To test API using Postman what should be the best practice for test management.
We tried to create a fork for the folder in collection where developer created his APIs.
But if the developer do any changes on his collection no change will get reflected in our forked folder.
Please advise
After forking a collection, the parent collection may be updated by others. If that happens, your fork will no longer be the same as the parent. In such circumstances, Postman notifies you about this change and allows you to pull these changes.
Read: https://learning.getpostman.com/docs/postman/collections/version-control-for-collections/
Related
I have a Firestore collection that I need to rename.
To do that I'll have to do two things. One, rename the collection, two, update my app (only web right now) to use the new collection name.
My problem is that if I just go ahead and do that, any user that has not refreshed the app won't be able to find the renamed collection.
So, my question is: Is there any best practice to handle this scenario?
I can think of a couple of options:
Somehow forcing a reload of the web apps immediately after renaming the collection.
Set a feature flag so that the web apps enter into maintenance mode while I update everything and then reload the web apps once the change is finished. Unfortunately the currently deployed web app doesn't have a maintenance mode to enable so this doesn't seem to be a valid solution.
However, I'd like to hear about other options. There might be some best practice that I'm missing. Moreover, I'm aware this is a problem that might be more general than just related to Firestore. For example when changing a REST API endpoint, so I guess there must be some tried and tested solutions out there.
I tried searching for best practices regarding this and couldn't find any.
Also, if I was consuming a REST API it would be easier to solve because I could change the DB and keep the DB unchanged. But given that Firestore gets consumed directly from the web app I don't have this benefit.
Locking out outdated clients is a common practice, but leads to a lesser user experience. It also requires that you have a mechanism for the clients to detect that they're outdated, which you don't seem to have.
The most common practice I know of is to perform dual writes to both the old and the new collection while clients are updating.
In the bitbucket interface, there is a toggle that you can click to inherit branching strategies at the top level for a project from the repository's project group settings. I have over 100 of these I need to go through. Is there a call to the REST API that I can make that would set it?
I've been looking for a same solution, but it appears the API doesn't cover this functionality (yet).
I've played around with all manor of API calls/parameters in an attempt to discover the right variable. Even inspecting the payload from the web UI but sadly no luck. I think we're just gonna have to wait.. that or loop through each repo and apply the same configuration.
There is currently a side effect when using this API endpoint. If the repository is inheriting branching model settings from its project, updating the branching model for this repository will disable the project setting inheritance.
We have deprecated this side effect and will remove it on 1 August 2022.
https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/rest/api-group-branching-model/#api-repositories-workspace-repo-slug-branching-model-settings-put
I've been reading about how nuxt can generate a static site when a client makes a request to view the website. We are planning to build a headless cms to migrate the database with the data the website needs. This data will only be changed when you save it in the headless cms.
My question is since this data will only change when it is changed in the headless cms. Isn't it possible to just generate the site when it is modified from the headless cms, and then serve that site to the client? To reduce server costs.
Is it possible to do this with nuxt? Or are there any possibilities to do this?
We are planning on using Firebase as a backend.
There's nothing explicitly preventing Nuxt from being rebuilt each time you change an item in your DB. The part that matters is how you tell your app to rebuild itself.
By far the simplest way is using some sort of "build hook". See Netlifys docs here for a quick overview of what they are. However, this only really works if you're using a headless CMS that can send hooks on save, and a build provider that can trigger builds using those hooks.
You will absolutely save on server costs using this sort of method, but beware: if you have a lot of user generated content triggering builds, your build cost can easily outweigh the server costs. You also need to be aware that builds generally take a few minutes, so you won't see instant changes on your site.
The other option you have is foregoing static site generation in favour of SSR, which can dynamically load and render your content, completely avoiding the need to build every time a new DB change is made. This is what I'd consider the best alternative if you do indeed have a lot of user generated content.
It's hard to give any further advice without knowing the specifics of the CMS or build provider though.
For custom smart contract is very useful for some case like template and flexible for business requirement? for now that have not been released. if something do this thing put into off-chain system and only related the reference into chain of smart contract. is it the best practice?
There is no dynamic loading of CorDapp code currently. You have to power down the node, add the new or modified CorDapp to the node's plugins folder, then restart the node.
In the future, Corda is expected to implement "hot" reloading, so you will be able to install or update the node's CorDapps while the node is running.
how can I get the document status with Javascript application or CMIS. I mean if it was approved or rejected in a Workflow.
If you are using an out-of-the-box workflow, I don't know of an easy way to get that information because the out-of-the-box workflows do not change any properties on the documents in the workflow package.
You could modify the workflow to set a property on the document. Then you'd be able to check that property to determine what happened in the workflow.
See this tutorial for an example that does this.