I currently have a small application which is using GraphQL to communicate with the .net core backend. I currently have one one root query as is mandatory for GraphQL and am looking for a way to break this up into multiple pieces for organization's sake. My Query looks as follows:
public class ReactToFactsQuery : ObjectGraphType
{
public ReactToFactsQuery(IArticleService articleService,
INewsItemService newsItemService)
{
Field<ArticleType>(
name: "article",
arguments: new QueryArguments(new QueryArgument<IntGraphType> { Name = "id" }),
resolve: context =>
{
var id = context.GetArgument<int>("id");
return articleService.Get(id);
}
);
Field<ListGraphType<ArticleType>>(
name: "articles",
arguments: new QueryArguments(new QueryArgument<IntGraphType>() { Name = "count" }),
resolve: context =>
{
var count = context.GetArgument<int?>("count");
if (count.HasValue)
{
return articleService.GetAll(count.Value);
}
else
{
return articleService.GetAll();
}
}
);
Field<ListGraphType<NewsItemType>>(
name: "newsItems",
arguments: new QueryArguments(
new QueryArgument<IntGraphType>() { Name = "count" },
new QueryArgument<IntGraphType>() { Name = "newsType" }),
resolve: context =>
{
var count = context.GetArgument<int?>("count");
var category = context.GetArgument<int>("newsType");
var newsType = (NewsType)category;
if (count.HasValue)
{
return newsItemService.GetMostRecent(newsType, count.Value);
}
else
{
return newsItemService.GetMostRecent(newsType);
}
}
);
}
}
Currently the query is pretty small and manageable but as the application grows, I can easily see there being a huge number of queries defined in this class. THe current query names that exist are article, articles, and newsItems. Preferably, I'd like to create a query class to represent each model type (i.e one query class for article related queries, one for news item related queries, etc).
I've read the documentation here however I for whatever reason am struggling to understand the example here and how to apply it to my code.
All help is appreciated.
As the documentation says, you can split queries into virtual groups like this ...
Creating sub query types (ArticlesQueryType) that controls the specific queries.
public class RootQuery : ObjectGraphType
{
public RootQuery()
{
Name = "RootQuery";
// defines the articles sub query and returns an empty anonymous type object
// whose only purpose is to allow making queries on the subtype (ArticlesQueryType)
Field<ArticlesQueryType>("articles", resolve: context => new {});
}
}
// defines the articles specific queries
public class ArticlesQueryType: ObjectGraphType
{
public ArticlesQueryType(IArticleService articleService)
{
Name = "ArticlesQuery";
Field<ArticleType>(
name: "article",
arguments: new QueryArguments(new QueryArgument<IntGraphType> { Name = "id" }),
resolve: context =>
{
var id = context.GetArgument<int>("id");
return articleService.Get(id);
});
}
}
GraphQL query type would be
type RootQuery {
articles: ArticlesQuery
news: NewsQuery
}
type ArticlesQuery {
article(id: ID): Article
articles: [Article]
}
...
On the other hand, if you don't want to change the query structure and has only one root that holds the specific queries, you can split the queries into partial classes for clarity ...
public partial class RootQuery: ObjectGraphType
{
private IArticleService ArticleService { get; }
public RootQuery()
{
Name = "RootQuery";
InitializeArticlesQueries()
}
}
and in another file (RootQuery_Articles.cs) for example
public partial class RootQuery
{
protected InitializeArticlesQuery()
{
Field<ArticleType>(
name: "article",
arguments: new QueryArguments(new QueryArgument<IntGraphType> { Name = "id" }),
resolve: context =>
{
var id = context.GetArgument<int>("id");
return articleService.Get(id);
});
}
}
This way, the GraphQL query type is
type RootQuery {
articles: [Article]
....
}
Related
I have an ASP.NET Core Web API and a React client. I'm trying to build admin dashboard with React-Admin. My problem is when I receive the data from server, my object are with property Id (uppercase), then in console I'm getting an error
The response to 'getList' must be like { data : [{ id: 123, ...}, ...] }, but the received data items do not have an 'id' key
I tried making new test class with property id (lowercase) in my server and then the problem is gone.
How can I fix this issue?
This is my test class and its working.
public class CityModel
{
public string id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
[HttpGet("Cities")]
public CityModel[] GetCities()
{
var city1 = new CityModel()
{
id = "ahsxge",
Name = "Berlin"
};
var city2 = new CityModel()
{
id = "axhdagw",
Name = "London"
};
var list = new List<CityModel>();
list.Add(city1);
list.Add(city2);
Response.Headers.Add("Access-Control-Expose-Headers", "X-Total-Count");
Response.Headers.Add("X-Total-Count", list.Count.ToString());
return list.ToArray();
}
This is my component in react :
const AppAdmin = () => {
const jwt = localStorage.getItem("jwt");
const httpClient = (url, options = {}) => {
options.user = {
authenticated: true,
token: 'Bearer ' + jwt
};
return fetchUtils.fetchJson(url, options);
};
const dataProvider = jsonServerProvider('https://localhost:44366/api', httpClient);
dataProvider.getList('Cities/Cities', {
pagination: { page: 1, perPage: 15 },
sort: { field: 'Name', order: 'ASC' },
})
.then(response => console.log(response));
return (
<Admin dataProvider={dataProvider}>
<Resource name='Cities/Cities' list={CitiesList} />
</Admin>
)
}
export default AppAdmin
You can configure the json converter to use camelCase serialization int the ConfigureServices method in the Startup.cs file the following way:
services
.AddControllers()
.AddJsonOptions(opts =>
{
opts.JsonSerializerOptions.PropertyNamingPolicy = JsonNamingPolicy.CamelCase;
})
This way you can use PascalCase properties in your c# code (which you should do), but your client will recieve camelCase json properties.
I have set routing and display the page according to user roles. For this i am using guard on route. I am extracting userRole from service in Appcomponent class and using set and get method in main-service file. Now problem is that before i get role, routing takes place and it navigate to wrong url as it doesn't have role by then. Tough from next call, it works properly. Let me share the code:-
1.Here is guard class:-
export class HomeGuard implements CanActivate {
constructor(private _router: Router,private mainService: MainService) {
}
canActivate(): boolean {
let userRoles:any;
alert('HomeGuard');
userRoles = this.mainService.getSavedUserRole();
//userRoles = ['Profile Manager','Operations','Shipper'];
alert('userRoles are here'+userRoles);
console.log('here in homeguard');
if(userRoles) {
if(userRoles.some(x => x === 'Shipper') || userRoles.some(x => x === 'Admin'))
return true;
}
this._router.navigate(['/notfound']);
return false;
}
}
Here is AppComponent where i am extracting userRole from service:-
export class AppComponent {
savedUserRoles:any;
constructor(private translate: TranslateService,private mainService: MainService) {
console.log('Environment config', Config);
// this language will be used as a fallback when a translation isn't found in the current language
translate.setDefaultLang(AppSettings.LNG_TYPE);
// the lang to use, if the lang isn't available, it will use the current loader to get them
translate.use(AppSettings.LNG_TYPE);
this.mainService.getCurrentUser().subscribe(result => {
this.savedUserRoles = JSON.parse(JSON.parse(result._body).Data).Roles;
console.log('sdfghj'+this.savedUserRoles);
this.mainService.setSavedUserRole(this.savedUserRoles);
});
}
}
Here is main-service where i have defined set and get method:-
setSavedUserRole(name: any) {
console.log('main'+name);
this._userRoles = name;
}
getSavedUserRole() {
return this._userRoles;
}
I'm trying to create a field modifiedBy with type: Object (to Meteor users).
I see you can setup blackbox: true for a Custom Object, but if I want to setup to a specific Object say a Group (collection) field modifiedBy is the logged in user, any pointers/help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
As far as I see it, you have two options:
Store user-ids there with type: String
Denormalize it as you proposed
Denormalize it as you proposed
To denormalize it you can do something like this inside your schema:
...
modifiedBy: {
type: object
}
'modifiedBy._id': {
type: String,
autoValue: function () {
return Meteor.userId()
}
}
'modifiedBy.username': {
type: String,
autoValue: function () {
return Meteor.user().username
}
}
...
As you pointed out, you'd want to update these properties when they change:
server-side
Meteor.users.find().observe({
changed: function (newDoc) {
var updateThese = SomeCollection.find({'modifiedBy.username': {$eq: newDoc._id}})
updateThese.forEach () {
SomeCollection.update(updateThis._id, {$set: {name: newDoc.profile.name}})
}
}
})
Store user-ids there with type: String
I'd recommend storing user-ids. It's cleaner but it doesn't perform as well as the other solution. Here's how you could do that:
...
modifiedBy: {
type: String
}
...
You could also easily write a Custom Validator for this. Now retrieving the Users is a bit more complicated. You could use a transform function to get the user objects.
SomeCollection = new Mongo.Collection('SomeCollection', {
transform: function (doc) {
doc.modifiedBy = Meteor.users.findOne(doc.modifiedBy)
return doc
}
})
But there's a catch: "Transforms are not applied for the callbacks of observeChanges or to cursors returned from publish functions."
This means that to retrieve the doc reactively you'll have to write an abstraction:
getSome = (function getSomeClosure (query) {
var allDep = new Tacker.Dependency
var allChanged = allDep.changed.bind(allDep)
SomeCollection.find(query).observe({
added: allChanged,
changed: allChanged,
removed: allChanged
})
return function getSome () {
allDep.depend()
return SomeCollection.find(query).fetch()
}
})
I'm using aurelia-validate and my validation works fine if I use variables, but I need it to validate properties of an object rather than a variable:
Here's what works:
import {Validation} from 'aurelia-validation';
import {ensure} from 'aurelia-validation';
import {ItemService} from './service';
export class EditItem {
static inject() {
return [Validation, ItemService];
}
#ensure(function(it){
it.isNotEmpty()
.hasLengthBetween(3,10);
})
name = '';
#ensure(function(it){
it.isNotEmpty()
.hasMinLength(10)
.matches(/^https?:\/\/.{3,}$/) //looks like a url
.matches(/^\S*$/); //no spaces
})
url = '';
constructor(validation, service) {
this.validation = validation.on(this);
this.service = service;
}
activate(params){
return this.service.getItem(params.id).then(res => {
console.log(res);
this.name = res.content.name; //populate
this.url = res.content.url;
});
}
update() {
this.validation.validate().then(
() => {
var data = {
name: this.name,
url: this.url
};
this.service.updateItem(data).then(res => {
this.message = "Thank you!";
})
}
);
}
}
Here's what I'm trying to do (but doesn't work)...also I'm not sure if it's better to keep the properties on the class or have a property called this.item which contains the properties (this is the typical angular way):
import {Validation} from 'aurelia-validation';
import {ensure} from 'aurelia-validation';
import {ItemService} from './service';
export class EditItem {
static inject() {
return [Validation, ItemService];
}
#ensure(function(it){
it.isNotEmpty()
.hasLengthBetween(3,10);
})
this.item.name; //no assignment here should happen
#ensure(function(it){
it.isNotEmpty()
.hasMinLength(10)
.matches(/^https?:\/\/.{3,}$/) //looks like a url
.matches(/^\S*$/); //no spaces
})
this.item.url; //no assignment?
constructor(validation, service) {
this.validation = validation.on(this);
this.service = service;
this.item = null;
}
activate(params){
return this.service.getItem(params.id).then(res => {
console.log(res);
this.item = res.content; //populate with object from api call
});
}
update() {
this.validation.validate().then(
() => {
var data = {
name: this.item.name,
url: this.item.url
};
this.service.updateItem(data).then(res => {
this.message = "Thank you!";
})
}
);
}
}
Can someone give me some guidance here on how to use a validator against an existing object (for an edit page)?
The validation works in all kinds of situations, but using the #ensure decorator can only be used to declare your rules on simple properties (like you found out).
Hence...
Option a: replace the ensure decorator with the fluent API 'ensure' method, this supports 'nested' or 'complex' binding paths such as:
import {Validation} from 'aurelia-validation';
import {ItemService} from './service';
export class EditItem {
static inject() {
return [Validation, ItemService];
}
constructor(validation, service) {
this.validation = validation.on(this)
.ensure('item.url')
.isNotEmpty()
.hasMinLength(10)
.matches(/^https?:\/\/.{3,}$/) //looks like a url
.matches(/^\S*$/)
.ensure('item.name')
.isNotEmpty()
.hasLengthBetween(3,10);
this.service = service;
this.item = null;
}
activate(params){
return this.service.getItem(params.id).then(res => {
console.log(res);
this.item = res.content; //populate with object from api call
});
}
update() {
this.validation.validate().then(
() => {
var data = {
name: this.item.name,
url: this.item.url
};
this.service.updateItem(data).then(res => {
this.message = "Thank you!";
})
}
);
}
}
Note: you can set up your validation even before item is set. Cool, no?
Option b: Since the validation rules are specific to the item, you could move your validation rules inside your item class using the #ensure decorator inside that class instead.
You can then set up validation in your VM after you've retrieved the item: this.validation = validation.on(this.item); or, your service can set up the validation when it returns your item to your VM and make it an intrinsic part of the model: item.validation = validation.on(item);
Option a is easiest and seems to match your experience. Option b is more maintainable, as the validation rules for your model will live on the model, not on the view-model. However if you go with option b, you might have to adjust your HTML a bit to make sure validation hints appear.
Use the .on method of the validator to apply your rules to object properties.
The example below is called after I retrieve an object named stock, it validates that the quantity is not empty and is numeric only. Hope this helps...
let stock = {
name: 'some name'
minimumQuantity: '1'
};
applyRules() {
ValidationRules
.ensure((m: EditStock) => m.minimumQuantity)
.displayName("Minimum Quantity")
.required()
.withMessage(`\${$displayName} cannot be blank.`)
.matches( /^[0-9]*$/)
.withMessage(`\${$displayName} must be numeric only.`)
.on(this.stock);
}
So I'm trying to make a call to this specific method:
[HttpGet]
public int GetLogin(string u, string p)
{
UserLogin uL = new UserLogin();
return (int)uL.Authenticate(u, p);
}
However it keeps calling this method in my Controller instead:
public IEnumerable<string> Get()
{
return new string[] { "value1", "value2" };
}
^^ Which is the generated code in the Controller.
Here Angular code for my factory and, more importantly, my URI:
var loginFactory = angular.module('loginService', ['ngResource'])
loginFactory.factory('UserLogin', function ($resource) {
return $resource('api/login?:username?:password', {}, {
query: {
method: 'GET',
params: { username: 'hunter', password: 'hunter' },
isArray:true
}
});
});
Any insight would be much appreciated. Thanks.
Change your resource to this:
$resource('api/GetLogin?u=:username&p=:password', {}, { // if that's the right route
query: {
method: 'GET',
params: { username: 'hunter', password: 'hunter' },
isArray:true
}
});
Is your request going like api/login?username=something&password=something...?
if yes, the parameter names on the action should match the query string parameter names:
public int GetLogin(string **username**, string **password**)