I have created an Index Pattern in Kibana, which successfully matches the indexes that I need. I would like to go back and give that existing Index Pattern a custom ID (In the Advanced Options in Step 2 of the wizard in Kibana when creating). Is that possible, or do I need to delete/recreate the Index Pattern?
Just for reference how an index pattern looks in the background:
{
"_index" : ".kibana_1",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "index-pattern:metricbeat-*",
"_score" : 1.0,
"_source" : {
"index-pattern" : {
...,
"timeFieldName" : "#timestamp",
"title" : "metricbeat-*"
},
"type" : "index-pattern",
"references" : [ ],
"migrationVersion" : {
"index-pattern" : "6.5.0"
},
"updated_at" : "2019-08-11T09:00:09.020Z"
}
}
If you set a custom ID for the index pattern, it will result in "_id" : "index-pattern:<your-name>". So whatever you do, you will need to remove the old index pattern and create a new one (even if you update parts of the document through the API), since the document ID defines the document.
But generally, the index pattern doesn't contain too much information, so it should be easy to recreate, right?
Also, why do you need a specific ID for the index pattern?
Related
I have a document with the following structure:
{
"email" : "a#gmail.com",
"value" : 100,
"children" : [
{
"email" : "b#gmail.com",
"value" : 100
},
{
"email" : "b#gmail.com",
"value" : 200
}
]
}
I want to remove all elements with the email b#gmail.com from the children array. I am able to remove one item if I pass the whole object to be removed like this:
FieldValue.arrayRemove(childObject)
But I want both the objects with the email b#gmail.com to be removed. Is there anyway to achieve this using FieldValue.arrayRemove()?
The arrayRemove operation removes the exact item that you specify from the array. There is no way to pass a partial object and remove all array items that match the partial information. You will have to pass in each complete item that you want to remove.
If you don't know what those items are yet, you will typically have to first read the document, loop over the items in the array to remove them, and write the modified array back to the document.
As an update, it is still the case that you must match the object exactly to remove it from an array. Additionally, of course, in the example above, he is querying for a value, which requires a query to see what matches.
However, depending on the logic: if you use a Map instead...for instance in the case above, adjusted:
"children" :
"b#gmail.com_100":
{
"email" : "b#gmail.com",
"value" : 100
},
"b#gmail.com_200":
{
"email" : "b#gmail.com",
"value" : 200
}
You can simply use:
'children.b#gmail.com_200': FieldValue.delete(),
As of late, I've gravitated away from Lists to Maps for this reason.
I am trying to write a pact consumer test to match the following response.
[
{
"accountId" : 1,
"permissions" : [
{
"schedule" : {
"01/01/2018" : false,
"01/01/1900" : true
},
"permissionId" : 3
}
]
}
]
Each schedule object is composed of an unknown number of keys which match a simple regular expression. But I don't see a way to match a key using a regular expression while having the value map to a simple boolean.
For instance, I see the following method in the API.
public LambdaDslObject eachKeyLike(
String exampleKey,
Consumer<LambdaDslObject> nestedObject)
But that is going to expect a new object as the value, instead of a primitive type.
"schedule" : {
"01/01/2018" : { ... }, // not what I want to match
"01/01/1900" : false // what I want to match
}
Is there a way to specify an imprecise key mapped to a primitive value in pact-jvm?
Sorry, this feature doesn't exist yet, but it's been discussed for the next version of the pact specification. You can add your thoughts on this issue: https://github.com/pact-foundation/pact-specification/issues/47
The new Firebase database Firestore says
Function DocumentReference.set() called with invalid data. Nested arrays are not supported.
When trying to save the following object:
{
"desc" : "Blala",
"geojson" : {
"features" : [ {
"geometry" : {
"coordinates" : [ 8.177433013916017, 48.27753810094064 ],
"type" : "Point"
},
"type" : "Feature"
} ],
"type" : "FeatureCollection"
},
"location" : {
"lat" : 48.27753810094064,
"lng" : 8.177433013916017
},
"name" : "Wald und Wiesen",
"owner" : "8a2QQeTG2zRawZJA3tr1oyOAOSF3",
"prices" : {
"game" : {
"Damwild" : 10,
"Raubwild" : 300,
"Rehwild" : 250,
"Schwarzwild" : 40
},
"perDay" : 35
},
"rules" : "Keine Regeln!",
"wild" : {
"desc" : "kein Wild",
"tags" : [ "Damwild", "Rehwild", "Schwarzwild", "Raubwild" ]
}
}
what exactly is the nested array that firestore is complaining about? I can't find it in the documentation.
If it's the GeoJSON object - how would I save it instead?
UPDATE: This was fixed in Firebase JS SDK 4.6.0. Directly nested arrays are still unsupported, but you can now have an array that contains an object that contains an array, etc.
This is a bug in the currently released SDKs.
The backend has the restriction that only directly nested Arrays are unsupported.
In your case you have arrays containing objects containing arrays and the validation logic in the clients is disallowing it when it shouldn't.
There's no public bug tracking this but I'll post back when we have a fix.
You could adapt a serialization function that converts arrays with object types into a map. The keys can be numeric to maintain order.
i.e.
{ 1: Object, 2: Object2 ... }
On deserialization you can get the Object.values(data); to put it back into an array to be used client-side.
Can't comment so here it goes: this is fixed in 4.6.0, see release notes: https://firebase.google.com/support/release-notes/js#4.6.0
Cloud Firestore
FIXED Fixed the validation of nested arrays to allow indirect nesting.
Python:
# Matrix storage in firestore
def matrix_to_fb_data(matrix):
return [{'0': row} for row in matrix]
def fb_data_to_matrix(fb_data):
return [row['0'] for row in fb_data]
Firestore doesn't allow 2d arrays, like previous answers have noted, but they allow arrays of maps... of arrays :)
Suppose I have my collection as follows:
{
"_id" : "PipdmEzTMAziXjWBn",
"text" : "jkhkj",
"createdAt" : ISODate("2017-02-27T13:43:22.856Z"),
"hashtags" : [ "fwXJcu5CpKcYZpQ3v", "DCS4eLNiS7NjipiDQ" ] }
The important thing here is that i store id's of hashtags as an array.
Suppose I have a hashtag id as my input, how do I find all records that contain that id?
EDIT:
With the help of #zim, I did this:
Feeds.find({hashtags: {$in: "DCS4eLNiS7NjipiDQ"}});
But now it says:
Exception while simulating the effect of invoking 'feeds.findByHashtag' Error: $in needs an array
for a top-level query, you can use $in. e.g.
let hashtagId = ['abc123'];
collection.find({hashtags: {$in: hashtagId}});
I need to get the PHIDs for one project and several users in our Phabricator install. It seems like it should be trivial to find out how to do this, but I've searched the docs to no avail. Am I looking in the wrong place or something?
Easiest way:
Go to the project
Click New Task
Look at the URL, it will have a parameter like:
?projects=PHID-PROJ-owipizovyry4fatifwfd
PHID is "PHID-PROJ-owipizovyry4fatifwfd"
Option 2:
Go to your Conduit [phabricator_url]\conduit
Find the method project.query
Enter the name in a JSON encoded array (i.e. ["project name"])
Click Call Method
PHID will be one of the data elements:
{
"data" : {
"PHID-PROJ-oybqquyhhke4awiw2akz" : {
"id" : "19",
"phid" : "PHID-PROJ-oybqquyhhke4awiw2akz",
"name" : "project name",
"members" : [
"PHID-USER-gapak5h34h6d5yvl67dx",
"PHID-USER-674vq754zfuhyxgvvq7x",
"PHID-USER-qvcdsyc4oz7rzpzziiyk",
"PHID-USER-qmefzjtsrmnxjxpc45km",
"PHID-USER-pbhygge7rgpdowz3s5vk"
],
"slugs" : [
"project_name"
],
"dateCreated" : "1396666703",
"dateModified" : "1396668261"
}
}
}
A more robust method would be to call the conduit method phid.lookup:
https://<your install>/conduit/method/phid.lookup/
Then enter in names something like #user, #project or Z2 and you'll get the PHID.