Related
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2019-04-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"location": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "North Europe"
},
"storageaccountname": {
"defaultValue": "storageforarm1910",
"type": "string"
},
"storageaccounttype": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "Standard_GRS"
}
},
"functions": [],
"variables": {},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts",
"apiVersion": "2021-01-01",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"name": "[parameters('storageaccountname')]",
"kind": "FileStorage",
"sku": "[parameters('storageaccounttype')]",
"properties": {}
}
],
"outputs": {}
}
Error:
{"code":"InvalidTemplate","message":"Deployment template parse failed: 'Error converting value \"Standard_GRS\" to type 'Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ResourceStack.Common.Core.Definitions.Resources.ResourceSku'. Path ''.'."}
If we want to create Azure FileStorage account, the sku must be Premium_LRS or Premium_ZRS. For more details, please refer to the official document.
Besides,please note that if we use Premium_ZRS, we just can create the storage account in some regions. Regarding the region, please refer to here.
I am preparing ARM template for "Schedule update deployment" in Update Management service. I want to add parameters like: "excludedKbNumbers" and "includedKbNumbers". I am deploying my templates using powershell. When I am passing KB numbers using mentioned parameters templates completed successfully. In case when I am putting KB number using one of the mentioned parameters, second is empty, template completed successfully. Problem is when I dont want to pass Included/Exluded KB numbers, in my powershell deployment command I am not putting parameter names "excludedKbNumbers" and "includedKbNumbers", and then I am receiving below error: "message": "{\"Message\":\"The request is invalid.\",\"ModelState\":{\"softwareUpdateConfiguration.properties.updateConfiguration\":[\"Software update configuration has same KbNumbers in
includedKbNumbers and excludedKbNumbers.\"]}}"
I am using this structure in my template json('null') and this is a problematic area.
extract from my template:
"parameters": {
"excludedKbNumbers": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "",
"metadata": {
"description": "Specify excluded KB numbers, required data structure: 123456"
}
},
"includedKbNumbers": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "",
"metadata": {
"description": "Specify included KB numbers, required data structure: 123456"
}
},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/softwareUpdateConfigurations",
"apiVersion": "2017-05-15-preview",
"name": "[concat(parameters('automationAccountName'), '/', parameters('scheduleName'))]",
"properties": {
"updateConfiguration": {
"operatingSystem": "[parameters('operatingSystem')]",
"windows": {
"includedUpdateClassifications": "[parameters('Classification')]",
"excludedKbNumbers": [
"[if(empty(parameters('excludedKbNumbers')), json('null'), parameters('excludedKbNumbers'))]"
],
"includedKbNumbers": [
"[if(empty(parameters('includedKbNumbers')), json('null'), parameters('includedKbNumbers'))]"
],
"rebootSetting": "IfRequired"
},
"targets": {
"azureQueries": [
{
"scope": [
"[concat('/subscriptions', '/', parameters('subscriptionID'))]"
],
"tagSettings": {
"tags": {
"[parameters('tagKey')]": [
"[parameters('tagValue')]"
]
},
"filterOperator": "All"
},
"locations": []
}
]
},
"duration": "PT2H"
},
"tasks": {},
"scheduleInfo": {
"isEnabled": false,
"startTime": "2050-03-03T13:10:00+01:00",
"expiryTime": "2050-03-03T13:10:00+01:00",
"frequency": "OneTime",
"timeZone": "Europe/Warsaw"
}
}
}
],
try doing this:
"excludedKbNumbers": "[if(empty(parameters('excludedKbNumbers')), json('null'), array(parameters('excludedKbNumbers')))]",
"includedKbNumbers": "[if(empty(parameters('includedKbNumbers')), json('null'), array(parameters('includedKbNumbers')))]"
I am deploying an arm template that contains the following resources
Microsoft.Storage/storageAccount
Microsoft.Sql/servers
Microsoft.Sql/servers/auditPolicies
Now everything worked until I started changing the values for the auditPolicies object. Here are the steps I took until the InternalServerError occurred.
Added the auditState property and set its value to Disabled. Deployment Successful.
Changed the auditState property to Enabled. Deployment failed. Error states that the storageAccountName is required.
Added storageAccountName and set its value to the name of the storage account. Deployment failed. Error states that storageAccountKey.
Added storageAccountKey and set its value to key1 of the storage account's keys object. Deployment failed. Internal Server Error - "An Error has occurred while saving Auditing settings, please try again later". Additionally, the errors cause the deployment to run indefinitely. Though I am not concerned about that aspect.
The following is the complete template.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"app-name-prefix": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"app-locations": {
"type": "array",
"minLength": 1
},
"app-friendly-names": {
"type": "array",
"minLength": 1
},
"db-user-admin-username": {
"type": "securestring"
},
"db-user-admin-password": {
"type": "securestring"
},
"database-audit-enabled": {
"defaultValue": "Enabled",
"allowedValues": [
"Enabled",
"Disabled"
],
"type": "string"
},
"storage-kind": {
"defaultValue": "BlobStorage",
"allowedValues": [
"StorageV2",
"BlobStorage"
],
"type": "string"
},
"storage-sku": {
"defaultValue": "Standard_LRS",
"allowedValues": [
"Standard_LRS",
"Standard_ZRS",
"Standard_GRS",
"Standard_RAGRS",
"Premium_LRS"
],
"type": "string"
}
},
"variables": {
"db-service-name": "[concat(parameters('app-name-prefix'), '-database-service-')]",
"storage-name": "[concat(toLower(parameters('app-name-prefix')), 'auditstorage')]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "[concat(variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()])]",
"type": "Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts",
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('storage-sku')]"
},
"kind": "[parameters('storage-kind')]",
"apiVersion": "2018-02-01",
"location": "[parameters('app-locations')[copyIndex()]]",
"copy": {
"count": "[length(parameters('app-locations'))]",
"name": "storageCopy"
},
"properties": {
"supportsHttpsTrafficOnly": true,
"accessTier": "Hot",
"encryption": {
"services": {
"blob": {
"enabled": true
},
"file": {
"enabled": true
}
},
"keySource": "Microsoft.Storage"
}
}
},
{
"type": "Microsoft.Sql/servers",
"name": "[concat(variables('db-service-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()])]",
"apiVersion": "2014-04-01",
"location": "[parameters('app-locations')[copyIndex()]]",
"copy": {
"name": "databaseServiceCopy",
"count": "[length(parameters('app-locations'))]"
},
"properties": {
"administratorLogin": "[parameters('db-user-admin-username')]",
"administratorLoginPassword": "[parameters('db-user-admin-password')]",
"version": "12.0"
},
"resources": [
{
"type": "auditingPolicies",
"name": "Default",
"apiVersion": "2014-04-01",
"location": "[parameters('app-locations')[copyIndex()]]",
"properties": {
"auditingState": "[parameters('database-audit-enabled')]",
"storageAccountName": "[concat(variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()])]",
"storageAccountKey": "[listKeys(concat(variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]), '2018-02-01').keys[0].value]"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Sql/servers', concat(variables('db-service-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]))]",
"storageCopy"
]
}
]
}
]
}
What am I missing that will help resolve this issue? What do I need to do to stop this internal server error?
I have added the complete template as was requested by #Pete
I have found the answer after connecting with Azure Support.
The resource type: Microsoft.Sql/servers/auditingPolicies is no longer supported and in the next few weeks Azure Resource Manager will no longer support this completely.
This resource type refers directly to table auditing, which has been reported as being deprecated for blob auditing. Though the documentation at this time does not directly report it. The docs will be updated in the coming days after this post, by the owners.
To enable the auditing you need to use the Microsoft.Sql/servers/auditingSettings object. The documentation on this is coming and until it does you will be directed to documentation for the database version of this resource type Microsoft.Sql/servers/databases/auditingSettings.
Auditing settings work much like the Auto-Tuning advisors. You can set either server or database level settings. The server settings will be inherited by the database if the database has not been configured directly.
This is a sample of the auditingSettings object that I use instead of the auditingPolicies object above. It is nested just the same.
{
"apiVersion": "2017-03-01-preview",
"type": "auditingSettings",
"name": "DefaultAuditingSettings",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Sql/servers', concat(variables('db-service-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]))]",
"storageCopy"
],
"properties": {
"state": "Enabled",
"storageEndpoint": "[reference(concat('Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts', '/', variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]), '2018-02-01').primaryEndpoints.blob]",
"storageAccountAccessKey": "[listKeys(concat(variables('storage-name'), parameters('app-friendly-names')[copyIndex()]), '2018-02-01').keys[0].value]",
"storageAccountSubscriptionId": "[subscription().subscriptionId]",
"isStorageSecondaryKeyInUse": false,
"retentionDays": "30"
}
}
I'm hosting my own service (HTTPS) on Azure - I have selected 'my endpoint is a subdomain with a wildcard cert'
I'm using Alexa.NET to craft the response.
I can verify that the simulator is hitting my endpoint (I did remote debugging and saw the breakpoint was hit) and I know that my endpoint is returning this (I tried it in Postman)
{
"Version": "1.0",
"SessionAttributes": null,
"Response": {
"OutputSpeech": {
"Type": "PlainText",
"Text": "test successful"
},
"Card": null,
"Reprompt": null,
"ShouldEndSession": true,
"Directives": []
}
}
I can't find any documentation on what the response is supposed to look like. I guess I can try creating the same thing with a lambda function...
Anyone have any suggestions on what I can try? This whole process of hosting my own service has been very frustrating...
Please find sample response format here https://developer.amazon.com/public/solutions/alexa/alexa-skills-kit/docs/alexa-skills-kit-interface-reference#response-body-syntax
{
"version": "string",
"sessionAttributes": {
"string": "<object>"
},
"response": {
"outputSpeech": {
"type": "string",
"text": "string",
"ssml": "string"
},
"card": {
"type": "string",
"title": "string",
"content": "string",
"text": "string",
"image": {
"smallImageUrl": "string",
"largeImageUrl": "string"
}
},
"reprompt": {
"outputSpeech": {
"type": "string",
"text": "string",
"ssml": "string"
}
},
"directives": [
{
"type": "Display.RenderTemplate",
"template": {
"type": "string"
...
}
},
{
"type": "AudioPlayer",
"playBehavior": "string",
"audioItem": {
"stream": {
"token": "string",
"url": "string",
"offsetInMilliseconds": 0
}
}
},
{
"general": {
"type": "VideoApp.Launch",
"videoItem": {
"source": "string",
"metadata": {
"title": "string",
"subtitle": "string"
}
}
}
}
],
"shouldEndSession": boolean
}
}
It was because my 'name's started with an uppercase. Friggin Javascript serializer....
But thanks Vijay for the pointer to the documentation.
In .NET mvc, this is how you make the property names lower case:
return JsonConvert.SerializeObject(alexaSkillResponse, new JsonSerializerSettings {
ContractResolver = new CamelCasePropertyNamesContractResolver()
});
I have taken a deployment template from azure and added this to a deployment project in Visual Studio 2015. When the Resource Group is made and deployed, everything works well except for the Web Site connectionstrings.
I have TableStorage, DocumentDb, and Redis instances all being created by this and cannot figure out how to get the Primary Connection String and Primary Key of these items so that I don't have to go in by hand and add them.
looking at the ARM Template Functions ListKeys should do the trick, but after deployment the value is empty. Furthermore, trying a simple string (TestConnectionString) also adds the name, but not the value.
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"kind": "app",
"name": "[parameters('WebAppName')]",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('WebAppName')]",
"resources": [],
"siteConfig": {
"connectionstrings": [
{
"name": "DocumentDbKey",
"value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
{
"name": "TestConnectionString",
"value": "dummystring:pleaseignore;",
"type": "Custom"
}
]
}
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('docDbName'))]",
]
}
As your description we can use ARM Template Functions ListKeys to get the Keys. And we could use the following template code to set the connection string. I test Azure storage connection string and Document DB key, It works correctly for me , please have a try. The following is my detail steps:
1.Create Basic Azure Resource Group project with template WebApp
2.From demo remove the unnecessary resource.
3.Add the connection string setting
"resources": [
{
"name": "connectionstrings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "tomConnectionString"
},
"properties": {
"documentDB": {
"value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', variables('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
"storage": {
"value": "[concat('DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=',parameters('storageAccountName'),';AccountKey=',concat(listKeys(variables('storageAccountId'),'2015-05-01-preview').key1))]",
"type": "Custom"
}
}
}
]
Add the corresponding parameters or variables such as storage info or docDbName
Deploy the Website
Check the result from the portal
Full template code:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "S1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and instance size. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"storageAccountName": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "Storage Account to access blob storage."
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"webSiteName": "[concat('webSite', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]",
"docDbName": "tomdocumentdb",
"storageAccountId": "[concat(resourceGroup().id,'/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/', parameters('storageAccountName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "connectionstrings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "tomConnectionString"
},
"properties": {
"documentDB": {
"value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', variables('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
"storage": {
"value": "[concat('DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=',parameters('storageAccountName'),';AccountKey=',concat(listKeys(variables('storageAccountId'),'2015-05-01-preview').key1))]",
"type": "Custom"
}
}
}
]
}
]
}
Update:
We could get more useful info about ARM template from the azure resource.
I just had same problem, and it turns out the name of the property that holds the connection string should be named connectionString, so your siteConfig object should look like this:
"siteConfig": {
"connectionstrings": [
{
"name": "DocumentDbKey",
"connectionString": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
{
"name": "TestConnectionString",
"connectionString": "dummystring:pleaseignore;",
"type": "Custom"
}
]
}