I have the following scenario:
(Client/Browser) => (Web Service/Web API) => (SharePoint REST-Api).
Basically what I want to achive is to have the middle application (WebService/Web API) to act as a facade infront of the SharePoint-REST-API to ease the development for anybody that needs to communicate with our SharePoint-application. (Basically we wrap a few SharePoint-request-calls into one single call in the Web API/Facade).
Now the problem is that I also want to be able to send the logged in Windows user (AD-user) from the Client to the Web Service, and then the web service should act on behalf of that Windows user and perform whatever actions needed in the SharePoint REST-API (this is to make sure that permissions to files and so on are actually set based on the authenticated user).
What we have tried so far is setting uo the Web Service on one server, and SharePoint on a different server.. and then we have tried to setup authentication using Kerberos and delegation, but we could not get this working.
Based on the information I have provided, do you guys think that a "double hop" like this would work if we manage to get Kerberos setup properly?
Another thought that hit me is that maybe we dont have to host the Web Service and the SharePoint applications in two different servers, but we could actually host them both on the same server within one single IIS-server with two sites.
Would this still require Kerberos to be setup with a double hop? Or does a "hop" only count once the ticket actually leaves one server to another.. cause in the case described here, the request from the Web Service to the SharePoint-REST-API would never leave the actual server, but it might cross domains (as in web-domains.. not AD-domains).
Could this work, instead of having to hassle with Kerberos double hop, SPNs and what not..?
when you use integrated authentication, anonymous is disabled at that time and impersonate is enabled.so security settings will not allow your site to access resources on any network servers.
When you authenticate to the IIS server using Integrated Authentication, that uses up your first 'hop'. When IIS tries to access a network device, that would be the double or second hop which is not allowed. iis will not pass those credential to the next network device.
if you use anonymous enable and impersonate off this issue will not occur.
to configure Kerberos Authentication in iis you could follow the below steps:
1)open iis manager and select site.
2)select the authentication feature from the middle pane.
3)enable windows authentication and disable anonymous.
4)With Windows Authentication, click on the Providers from the Action pane.
5)set the provider in below manner:
Negotiate
NTLM
save the changes.
6)go back and select the configuration editor.
from section dropdown select system.webServer/security/authentication/windowsAuthentication.
“useAppPoolCredentials” set to true.
"useKernelMode" to "True" and save the settings.
7)restart the iis.
8)Configure SPNs
open the command prompt as administrator and run below command to check the machine name:
hostname
When you have a custom hostname and you want to register it to a domain account, you need to create a SPN a below.
setspn -a HOST/${FQDN_HOST} ${MACHINE_NAME}
setspn -a http/${FQDN_HOST} ${MACHINE_NAME}
9)after doing that set application pool identity to the custom account and set the username and password.
You could refer this below article for more detailed information:
https://weblogs.asp.net/owscott/iis-windows-authentication-and-the-double-hop-issue
https://active-directory-wp.com/docs/Networking/Single_Sign_On/SSO_with_IIS_on_Windows.html
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/IIS-Support-Blog/Setting-up-Kerberos-Authentication-for-a-Website-in-IIS/ba-p/324644
Related
Short version:
For IIS 7.5 web applications with Windows Authentication does the end
user need to have Read file access?
Long version:
I have an intranet ASP.NET web app that uses windows authentication. It's installed at dozens of different companies and normally the authentication works fine: users navigate to the site e.g. http://appserver/MyApp, the app recognizes who they're logged in as and displays pages accordingly. I just installed it at a new client and encountered a problem:
When connecting e.g. to http://appserver/MyApp I'm prompted for windows credentials but after entering them I'm repeatedly prompted. After several re-entering credentials I'm shown a 401 error page saying "401 - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to invalid credentials.". So not only is it not passing through my identity but even when entering the username & password it's still denying access.
Giving Read & Execute permissions to the end users of the app solves this problem, but I don't think this should be necessary at all.
In the windows Application Event Log there's a message "File authorization failed for the request" along with Thread account name: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE and User: [the correct workstation users's domain account]. This suggests that the file access is being performed with the User's identity, not the AppPool identity of Network Service. Sure enough if I grant the end user Read & Execute permission (I didn't try Read only) to the application's directory then everything works correctly: when the user browses to the site they're authenticated automatically, not prompted, and the web site correctly recognizes their identity! Therefore my workaround solution is to give Read & Execute permission to Everybody on the application directory...but this is not an ideal solution.
This seems very strange. I've never needed to do this before in IIS 7.5, so far as I recall, and definitely never needed to in IIS 6 or IIS 7. Is this a new IIS7.5 thing? The documentation says that Impersonation is turned off by default. I added a element to the web.config to be sure, removed file permissions other than Network Service, but the problem remained.
Any thoughts? Is it normal for Windows Authenticated sites on IIS 7.5 for end users to need file permissions on the web server files?
Some relevant details:
Network Service
has Full Control file permissions to the app folder.
When connecting from the server itself I was prompted for credentials
but after entering them i'm authenticated and the application works
correctly including displaying my windows login and connecting and
retrieving data from the db. I later determined that it was prompting
for credentials because http://localhost was in the trusted sites
and therefore not recognised as the Intranet Zone and thus not
passing identity through. I also determined that it was working as
this user identity because it's an admin user who has file
permissions.
The web server is running Windows Server 2008 R2 / IIS
7.5. It didn't have IIS on it until I installed it. I installed the default features as well as Windows Authentication, ASP.NET, and
possibly a couple of other items. A separate WCF app I installed that
uses IIS, anonymous authentication & .net 2.0 is working fine on
that web server.
The app install process is a manual copy of files,
creation of IIS App Pools & web apps, updating connection strings,
etc.
I checked the IE security settings. It was recognizing the
server as in the Intranet zone and had the option 'Automatic logon
only in Intranet zone' selected. Also on Advanced Settings the
'Enable Integrated Windows Authentication' option was checked.
After
installing IIS I ran aspnet_regiis -i for .net 2.0 and
aspnet_regiis -iru for .net 4.0.
Anonymous authentication is
disabled for my app and Windows Authentication enabled.
The app is
running on ASP.NET v4 but there's another app I installed
experiencing the same issue running ASP.NET v2.
The app is running
with Identity = Network Service and in 32-bit mode.
Database
connection string includes Trusted Connection=True and database
permissions are granted to the web server account [domain]\[server]$
e.g. DGM\MyServer$.
In IIS > Authentication > Windows Authentication > Providers the list was Negotiate first then NTLM. I tried reordering so NTLM is first.
In the Windows Security Event Log there
were a series of Microsoft Windows security auditing events: Logon
and Logoff. They indicated that the Logon was successful and was
displaying the User Id of the workstation user. This are from when
I'm connecting from another workstation and receive a 401
Unauthorized after several attempts.
I see someone has had this problem reported here but with no solution. Originally I posted in the ASP and then the IIS forums with no answers so far.
Update:
This msdn article says
When Windows authentication is enabled but impersonation is disabled, ASP.NET performs file access checks in the file authorization module using the credentials that are sent from the browser (my emphasis). Impersonation does not need to be enabled, because the FileAuthorizationModule module ensures that the requesting user is allowed read access or write access to the resource, depending on the request verb (for example, GET or POST) before executing the request. This behavior applies to any requests that enter managed code. In earlier versions of ASP.NET, accessing files based on URIs such as "Default.aspx" triggered the access check. In ASP.NET MVC applications, where access to resources is typically performed using extensionless URLs, this check typically does not apply, because there is not a physical file to check. In that case, the FileAuthorizationModule class falls back to checking access-control lists (ACLs) for the folder.
This does suggest that the end user needs permissions to the files (in the case of .aspx) or the folder (for MVC) ... although still this seems slightly tucked away and non-definitive. This article about App Pools says they're used as the identity for securing resources, which contradicts the idea of needing to grant privileges to end users. Unless the rules are different for App Pools and NETWORK SERVICE, which could be the case but would be surprising.
Are authenticated users allowed to the app folder?
We were also fighting with this issue, and started setting up security groups so we could give our users file level permissions. Then one of our server admins stumbled across a couple of new properties that allow the app to authenticate to the file system under set credentials, and resolved the need for the users to have access. Here is what he came up with…
There are two IIS settings that control this:
Physical Path Credentials Physical Path Credentials Logon type
By default, Physical Path Credentials is set to Application User
(Pass-through authentication). This means that IIS doesn’t do any
impersonation when handling Windows Authentication requests. This can,
however, be set to a specific user (though not, unfortunately, the
application pool identity, which would be ideal). Physical Path
Credentials Logon Type is set by default to Clear-Text. For my testing
I set this to Interactive (though this may not be the correct value).
Possible values are Clear-Text, Batch, Interactive, and Network.
To set this up I did the following:
Created a local account (IIS-AccessUser)
Granted IIS-AccessUser read and execute access to the /home directory of the site.
Added IIS-AccessUser to IIS_IUSRS group (necessary for accessing .NET temporary files)
Set IIS-AccessUser as the Physical Path Credentials
Set Physical Path Credentials Logon Type to Interactive
Doing the above allowed me to log in to the application directly,
without having to allow Authenticated Users, or me having to be a
member of any of the groups in the /home folder. It also still
preserved .NET Authorization roles, so I still could not access parts
of the site that I was not allowed to.
The short answer is NO. You are not required to grant file access permissions when using Windows Authentication in IIS 7.0 and IIS 7.5.
We were only able to discover this because our server admin smelled the security and management issues that arise from taking the route of granting file level access to users and groups.
For anyone dealing with this issue or if you are setting up a new IIS7/IIS7.5 server and/or moving from IIS 6, here is an article that gives you all of the Windows Authentication options and configurations that need to be modified to avoid granting file level access to individuals or groups.
Please read the two comments in at the end of the POST for some valid critiques of the methods used in this article.
http://weblogs.asp.net/owscott/iis-using-windows-authentication-with-minimal-permissions-granted-to-disk
In addition to the information in the article, please be aware that IIS 7.5 is not using the web configuration tags for system.web (at least not in my MVC 4 application).
It is looking in the system.webserver tags for authorization configuration (where you will need to list the windows domain\groups a user needs to be in to access your application).
-- DSB
We have built a WCF service for an application and everything is working out well, using WSHttpBinding. We now have been asked to make sure the communication between the Web Application -> WCF -> Database is secure and have been asked to use SSL. Along with that they are requesting we make sure the WCF service can not be accessed by another application.
If we setup SSL, does that block others from trying to get in, or we do still need to setup the clientCredentialType setting on the service? Also the entire application (site, wcf, db) will be within a company's network, so if we setup the clientCredentialType="Windows" which account is used, how does WCF know to allow the website to talk to it, which Windows account are they using, or this an account we need to setup?
Thanks.
SSL has nothing to do with Authentication or Authorization.
It does 2 things:
prevents third parties from intercepting your traffic.
verifies that people are who they say they are.
The requirement "make sure the WCF service can not be accessed by another application" needs to be handled through some Authentication / Authorization mechanism. You could use Basic or Windows depending on your needs.
Since you're in the company's network, I'd attempt to use Windows Authentication. This will force clients to be authenticated through your domain, however it looks like you don't want just any domain user to have access. In this case, you need to set up either Role based authorization, or user based. Either war, you can drop a Web.config file into the same folder as the WCF service endpoint specifying what accounts are authorized. Other users will see a 401 Unauthorized.
This is the general approach I'd take.
What I want to do is:
Allow anonymous users to access my ASP .NET site.
Use Windows Authentication for the site to access Sql Server. It will log in to Sql Server with a domain account set aside especially for the site (and preferably do everything under the same account).
Every article on the Web tells you to do this:
<authentication mode="Windows"/>
<identity impersonate="true"/>
in Web.config. However, I gather that this is only if you want users to log in with Windows Authentication. It has nothing to do with the server logging in to SQL Server (except that the combination of the above 2 implies that users' authentication will also be used to connect to the database). Is this correct? Given that my Windows account has access to files on the server and the database which the site is connecting to, this seems hard to test....
It seems that if I:
set the App Pool Identity to the domain account
enable Anonymous Access on the site using the domain account
use a connect string with Windows Authentication
then the site will connect to SQL Server via Windows Authentication. Also, it will use the domain account as long as impersonation is off. Is this correct?
in Web.config. However, I gather that
this is only if you want users to log
in with Windows Authentication. It has
nothing to do with the server logging
in to SQL Server
This is partially true. The impersonated account will be used to logon SQL server if delegation is setup properly. You didn't see this because in most of the environment, delegation needs to be explicitly setup. Delegation is a more powerful form of impersonation and makes it possible for the server process (in your case, IIS process) to access remote resources (in your case, SQL server) while acting as the client. For more information, you can google ASP.NET Delegation. I said it's partially true because in some simple environment, you don't even need any special configuration. The delegation is just working. For example, if you have SQL server running on the same machine as the IIS server. Another case is that you have your IIS server running on an Active Directory domain controller (very rare). In these two cases or on a machine with delegation configured properly, your above statements will be wrong.
It seems that if I:
set the App Pool Identity to the
domain account
enable Anonymous
Access on the site using the domain
account
use a connect string with
Windows Authentication
then the site
will connect to SQL Server via Windows
Authentication. Also, it will use the
domain account as long as
impersonation is off. Is this correct?
Yes, this is correct.
Given that my Windows account has
access to files on the server and the
database which the site is connecting
to, this seems hard to test....
It's easy to test if you have two domain accounts (or one domain account and one local account). Set the App Pool identity to use your DomainAccount1. Grant only DomainAccount1 to have permission to access your database. Access your web app on another machine using another accound (either domain account or local account). Test if the web app can properly access your database.
If I'm following you correctly, you are right; You do not want to use impersonation/authentication to do what you want to do. Set the App Pool identity appropriately, and assure that user account has appropriate access to SQL Server.
Instead of using a Windows Account you can create a separate Sql Login i.e. a username/pwd and use that in the connection string instead.
We have been running an ASP application in local intranet using IIS7 and now have requirement to get Client computer name and logged user name, so that we can show his home page according to his setting. I did search on internet but did not find any solution yet. I also tried using LOGON_USER server variables but it works fine when I run using localhost but not when use IP Address (Return blank value). I also enabled window authentication and disabled anonymous but I prompt for user name and password even I did not set user name and password.
You will not be able to determine the computername directly. You will need to perform a reverse DNS lookup on the client's IP. Check out the link below from ASP101 to accomplishing this in ASP classic.
As far as the username, you will need to enable authentication in IIS otherwise all incoming requests will be anonymous. If you are running in a trusted environment, setup IIS for "Integrated Windows Authentication". This will allow the client's current user information to be used to authenticate to your website without a userid/password prompt. Note that integrated authentication is not part of the default IIS7 install.
Good luck.
ASP based Reverse DNS Lookup
http://www.asp101.com/articles/jason/reversedns/default.asp
Integrated Windows Authentication in IIS6 and IIS7
http://blogs.iis.net/nitashav/archive/2010/03/12/iis6-0-ui-vs-iis7-x-ui-series-integrated-windows-authentication.aspx
You can also achieve this by using WMI, however the remote computer and logged on user must be part of a domain that you have the administration credentials for. You will also need to use reverse DNS to find out the computer name, which #jking89 has given a great reference to above. Take a look at the WMI Win32_ComputerSystem class, here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa394102(VS.85).aspx. Hope this helps as an alternate solution.
I have a web service running in IIS 6.0 on Windows 2003. It's authentication mode is Integrated Windows security (anonymous disabled), and authorization is done with Authorization Manager and an XML authorization store. My test user is a domain user (admin, actually) with membership in an authorized role.
I am testing this (for now) on the web server (localhost), and using (for now) Internet Explorer to access the web service (.asmx).
I can successfully open the web service (wsdl) page through localhost, like this:
http://localhost:8080/MyService/MyService.asmx
Using this url, integrated windows authentication succeeds (silently), and I am sucessfully authorized by AzMan to access the service. The same goes for the server name:
http://myserver:8080/MyService/MyService.asmx
Now I need to use the external host name (www.mysite.no) to access the service (this in order to get ssl to work with a certificate issued to that sitename). To do this, I add the host name to my HOSTS file, like this:
127.0.0.1 www.mysite.no
...then type this into IE:
http://www.mysite.no:8080/MyService/MyService.asmx
What happens then is that authorization fails. I get the IE/Windows login box and enter my correct credentials three times. Then I get a 401.1:
HTTP Error 401.1 - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to invalid credentials.
Internet Information Services (IIS)
How is authorization through AzMan influenced by the host name?
Edit: I have reason to believe AzMan has nothing to do with it - it seems to be the authentication that fails.
I have reproduced the problem on another server. The essence seems to be that accessing localhost via an entry in the local host file somehow messes up the integrated windows authentication between the browser and IIS.
I have worked around the problem, now my curiosity is all that's left...
Enable audit login failure auditing & check the security event log on the host.
1) On the webserver, go to Control Panel, Administrative Tools, Local Security Policy.
2) Go to local policies, audit policy. Add failure for 'audit logon events'.
3) Close the MMC. Open a command prompt and type gpupdate.
4) browse to http://www.mysite.no. You will get the error again.
5) Launch event viewer (control panel, admin tools, event viewer). Navigate to the security event log and look for the login failure(s).They shoudl tell you something descriptive, like 'the user has not been granted the specified logon type'. Unfortunately the login type itself is not descriptive; logon type 2 is interactive (locally), 3 is 'access this computer over the network', 5 is 'logon as a service' (NT service, not WCF service). The rights required can be granted in the local security policy.
Also, check to see if you have a proxy enabled in IE. If your traffic is being routed to the proxy, it is possible that the proxy does not support NTLM. Add the host as a proxy exception while you test using IE.
My first guess is that it's not the host name.
The first thing to do is narrow down the problem as there are a couple things that could be going wrong.
First set the IIS site to anonymous access, and make sure you can pull up the web service. That will verify that you're accessing the right IIS web site and it's truly narrowed down to an authorization problem.
Also, check the Application Pool credentials, and the security settings on the file folder containing the web service as these could be contributors.