Pass arguments in redux - redux

I want to pass an argument in redux but I didn't found the way to do it.
Here's my code:
redux/actions
export const next_page = (max_page) => {
return {
type: NEXT_PAGE,
payload: max_page
}
}
redux/middleware
export const update_page = (dispatch) => next => action => {
next(action)
if (action.type === NEXT_PAGE) {
dispatch(next_page({max_page: action.payload}))
}
}
redux/reducer
export default (page = 1, action) => {
switch (action.payload) {
case NEXT_PAGE:
const nextPage = page + 1
return nextPage <= action.payload ? nextPage : page
default:
return page
}
}
Calling the component
<ChangePage max={this.state.max_pages} {...{prevPage, nextPage, page}} />
const mapStateToProps = state => ({
page: state.page,
})
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch) => ({
nextPage: () => dispatch(next_page()),
})
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(Home)
ChangePage component
<button onClick={() => this.props.nextPage(max_page)}>Next</button>
The problem is that I don't know how to pass the argument max_page to use it in redux/reducer

You just need to pass max_page through your nextPage prop in mapDispatchToProps:
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch) => ({
nextPage: max_page => dispatch(next_page(max_page)),
})
Then, when you invoke it inside of the ChangePage component your max_page argument will already be passed through.
In addition, note that you don't need a middleware to re-dispatch the action again (this will result in an infinite loop):
// Just delete the middleware
And your reducer should be switching on action.type, not action.payload:
// redux/reducer
export default (page = 1, action) => {
switch (action.type) { // changed from action.payload
case NEXT_PAGE:
const nextPage = page + 1
return nextPage <= action.payload ? nextPage : page
default:
return page
}
}

Related

TypeError: dispatch is not a function when clicking the toggle button

I am using react redux-thunk. I have a set of users data that I get from an API and this is the schema:
.
I've connected the "active" property with the checked attribute of a Switch MUI button, so naturally when calling the API I have some users with their switch button already on "true". What I am trying to do is to just make the switch functional, and just be able to click it and change its state, not necessarily doing anything with that.
Here's my toggleType.js:
export const TOGGLE = "TOGGLE";
Here's my toggleAction.js:
import { TOGGLE } from "./toggleType";
const statusToggleAction = () => {
return {
type: TOGGLE,
};
};
export const statusToggle = () => {
return (dispatch) => {
dispatch(statusToggleAction);
};
};
Here's my toggleReducer.js:
import { TOGGLE } from "./toggleType";
const initialState = {
status: false,
};
const toggleReducer = (state = initialState, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case TOGGLE:
status: true;
default:
return state;
}
};
export default toggleReducer;
Everything is under my userContainer.js, like that:
function UserContainer({ userData, fetchUsers }) {
useEffect(() => {
fetchUsers();
}, []);
return userData.loading ? (
<h2>Loading</h2>
) : userData.error ? (
<h2>{userData.error}</h2>
) : (
<Container maxWidth="lg" style={{ flexGrow: 1, height: "100%" }}>
<h2>User List</h2>
<div>
{userData &&
userData.users &&
userData.users.map((user) => (
<div key={user.id}>
<p>{user.name}</p>
<Switch checked={user.active} onChange={statusToggle()} />
</div>
))}
</div>
</Container>
);
}
const mapStateToProps = (state) => {
return { userData: state.user, statusToggle: state.status };
};
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch) => {
return {
fetchUsers: () => dispatch(fetchUsers()),
statusToggle: () => dispatch(statusToggle()),
};
};
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(UserContainer);
This is the error I am getting whenever I am clicking one of those switches:
Any ideas are welcome, I "learned" redux like 3 days ago!
toggleReducer function in toggleReducer.js, replace status: true; with return { status: true }.
Just return action in statusToggle function in toggleAction.js without dispatch as following.
export const statusToggle = () => {
return statusToggleAction();
};
Or just call statusToggleAction directly in userContainer.js as following.
export const statusToggle = () => {
return (dispatch) => {
dispatch(statusToggleAction());
};
};

Refactoring with createSlice reduxtoolkit

I'm having trouble refactoring with createSlice, I'm a beginner with redux-toolkit and have looked through the documentation but still having problems.if someone could point me in the right direction that would be fantastic. This is the working code
const SET_ALERT = 'setAlert';
const REMOVE_ALERT = 'alertRemoved';
export const setAlert =
(msg, alertType, timeout = 5000) =>
(dispatch) => {
const id = nanoid();
dispatch({
type: SET_ALERT,
payload: { msg, alertType, id },
});
setTimeout(() => dispatch({ type: REMOVE_ALERT, payload: id }), timeout);
};
const initialState = [];
export default function alertReducer(state = initialState, action) {
const { type, payload } = action;
switch (type) {
case SET_ALERT:
return [...state, payload];
case REMOVE_ALERT:
return state.filter((alert) => alert.id !== payload);
default:
return state;
}
}
Your current setAlert action creator creates a thunk action (an action which takes dispatch as an argument) so it cannot be an action creator that is automatically generated by createSlice.
createSlice
You can keep the setup very similar to what you have now. You would have two separate actions for setting and removing an alert and a thunk for dispatching both. The underlying basic actions can be created with createSlice.
import { createSlice, nanoid } from "#reduxjs/toolkit";
const slice = createSlice({
name: "alerts",
initialState: [],
reducers: {
addAlert: (state, action) => {
// modify the draft state and return nothing
state.push(action.payload);
},
removeAlert: (state, action) => {
// replace the entire slice state
return state.filter((alert) => alert.id !== action.payload);
}
}
});
const { addAlert, removeAlert } = slice.actions;
export default slice.reducer;
export const setAlert = (msg, alertType, timeout = 5000) =>
(dispatch) => {
const id = nanoid();
dispatch(addAlert({ msg, alertType, id }));
setTimeout(() => dispatch(removeAlert(id)), timeout);
};
CodeSandbox
createAsyncThunk
This next section is totally unnecessary and overly "tricky".
We can make use of createAsyncThunk if we consider opening the alert as the 'pending' action and dismissing the alert as the 'fulfilled' action. It only gets a single argument, so you would need to pass the msg, alertType, and timeout as properties of an object. You can use the unique id of the thunk which is action.meta.requestId rather than creating your own id. You can also access the arguments of the action via action.meta.arg.
You can still use createSlice if you want, though there's no advantage over createReducer unless you have other actions. You would respond to both of the thunk actions using the extraReducers property rather than reducers.
import { createAsyncThunk, createSlice } from "#reduxjs/toolkit";
export const handleAlert = createAsyncThunk( "alert/set", (arg) => {
const { timeout = 5000 } = arg;
return new Promise((resolve) => {
setTimeout(() => resolve(), timeout);
});
});
export default createReducer(initialState, (builder) =>
builder
.addCase(handleAlert.pending, (state, action) => {
const { alertType, msg } = action.meta.arg;
const id = action.meta.requestId;
// modify the draft state and don't return anything
state.push({ alertType, msg, id });
})
.addCase(handleAlert.fulfilled, (state, action) => {
const id = action.meta.requestId;
// we are replacing the entire state, so we return the new value
return state.filter((alert) => alert.id !== id);
})
);
example component
import { handleAlert } from "../store/slice";
import { useSelector, useDispatch } from "../store";
export const App = () => {
const alerts = useSelector((state) => state.alerts);
const dispatch = useDispatch();
return (
<div>
{alerts.map((alert) => (
<div key={alert.id}>
<strong>{alert.alertType}</strong>
<span>{alert.msg}</span>
</div>
))}
<div>
<button
onClick={() =>
dispatch(
handleAlert({
alertType: "success",
msg: "action was completed successfully",
timeout: 2000
})
)
}
>
Success
</button>
<button
onClick={() =>
dispatch(
handleAlert({
alertType: "warning",
msg: "action not permitted"
})
)
}
>
Warning
</button>
</div>
</div>
);
};
export default App;
CodeSandbox

Redux action not dispatched. TypeError: Invalid attempt to spread non-iterable instance

In my application I want to add a 'ticket' to an array in the 'event' object. In the action I post the new ticket to the database, and after that I dispatch the action to the reducer. By using the Redux logger, I am able to retrieve the error:
The action of 'createTicket' is this:
// actions/tickets.js
export const TICKET_CREATE_SUCCESS = 'TICKET_CREATE_SUCCESS';
const ticketCreateSuccess = tickets => ({
type: TICKET_CREATE_SUCCESS,
tickets
});
export const createTicket = (eventId, data) => (dispatch, getState) => {
const jwt = getState().currentUser.token;
const id = getState().currentUser.userId;
const email = getState().currentUser.email;
const name = getState().currentUser.name;
request
.post(`${baseUrl}/events/${eventId}/tickets`)
.set('Authorization', `Bearer ${jwt}`)
.send(data)
.then(response => {
dispatch(ticketCreateSuccess({ ...response.body, user: { id, email, name } }));
})
.catch(error => error);
};
The reducer
// reducers/events.js
import { EVENT_FETCHED } from '../actions/events';
import { TICKET_EDIT_SUCCESS, TICKET_CREATE_SUCCESS } from '../actions/tickets';
export default (state = null, action = {}) => {
switch (action.type) {
case EVENT_FETCHED:
return action.event;
case TICKET_EDIT_SUCCESS:
return {
...state,
tickets: state.tickets.map(ticket => {
if (ticket.id === action.ticket.id) {
return action.ticket;
}
return ticket;
})
};
case TICKET_CREATE_SUCCESS:
console.log({ ...state, tickets: [...state.tickets, action.tickets] });
return { ...state, tickets: [...state.tickets, action.tickets] };
default:
return state;
}
};
The reducers are combined into :
import { combineReducers } from 'redux';
import currentUser from './currentUser';
import events from './events';
import event from './event';
import ticket from './ticket';
import tickets from './tickets';
import numberOfTickets from './numberOfTickets';
export default combineReducers({ currentUser, events, event, ticket, tickets, numberOfTickets });
Could it be that you're trying to spread your reducer state when its value is null:
export default (state = null, action = {}) => {
return {
...state, // Here
// rest
}
Your default state should probably be an object, e.g.:
const InitialState = {
tickets: []
};
export default (state = InitialState, action) => {
// Some code
case TICKET_CREATE_SUCCESS:
return {
...state,
tickets: [
...state.tickets,
action.tickets
]
}
}
just add this ...state || []
and you are good to go.
the problem is value of ...state equals null with empty array and when you try to iterate over null it creates an error.
so use and "OR" operator and it will work fine.

State does not change in my reducer when action is dispatched

I am not able to retrieve the state in the reducer
MyComponent looks like this
const MyComponent = ({name, features, onClick}) => {
return (
<div>
Hello! {name}
<Button onClick={() => { onClick(features); }}> Weight</Button>
</div>
);
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch: any) => {
return {
onClick: (features) => {
dispatch(weightSort(features));
}
};
};
const mapStateToProps = (state: any, ownProps: any) => {
console.log(state); //Displays the state
return {
name: "John Doe",
features: ownProps.features,
};
};
export const FeatureBlock = connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(MyComponent);
My actions and reducers looks like below:
// Action Creator
export const weightSort = (features) => {
console.log("inside the weight sort action creator!!!");
return {
type: "SET_WEIGHT_FILTER",
filter: "DESC",
features,
};
};
// Reducer
export const weightFilter = (state = [], action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case "SET_WEIGHT_FILTER":
console.log(state); // Gives me empty state
console.log("++inside weight filter+++++", action); //Displays action
return state;
default:
return state;
}
};
export const FeatureBlock = connect(
mapStateToProps,
mapDispatchToProps,
)(MyComponent);
What am I missing here? Any help will be appreciated!
In your reducer, when you console.log(state), it is correct in returning an empty array because you haven't done anything to modify it.
// Reducer
export const weightFilter = (state = [1,2,3], action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case "SET_WEIGHT_FILTER":
console.log(state); // This will show [1,2,3] because [1,2,3] is the initial state.
console.log("++inside weight filter+++++", action); //Displays action
return state;
default:
return state;
}
};
My guess is that you want something like this for your reducer:
// Action Creator
export const weightSort = (name, features) => {
console.log("inside the weight sort action creator!!!");
return {
type: "SET_WEIGHT_FILTER",
name,
features,
};
};
// Reducer
export const weightFilter = (
state = {
name: '',
features: [],
},
action
) => {
switch (action.type) {
case "SET_WEIGHT_FILTER":
return {...state, name: action.name, features: action.features}
default:
return state;
}
};
and then in your mapStateToProps you would map out the attributes like so:
const mapStateToProps = (state: any, ownProps: any) => {
console.log(state); //Displays the state
return {
name: state.weightFilter.name,
features: state.weightFilter.features,
};
};
and your button would have a name prop passed into the function like so:
<Button onClick={() => { onClick(name, features); }}> Weight</Button>
If you would like to sort your data, you can do so either in the reducer or inside the container. I prefer to do it in the container and like to use the lodash sortBy function. It works like this:
import { sortBy } from 'lodash' //be sure to npm install lodash if you use this utility
...
...
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return {
name: state.weightFilter.name,
features: sortBy(features, ['nameOfPropertyToSortBy'])
};
}
Here is the lodash documentation on sortBy: https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.4#sortBy
Hope that helps!

Action creators handling axios get.request with state access for param

I'm trying to pass some value from a component to a action creators which is doing a get request with axios. I'm trying to follow this pattern from Dan Abramov :
export const SOME_ACTION = 'SOME_ACTION';
export function someAction() {
return (dispatch, getState) => {
const {items} = getState().otherReducer;
dispatch(anotherAction(items));
}
}
However I can't make it work. I think I have trouble on two level : my component and my action creator. Would be great to have some helps.
my component :
const timeR = ({
selectedTimeRange,
timeRange = [],
onTimeChange }) => {
return (
<div>
<div>
Filters:
<div>
Year:
<select
defaultValue={selectedTimeRange}
onChange={onTimeChange}>
<option value="all" >All</option>
{timeRange.map((y, i) =>
<option key={i} value={y}>{y}</option>
)}
</select>
</div>
</div>
</div>
);
}
function mapStateToProps(state) {
var range = ['30daysAgo', '15daysAgo', '7daysAgo'];
return {
selectedTimeRange: state.timeReducer.timerange[0],
timeRange: range
};
};
const mapDispachToProps = (dispatch) => {
return {
onTimeChange: (e) => {dispatch (onSetTimeRange(e.target.value));},
};
};
const TimeRange = connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispachToProps)(timeR);
export default TimeRange;
This component give me a dropdown menu. When selecting a timerange, for example '30daysAgo', it update my redux store state so I can access the value from my reducer.
Here is the action associated to my dropdown menu :
export function onSetTimeRange(timerange) {
return {
type: 'SET_TIME_RANGE',
timerange
}
}
and here is the action dealing with axios.get :
export const fetchgadata = () => (dispatch) => {
dispatch({
type: 'FETCH_DATA_REQUEST',
isFetching:true,
error:null
});
var VIEW_ID = "ga:80820965";
return axios.get("http://localhost:3000/gadata", {
params: {
id: VIEW_ID
}
}).then(response => {
dispatch({
type: 'FETCH_DATA_SUCCESS',
isFetching: false,
data: response.data.rows.map( ([x, y]) => ({ x, y }) )
});
})
.catch(err => {
dispatch({
type: 'FETCH_DATA_FAILURE',
isFetching:false,
error:err
});
console.error("Failure: ", err);
});
};
My question :
How do I bring these two actions together. At the end I would like to be able, when doing onChange on my drop-down menu, to call a action with the value selected from my menu as a param for my axios.get request.
I feel like I need to nest two actions creators. I've tried this but doesn't work ("fetchgadata" is read-only error in my terminal)
export const SET_TIME_RANGE = 'SET_TIME_RANGE';
export function onSetTimeRange() {
return (dispatch, getState) => {
const {VIEW_ID} = getState().timerange;
dispatch(fetchgadata = (VIEW_ID) => (dispatch) => {
dispatch({
type: 'FETCH_DATA_REQUEST',
isFetching:true,
error:null,
id:VIEW_ID,
});
});
return axios.get("http://localhost:3000/gadata", {
params: {
id: VIEW_ID
}
}).then(response => {
dispatch({
type: 'FETCH_DATA_SUCCESS',
isFetching: false,
data: response.data.rows.map( ([x, y]) => ({ x, y }) )
});
})
.catch(err => {
dispatch({
ype: 'FETCH_DATA_FAILURE',
isFetching:false,
error:err
});
console.error("Failure: ", err);
});
}
}
Edit:
reducers for API call :
const initialState = {data:null,isFetching: false,error:null};
export const gaData = (state = initialState, action)=>{
switch (action.type) {
case 'FETCH_DATA_REQUEST':
case 'FETCH_DATA_FAILURE':
return { ...state, isFetching: action.isFetching, error: action.error };
case 'FETCH_DATA_SUCCESS':
return Object.assign({}, state, {data: action.data, isFetching: action.isFetching,
error: null });
default:return state;
}
};
reducers for Drop-down :
const items = [{timerange: '30daysAgo'},{timerange: '15daysAgo'},{timerange: '7daysAgo'}]
const timeReducer = (state = {
timerange: items
}, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case 'SET_TIME_RANGE':
console.log(state,action);
return {
...state,
timerange: action.timerange,
};
default:
return state;
}
}
I see a little typo in the catch of your axios.get request, it reads ype: FETCH_DATA_FAILURE. Otherwise, can you add in your reducer for me, I don't see it up there? If I understand correctly, you want one action to update two different pieces of state, in which case you would simply dispatch an action and add it to both reducers. Really it's best to just demonstrate:
//axios call
axios.get("some route", { some params } )
.then(response => {
dispatch({
type: UPDATE_TWO_THINGS,
payload: some_value
})
}) .... catch, etc
//reducer 1
import { UPDATE_TWO_THINGS } from 'types';
const INITIAL_STATE = { userInfo: '' };
export default function (state = INITIAL_STATE, action) {
switch(action.type) {
case UPDATE_TWO_THINGS:
return {...state, userInfo: payload };
}
return state;
}
//reducer 2
import { UPDATE_TWO_THINGS } from 'types';
const INITIAL_STATE = { businessInfo: '' };
export default function (state = INITIAL_STATE, action) {
switch(action.type) {
case UPDATE_TWO_THINGS:
return {...state, businessInfo: payload };
}
return state;
}
Hopefully this helps, but let me know if not, I'll do my best to get this working with you! Thanks for asking!

Resources