I have two data frames, one containing the raw data (and lots of NAs) and one containing the means of the raw data at different intervals.
I would like to replace the NAs with the means at those intervals, while retaining the non-NAs.
I have googled a lot on "impute missing data r", or "replace missing data r", but have yet to find any solution that seems to fit, they all either seem to replace data with 0:s, or use a way to complex method for this assignment, like using the MICE package.
Code example:
This is the head of the first DF, with the raw data. As you can see, they are all NA for the first day.
steps date interval
1 NA 2012-10-01 0
2 NA 2012-10-01 5
3 NA 2012-10-01 10
4 NA 2012-10-01 15
5 NA 2012-10-01 20
6 NA 2012-10-01 25
...
The second data frame head contains the mean steps per interval, like this:
steps interval
1 1.72 0
2 0.340 5
3 0.132 10
4 0.151 15
5 0.0755 20
6 2.09 25
...
Now, what I am looking for is to be able to fill the NAs with the mean steps for the relevant interval, so it looks like this:
steps date interval
1 1.72 2012-10-01 0
2 0.340 2012-10-01 5
3 0.132 2012-10-01 10
4 0.151 2012-10-01 15
5 0.0755 2012-10-01 20
6 2.09 2012-10-01 25
...
Any tips, or links for resources I have missed? As this is a course assignment and I mostly wanna learn, any help without doing the assignment for me would be much appreciated! =)
edit: Also, since this is my first question on Stack Overflow, any comments on how to improve my question-making is also appreciated!
There are many ways to do that in R. For example
# generate dataframe with some interval vaulues
df1 <- data.frame(interval= rep(seq(0, 25, 5), 5))
# add a steps column
df1$steps <- 1:nrow(df)
# copy the dataframe
df2 <- df1
# replace some steps values with missings in df1
df1$steps[c(1,2,5, 14)] <- NA
# sapply goes thru every unique interval...
sapply(df1$interval, function(interval_i){
# replace missing steps of interval_i in df1 with the steps mean of interval_i of df2
df1$steps[is.na(df1$steps) & df1$interval == interval_i] <<- mean(df2$steps[df2$interval == interval_i], na.rm= TRUE)
# you must use <<- not <- to assign it to df outside of sapply
})
I'll add a solution using dplyr.
It's good practice to give some reproducible data in your question rather that can be put straight into R, rather than just pasting in the head of your data. I've created some dummy data instead:
# create random sample data
library(dplyr)
set.seed(100)
df1 <- tibble(
steps = runif(1e3),
date = lubridate::today() + runif(1e3) * 24,
interval = as.numeric(sample(seq(0,25, by=5), 1e3, replace = T))
)
# add 100 NAs at random
df1$steps[sample(1:1e3, 100)] <- NA
df1
# steps date interval
# <dbl> <date> <dbl>
# 1 0.308 2019-07-18 15
# 2 NA 2019-07-19 10
# 3 NA 2019-07-31 0
# 4 0.0564 2019-08-02 20
# 5 0.469 2019-07-25 0
# 6 0.484 2019-07-21 25
# 7 NA 2019-07-17 5
# 8 0.370 2019-07-28 0
# 9 0.547 2019-07-31 5
# 10 0.170 2019-08-08 15
# # … with 990 more rows
Using dplyr the imputation task is then pretty simple with group_by
df1 %>%
group_by(interval) %>%
mutate(steps = if_else(is.na(steps), mean(steps, na.rm = T), steps))
# # A tibble: 1,000 x 3
# # Groups: interval [6]
# steps date interval
# <dbl> <date> <dbl>
# 1 0.308 2019-07-18 15
# 2 0.573 2019-07-19 10
# 3 0.523 2019-07-31 0
# 4 0.0564 2019-08-02 20
# 5 0.469 2019-07-25 0
# 6 0.484 2019-07-21 25
# 7 0.527 2019-07-17 5
# 8 0.370 2019-07-28 0
# 9 0.547 2019-07-31 5
# 10 0.170 2019-08-08 15
# # … with 990 more rows
We can confirm that the imputed means are correct for each group by calculating the mean for each group and comparing it to the imputed values:
df1 %>%
group_by(interval) %>%
summarise(mean_int = mean(steps, na.rm=T))
# # A tibble: 6 x 2
# interval mean_int
# <dbl> <dbl>
# 1 0 0.523
# 2 5 0.527
# 3 10 0.573
# 4 15 0.511
# 5 20 0.475
# 6 25 0.485
Related
I'm surprised to find no one asked this question on Stackoverflow before. Maybe it's too stupid to ask?
So I have a dataframe that contains 48 weather variables, each representing a weather value for a month. I have drawn a simplified table shown below:
weather 1
weather 2
weather 3
weather 4
weather 5
weather 6
weather 7
weather 8
weather 9
weather 10
weather 11
weather 12
12
6
34
9
100
.01
-4
38
64
77
21
34
99
42
-3
34
34
.5
27
19
7
18
NA
20
My objective is to make the column names from "weather 1, weather 2, ..." to "weather 01, weather 02, ...." And I wrote a loop like this:
for (i in 1:9){
colnames(df) = gsub(i, 0+i, colnames(df))
}
However, instead of replacing the single-digit numbers with a leading zero, R replaced the actual letter "i" with "0+i". Can anyone let me know what's going on here and how to fix it? Or is there a better way to add leading zeros to column names?
Thank you very much!
We can use
library(stringr)
colnames(df) <- str_replace(colnames(df), "\\d+",
function(x) sprintf("%02d", as.integer(x)))
Here is another option:
library(tidyverse)
set.seed(35)
example <- tibble(`weather 1` = runif(2),
`weather 2` = runif(2),
`weather 3` = runif(2))
rename_with(example, ~str_replace(., "(weather )(\\d+)", "\\10\\2"), everything())
#> # A tibble: 2 x 3
#> `weather 01` `weather 02` `weather 03`
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 0.857 0.553 0.486
#> 2 0.0108 0.950 0.0939
or with base R
colnames(example) <- gsub("(weather )(\\d+)", "\\10\\2", colnames(example))
example
#> # A tibble: 2 x 3
#> `weather 01` `weather 02` `weather 03`
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 0.857 0.553 0.486
#> 2 0.0108 0.950 0.0939
I have a data series of daily snow depth values over a 60 year period. I would like to see the number of days with a snow depth higher than 30 cm for each season, for example from July 1980 to June 1981. What does the code for this have to look like? I know how I could calculate the daily values higher than 30 cm per season individually, but not how a code could calculate all seasons.
I have uploaded my dataframe on wetransfer: Dataframe
Thank you so much for your help in advance.
Pernilla
Something like this would work
library(dplyr)
library(lubridate)
df<-read.csv('BayrischerWald_Brennes_SH_daily_merged.txt', sep=';')
df_season <-df %>%
mutate(season=(Day %>% ymd() - days(181)) %>% floor_date("year") %>% year())
df_group_by_season <- df_season %>%
filter(!is.na(SHincm)) %>%
group_by(season) %>%
summarize(days_above_30=sum(SHincm>30)) %>%
ungroup()
df_group_by_season
#> # A tibble: 61 × 2
#> season days_above_30
#> <dbl> <int>
#> 1 1961 1
#> 2 1962 0
#> 3 1963 0
#> 4 1964 0
#> 5 1965 0
#> 6 1966 0
#> 7 1967 129
#> 8 1968 60
#> 9 1969 107
#> 10 1970 43
#> # … with 51 more rows
Created on 2022-01-15 by the reprex package (v2.0.1)
Here is an approach using the aggregate() function. After reading the data, convert the Date field to a date object and get rid of the rows with missing values for the date:
snow <- read.table("BayrischerWald_Brennes_SH_daily_merged.txt", header=TRUE, sep=";")
snow$Day <- as.Date(snow$Day)
str(snow)
# 'data.frame': 51606 obs. of 2 variables:
# $ Day : Date, format: "1961-11-01" "1961-11-02" "1961-11-03" "1961-11-04" ...
# $ SHincm: int 0 0 0 0 2 9 19 22 15 5 ...
snow <- snow[!is.na(snow$Day), ]
str(snow)
# 'data.frame': 21886 obs. of 2 variables:
# $ Day : Date, format: "1961-11-01" "1961-11-02" "1961-11-03" "1961-11-04" ...
# $ SHincm: int 0 0 0 0 2 9 19 22 15 5 ...
Notice more than half of your data has missing values for the date. Now we need to divide the data by ski season:
brks <- as.Date(paste(1961:2022, "07-01", sep="-"))
lbls <- paste(1961:2021, 1962:2022, sep="/")
snow$Season <- cut(snow$Day, breaks=brks, labels=lbls)
Now we use aggregate() to get the number of days with over 30 inches of snow:
days30cm <- aggregate(SHincm~Season, snow, subset=snow$SHincm > 30, length)
colnames(days30cm)[2] <- "Over30cm"
head(days30cm, 10)
# Season Over30cm
# 1 1961/1962 1
# 2 1967/1968 129
# 3 1968/1969 60
# 4 1969/1970 107
# 5 1970/1971 43
# 6 1972/1973 101
# 7 1973/1974 119
# 8 1974/1975 188
# 9 1975/1976 126
# 10 1976/1977 112
In addition, you can get other statistics such as the maximum snow of the season or the total cm of snow:
maxsnow <- aggregate(SHincm~Season, snow, max)
totalsnow <- aggregate(SHincm~Season, snow, sum)
There is a longitudinal data set in the wide format, from which I want to compute time (in years and days) between the first observation date and the last date an individual was observed. Dates are in the format yyyy-mm-dd. The data set has four observation periods with missing dates, an example is as follows
df1<-data.frame("id"=c(1:4),
"adate"=c("2011-06-18","2011-06-18","2011-04-09","2011-05-20"),
"bdate"=c("2012-06-15","2012-06-15",NA,"2012-05-23"),
"cdate"=c("2013-06-18","2013-06-18","2013-04-09",NA),
"ddate"=c("2014-06-15",NA,"2014-04-11",NA))
Here "adate" is the first date and the last date is the date an individual was last seen. To compute the time difference (lastdate-adate), I have tried using "lubridate" package, for example
lubridate::time_length(difftime(as.Date("2012-05-23"), as.Date("2011-05-20")),"years")
However, I'm challenged by the fact that the last date is not coming from one column. I'm looking for a way to automate the calculation in R. The expected output would look like
id years days
1 1 2.99 1093
2 2 2.00 731
3 3 3.01 1098
4 4 1.01 369
Years is approximated to 2 decimal places.
Another tidyverse solution can be done by converting the data to long format, removing NA dates, and getting the time difference between last and first date for each id.
library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)
library(lubridate)
df1 %>%
pivot_longer(-id) %>%
na.omit %>%
group_by(id) %>%
mutate(value = as.Date(value)) %>%
summarise(years = time_length(difftime(last(value), first(value)),"years"),
days = as.numeric(difftime(last(value), first(value))))
#> # A tibble: 4 x 3
#> id years days
#> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 1 2.99 1093
#> 2 2 2.00 731
#> 3 3 3.01 1098
#> 4 4 1.01 369
We could use pmap
library(dplyr)
library(purrr)
library(tidyr)
df1 %>%
mutate(out = pmap(.[-1], ~ {
dates <- as.Date(na.omit(c(...)))
tibble(years = lubridate::time_length(difftime(last(dates),
first(dates)), "years"),
days = lubridate::time_length(difftime(last(dates), first(dates)), "days"))
})) %>%
unnest_wider(out)
# A tibble: 4 x 7
# id adate bdate cdate ddate years days
# <int> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl>
#1 1 2011-06-18 2012-06-15 2013-06-18 2014-06-15 2.99 1093
#2 2 2011-06-18 2012-06-15 2013-06-18 <NA> 2.00 731
#3 3 2011-04-09 <NA> 2013-04-09 2014-04-11 3.01 1098
#4 4 2011-05-20 2012-05-23 <NA> <NA> 1.01 369
Probably most of the functions introduced here might be quite complex. You should try to learn them if possible. Although will provide a Base R approach:
grp <- droplevels(interaction(df[,1],row(df[-1]))) # Create a grouping:
days <- tapply(unlist(df[-1]),grp, function(x)max(x,na.rm = TRUE) - x[1]) #Get the difference
cbind(df[1],days, years = round(days/365,2)) # Create your table
id days years
1.1 1 1093 2.99
2.2 2 731 2.00
3.3 3 1098 3.01
4.4 4 369 1.01
if comfortable with other higher functions then you could do:
dat <- aggregate(adate~id,reshape(df1,list(2:ncol(df1)), dir="long"),function(x)max(x) - x[1])
transform(dat,year = round(adate/365,2))
id adate year
1 1 1093 2.99
2 2 731 2.00
3 3 1098 3.01
4 4 369 1.01
Using base R apply :
df1[-1] <- lapply(df1[-1], as.Date)
df1[c('years', 'days')] <- t(apply(df1[-1], 1, function(x) {
x <- na.omit(x)
x1 <- difftime(x[length(x)], x[1], 'days')
c(x1/365, x1)
}))
df1[c('id', 'years', 'days')]
# id years days
#1 1 2.994521 1093
#2 2 2.002740 731
#3 3 3.008219 1098
#4 4 1.010959 369
I'm looking at covid-19 data to calculate estimates for the reproductive number R0.
library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)
library(stringr)
library(TTR)
# Get COVID cases, available from:
url <- "https://static.usafacts.org/public/data/covid-19/covid_confirmed_usafacts.csv"
DoubleCOV <- read.csv(url, stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
names(DoubleCOV)[1] <- "countyFIPS"
DoubleCovid <- pivot_longer(DoubleCOV, cols=starts_with("X"),
values_to="cases",
names_to=c("X","date_infected"),
names_sep="X") %>%
mutate(infected = as.Date(date_infected, format="%m.%d.%y"),
countyFIPS = str_pad(as.character(countyFIPS), 5, pad="0"))
#data is by county, summarise for the state of interest
stateData <- DoubleCovid %>% filter(State == "AL") %>% filter(cases != 0) %>%
group_by(infected) %>% summarise(sum(cases)) %>%
mutate(DaysSince = infected - min(infected))
names(stateData)[2] <- "cumCases"
#3 day moving average to smooth a little
stateData <- stateData %>% mutate(MA = runMean(cumCases,3))
#calculate doubling rate (DR) and then R0 infectious period/doubling rate
for(j in 4:nrow(stateData)){
stateData$DR[j] <- log(2)/log(stateData$MA[j]/stateData$MA[j-1])
stateData$R0[j] <- 14/stateData$DR[j]
}
CDplot <- stateData %>%
ggplot(mapping = aes(x = as.numeric(DaysSince), y = R0)) +
geom_line(color = "firebrick")
print(CDplot)
So in the above the state of interest is Alabama, hence filter(State == "AL") and this works.
But if I change the state to "NY" I get
Error in `$<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`, "DR", value = c(NA, NA, NA, 0.733907206043719 :
replacement has 4 rows, data has 39
head(stateData) yields
infected cumCases DaysSince MA
<date> <int> <drtn> <dbl>
1 2020-03-02 1 0 days NA
2 2020-03-03 2 1 days NA
3 2020-03-04 11 2 days 4.67
4 2020-03-05 23 3 days 12
5 2020-03-06 25 4 days 19.7
6 2020-03-07 77 5 days 41.7
The moving average values in rows 3 and 4 (12 and 4.67) would yield a doubling rate of 0.734 which aligns with the value in the error message value = c(NA, NA, NA, 0.733907206043719 but why does it throw an error after that?
Bonus question: I know loops are frowned upon in R...is there a way to get the moving average and R0 calculation without one?
You have to initialise the new variables before you can access them using the j index. Due to recycling, Alabama, which has 28 rows (divisible by 4), does not return an error, only the warnings about uninitialised columns. New York, however, has 39 rows, which is not divisible by 4 so recycling fails and R returns an error. You shouldn't ignore warnings, sometimes you can, but it's not a good idea.
Try this to see what R (you) is trying to do:
stateData[4]
You should get all rows of the 4th column, not the 4th row.
Solution: initialise your DR and R0 columns first.
stateData$DR <- NA
stateData$R0 <- NA
for(j in 4:nrow(stateData)){
stateData$DR[j] <- log(2)/log(stateData$MA[j]/stateData$MA[j-1])
stateData$R0[j] <- 14/stateData$DR[j]
}
For the bonus question, you can use lag in the same mutate with MA:
stateData <- stateData %>% mutate(MA = runMean(cumCases,3),
DR = log(2)/log(MA/lag(MA)),
R0 = 14 / DR)
stateData
# A tibble: 28 x 6
infected cumCases DaysSince MA DR R0
<date> <int> <drtn> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 2020-03-13 5 0 days NA NA NA
2 2020-03-14 11 1 days NA NA NA
3 2020-03-15 22 2 days 12.7 NA NA
4 2020-03-16 29 3 days 20.7 1.42 9.89
5 2020-03-17 39 4 days 30 1.86 7.53
6 2020-03-18 51 5 days 39.7 2.48 5.64
7 2020-03-19 78 6 days 56 2.01 6.96
8 2020-03-20 106 7 days 78.3 2.07 6.78
9 2020-03-21 131 8 days 105 2.37 5.92
10 2020-03-22 167 9 days 135. 2.79 5.03
# ... with 18 more rows
I'm using Alabama's data.
I have a bunch of time series data stacked on top of one another in a data frame; one series for each region in a country. I'd like to apply the seas() function (from the seasonal package) to each series, iteratively, to make the series seasonally adjusted. To do this, I first have to convert the series to a ts class. I'm struggling to do all this using purrr.
Here's a minimum worked example:
library(seasonal)
library(tidyverse)
set.seed(1234)
df <- data.frame(region = rep(1:10, each = 20),
quarter = rep(1:20, 10),
var = sample(5:200, 200, replace = T))
For each region (indexed by a number) I'd like to perform the following operations. Here's the first region as an example:
tem1 <- df %>% filter(region==1)
tem2 <- ts(data = tem1$var, frequency = 4, start=c(1990,1))
tem3 <- seas(tem2)
tem4 <- as.data.frame(tem3$data)
I'd then like to stack the output (ie. the multiple tem4 data frames, one for each region), along with the region and quarter identifiers.
So, the start of the output for region 1 would be this:
final seasonaladj trend irregular region quarter
1 27 27 96.95 -67.97279 1 1
2 126 126 96.95 27.87381 1 2
3 124 124 96.95 27.10823 1 3
4 127 127 96.95 30.55075 1 4
5 173 173 96.95 75.01355 1 5
6 130 130 96.95 32.10672 1 6
The data for region 2 would be below this etc.
I started with the following but without luck so far. Basically, I'm struggling to get the time series into the tibble:
seas.adjusted <- df %>%
group_by(region) %>%
mutate(data.ts = map(.x = data$var,
.f = as.ts,
start = 1990,
freq = 4))
I don't know much about the seasonal adjustment part, so there may be things I missed, but I can help with moving your calculations into a map-friendly function.
After grouping by region, you can nest the data so there's a nested data frame for each region. Then you can run essentially the same code as you had, but inside a function in map. Unnesting the resulting column gives you a long-shaped data frame of adjustments.
Like I said, I don't have the expertise to know whether those last two columns having NAs is expected or not.
Edit: Based on #wibeasley's question about retaining the quarter column, I'm adding a mutate that adds a column of the quarters listed in the nested data frame.
library(seasonal)
library(tidyverse)
set.seed(1234)
df <- data.frame(region = rep(1:10, each = 20),
quarter = rep(1:20, 10),
var = sample(5:200, 200, replace = T))
df %>%
group_by(region) %>%
nest() %>%
mutate(data.ts = map(data, function(x) {
tem2 <- ts(x$var, frequency = 4, start = c(1990, 1))
tem3 <- seas(tem2)
as.data.frame(tem3$data) %>%
mutate(quarter = x$quarter)
})) %>%
unnest(data.ts)
#> # A tibble: 200 x 8
#> region final seasonaladj trend irregular quarter seasonal adjustfac
#> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 1 27 27 97.0 -68.0 1 NA NA
#> 2 1 126 126 97.0 27.9 2 NA NA
#> 3 1 124 124 97.0 27.1 3 NA NA
#> 4 1 127 127 97.0 30.6 4 NA NA
#> 5 1 173 173 97.0 75.0 5 NA NA
#> 6 1 130 130 97.0 32.1 6 NA NA
#> 7 1 6 6 97.0 -89.0 7 NA NA
#> 8 1 50 50 97.0 -46.5 8 NA NA
#> 9 1 135 135 97.0 36.7 9 NA NA
#> 10 1 105 105 97.0 8.81 10 NA NA
#> # ... with 190 more rows
I also gave a bit more thought to doing this without nesting, and instead tried doing it with a split. Passing that list of data frames into imap_dfr let me take each split piece of the data frame and its name (in this case, the value of region), then return everything rbinded back together into one data frame. I sometimes shy away from nested data just because I have trouble seeing what's going on, so this is an alternative that is maybe more transparent.
df %>%
split(.$region) %>%
imap_dfr(function(x, reg) {
tem2 <- ts(x$var, frequency = 4, start = c(1990, 1))
tem3 <- seas(tem2)
as.data.frame(tem3$data) %>%
mutate(region = reg, quarter = x$quarter)
}) %>%
select(region, quarter, everything()) %>%
head()
#> region quarter final seasonaladj trend irregular seasonal adjustfac
#> 1 1 1 27 27 96.95 -67.97274 NA NA
#> 2 1 2 126 126 96.95 27.87378 NA NA
#> 3 1 3 124 124 96.95 27.10823 NA NA
#> 4 1 4 127 127 96.95 30.55077 NA NA
#> 5 1 5 173 173 96.95 75.01353 NA NA
#> 6 1 6 130 130 96.95 32.10669 NA NA
Created on 2018-08-12 by the reprex package (v0.2.0).
I put all the action inside of f(), and then called it with purrr::map_df(). The re-inclusion of quarter is a hack.
f <- function( .region ) {
d <- df %>%
dplyr::filter(region == .region)
y <- d %>%
dplyr::pull(var) %>%
ts(frequency = 4, start=c(1990,1)) %>%
seas()
y$data %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
# dplyr::select(-seasonal, -adjustfac) %>%
dplyr::mutate(
quarter = d$quarter
)
}
purrr::map_df(1:10, f, .id = "region")
results:
region final seasonaladj trend irregular quarter seasonal adjustfac
1 1 27.00000 27.00000 96.95000 -6.797279e+01 1 NA NA
2 1 126.00000 126.00000 96.95000 2.787381e+01 2 NA NA
3 1 124.00000 124.00000 96.95000 2.710823e+01 3 NA NA
4 1 127.00000 127.00000 96.95000 3.055075e+01 4 NA NA
5 1 173.00000 173.00000 96.95000 7.501355e+01 5 NA NA
6 1 130.00000 130.00000 96.95000 3.210672e+01 6 NA NA
7 1 6.00000 6.00000 96.95000 -8.899356e+01 7 NA NA
8 1 50.00000 50.00000 96.95000 -4.647254e+01 8 NA NA
9 1 135.00000 135.00000 96.95000 3.671077e+01 9 NA NA
10 1 105.00000 105.00000 96.95000 8.806955e+00 10 NA NA
...
96 5 55.01724 55.01724 60.25848 9.130207e-01 16 1.9084928 1.9084928
97 5 60.21549 60.21549 59.43828 1.013076e+00 17 1.0462424 1.0462424
98 5 58.30626 58.30626 58.87065 9.904130e-01 18 0.1715082 0.1715082
99 5 61.68175 61.68175 58.07827 1.062045e+00 19 1.0537962 1.0537962
100 5 59.30138 59.30138 56.70798 1.045733e+00 20 2.5294523 2.5294523
...