Can we insert data into kusto table using flow?
I tried to insert data into kusto table using .ingest inline command but it throws a bad request error shown below:
Bad request: Control commands (starting with a dot '.') cannot be served from the query endpoint unless they are .show control commands.\r\nPlease provide the following information when contacting the Kusto.
So can we insert data into kusto table using flow?
it is possible, you just need to choose the Run control command... action instead of the Run query ... option (as .ingest, like any other command that starts with a dot (.) is a control command, and not a query)
that said, using direct ingestion is not necessarily recommended for large scale - you can read more about why here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/kusto/management/data-ingestion/
Inline ingestion (push): A control command (.ingest inline) is sent to the engine, with the data to be ingested being a part of the command text itself. This method is primarily intended for ad-hoc testing purposes, and should not be used for production purposes.
#Yoni L
Thank you it worked but we need to choose Chart Type as Html Table
Related
I am trying to return more than 1 million records from Kusto database in Kusto explorer but I am getting this error below
Query result set has exceeded the internal record count limit 500000 (E_QUERY_RESULT_SET_TOO_LARGE; see http://aka.ms/kustoquerylimits)
I think the limit is 5000000. Any ideas how can I achieve this? thanks
set notruncation;
It's strongly recommended that, in this case, some form of limitation
is still put in place.
set truncationmaxsize=YOUR_LIMIT;
set truncationmaxrecords=YOUR_LIMIT;
Reference : https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-explorer/kusto/concepts/querylimits#limit-on-result-set-size-result-truncation
For large data exports - please use server-export options described here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-explorer/kusto/management/data-export/
Service-side export (push): The methods above are somewhat limited since the query results have to be streamed through a single network connection between the producer doing the query and the consumer writing its results. For scalable data export, Kusto provides a "push" export model in which the service running the query also writes its results in an optimized manner. This model is exposed through a set of .export control commands, supporting exporting query results to an external table, a SQL table, or an external Blob storage.
Additional option is to use Kusto Explorer "run query into csv" button, this will add the set notruncation; for you and will save the results directly to disk, so that you can easily open the results in other tools such as Excel.
I am trying to create a function that will accept name of tag and a datetime value and drop a extent within a specific table which has that tag and then ingest a new record into that table with the same tag and the input datetime value -- sort of 'update' simulation. I am not bothered about performance, it's just going to hold metadata -- maybe 20-30 rows at max.
So this is how the create table looks:-
.create table MyTable(sometext:string,somevalue:datetime)
And shown below is my function creation step, which is failing:-
.create-or-alter function MyFunction(arg_sometext:string,arg_somedate:datetime)
{
.drop extents <| .show table MyTable extents where tags has arg_sometext;
.ingest inline into table MyTable with (tags="[arg_sometext]") <| arg_somedate
}
So you can see I am trying to do something simple -- I am suspecting that Kusto won't allow commands in a function. Is there any workaround for achieving this?
Generally:
Kusto mandates that control commands start with a dot (.), and that this must be the first character in the text of the command. As queries, functions, etc. don't start with a dot, this precludes them from invoking control commands.
This is an intentional limitation that prevents a wide range of code injection attacks. By imposing this rule, Kusto makes it easy to guarantee that any query that does not begin with a dot will only have read access to the data and metadata, and never be able to alter them.
Specifically: with regards to your specific scenario:
I'm assuming it's triggered automatically (even if you did have the option to create a function), which suggests you should be able to achieve your goal using Kusto's API / Client libraries and a simple script/app.
An alternative, and perhaps even better approach, would be to re-consider if you actually need to delete or update specific records, or you can use summarize arg_max() in order to query for only the latest "versions" of the records (you could also create a function which encapsulates that logic and overrides the table, by naming the function with the table's name).
I have to code a script in Teradata that will accept a database-name as an input parameter and then will drop and re-create all the tables that exist in the database (ie passed as the input parameter).
If necessary, it is also good to create a UNIX script with an input parameter that would log-in to the Teradata server and accomplish the same (drop and then recreate), in which case I would want to log the ddls in a file before dropping and recreating them.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
I need to be able to run a query such as
SELECT * FROM atable WHERE MyFunc(afield) = "some text"
I've written MyFunc in a VB module but the query results in "Undefined function 'MyFunc' in expression." when executed from .NET
From what I've read so far, functions in Access VB modules aren't available in .NET due to security concerns. There isn't much information on the subject but this avenue seems like a daed end.
The other possibility is through the CREATE PROCEDURE statement which also has precious little documentation: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb177892%28v=office.12%29.aspx
The following code does work and creates a query in Access:
CREATE PROCEDURE test AS SELECT * FROM atable
However I need more than just a simple select statement - I need several lines of VB code.
While experimenting with the CREATE PROCEDURE statement, I executed the following code:
CREATE PROCEDURE test AS
Which produced the error "Invalid SQL statement; expected 'DELETE', 'INSERT', 'PROCEDURE', 'SELECT', or 'UPDATE'."
This seems to indicate that there's a SQL 'PROCEDURE' statement, so then I tried
CREATE PROCEDURE TEST AS PROCEDURE
Which resulted in "Syntax error in PROCEDURE clause."
I can't find any information on the SQL 'PROCEDURE' statement - maybe I'm just reading the error message incorrectly and there's no such beast. I've spent some time experimenting with the statement but I can't get any further.
In response to the suggestions to add a field to store the value, I'll expand on my requirements:
I have two scenarios where I need this functionality.
In the first scenario, I needed to enable the user to search on the soundex of a field and since there's no soundex SQL function in Access I added a field to store the soundex value for every field in every table where the user wants to be able to search for a record that "soundes like" an entered value. I update the soundex value whenever the parent field value changes. It's a fair bit of overhead but I considered it necessary in this instance.
For the second scenario, I want to normalize the spacing of a space-concatenation of field values and optionally strip out user-defined characters. I can come very close to acheiving the desired value with a combination of TRIM and REPLACE functions. The value would only differ if three or more spaces appeared between words in the value of one of the fields (an unlikely scenario). It's hard to justify the overhead of an extra field on every field in every table where this functionality is needed. Unless I get specific feedback from users about the issue of extra spaces, I'll stick with the TRIM & REPLACE value.
My application is database agnostic (or just not very religious... I support 7). I wrote a UDF for each of the other 6 databases that does the space normalization and character stripping much more efficiently than the built-in database functions. It really annoys me that I can write the UDF in Access as a VB macro and use that macro within Access but I can't use it from .NET.
I do need to be able to index on the value, so pulling the entire column(s) into .NET and then performing my calculation won't work.
I think you are running into the ceiling of what Access can do (and trying to go beyond). Access really doesn't have the power to do really complex TSQL statements like you are attempting. However, there are a couple ways to accomplish what you are looking for.
First, if the results of MyFunc don't change often, you could create a function in a module that loops through each record in atable and runs your MyFunc against it. You could either store that data in the table itself (in a new column) or you could build an in-memory dataset that you use for whatever purposes you want.
The second way of doing this is to do the manipulation in .NET since it seems you have the ability to do so. Do the SELECT statement and pull out the data you want from Access (without trying to run MyFunc against it). Then run whatever logic you want against the data and either use it from there or put it back into the Access database.
Why don't you want to create an additional field in your atable, which is atable.afieldX = MyFunc(atable.afield)? All what you need - to run UPDATE command once.
You should try to write a SQL Server function MyFunc. This way you will be able to run the same query in SQLserver and in Access.
A few usefull links for you so you can get started:
MSDN article about user defined functions: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc164062.aspx
SQLServer user defined functions: http://www.sqlteam.com/article/intro-to-user-defined-functions-updated
SQLServer string functions: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181984.aspx
What version of JET (now called Ace) are you using?
I mean, it should come as no surprise that if you going to use some Access VBA code, then you need the VBA library and a copy of MS Access loaded and running.
However, in Access 2010, we now have table triggers and store procedures. These store procedures do NOT require VBA and in fact run at the engine level. I have a table trigger and soundex routine here that shows how this works:
http://www.kallal.ca/searchw/WebSoundex.htm
The above means if Access, or VB.net, or even FoxPro via odbc modifies a row, the table trigger code will fire and run and save the soundex value in a column for you. And this feature also works if you use the new web publishing feature in access 2010. So, while the above article is written from the point of view of using Access Web services (available in office 365 and SharePoint), the above soundex table trigger will also work in a stand a alone Access and JET (ACE) only application.
Is there a way to determine if a MATCH query sent to an fts3 table in sqlite is valid? Currently, I don't find out if the expression is invalid until I try to run it, which makes it a little tricky. I'd like to report to the user that the syntax is invalid before even trying to run it.
I'm using sqlite with the C api.
Additionally, doing a search with the expression "NOT " will fail with a "SQLlite logic/database error". Googling seems to indicate that such a query is invalid. Is there a correct syntax to do the operation? I'm essentially trying to find entries that do NOT contain that term. Or do I have to drop back down to using LIKE and do a sequential scan and not use FTS?
Looks like the simplest way right now is to create a separate FTS table with no rows, and execute the query against it. It will be immediate since there's no data in the table, and will report and error if the query syntax is incorrect.