My environment is below.
・Operating System and version:windows 10 64bit
・Compiler:C:\msys64\mingw64\bin\g++.exe
・PCL Version:1.9.1
pcl_config.h not found as below error occurred when compiled under above env..
Certainly this header file is not included.
Let me know how to solve it.
PS C:\pcl\pcl\examples\common> g++ -o minmax -I ../../io/include -I ../../common/include .\example_get_max_min_coordinates.cpp
In file included from ../../common/include/pcl/PCLHeader.h:10,
from ../../common/include/pcl/point_cloud.h:47,
from ../../io/include/pcl/io/pcd_io.h:42,
from .\example_get_max_min_coordinates.cpp:2:
../../common/include/pcl/pcl_macros.h:64:10: fatal error: pcl/pcl_config.h: No such file or directory
#include
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
Short answer
pcl_config.h is generated via pcl_config.h.in by the cmake tool. So it seems that compilation did not finish correctly.
Longer answer
Please make sure you have compiled the relevant modules of PCL (at least pcl-core) before proceeding
You might prefer a pre-built installation from releases or distributed by a package/source manager of your choice
PCL makes heavy use of other libraries and it is best to supply the dependencies (as mentioned below) via CMake or manually via the -I and -l options. If you provide the location of pcl_config.h, the compiler will complain about Eigen next.
The build instructions are available here. TL;DR: After satisfying the dependencies (cmake, c++ compiler, boost, eigen, flann, vtk and other depending on use-case), run the following commands
cd $PCL_SOURCE_DIR
mkdir -p build; cd build
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ..
make -j8
Feel free to use any build generator (like Ninja) or change build type to Debug or RelWithDebInfo as per your needs.
Related
Background: I compile bitcoind on one system but run it on another. When I compiled bitcoind 0.19.1 some time back using the following method, I was able to run bitcoind and bitcoin-cli on the target system without issue. I think.
./autogen.sh
./configure --disable-wallet --disable-tests --disable-bench --disable-gui --enable-util-tx=no --prefix=$HOME/bitcoind/x64 --exec-prefix=$HOME/bitcoind/x64
make && make install
Today I compiled v0.20.0 using the same method. If I run ./bitcoind -version on the system I compiled the binary it runs fine, but if I take the binary to my target system I get the following error:
./bitcoind: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_filesystem.so.1.67.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
The binary seemed to be portable last time, and the pre-compiled binary I download from the Bitcoin Core team runs fine.
Note that on the target system libboost-filesystem-dev and libboost-filesystem1.67-dev are not installed, this is likely the source of my error. That said, running the pre-compiled binary from the Core team runs, so why doesn't mine?
Can someone help me understand if I did something wrong or if I need to add ./configure flags to make the binary more portable? Specifically what I likely did differently than the core developers that made my binary fail where theirs worked?
EDIT 1: Running ./configure --enable-static or ./configure LDFLAGS=-static does not result in a portable binary either.
Also note that installing libboost-filesystem library with apt does fix the error.
Thanks to Andrew Chow for his helpful answer to this on the bitcoind StackExchange. I needed to build the depends as per the depends documentation. Since I'm building for the same platform I'll be running on, I can run make in the depends directory with no arguments except -j2 which uses two cores. Change the number to however many cores you want to commit to the compile.
cd depends
make -j2
cd ..
./autogen.sh
./configure --prefix=$PWD/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
make -j2 && make install
Problem Definition
I'm attempting to adapt these rosjava installation instructions so that I can include rosjava on a target image built by the BitBake build system. I'm using the jethro branch of Poky.
Implementation Attempt: Build From .deb with package_deb.bbclass
According to the installation instructions, all that really needs to be done to install rosjava is the following:
sudo apt-get install ros-indigo-rosjava
Which works perfectly fine on my build machine. I figured that if I can just point to a .deb and use the Poky metadata class package_deb, it would do all the heavy lifting for me, so I produced the following simple recipe adapted on this posting on the Yocto Project mailing list:
inherit package_deb
SRC_URI = "http://packages.ros.org/ros/ubuntu/pool/main/r/ros-indigo-rosjava/ros-indigo-rosjava_0.2.1-0trusty-20160207-031808-0800_amd64.deb"
SRC_URI[md5sum] = "2020ccc8b4a67dd918a9a2c426eece0b"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "ab9493fabe1285b0d21aab031348d0d733d116b0b2470bae90025709b303b649"
The relevant part of the errors I get during the above recipe's do_unpack are:
| no entry data.tar.gz in archive
|
| gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
| tar: This does not look like a tar archive
| tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
| DEBUG: Python function base_do_unpack finished
| DEBUG: Python function do_unpack finished
The following command produces the output below:
$ ar t python-rosdistro_0.4.5-1_all.deb
debian-binary
control.tar.gz
data.tar.xz
You can see here that there's a data.tar.xz, not data.tar.gz. What can I do to remedy this error and install from this particular .deb?
I've included package_deb in my PACKAGE_CLASSES variable and package-management in my IMAGE_FEATURES. I've tried other methods of installation which have all failed; I thought this method in particular would be very useful to know how to implement.
Update - 3/22
I'm attempting to circumvent the problems with the method above by doing my installation through a ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND which I've adapted from forum posts like this
install_rosjava() {
${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/dpkg \
--root=${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/ \
--admindir=${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/var/lib/dpkg/ \
-L /var/cache/apt/archives/ros-indigo-rosjava_0.2.1-0trusty-20160207-031808-0800_amd64.deb
}
ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND += " install_rosjava() ; "
However, this fails due to dpkg not being a command found within the ${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE} path. The Yocto Project Reference Manual states that:
STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE Specifies the path to the /usr/bin subdirectory of the sysroot directory for the build host.
Taking a look inside this directory yields a lot of commands but not dpkg (The recipe depends on the dpkg package, and this command can be found in my target rootfs after the build is finished; I've also tried pointing to ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/usr/bin/dpkg which yields the same results). From what I understand of the BitBake process, this command may be in another sysroot, but I must admit that this is where my understanding breaks down.
Can I adjust this method so that it works, or will I need to start from scratch on an installation from source?
Perhaps there's a different method entirely which I could consider?
If you really want to install their deb directly then your rootfs postprocess is one solution. It doesn't work because depending on dpkg will build you a dpkg for the target but you want a dpkg that will run on the host. Add a dependency on dpkg-native to your image.
Though personally I'd either inherit bin_package and extract the deb they provide then re-package it as a standard package in OE, or ideally write a proper recipe to build rosjava and submit it to meta-ros (https://github.com/bmwcarit/meta-ros).
package_deb is where the packaging machinery for deb packages is stored, it's not something you'd inherit in a recipe but should be listed in PACKAGE_CLASSES.
When you put a .deb in a SRC_URI the fetcher will try to unpack it so you can access the contents: the assumption is that you're going to repack the contents as a native Yocto recipe.
If that's what you want to do then first you'll need to fix the unpack logic (in bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py) to handle .debs with xz-compressed data. This is a bug in bitbake and a bug report and/or patch would be appreciated.
The alternative would be to use their deb directly but I don't recommend that as it's likely the dependencies don't match. The best long-term solution would be to build it from source directly instead of attempting to use a package for another distro.
I have an existing Qt5.3.2 installation from tar.gz source files.
When attempting to compile VTK, which has optional Qt{4,5} interface, I was informed I don't have QtWebKitWidgets by ccmake.
I don't particularly want to reinstall Qt5 on top of the existing installation, for fear of breaking other things built against it.
Can I add to my current Qt5?
Would variants on
/path/to/configure -release -prefix $existingPrefix
make -module-qtwebkit
make install
or
/path/to/configure -release -prefix $newPrefix
make -module-qtwebkit
make install
cp -rf $newPrefix/CMake/QtWebKit (or similar path) $existingPrefix/CMake/
or as above, but with symlink, work?
Qt5.3 no longer includes QtWebKit, which should now be built separately.
The WebKit package can be downloaded from the Qt Downloads website, via the separate packages repository: link for 5.3.2
This can then be installed by appropriately setting environment variables such that the relevant (Qt5.3.2) qmake is first in the path, then from the expanded source directory, typing:
qmake
make -jN (with N make jobs)
(sudo, if appropriate) make install
The download is approximately 50MB.
Edit: It's also worth noting that if your Bison version is 3.x, then you might not be able to build the snapshot for QtWebKit. Instead download from the development repositories, to avoid an error looking something like: link to bug report
g++ -c [...] -o .obj/release-shared/generated/glslang_tab.o generated/glslang_tab.cpp
generated/glslang_tab.cpp: In function 'int yyparse(TParseContext*)':
generated/glslang_tab.cpp:1785:30: error: too few arguments to function 'int yylex(YYSTYPE*, void*)'
yychar = yylex (&yylval);
^
generated/glslang_tab.cpp:279:12: note: declared here
extern int yylex(YYSTYPE* yylval_param, void* yyscanner);
I'm using gcc (GCC) 4.5.4 20120510 for GNAT GPL 2012 (20120509)
and qtada from qtada-gpl-3.2.0-20120708-3871-qt4.8.2-2.exe installer.
I'm trying to compile example from "..\GNAT\2012\examples\qtada\sql\cached_table", but it say "table_editors-moc.ads not found",
The error came from statement :
with Table_Editors.MOC; pragma Warnings (Off, Table_Editors.MOC);
-- Child package MOC must be included in the executable.
Where can i found the "Child package MOC" that contains "table_editors-moc.ads" and another moc file??
I don't know Qt or QtAda, but a quick search indicates that Qt uses a Meta Object Compiler (MOC) to auto-generate source code from macros. Could it be that your Table_Editor.MOC is supposed to be generated?
I'm surprised that QtAda has installed its examples at \GNAT\2012\examples; judging by the way GNAT is set up on this Mac, I'd have expected \GNAT\2012\share\examples.
However .. I suspect that QtAda's file system layout is complicated enough that you'll need to use a "GNAT Project file" to do the build. I hope there's a .gpr file in the same directory as your example code (if not, I can't help); if so, and assuming it's called cached_table.gpr, then in a command window say
gnatmake -p -P cached_table.gpr
or (following the documentation for QtAda 3.1)
gprbuild -p -P cached_table.gpr
I am trying to compile Qt 4.7.3 on mignw32 using gcc 4.6.0.
I get the following error when running ./configure:
In file included from C:/work/qt-gcc-4.6.0/include/QtCore/private/qcore_unix_p.h:1:0,
from C:/work/qt-gcc-4.6.0/src/corelib/io/qfsfileengine_unix.cpp:45:
C:/work/qt-gcc-4.6.0/include/QtCore/private/../../../src/corelib/kernel/qcore_unix_p.h:59:3: error: #error "qcore_unix_p.h included on a non-Unix system"
The weird thing is that I am running Windows 7, and it is trying to include that.
Also in the Makefile it is using qfsfileengine_unix and qfsfileengine_iterator_unix instead of qfsfileengine_win and qfsfileengine_iterator_win.
If I change the Makefile to use the Windows' ones, I get the following error (the file does not exist):
In file included from C:/work/qt-gcc-4.6.0/include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/global/qglobal.h:62:0,
from C:/work/qt-gcc-4.6.0/include/QtCore/qglobal.h:1,
from C:/work/qt-gcc-4.6.0/mkspecs/win32-g++/qplatformdefs.h:53,
from C:/work/qt-gcc-4.6.0/src/corelib/io/qfsfileengine_win.cpp:43:
C:/work/qt-gcc-4.6.0/include/QtCore/qconfig.h:1:46: fatal error: ../../src/corelib/global/qconfig.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
When compiling /qt/src/corelib/io/qfsfileengine_win.cpp
Suggestions?
Try ./configure --help
There is probably a flag for a ms-windows, x86 compilation.
It might be something like:
./configure --target-os=mingw32
Keep in mind -- the os parameter name might be different, and the selectable target values *might be different* -- with scripts from different authors -- some values you might encounter might be 'win32', 'win32-386', 'x86-windows32', etc.
See if
./configure --help
Won't give you a list...
You can also redirect its output to a file for easy reading in your favorite editor,
./configure --help > myconfighelp.txt
Good luck!