedata_server.js:1492)
at _.extend._runHandler (packages/livedata/livedata_server.js:914)
at _.extend._startSubscription (packages/livedata/livedata_server.js:764)
at _.extend.protocol_handlers.sub (packages/livedata/livedata_server.js:577)
at packages/livedata/livedata_server.js:541
Sanitized and reported to the client as: Match failed [400]
Can anyone help me to eliminate this error and get the site working? I'd be very grateful!
Tony
P.S.: I never got this error using localhost.
EDIT:
The line causing the problem the problem is this (line 41):
return Activities.find({user: id}, {sort: {timeStamp: -1}, limit:40});
One document in the activities collection looks like this:
{
"user" : "ZJrgYm34rR92zg6z7",
"type" : "editArg",
"debId" : "wtziFDS4bB3CCkNLo",
"argId" : "YAnjh2Pu6QESzHQLH",
"timeStamp" : ISODate("2014-09-12T22:10:29.586Z"),
"_id" : "sEDDreehonp67haDg"
}
When I run the query done in line 41 in mongo shell, I get the following error:
error: { "$err" : "Unsupported projection option: timeStamp", "code" : 13097 }
I don't really why this is though. Can you help me there as well? Thank you.
Make sure that you are passing an integer to skip and limit. Use parseInt() if need be.
You have a document on your website that does not match your check validation.
The validation you have is in app/server/publications.js:41
So the attribute in question exists in some way like Match.optional(Match.oneOf(xx)) but the document's attribute is neither of the values in Match.oneOf
You would have to go through your documents for the collection causing this and remove or correct the attribute causing this to match your check statement.
Update for your updated question.
You're running Meteor commands in the meteor mongo/mongo shell. The error you get is unrelated to the problem in Meteor, to sort in the mongo shell you would do activities.find(..).sort(), instead of activities.find(.., { sort : {..}). This is unrelated to the issue
The issue is most-likely that your id is not actually a string. Its supposed to be sEDDreehonp67haDg for the document you're looking for. You might want to use the debugger to see what it actually is.
I don't think you can use limit in client-side find queries. Removing limit from my query solves the problem. If you're looking for pagination, then you can either manually roll your own by passing a parameter to your Activities publication so that the limit is added to the server-side query along with an offset. There is also this pagination package.