I'm working in a DQL witch is almost ok but I need to change one 'AND' with a 'OR'... this is the query I'm getting now so far:
SELECT *
FROM amp a0_
WHERE (a0_.expediente LIKE '%zumardia 27%' OR a0_.expediente LIKE '%zumardia__27%') AND (a0_.expediente LIKE '%apertura%' OR a0_.expediente LIKE '%apertura%')
****AND**** (a0_.fecha LIKE '%zumardia 27%' OR a0_.fecha LIKE '%zumardia__27%') AND (a0_.fecha LIKE '%apertura%' OR a0_.fecha LIKE '%apertura%')
the ****AND**** is witch I need to change, this is my code right now:
foreach ($fields as $field) {
foreach ($value as $v) {
$toFind = [' ',',','?'];
$clean = str_replace($toFind, '__', $v);
$qb->andWhere(
$qb->expr()->orX(
$qb->expr()->orX($expr->like('a.'.$field, ':v'.$field.$miindex)),
$qb->expr()->orX($expr->like('a.'.$field, ':v2'.$field.$miindex))
)
)->setParameter('v'.$field.$miindex, '%'.$v.'%')
->setParameter('v2'.$field.$miindex, '%'.$clean.'%');
}
}
What I want to do is search for 2 parameters y every fields on a table
Related
I have CLub model (clubs) hasMany with User model like
Club n-n User
and I have UserClub model with columns: id, club_id, user_id, etc
In Club model
public function getCountUsers()
{
return $this->hasMany(UserClub::className(), ['club_id'=>'id'])->count();
}
I wanna count all User on Club as code:
$query = Club::find()
->joinWith(['countUsers']);
// ->with('countUsers');
->all();
so it is not working and throwing an error
Club has no relation named \"countUsers\"."
Because it isn't a relation as it does not return a model object or an array of model objects, instead you are using ->count() that makes it return a string that contains the total count for the user against the club.
If you are looking to get a count for the users against all the Clubs you can use the currently defined relation like $club->countUser see below.
$clubs=Club::find()->all();
foreach($clubs as $club){
echo $club->countUser;
}
or change the relation to
public function getCountUser(){
return $this->hasMany(UserClub::className(), ['club_id'=>'id']);
}
and use it like
$clubs=Club::find()->all();
foreach($clubs as $club){
echo count($club->countUser);
}
or like below
$clubs=Club::find()->all();
foreach($clubs as $club){
echo $club->getCountUser()->count();
}
EDIT
You are actually trying to transform the following query using ActiveRecord as far as I understood from the discussion.
SELECT clubs.id, count(user_clubs.id) as total
FROM
clubs
left join user_clubs on clubs.id = user_clubs.club_id
group by clubs.id
if that is correct you can use the following
Clubs::find ()
->alias ( 'c' )
->select ( [ new \yii\db\Expression ( 'c.[[id]], count(uc.[[id]]) as total' ) ] )
->leftJoin ( '{{%user_clubs}} uc' , 'uc.club_id=c.id' )
->groupBy ( 'c.id' )
->all ();
Note : You have to do one more thing you have to add a public property $total inside your Club model and add it to safe rules, because you are selecting the count as an alias total and until unless you define it inside the model the result set won't show you the count, so add the following inside the Club model.
public $total;
under rules
[[other fields...,'total'] , 'safe' ] ,
EDIT2
For some reason, I have a feeling that you are trying to count by specifying a relation instead of specifying the ->leftJoin () with the table user_clubs in the query.
If that is so then you have to change your relation getUserCount() you should better give a meaningful name that describes it. i would rename it to getClubUsers()
public function getClubUsers(){
return $this->hasMany(UserClub::className(), ['club_id'=>'id']);
}
After this, you still have to declare a public property $total as I described before inside your Club model, and add it to safe rules.
Now you can write your query in the following way
Clubs::find ()
->alias ( 'c' )
->select ( [ new \yii\db\Expression ( 'c.[[id]], count(cu.[[id]]) as total' ) ] )
->joinWith( ['clubUsers cu'] )
->groupBy ( 'c.id' )
->all ();
You can do this with join, in my case i get users who have more than 0 referrals.
$users = User::find()->with('referrals')
->from(User::tableName() . ' t')
->join('left join',User::tableName().' r','r.Deeplink = t.ReferralID')
->select('t.*,count(r.ID) as ct')
->groupBy('t.ID')
->andFilterHaving(['>','ct',0])
->all();
Hi your relation is correct check you error Club has no relation named \"countUsers\"."
Means you are calling a relation which not exist :
change query like this, Relation name should be in Club Model
public function getCount(){
return $this->hasMany(UserClub::className(), ['club_id'=>'id']);
}
$clubs=Club::find()->all();
foreach($clubs as $club){
echo count($club->getCount);
}
$query = Club::find()
->joinWith(['count']);
// ->with('countusers');
->all();
If you want count just do like this .
Load the Club model .
$club_model = Club::find()
$count = club_model->count;
I have these two tables
I want to get all products(with all the children) that have at least one child with log_id = 13. Let's say I have the following rows in eorder_product_config table:
The function that retrieves the products looks like this:
public function getProducts($logId){
$q = $this
->createQueryBuilder('p')
->select('p', 'pc')
->where('pc.logisticStatus = :logId')
->setParameter('logId', $logId)
->getQuery();
return $q->getResult();
}
This will get the product(id = 18) with only 2 children(id = 46,48) in the productConfigs collection and I want have all 5 children if there is at least one that has log_id = 13.
I've found a workaround using subqueries:
public function getProducts($logId){
// search for configs that have log_id = 13
$subQuery = $this->createQueryBuilder('pp')
->select('DISTINCT pp.id')
->leftJoin('pp.productConfigs', 'ppc')
->leftJoin('ppc.logisticStatus', 'pls')
->where('ppc.logisticStatus = :logId');
//->andWhere('ppc.id = p.id'); // used for EXIST query method
// main query
$q = $this->createQueryBuilder('p');
$q->select('p', 'pc');
$q->leftJoin('p.productConfigs', 'pc')
// inject subquery, check to see if current product is in
// the subquery result
$q->where($q->expr()->in('p.id', $subQuery->getDQL()));
//$q->where($q->expr()->exists($subQuery->getDQL()))
$q->setParameter('logId', $logId);
return $q->getQuery()->getResult();
}
***I've seen that using the EXIST query does't work as it should that's why I choose the IN query. But in the raw sql query they both return same results.
I would like to upgrade my symfony 2 project from 2.3 to 2.7 LTS version. I have a problem in a repository to get result of a query. In 2.3, this query give me something :
public function findProtectedPublications( $steps, $start, $end)
{
$query= $this->getEntityManager()
->createQueryBuilder()
->select('d.pubRefs')
->from('ImpressionDemandBundle:Event', 'h')
->innerJoin('h.demand','d')
->where('d.protectedPublications = :pub')
->setParameter('pub', 1 )
->andWhere('h.date >= :start')
->setParameter('start', $start )
->andWhere('h.date <= :end')
->setParameter('end', $end )
->andWhere('h.stepId in (:steps)')
->setParameter('steps', $steps )
->orderBy('d.id','ASC')
->getQuery();
$results = $query->getResult();
$publications = array();
if ($results && ! empty ($results)){
foreach($results as $result){
$pubs = $result['pubRefs'];
if ($pubs && ! empty($pubs)){
foreach($pubs as $pub){
$publications[] = $pub;
}
}
}
}
return $publications;
}
But this code doesn't work in earlier version because $pubs variable in an ArrayCollection. So I changed the end of my code with this :
$results = $query->getResult();
$publications = array();
if ($results && ! empty ($results)){
foreach($results as $result){
$pubs = $result['pubRefs'];
var_dump($pubs);
if (! $pubs->isEmpty()){
$arrayPubs = $pubs->toArray();
foreach($arrayPubs as $pub){
$publications[] = $pub;
}
}
}
}
return $publications;
In this part, when I dump the $pubs variable, I have :
object(Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection)#131 (2) {
["elements":"Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection":private]=>
NULL
["_elements":"Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection":private]=>
array(1) {
[0]=>
object(Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publication)#125 (5) {
["editor":"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publication":private]=>
string(24) "Journal Le Monde 4-10-13"
["coauthors":"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publication":private]=>
string(12) "Machin Machin"
["title":"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publication":private]=>
string(57) "La tragédie de Lampedusa: s"émouvoir, comprendre, agir."
["nbPages":"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publication":private]=>
float(1)
["nbCopies":"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publication":private]=>
float(40)
}
}
}
So it seems that there are elements in this ArrayCollection, but the test $pubs->isEmpty() gives a true result, so I have nothing in $publications array.
Edit: In fact, the problem seems to be due to my data in the database : for an object previous from my upgrade, I have something like this in the database :
O:43:"Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection":1:{s:54:"Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection_elements";a:1:{i:0;O:42:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publication":5:{s:50:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publicationeditor";s:5:"BREAL";s:53:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publicationcoauthors";s:5:"MONOT";s:49:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publicationtitle";s:18:"USA Canada mexique";s:51:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\PublicationnbPages";d:150;s:52:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\PublicationnbCopies";d:150;}}}
and this gives the error.
For a object add after my upgrade, I have something like this in the database :
O:43:"Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection":1:{s:53:"Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollectionelements";a:1:{i:0;O:42:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publication":5:{s:50:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publicationeditor";s:8:"dfg dfgd";s:53:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publicationcoauthors";s:7:"dfg dfg";s:49:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\Publicationtitle";s:5:"fdg d";s:51:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\PublicationnbPages";d:5;s:52:"Impression\DemandBundle\Entity\PublicationnbCopies";d:3;}}}
and the function findProtectedPublications() works without errors.
The difference between the two versions is ArrayCollection_elements for the first and ArrayCollectionelements for the second.
To correct this data, I tried with
UPDATE demand SET pub_refs = REPLACE (pub_refs, "ArrayCollection_elements', 'ArrayCollectionelements')
but this doesn't work because of special chars. Trying with
UPDATE demand SET pub_refs = REPLACE (pub_refs, "ArrayCollection�_elements', 'ArrayCollection�elements')
doesn't work better. How can I correct this data ?
Doctrine can populate results as an Array instead of an ArrayCollection, simply change the getResult() call to:
$results = $query->getResult(\Doctrine\ORM\AbstractQuery::HYDRATE_ARRAY);
This would be the most efficient way to complete your task however you could also use ArrayCollection's built-in toArray() method to convert its own data to array format:
$publications = $results->toArray();
As the problem seems to be due to a change in the storage of ArrayCollection in database between 2.3 and 2.7 version of symfony, I created an line command to update these in database.
I've wrote the following Doctrine query:
$query3 = $this->entityManager
->createQueryBuilder()
->select('t.textDomain , t.translationKey , t.languageIso , t.translationDate')
->from(
'AMDatabase\Entity\TheVerse\TranslationsMasters',
't'
)
->groupBy('t.languageIso')
->orderBy(
't.translationDate',
'DESC'
);
// the values of $key2 array are:
// en-US
// es-MX
// es-PR
foreach( $translation AS $key2=>$value2 ) {
if ( $key2 == 'en-US' ) {
$query3
->orWhere(
$query3->expr()
->like(
't.languageIso',
':languageIso'
)
)
->setParameter(
'languageIso',
$key2
);
}
}
$result3 = $query3->getQuery()
->getArrayResult();
How do I have the query search for all 3 language ISO's at the same time?
With "if ( $key2 == 'en-US' ) {" the query executes and gives me the expected result.
But if I remove "if ( $key2 == 'en-US' ) {" there are no search results.
I thought by using "orWhere" it would keep adding conditions to the query (where en-US will still produce a match).
In haven't ever been able to get orWhere to function the way I think it should. It might be that you need a Where in your opening definition before you can add an orWhere later. You might have to use the nested orX statement like this instead:
$query3->andWhere($query3->expr()->orX(
$query3->expr()->like('t.languageIso', $query3->expr()->literal('en-US')),
$query3->expr()->like('t.languageIso', $query3->expr()->literal('es-MX')),
$query3->expr()->like('t.languageIso', $query3->expr()->literal('es-PR'))
));
You can't develop the statement through a loop. But, since you've only got three criteria, it's easy enough to write out.
I am tasked with i18n-ing our current CMS setup in Drupal.
The problem that I am facing is with use of module_invoke() to place blocks within nodes.
I have managed to string translate blocks, and that is working when a block is placed in a region (block content is successfully translated) using the UI.
However, when a block is injected into a node like such:
$block = module_invoke('block', 'block', 'view', 22); print $block['content'];
It is not getting translated, or even worse, not showing at all.
I have also tried this variation using t(). e.g.:
$block = module_invoke('block', 'block', 'view', 22); print t($block['content']);
to no avail.
Generally speaking I've having a bit of trouble with blocks for i18n. Does anyone have a recommended approach for dealing with blocks in drupal with regards to translating them? I would prefer not to create different blocks for each language.
So .. After digging around in the bowels of Drupal - and much hair pulling .. I've come up with an almost decent solution.
Basically, with this function, I can extract a translated version of a block:
function render_i18n_block($block_id, $region = "hidden"){
if ($list = block_list($region)) {
foreach ($list as $key => $block) {
// $key == <i>module</i>_<i>delta</i>
$key_str = "block_".$block_id;
if ($key_str == $key){
return theme('block', $block);
}
}
}
}
Then, in my node, I simple call:
<?php echo render_i18n_block(<block_id>,<region>); ?>
There can be some issues where your blocks might not be displaying in a region (and therefore you can't pass a region into block_list). For this case, I simply created a region called "hidden" which is not rendered anywhere in my template, but can be used to call block_list.
Finally (and this is the part that I still need to find a good solution for), I discovered that block_list() in: includes/blocks/block.inc has a bit of an issue.
It appears that $theme_key is not reliably set unless block_list() is being called from the theme() function (in includes/themes.inc) .. this causes the SQL to return an empty results set. The SQL looks like this:
$result = db_query(db_rewrite_sql("SELECT DISTINCT b.* FROM {blocks} b LEFT JOIN {blocks_roles} r ON b.module = r.module AND b.delta = r.delta WHERE b.theme = '%s' AND b.status = 1 AND (r.rid IN (". db_placeholders($rids) .") OR r.rid IS NULL) ORDER BY b.region, b.weight, b.module", 'b', 'bid'), array_merge(array($theme_key), $rids));
As you can see, if theme_key is not set, then it will just return an empty result.
For now I am bypassing this by simply adding:
if (!isset($theme_key)){$theme_key="<my_theme_name>";}
in modules/blocks/block.inc::block_list() around line 429 .. I still need to work out a better way to do this.
10 for anyone with suggestions on how I could ensure that $theme_key is set before calling block_list :)
I had exactly the same problem as you, since I was using
$block = module_invoke('block', 'block_view', 'block_id');
print render($block['content']);
to inject the block into my nodes. However, looking up module_invoke in the Drupal reference, I found a comment titled "to render blocks in Drupal 7 better to use Block API", with this code:
function block_render($module, $block_id) {
$block = block_load($module, $block_id);
$block_content = _block_render_blocks(array($block));
$build = _block_get_renderable_array($block_content);
$block_rendered = drupal_render($build);
return $block_rendered;
}
I just un-functioned it to use directly, like so:
$block = block_load('block', 'block_id');
$block_content = _block_render_blocks(array($block));
$build = _block_get_renderable_array($block_content);
print render($build);
And for me it works like a charm. Be aware however that this method prints the block title as well, so maybe you'll want to set it to 'none' in the original language.
Create a function like this
<?php
function stg_allcontent2($allC, $level
= "1") {
global $language; $lang = $language->language;
foreach ($allC as $acKey => $ac) {
if($ac['link']['options']['langcode']
== $lang){ if ($level == "1")
$toR .= "";
if (is_array($ac['below']))
$class="expanded"; else
$class="leaf";
$toR .= "<li class=\"".$class."\">" . l($ac['link']['link_title'], $ac['link']['link_path']) . "</li>";
if ($level != "1") $toR .= ""; if (is_array($ac['below'])) $toR .= "<ul class=\"menu\">".stg_allcontent2($ac['below'], "2")."</ul>"; if ($level == "1") $toR .= ""; }
}
return $toR; } ?>
call like this
<?php echo '<ul class="menu">'; echo stg_allcontent2(menu_tree_all_data($menu_name
= 'menu-header', $item = NULL)); echo '</ul>'; ?>
This may help you: http://drupal-translation.com/content/translating-block-contents#
UPDATE: the t() function allows you to pass in the language code to use.