I need help to upload document content back in Alfresco Community 5.2 though a share javascript.
The destination noderef is already existing, I upload a new version of a document.
I can't use the api/upload web service because I also need to do some operation on the noderef and I have a base64 content of the file which need to be converted.
So I wrote a new webscript and it is all working fine, at least while I upload documents which are smaller than 3MB,
Here it is the code
Alfresco.util.Ajax.request({
method: Alfresco.util.Ajax.POST,
dataObj: {
bytes: response.bytes,
digestAlgorithm: response.digestAlgorithm,
mimeType: response.mimeType.mimeTypeString,
name: response.name,
nodeRef: this.nodeRef,
signatureLevel: this.signatureLevel
},
url: thisClass.urlAlfrescoService + "myOrg/myPackage/uploadDocument",
successCallback: {
fn: thisClass._successOnUploadContent,
scope: this
},
failureCallback: {
fn: thisClass._errorOnUploadContent,
scope: this
},
scope: this,
noReloadOnAuthFailure: true
});
Do I miss some option to increase max upload file size?
I tryed uploading the file normally (with drag and drop) and it works.
The problem is when the file is >= 3MB the java class behind the webscript does not receive any byte
UPDATE
After some researches I found it could be a problem of how data are passed through POST, as application/x-www-form-urlencoded instead of multipart/form-data, but I can't find a way to specify the request content type in the ajax request
SOLUTION
The problem was the application/x-www-form-urlencoded instead of the multipart/form-data, I used a fetch POST request as stated here, but also the ajax request solution is good.
Last week,I had a same very similar problem with Alfresco AJAX request on Alfresco 5.0.2.5 and I used jquery's AJAX calls and it worked for me.
$.ajax({
url: Alfresco.constants.PROXY_URI + "your_web_script",
type: "POST",
data: dataFromFiles,
mimeType: "multipart/form-data",
contentType: false,
cache: false,
processData: false,
dataType: "text",
success: function(data, textStatus, jqXHR) {
},
error: function(jqXHR, textStatus, errorThrown) {
}
});
Reference link : https://blog.arvixe.com/sending-multipart-form-using-ajax/
Hope this helps you.
Related
This was working fine and suddenly stopped working. I'm not sure what exactly changed.
I need to download multiple images via URLs.
I'm using the following code:
https://plnkr.co/edit/nsxgwmNYUAVBRaXgDYys?p=preview
$http({
method:"GET",
url:"imageurl"
}).then(function(response){
saveAs(new Blob([response.data]), "image.jpg");
},function(err){
});
The files have different sizes, they are not 0 bytes.
For others coming here, check this solution.
What needed to be done was to add responseType: "blob" to the request:
$http({
method:"GET",
url:"imageurl",
responseType: "blob"
})
.then(...)
Here is the documentation for the responseType valid values, where it says the default is "" so the response is treated as text:
"": An empty responseType string is treated the same as "text", the default type (therefore, as a DOMString).
"blob:": The response is a Blob object containing the binary data.
Following code worked for me:
axios.get(`http://localhost:61078/api/values`, {
responseType: 'blob',
}).then(response => {
if (response) {
var FileSaver = require('file-saver');
FileSaver.saveAs(new Blob([response.data]), "image.png");
}
});
I'm writing a meteor app and I'm trying to add an autocomplete feature to a search box. The data is very large and is on the server, so I can't have it all on the client. It's basically a database of users. If I'm not wrong, the mizzao:autocomplete package should make that possible, but I can't seem to get it to work.
Here's what I have on the server:
Meteor.publish('autocompleteViewers', function(selector, options) {
Autocomplete.publishCursor(viewers.find(selector, options), this);
this.ready();
});
And here are the settings I use for the search box on the client:
getSettings: function() {
return {
position: 'bottom',
limit: 5,
rules: [{
subscription: 'autocompleteViewers',
field: '_id',
matchAll: false,
options: '',
template: Template.vLegend
}],
};
}
But I keep getting this error on the client:
Error: Collection name must be specified as string for server-side search at validateRule
I don't really understand the problem. When I look at the package code, it just seems like it's testing whether the subscription field is a string and not a variable, which it is. Any idea what the problem could be? Otherwise is there a minimum working example I could go from somewhere? I couldn't find one in the docs.
Error: Collection name must be specified as string for server-side search at validateRule
You get this error because you don't specify a Collection name in quotes.
getSettings: function() {
return {
position: 'bottom',
limit: 5,
rules: [{
subscription: 'autocompleteViewers',
field: '_id',
matchAll: false,
collection: 'viewers', // <- specify your collection, in your case it is a "viewers" collection.
options: '',
template: Template.vLegend
}],
};
}
For more information please read here.
Hope this helps!
I'm developing an app with Spring MVC and the view in extjs 4. At this point, i have to create a Grid which shows a list of users.
In my Spring MVC controller i have a Get method which returns the list of users in a jsonformat with "items" as a root.
#RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.GET, value="/getUsers")
public #ResponseBody Users getUsersInJSON(){
Users users = new Users();
users.setItems(userService.getUsers());
return users;
}
If i try to access it with the browser i can see the jsondata correctly.
{"items":[{"username":"name1",".....
But my problem is relative to request of the Ext.data.Store
My Script is the following:
Ext.onReady(function(){
Ext.define('UsersList', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
fields: [
{name:'username', type:'string'},
{name:'firstname', type:'string'}
]
});
var store = Ext.create('Ext.data.Store', {
storeId: 'users',
model: 'UsersList',
autoLoad: 'true',
proxy: {
type: 'ajax',
url : 'http://localhost:8080/MyApp/getUsers.html',
reader: {type: 'json', root: 'items'}
}
});
Ext.create('Ext.grid.Panel',{
store :store,
id : 'user',
title: 'Users',
columns : [
{header : 'Username', dataIndex : 'username'},
{header : 'Firstname', dataIndex: 'firstname'}
],
height :300,
width: 400,
renderTo:'center'
});
});
When the store tries to retrieve the data and launchs the http request, in my firebug console appears OPTIONS getUsers.html while the request in the browser launchs GET getUsers.html
As a result, Ext.data.Store has not elements and the grid appears with the columnames but without data. Maybe i've missed something
Thank you
You can change the HTTP methods that are used by the proxy for the different CRUD operations using actionMethods.
But, as you can see in the doc (and as should obviously be the case), GET is the default for read operations. So the OPTIONS request you are observing is quite puzzling. Are you sure that there's not another part of your code that overrides the default application-wide? Maybe do a search for 'OPTIONS' in all your project's JS files, to try and find a possible suspect. Apparently there's no match in the whole Ext code, so that probably doesn't come from the framework.
Edit:
Ok, I think I've got it. If your page is not accessed from the same domain (i.e. localhost:8080, the port is taken into account), the XHR object seems to resort to an OPTIONS request.
So, to fix your problem, either omit the domain name completely, using:
url: '/MyApp/getUsers.html'
Or double check that your using the same domain and port to access the page and make the requests.
I am trying to send a notification from the server and the docs says to POST to /api/push/broadcast/ which I have done from the following code
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
dataType: 'json',
url: 'https://go.urbanairship.com/api/push/?callback=?',
data: '{"android": {"alert": "hi"}}',
contentType: "application/json",
username:"P4...UBg",
password:"fg...gDA",
error: function(jqXHR, textStatus, errorThrown){
// log the error to the console
alert(
"The following error occured: "+
textStatus, errorThrown
);
},
});
And I am getting a 500 (Internal Server Error). I added the callback to prevent "same origin policy" error as suggested here. Does anybody know how to do it correctly?
Thanks
I initially tried to set things up this way (making a raw $POST) to their servers. In the end, I was happy to find that they have modules for most common languages. Our server is all written in Python so we used the Python module. Here is a list of the packages they have:
https://support.urbanairship.com/customer/portal/articles/60713-push-server-libraries
All we had to do was upload the .py file into our bin and we're able to send pushes like this:
airship_android = urbanairship.Airship(SECRET_KEY, MASTER_KEY)
push_data = {"android": {"alert": notification_message, "extra": str(extra_data_str)}, "apids": [apid]}
airship_android.push(push_data)
Hopefully that helps!
Hi this is my first attempt to use MustacheJS with a JSON webservice in .net
Currently I am struggling I can't seem to find what I am doing wrong setting this basic example:
My Webservice is returing the following string:
[
{
"ShortDescription":"BOX",
"Description":"BOXING",
"Id":1
},
{
"ShortDescription":"EPL",
"Description":"ENGLISH PREMIER LEAGUE",
"Id":2
}
]
I have validated its syntax with this website: http://json.parser.online.fr/
and here is the HTML code I am using:
google.load("jquery", "1");
google.setOnLoadCallback(function () {
$(document).ready(
function () {
$.ajax({
url: "../data.asmx/geteagues",
type: "POST",
dataType: "json",
data: "",
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8",
success: function (data) {
var template = "<h1>{{ShortDescription}} {{Description}}</h1>";
var html = Mustache.render(template, data);
$('#sampleArea').html(html);
alert(html);
}
})
}
)
});
I am posting the whole JS code, since I am not very good with javascript, basically I want to load always the latest JQuery version from google and then work my WS call.
The problem so far is that when I place a breakpoint in the following line:
var html = Mustache.render(template, data);
I see that the template is setn ok, and so does the data, same value as I posted above, but the .render function is returning: I seems It didnt like the data.
So far all the examples I have seen for inline data come as the following structure:
{
"repo": [
{ "name": "resque" },
{ "name": "hub" },
{ "name": "rip" },
]
}
And then a template defined like this:
{{#repo}}
<b>{{name}}</b>
{{/repo}}
But the only difference of that against my data is that I dont have a "parent" like "repo"
At server side, I am using a .net library called JSON.net and in the documentation of how are collections being serialized:
james.newtonking.com/projects/json/help/html/SerializingCollections.htm
the final result does not include the parent node's name, which I thing is missing from my Mustache Template definition:
[
{
"Name": "Product 1",
"ExpiryDate": "2000-12-29T00:00Z",
"Price": 99.95,
"Sizes": null
},
{
"Name": "Product 2",
"ExpiryDate": "2009-07-31T00:00Z",
"Price": 12.50,
"Sizes": null
}
]
Is this what I am missing? the "repo" parent node from my data so I can iterate my Template?
Thanks in advance for your time.
-ed
Per #stealth on this question Mustache.js: Iterate over a list received via json
{{ #. }}
<b>{{Name}}</b>
{{ /. }}
Note the only difference from #stealth's answer is a "#" instead of "/".
The line data = { 'roles': data }; is the most crucial. Its attaching the key to the data returned by web api or any other source of data like pagemethods or web service
$.ajax({
dataType: "json",
url: '/api/TestApi/GetAllRole',
success: function (data) {
data = { 'roles': data }; // formatting the data to support the mustache format
var html = Mustache.to_html($('#RoleTemplate').html(), data);
$('#tblRole').append(html);
}
});
Few of my articles on the MustacheJs can be found here
INLINE FILTER FOR BASIC GRID USING MUSTACHEJS
http://www.techguides.in/add-inline-filter-to-basic-grid-using-mustache/
Master Details Grid on Demand data loading : Using Mustache.JS
http://www.techguides.in/master-details-grid-on-demand-data-loading-using-mustache-js/
Sorting a Grid using MustacheJs
http://www.techguides.in/enable-sorting-in-a-grid-bound-using-mustache-js/
short answer: YES
long answer: for security reasons [1], you need to wrap your JSON aray in an object anyways. for Mustache or any other library to be able to access your array you need to have at least one parent key on which you can base your iterator.
The "repo" key on your sample is the helper you need to tell mustache "go and iterate on the array that is inside the repo key", otherwise you have no way to tell the template what you want to output where
[1] this is just one of many resources you can find about why you need to wrap your JSON response in an object http://incompleteness.me/blog/2007/03/05/json-is-not-as-safe-as-people-think-it-is/