I want to use Google Forms to collect Contact Info for students.
In the case of families with more than one student at the school, I would like to see if there is a way to use one form for all students in one family. In this case, I would use conditional logic to continue on to the contact info for each student.
I would like to know if there is a way to pre-fill the info for any subsequent students in the family (based on the answers for the first student entered), but still allow the answers to be edited.
Any ideas on how to achieve that?
Related
I have a bit of a specific need to fill here. My client sales tennis lessons. He wants to be able to have an option on the form that I have created (Gravity Forms) that allows a customer to select a box that allows an additional student for the class. Not only does it allow the additional student, but it needs to charge an extra $10.00 for said student and have the availability to increment the number of students. Currently I have it set up like this (look towards the bottom) I would like to simplify it to have just the one check box and the increment number box as I already have on the site. Can anyone help me?
I want to develop a website where teachers create exams and students pay money in order to pass these exams, so it's an e-commerce website where products are quiz.
The exams will be managed with a quiz plugin : i'll use Watu.
I still have no idea what e-commerce plugin I'll use.
What I want is to make exams as products so students can add them to cart, but I dont't see how can I do it : the e-commerce plugin manages its own products !!! Is there an easy way to do it ?
This is my idea: alter the quiz module so when an exam is created the script insert a row in the e-commerce table(s), so when I go to the e-commerce plugin I'll find a new product! But I think this is not a clean way !!
You might consider setting up woo-commerce setting a link as a software product that will be delivered on checkout.
You could build a quiz answer table in sql, deliver a generic quiz (via a link sold in the store)
the quiz table could have a field for quiz_id and you could have their answers recorded as a text field.
so the link would be delivered digitally thru the store, your answers 1-100 a-d might look like this:
userid: xxxxx
autodate
test: 1
Answer:abadddaeababadddaeababadddaeababadddaeababadddaeababadddaeab
so one entry would contain all the answers on the test in question in one field.
once committed you could return a result based on a difference function from a pattern mask.
how many wrong answers in the simple query.
You then can store the answers and draw data based on what particular answers they got wrong.
they can also retake the same test at a later date and you can see each time how they did.
advantages of using a single text field means that you can use a single compare to pull the data and it's short to store.
with a membership plugin. Give roles afther payments. Diferent roles for diferent levels of exam. It´s easy than make conexion with database.
I have a scenario as given in the below workflow diagram using core service.
First step is manual step author will create/edit content and finish the activity and it is assigned to everyone.
In the second step, I want to do filter the users based on their groups.
In the third step, couple of scenario
a. If the user belongs to group "A" I want to list out all the next 3 available activities, User A can choose any one of these 3 activities.
b. If the user belongs to group "B", I want to list out "Reviewer" and "Approver" activity as next activity, user b can select any one of these 2.
Can any one give some idea to achieve this?
You should turn your problem around. Yes, it is possible, but the amount of knowledge required will be a huge barrier for you to implement.
So, instead think about it differently.
Change your "Filter Next activity" automated activity to an automatic decision, and have your code that determines the group membership also determine which activity should be next
have 2 forward paths from there - 1 for the users of Group A, other for the users of group B
on each forward path, have different selection options. You may try having links to the same activity from 2 different manual decisions, I don't know if that works though.
Worst case scenario you'll have repeated activities (not in name, but in function), and you saved yourself about 2 months of headaches trying to cope with the learning curve of doing CME extensions.
The simple answer to your initial question is: "no, this functionality is not out of the box".
But of course many things are possible by implementing critical parts yourself.
You'd probably need a GUI extension of some sorts to allow the user to pick from a list.
You'd need to store the information between phases of your custom solution.
And you'd then need some code in an automated workflow activity to implement the picking of the next activity.
Most of these steps have been covered in other questions already. Did you have a look for each of these? If so, you might want to share how far you already got and where you are stuck.
I am trying to model the following permissions in Plone and would like to know the best approach I should take:
Group 1 - Senior members
Group 2 - members
Group 3 - Senior members
Group 2 - members
All the members in the groups shouldn't be able to view any content item associated with them.
Senior members should be able to view and amend content items within their sub groups but should not be able to view each others content items - these content items all have a user_id field to indicate who the content belongs.
Members in sub groups should not be able to view content associated with senior members nor each others content items.
Thank You
I think you're going to get the same answers here as you got with your mailing list post: http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/Implementing-bespoke-access-control-levels-in-Plone-td6986879.html
You'll need to write your own local role adapter using http://pypi.python.org/pypi/borg.localrole. Perhaps take a look at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/borg.project as well and the article introducing it: http://www.martinaspeli.net/articles/developing-with-plone-3-borg.localrole-and
Try using collective.subscribable sections. I haven't fully tested it yet, but it seems to be doing the job for me. I went the borg.localrole route, and it was a major pain, and I was never happy with my solution.
I have a client who has suggested laying out a long list of categories in a custom order. The order is to be decided by them based on product items they sell the most etc.
I tend to disagree and feel that people browsing the internet prefer to search lists of categories that are in alphabetical order or sorted by something they can take reference of such as a date.
I would like to know others thoughts on this and it would be appreciated if anyone could point me in the direction of any open source surveys that have been taken in this area.
Thanks
Ben
What a silly stance to take regarding a simple customer request. Allow for both orderings, and other ones too. There is no survey that will demonstrate that the client is wrong as they are - by definition - correct.
Code that allows for different orderings has greater utility anyway, and real user data will be able to show them which - if either - should be the default.