How to add a reference to the App_code directory for a sub-folder in web project
I have been given a task to take an older, grown piecemeal over a decade internal website and bring it "up to speed". I have run into a problem in ASP files to "see" the app_code directory. Essentially the current site is a collection of folders that work(ish) that I am trying to collect together as a single project with the LEAST number of edits.
When functionality was superseded the old code was moved into a "deprecated" folder. The code files now reference object in the app_code directory which is not visible to the file from it's new location. The easy answer would be to copy a version of the class file into the "deprecated" folder but that seems more like a hack then a solution. The same for copying the App_code folder to a location visible to the ASP file.
My thought was to add a reference ("reference path") somehow to the deprecated folder pointing to the app_code folder but I cannot find how to do that.
A couple of other notes: 1) the site was built by using text editors and "freebie" editors - it has never been compiled or run in-total through VS before. 2) once I get it built and checked into TFS I am going to remove the deprecated folders. 3) I am working under some stipulations to satisfy concerns arising from actions of prior developers.
Code like:
tr.Controls.Add(GUI.GetTableCell("Salesman", 0, "Center"));
Works well when the ASP page is at the same directory level as the App_code folder ("GUI" is a class with a "GetTableCell" function).
If I can add a folder reference I can solve all of the remaining problems I have with this step in the project.
EDIT
Let me re-ask it this way. The image below is a composite of what I am facing in VS2017. I have such a feeling that a light bulb is simply not turning on for some reason. How I have done this so far is pulling down the current website from our internal Win2003 web server and am trying to convert it into a legit web project. I have done many of the steps necessary but there are 47 instances of the problem visible in the composite image from Visual studio
The code behind from SubscriptionEditor.aspx pictured lower right. Has reference to a namespace which is in the code files in the App_code folder (neatly hidden). This site functions fine but I am missing something to make it work from within VS. I am just at a loss.
For anyone that finds this I want to point out that there are a number of excellent answers available for similar questions here and i have looked at dozens and tried them all. The simple answer to my problem is "you can't".
How to convert ASP.NET website to ASP.NET web application came close
The problem being the source is just a collection of ASP files - it follows no project or template.
Namespaces are super important in development and the clever ways that prior developers found to breach that discipline can not be fixed through VS. It is simple a lot of bloody knuckle corrections of code and scope issues til the errors disappear.
The limitations put on me prohibit any solution. I will end up advocating not "saving the code" unless they are willing to put in the investment to heal the most egregious foibles. So if you see me in the "available for contract" sites then you know how that conversation went.
Related
At work I have been asked to make some amendments to a vb.net website project i've not worked on before. I've cloned the code from TFS and opened it in VS2019 but there were errors when I tried to run it. I know the website runs because my colleague has been working on it, and it is also live on a server and being used by our clients.
I have fixed some errors in the web.config and added some missing references, but now i'm getting an issue with a class called Translation which is in the App_Code folder. The class is used all around the website but i'm getting the error:
Type 'Translation' is not defined.
All of the solutions i've come across say that I need to change the build action on the class to 'compile', but that isn't possible for a website because there is no build action property. The other suggestion i've seen is to add a 'using' statement but as the class has no namespace this is not an option.
I've seen lots of people asking how to do this for websites but nobody has provided an answer, so i'm hoping someone out there can finally come up with a solution which can help me and anyone else struggling with this problem.
There is often a problem with app_code. In fact two fold. First up, is IIS will compile the code in that folder and NOT Visual Studio. This can lead to problems on deployment (some (a lot) of web sites don't have the newer rosylin complier, and I find some of the great new features (such as free form strings in code) will not compile.
But expand the app code, and then right click (properties) for say the given class, or module code you have, and change/set this: (build action)
Change above "build" action to compile (if it not already).
And even before you do above, try a re-build all (that often fixes this).
So, change above - it possible that the code/module you added to app_code not been (ever) compiled, and thus not seen in your project).
So, I actually now often create my own folder called "MyCode" and often avoid the issues of app_code. However, you might be dealing with a existing applcation.
You could also try doing this:
Rename app_code and add it again:
eg:
but, I would first try setting the code module/or class in app_code to compile in the properties sheet first. And try a re-build all.
In fact, exit VS, re-load, open project. rebuild all. Do that first, just in case (since then you don't make any changes). If exit/reload don't work, then as noted, right click on the module/class in app_code and set build action to compile.
And last but not least, you could try a re-name, and add the app_code folder - since it a specials .net folder, and manually adding that folder often does not work (don't just add folder - add "asp.net" folder) - you need to let VS add it for you as per above screen cap.
After many painful hours i've finally got the code running - mostly thanks to the efforts of my colleagues and my boss. It seems the existing project wouldn't run for me so my boss created a new project and added the required websites to that. After some fiddling with the configuration he got it working.
So unfortunately I cannot provide an answer. Apologies if you've arrived here looking for one. I'm not sure this is actually an issue anyway as I never found anything about anyone else having the problem.
Thanks to Albert D. Kallal for trying to help
My searching skills seem to be failing me on this one. It is a simple question;
In ASP.NET is it possible to store class files in a folder not under app_code?
What I am trying to accomplish is create class files which when added (or modified) to the web site will not cause the web site to restart. Anything under App_code or in the bin folder causes a restart. We are not using .NET for the presentation layer.
My reason is simple, we make changes somewhat regularly, and I do not want to wait until a specific time to add/change a feature. These are 24 hour websites and there is no great time to restart them.
Edit:
I am using FluorineFX to access the middle tier. I created a folder called "ProdCode" from the root of the application. When I try to access the NameSpace ProdeCode, class Employee_Calendar method getEvents. I get the error "Failed to locate the requested type ProdCode.Employee_Calendar"
Well, the goal of a non-restart is huge different, and HUGE separate from that of being able to place code modules, or class modules in some other folder.
When you build the project, most of the modules (and class ones) are crunched down to a single .dll anyway.
So, while you are free to add new folders and inside of those folders add new code/class modules? That may not well eliminate the need for the site to re-load, or in fact the site to re-compile the code again.
All of the app_code, and any other code module will crank out and result in a single .dll file. So, I don't see how you going to gain, or win anything new here.
What you could perhaps do is build some classes outside of the project, compile them, and then set a reference to the external code (and class) modules in the other project. That would suggest a external .dll. This would work during debugging, but an "il-merge" usealy occurs when publishing as non debug, and thus the gazillion .dll's are merged into one.
So, separate out code - great idea.
Adding code to additional folders - sure - no problem (do right click on the given class, or code module and make SURE the build action is compile - this is a default for app code - for other folders I can't remember. You need to check this.
so, up to this point? Hey, all great.
But, to save site re-compile time? No, this where train is flying off a big broken bridge, and the whole she-bang is crashing up in a HUGE ball of flames.
You might be able to same some time during debugging, but those included module are pulled into the "main" .dll (same name as your applcation). Go check the "bin" folder now - you not see the app_code .dll's but only one main .dll with the name of your project.
Such re-compile time is useally rather fast for the site to re-load. I you are just changing markup, then fine. But the idea that you want to include compiled code, and attempting to avoid a re-load? No I would not consider this - even if you could! I mean, how many times have you seen code fail or NOT take even after a publish and FORGETTING to re-start the web server? Those .dll's are often loaded into memory, locked and 100+ more issues exist. I many a time lost half a day because my .dll's did not take (due to me not re-starting the web server). there is pain and then there is this kind of "pain" in which parts of your application don't load. I just can't imagine the risk vs rewards in trying to save some time??? - I must be missing something here?
So I'm left maintaining a proprietary codebase from a third-party vendor. The vendor is still sort of around, but support is limp. The site is ASP.NET.
I have made some changes but I am having a really hard time getting IIS to compile these changes in. The bin/ directory has what I believe is a precompiled dll for the core classes. I've changed these but it doesn't recompile. I have tried deleting the dll but then the app refuses to build saying that the Global.asax can't inherit the type anymore, so I don't really know how to rebuild with changes.
I spent all day Saturday setting up a build environment and trying to get a testing thing working. I have just been importing into VS2008 as a web site from the local IIS server. I got it to rebuild the app without changes, but it ignores changes I would place in it.
So I need to make a solution out of this website and/or directory structure so that I can do actual, big, full grown-up rebuilds and make changes to this codebase. Anyone know how I can go about this?
EDIT: A bit more elaboration. I've tried creating a blank project and just Add Existing File... on the whole website directory. This hasn't worked, it stops the import about 10% in.
Keep in mind there are two (actually, three) levels of 'builds' or compiles going on here.
1) The DLLs in the /bin directory should be pre-built, by visual studio or otherwise. The content of .ASPX, ASCX, ASHX, ASAX etc fiels are not included in those.
2) The ASPX, etc files I noted above are then compiled by IIS when the first request comes in (normally; there are ways to change that behavior). That is the source of the error with Global.asax you are seeing; With the DLL(s) gone, the class that Global.asax is supposed to inherit from does not exist.
3) Then there is the just-in-time compilation, which is not relevant for this discussion.
It sounds like you may be missing the source files for the project, or perhaps the web site is not getting properly set up as a project to compile that DLL
Try these links, I suppose this is what you are looking for.
http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/dotnettipoftheday/archive/2010/01/20/linking-files-in-visual-studio.aspx
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/306234
Not sure this question is really valid anymore. The source we were working with was rather different than it should have been. Not sure if someone got angry in the past and moved stuff around or what, but grabbing a new copy of the source fixed most of our issues. I am able to build now with an included csproj.
This doesn't really help many others with the same issue I suppose, but if you are getting weird build behavior like this, you might want to start with basics, like making sure that your source checkout is valid.
I am new in asp.net so I am not sure it is a professional way or not.
I have the project without .snl file. I just create a empty web site and then paste the files inside the folder where I created the project.
It worked for me.
I think pasting the files and folder directly by file manager will help you.
We're a small team starting to use TortiseSVN to manage our web projects.
I was just wondering what is the best way to manage web projects into Subversion.
As you know a web solution consists of the .sln file as well as all the .aspx files.
Well we noticed when we right click the solution and we select "Add selected projects to subversion". It prompts me to tell it where to store the .sln file. So I give it some path like svn://serverName/CIS/MyWebSiteProject. Cool it just placed the .sln file...so I thought to myself how is it going to store the .aspx files as well.
Within a second I got a second prompt, I thought cool it is prompting me for the .aspx pages. So I tried giving it the path svn://serverName/CIS/MyWebSiteProject/ASPX_Files, but it comes back with an error stating I cannot place this folder within this path. I actually have to go outside of the folder MyWebSiteProject.
Not good cause now I have 2 folders one with the .sln folder and the other with all the .aspx pages and these folders are sitting on:
(sln file):
svn://serverName/CIS/MyWebSiteProject
(aspx files):
svn://serverName/cis/myWebSitePages
This really is not ideal cause I am sitting on the root of CIS with 2 folders for really one solution. Now when I try to check the project out I have to check both folders out.
What makes this even worse is when I do check them out I try to open the .sln file and I get an error that it cannot find the corresponding .aspx files. This seems like too much work, is there an easier way or a recommended way of using tortisesvn/subversion with asp.net web projects ?
While I am sure you have TortoiseSVN installed, it sounds like you are using Ahnk or some other VS SCC plugin to add from within VS.
I would suggest not using the plugin to initally add the solution to SVN, but to use TortoiseSVN in Windows Explorer for your initial check in. This will add your solution directory in its original state.
From that point on, you should be able to use the SCC plugin from within VS without trouble.
EDIT
Ok, after your commment I realize that I was not fully understanding the problem.
If you are dealing with a single project, after you create your solution and project, select the solution in Solution Explorer, go to 'file>save solution as' and save the solution inside the directory where your project file is.
Close the solution and go out to Explorer and use Tortoise to add the directory to SVN. If you have multiple projects/sites, just pick one to hold the solution.
Does that make sense? and from that point you should have no problems with ahnk
The key to successfully using Visual Studio with any source control is to put the solution file in the same path as the rest of the project files.
Usually, I will do something like the following:
\Project\Project.sln
\Project\MainWebSite\*.* <-- All web site files (including .??proj here).
\Project\Library\*.*
Then, I manually put \Project\*.* into source control.
Other options exist, as for my recent projects, I have been using:
\Project\SolutionFiles\Project.sln
\Project\MainWebSite\*.*
\Project\Library\*.*
Again, I manually put \Project\*.* into source control.
I generally find that it is better to set up the repositories for my solutions and projects from within Tortoise SVN. Then use whatever VS plugin that you care for to manage the commits of your pages etc. This gives you a little more control and allows you to get your setup correct from the start.
For example how this site is organized?
What i do not understand is what they upload to the Microsoft server?
I have created, with Visual studio, a very small web-page and i have to upload the whole site, even after the smallest change...
The usual approach is to replace everything with xcopy or the publish function in visual-studio, and in some cases replacing everything is the only approach - for example if you're using the web-application project model everything gets packaged into a single assembly and there you go - even to apply a small change you'll have to re-deploy the whole thing.
An alternative to this could be the Website model in visual studio, using which you should be able to deploy single code files on your server and they should be picked-up if you re-start the website from the IIS management tool. This model - in fact - works in a different way compared to the web-application project model. It's just a bunch of code files that will be dynamically compiled by the ASP.NET runtime.
Even if possible though - I wouldn't suggest the approach of deploying single files - as this is easily error prone (you deploy the code-behind and could easily forget to deploy the aspx counterpart, or similar). Unless you're delpoying Gigs of stuff over slow-networks, redeploying the whole thing is always the safest bet.
Have a look at this and this interesting links to find out more about website and web-application project models in visual studio.
It really depends a lot on how you're building your app.
If you're in VS and you're doing an ASP.Net site, then you can either do it as a Website Project, or as a Web Application project.
in the former case, your files will remain as aspx and .aspx.cs files and you xcopy (or FTP) whichever files change. if you want logic that's outside the scope of a single page, you'll either create a separate class library project or else use the App_code directory.
In the latter case, you'll compile all the logic into one or more .dll files that get copied to your site's /bin directory, and any number of aspx files that can either stay as such or be embedded (recommend leaving them as aspx files). Again, if an aspx file changes, you just movethe one that changed, if anything in the dll changes, you replace a whole dll.
All that said, a huge chunk of what's on the site you posted is probably being pulled out of the database. Most sites now dont' have content on pages, they just have organizational (view) logic on paes, and have other classes which fetch the actual content out of a database to serve up. This allows greater reuse and means that the 4,000 pages (number chosen at random) on MSDN don't have to be each coded individually as an HTML page.
After Googling i think, the check-box Use fixed naming and single page assemblies in the publish Website form of the Visual studio, is the right choice.
Although it might slow things down...