I had a problem with the item in QML. I wanna get children of an item but it seems working in the first element.
The detail code is below:
I have a gridview with a list custom component AAA_Styles
GridView{
id: grdViewDeviceControl
clip: true
interactive: true
ScrollIndicator.vertical: ScrollIndicator{}
cellWidth: 200
cellHeight: 300
model: ListModel{}
delegate: Item {
width: grdViewDeviceControl.cellWidth
height: grdViewDeviceControl.cellHeight
AAA_Styles{
id: deviceControl
objectName: "deviceControl"
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
anchors.verticalCenter: parent.verticalCenter
name: Names
subname: Subnames
}
}
My custom AAA_RTS is a QML component have some functions such as:
- function_a()
- function_b()
I added 2 items into model using
grdViewDeviceControl.model.append()
I ensure the model have data that I added because It appeared in my design and the count of gridview is 2 elements
console.log(grdViewDeviceControl.count) //the result is 2
After that, I tried to get each element to access functions that they are available using a method in signal onRelease of a button:
onReleased: {
console.log("number of item: " + grdViewDeviceControl.count)
var myRTS = grdViewDeviceControl.contentItem.children[0]
console.log(myRTS)
console.log(myRTS.children[0])
myRTS = grdViewDeviceControl.contentItem.children[1]
console.log(myRTS)
console.log(myRTS.children[1])
}
The result on console:
qml: number of item: 2
qml: QQuickItem(0x9828f60)
qml: AAA_Styles_QMLTYPE_0_QML_112(0x9829070, "deviceControl")
qml: QQuickItem(0x5554140)
qml: undefined
With the first element grdViewDeviceControl.contentItem.children[0], I access function_a or function_b successful but when I using the second the error appeared
TypeError: Cannot call method 'function_a' of undefined
So can anyone tell me why I wrong and how to fix it?
Many thanks for any help!
Do not try to access directly to the child items. Use delegate IDs, signals and slots instead:
Give a "delegate ID" to all your delegates through the model of your GridView.
In your GridView, add signals that will be used to broadcast to all the delegates the following things:
The "delegate ID" of the delegate that you want it to execute the function.
The arguments for the AAA_Styles function.
In your delegate, add one slot per AAA_Styles function. Each slot will execute the AAA_Styles function only if the broadcasted delegate ID is the delegate's: if (broadcastedID === delegateID) { function_ab() }.
When you want to execute function_a() or function_b() in a delegate, broadcast the delegate ID and the function arguments through the corresponding GridView signal (in onReleased, for example).
The following piece of code sums up what I have just described to you. If it does not work put the delegate in a separated QML file. This should work for good:
// Your grid
GridView {
id: grdViewDeviceControl
clip: true
interactive: true
ScrollIndicator.vertical: ScrollIndicator {}
cellWidth: 200
cellHeight: 300
model: ListModel {
/*
Example of list element:
ListElement { m_uuid: "{element-uuid}" }
*/
}
delegate: Item {
width: grdViewDeviceControl.cellWidth
height: grdViewDeviceControl.cellHeight
AAA_Styles {
id: deviceControl
objectName: "deviceControl"
anchors.centerIn: parent
name: Names
subname: Subnames
}
// The delegate ID
property string delegate_id: m_uuid
// Broadcast receivers
function delfunc_a(uuid, argA0) {
if (uuid === this.delegate_id) {
deviceControl.function_a(argA0)
}
}
function delfunc_b(uuid, argB0, argB1) {
if (uuid === this.delegate_id) {
deviceControl.function_b(argB0, argB1)
}
}
// Connecting broadcasters to receivers
Component.onCompleted: {
grdViewDeviceControl.exec_a.connect(this.delfunc_a)
grdViewDeviceControl.exec_b.connect(this.delfunc_b)
}
Component.onDestruction: {
grdViewDeviceControl.exec_a.disconnect(this.delfunc_a)
grdViewDeviceControl.exec_b.disconnect(this.delfunc_b)
}
}
// Your broadcasters
signal exec_a(string uuid, int argA0)
signal exec_b(string uuid, bool argB0, string argB1)
}
// Somewhere else in your code:
onReleased: {
/*
* Only the delegate whose ID is "{a-given-uuid}"
* will execute deviceControl.function_a(3):
*/
grdViewDeviceControl.exec_a("{a-given-uuid}", 3)
/*
* Only the delegate whose ID is "{another-given-uuid}"
* will execute deviceControl.function_b(true, "U got style!"):
*/
grdViewDeviceControl.exec_b("{another-given-uuid}", true, "U got style!")
}
Related
I am trying to make a change to all items of a GridView.
I have tried to iterate through either the model or the grid, I looked at similar examples on the web, but everything I try ends with Cannot read property 'buttonText' of undefined.
It seems to me that the problem is that the interpreter can't figure out that the item from the grid or model is a Button. But I don't know how to cast it.
If I change the log to only display the item, not any property, (see code snippet), it seems that it knows it is an item... see my experiments below.
The only thing I can make work is set a property (or call a signal, or a function) from the delegate. But that only affects one grid item, not all.
How can I set a property on every item of the grid ? Alternatively, how can I send a signal, or call a function, on every item?
My experiments are in function changeEverythingFunction()
file: Button.qml
Item
{
id: itemButton
signal changeEverything
property int buttonIndex
property string buttonText
...
}
file: Model.qml
Item
{
id: modelItem
ListModel
{
id: listModel
}
property int buttonCount: listModel.count
function changeEverythingFunction()
{
// for (var i = 0; i < buttonCount; i++)
// listModel.setProperty(i, buttonText, "abc")
for(var childIndex in gridItems.contentItem.children)
{
console.log(listModel.get(childIndex).buttonText) // Cannot read property 'buttonText' of undefined
console.log(gridItems.contentItem.children[childIndex].buttonText) // Cannot read property 'buttonText' of undefined
console.log(gridItems.contentItem.children[childIndex]["buttonText"]) // undefined (I saw this in a SO example)
var item = gridItems.contentItem.children[childIndex]
console.log(item) // qml: QQuickItem(0xe496370)
}
}
MouseArea
{
....
Rectangle
{
...
GridView
{
id: gridItems
anchors.fill: parent
clip: true
model: listModel
delegate: Item
{
id: buttonDelegate
Button
{
buttonIndex: gridId
buttonText: itemText
onChangeEverything:
{
changeEverythingFunction();
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Your approach is in the opposite direction: Your approach is to obtain the item of the view and modify it, but the approach that Qt points out is that the view reflects the information of the model and modifies it when necessary.
The following is a simple example where every time you press on the button with "change me" text increasing the number it shows, but if you press the button with "change all" text it will change all the numbers. As it is observed everything is done through the model, not through the view that are only used to display information or receive user interaction.
import QtQuick 2.14
import QtQuick.Window 2.14
import QtQuick.Controls 2.14
import QtQuick.Layouts 1.14
Window {
visible: true
width: 640
height: 480
ListModel{
id: listmodel
}
function changeAll(){
for(var i=0; i< listmodel.count; ++i){
listmodel.setProperty(i, "number", listmodel.get(i).number + 1)
}
}
GridView{
id: grid
anchors.fill: parent
clip: true
model: listmodel
cellHeight: 120
cellWidth: 120
delegate: Item {
width: grid.cellWidth; height: grid.cellHeight
Column {
anchors.fill: parent
Text { text: model.number; anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter }
Button{text: "change me"; onClicked: model.number +=1}
Button{text: "change all"; onClicked: changeAll()}
}
}
}
Component.onCompleted: {
for(var i=0; i < 10; ++i){
listmodel.append({"number": 0});
}
}
}
main.qml:
import QtQuick 2.11
import QtQuick.Controls 2.2
import QtQuick.Layouts 1.3
ApplicationWindow {
id: window
x: 200
y: 200
visible: true
Component {
id: firstViewComponent
FirstView {
id: firstView
}
}
StackView {
id: stackView
anchors.fill: parent
Component.onCompleted: push(firstViewComponent)
}
Timer {
interval: 1000
running: true
onTriggered: stackView.pop()
}
}
FirstView.qml:
Rectangle {
id: view
StackView.onDeactivating: console.log('view: view is deactivating')
ListModel {
id: aModel
ListElement {
name: 'Element 0'
}
ListElement {
name: 'Element 1'
}
}
ListView {
id: listView
model: aModel
delegate: Rectangle {
id: listViewDelegate
Connections {
target: view.StackView // <---- DOESN'T WORK
onDeactivating: console.log('delegate ' + index + ': needs to do some housekeeping now')
}
}
}
}
I have a view that is instantiated by a StackView in main.qml. The StackView attaches a signal StackView.onDeactivating to the view. Is there any way to attach to the signal from an object other than the one the signal is attached to? I need to do some cleanup in listViewDelegate when the view is popped.
I could have view emit its own signal, and have the delegate respond to that signal. But what I'm wondering is if there is a way to connect to the attached signal: StackView.onDeactivating from a different object (listViewDelegate).
Yes and no. The Qt documentation partially addresses this: A Note About Accessing Attached Properties and Signal Handlers
It is not possible to directly access the property from a child. Attached properties need to be explicitly read by the class providing them. For your example, the parent class (StackView) simply searches for all attached properties it does provide in the child item (FirstView) as soon as it gets added, and handles all found properties/signals etc. by connecting them internally to whatever logic provides them.
However, nothing prevents you from gettings the attached property from the parent item, as long as you refer to it by id:
sampleProp: view.StackView.someProperty
The thing is: This indirect access only works this way for properties and nor for signals, as you can't simply refer to the attached object via view.StackView - so sadly, you are stuck with forwarding the signal to the child elements indirectly by creating a second signal in the root item and emitting it when the attached signal gets emitted.
I'm following this tutorial (without the flickable content in each entry) for Qt 4.8 while using Qt 5.7 with QtQuick 2.0. The way the ListView there works is as follows:
User clicks on item in list
Alternative (detailed) view of item is displayed
User has to click on Close button in detailed view to reset the state of entry to its default compact view.
This leads to a clutter where at some point if the user clicks on all items in which case all will be shown in their full view. Having the user click on the Close button every time he/she opens a detailed view also is (omho) not that handy.
I've altered the entry to close when the user clicks on the view. I'm also trying to prevent this clutter and achieve a more (omho) flowing behaviour:
User clicks on item in list
Alternative view of item is displayed
User clicks on detailed view to reset state of entry to its default compact view OR
User clicks on another entry and all currently in detailed view entries are reset to their compact view
Currently I'm looping through my ListView's contentItem.children[loop_index] and setting the state to "" ("Details" = show detailed view | "" = show compact view). Due to the way ListView works (loading/unloading delegates on demand) this is quite unreliable and I often get an undefined reference when I try to access the state of other delegates. The following MouseArea, which I'm using to do all that, is part of every delegate:
// state is a QML `State` that is bound to the delegate (see below for the details on it)
MouseArea {
anchors.fill: background
onClicked: {
// Iterate through all other entries and close them
for (var entry = 0; entry < listView.count; ++entry) {
if(listView.contentItem.children[entry] !== gestureEntry) {
console.log("Hide other element");
listView.contentItem.children[entry].state = ""; // IT FAILS HERE (SOMETIMES)
}
}
// Change view of current entry
if(gestureEntry.state === "Details") {
gestureEntry.state = "";
console.log("Hiding details")
}
else {
gestureEntry.state = "Details";
console.log("Showing details");
}
}
}
with state being a delegate's state:
states: State {
name: "Details"
PropertyChanges { target: background; color: "white" }
PropertyChanges { target: gestureImage; width: 130; height: 130 } // Make picture bigger
PropertyChanges { target: gestureEntry; detailsOpacity: 1; x: 0; y: 0 } // Make details visible
PropertyChanges { target: gestureEntry; height: listView.height } // Fill the entire list area with the detailed view
}
I'm thinking that the state information can be stored inside the ListModel itself making it possible to iterate through the model's contents (which are always there unlike the contents of the delegates) however I don't know how to automatically update my list (and the currently visible/invisible delegates) when an entry changes in the model. From what I've found so far it seems not possible to do that since the ListView doesn't actively monitor its ListModel.
Is this indeed the case? If yes, then is it possible to go around this problem in a different way?
Why don't you use the currentIndex property of your ListView?
Just modify your delegate like this:
Item {
id: gestureEntry
...
state: ListView.isCurrentItem?"Details":""
...
MouseArea {
anchors.fill: background
onClicked: {
if(listView.currentIndex == index)
listView.currentIndex = -1
else
listView.currentIndex = index
}
}
}
EDIT:
The only issue with the solution above is that - upon loading - an entry in the ListView is preselected which automatically triggers the detailed view of that entry. In order to avoid that the following needs to be added to listView:
Component.onCompleted: {
listView.currentIndex = -1;
}
This ensures that no entry will be preselected.
guess it is an issue because you stored a state in your delegate. You should not do this as described in the delegate-property (Link), because the delegates get reused when they get out of view.
At least you should use a when: ListView.isCurrentItem in the State and depend on a value of the ListView. So only your current delegate is maximized. Then in the MouseArea only set `ListView.view.currentIndex = index'. Don't change the state manually in the function!
I ran in the same trouble, removed the states completely and just used the attached property ListView.isCurrentItem. But binding the state to a Value from the ListView should also work, because it's not stored in the delegate.
Minimal example:
import QtQuick 2.0
Item {
width: 800
height: 600
ListView {
id: view
anchors.fill: parent
model: 3
spacing: 5
currentIndex: -1
delegate: Rectangle {
id: delegate
color: ListView.isCurrentItem ? "lightblue" : "green" // directly change properties depending on isCurrentItem
height: 100
width: 100
states: State {
name: "maximized"
when: delegate.ListView.isCurrentItem // bind to isCurrentItem to set the state
PropertyChanges {
target: delegate
height: 200
}
}
MouseArea {
anchors.fill: parent
//onClicked: delegate.ListView.view.currentIndex = model.index // if only selection is wanted
onClicked: {
//console.debug("click");
if (delegate.ListView.isCurrentItem)
{
delegate.ListView.view.currentIndex = -1;
}
else
{
delegate.ListView.view.currentIndex = model.index;
}
}
}
Text {
anchors.centerIn: parent
text: index
}
}
Text {
text: "CurrentIndex: " + parent.currentIndex
}
}
}
Similar to the this keyword in C++, I’d like to either have a QML element to pass itself into a JS function, or have it set a property on another element to itself. Is this possible?
For example:
Rectangle{
id:theParent
property var theElement
SomeElement{
id:theChild
MouseArea {
anchors.fill:parent
onClicked: {
someJsFunction(*whatGoesHere*)
parent.theElement=*whatGoesHere*
}
}
Or, Consider this:
Rectangle{
id:theParent
property var theElement
SomeElement{
id:theChild
}
Then, in SomeElement.qml:
Rectangle{
MouseArea {
anchors.fill:parent
onClicked: {
someJsFunction(*whatGoesHere*)
parent.theElement=*whatGoesHere*
}
}
}
In this case, the *whatGoesHere* would be the instance of SomeElement where these are being called from.
Is this possible in QML? I would think the id property would make sense, but according to the docs, you cannot query the value of the id field, and anyway the id wouldn't be available if my SomeElement was described in a separate file, and the whatGoesHere handling above appeared in that separate file rather than in a particular instance.
I have two complementary proposals :
First, for a single usage, pass the ID as it's basically a pointer to the item :
MouseArea {
id: myClicker;
onClicked: { callFunc (myClicker); }
}
Then if you need multiple items to share this behavior, that means you're using MVC so the ID will work exactly the same :
Repeater {
model: 100;
delegate: MouseArea {
id: myClicker;
onClicked: { callFunc (myClicker); }
}
}
That is the classical part.
But to todo even better if you create your own components, keep in mind to create a 'self' helper property that does the 'this' job properly :
MouseArea { // component root definition
id: base;
property var self : base; // bind self on the I
}
Then use it like this :
Repeater {
model: 100;
delegate: MyComponent {
onClicked: { callFunc (self); }
}
}
Use this as often as you want !
Instance of your SomeElement is its id property value i.e. theChild. You can use it as this. No other built-in way exists as far as I can tell. But you can try to add your own QML item hierarchy with property which will return this.
Another way is to get children of some parent and use them. So you get children, locate the child you need and use that particular instance
If you define your element in a separate file, then you can simply assign an id and use it. It will be valid just within the context of that instance:
SomeElement.qml
Rectangle{
id: thisElement
MouseArea {
anchors.fill: parent
onClicked: {
someJsFunction(thisElement);
parent.theElement = thisElement;
}
}
}
I have a custom element called MenuButton:
import QtQuick 1.1
import VPlay 1.0
Image {
property alias text: buttontext.text
property alias mouseArea: area
property alias fontBold: buttontext.font.bold
property alias textSize: buttontext.font.pixelSize
id: button
source: "img/cloudButton.png"
opacity: 1
Text {
id: buttontext
color: "black"
anchors.verticalCenter: parent.verticalCenter
anchors.left: parent.left
anchors.leftMargin: 50
font.bold: true
}
MouseArea {
id: area
anchors.fill: parent
onPressed: button.opacity = 0.7
onReleased: button.opacity = 1.0
onCanceled: button.opacity = 1.0
}
function doStuff {
// do something here
}
width: 200
height: 60
}
Now, in my main View, I have a Column with 5 of those MenuButtons. And I want to iterate over them and call the function doStuff(). How do I do that?
I tried with column.childAt(i) and stuff like that, nothing worked.
MainView.qml
Rectangle {
width: 480; height: 320
// HERE IS MY PROBLEM, how do I iterate over all my elements in the column?
function update() {
for(var i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
column.childAt(i).doStuff(); // THIS IS WHAT I WANT TO DO
}
}
Column {
id: column
spacing: 5
anchors.centerIn: parent
Repeater {
id: repeater
model: 5
MenuButton {
id: levelbutton
text: "Level " + (modelData+1);
source: "img/cloud4.png"
}
}
}
}
The problem is in my update function in the MainView.qml
I dont know how to iterate over the elements and call the doStuff() function.
You may use Component.onCompleted attached signal, like this:
import QtQuick 1.0
Rectangle {
height: 600
width: 600
Repeater {
model: 5
Item {
Component.onCompleted: console.log('Component ' + index + ' completed!')
}
}
}
However, please consider, that this imperative operation is not good, because it will be called all time after model update. Probably you have problem X and asking how to get Y, that (you think) will solve your X?
From what I've seen in the source code in the QDeclarativePositioners class you cannot access the children elements!
But you could turn the way you call your doStuff() method: when do you want it to be called? After some time has passed (then add a Timer element to your MenuButton), or when a signal occurs? In the latter case, you could use the Connections element and listen to the signal beign emitted in your calling qml file where you use the Column and Repeater.
Cheers, Chris
You can access the children of an element via the children property that exists on all QtObjects. It contains an array of child elements and can be freely acccessed in javascript.
eg. element.children[0].doStuff()
Generally speaking, you should avoid actions that require you to manually iterate over the children. However, if you are attempting to write code that generically calls something on each of the children you do not always have a choice.