I have a JavaFX ComboBox, and I need to remove an item from it, but once an item is removed, it will trigger 3-4 unwanted change events. Can anybody help me to avoid those unwanted events?
My code is like this:
import javafx.beans.value.ChangeListener;
import javafx.beans.value.ObservableValue;
import javafx.scene.control.ComboBox;
public class ComboboxTest
{
private Boolean comboBoxRemovingMode = false;
public ComboBox<String> createCombo()
{
final ComboBox<String> myComboBox = new ComboBox<>();
myComboBox.getItems().addAll("prompt_txt", "A", "B", "C");
myComboBox.getSelectionModel().selectedIndexProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<Number>() {
#Override
public void changed(final ObservableValue<? extends Number> ov, final Number oldvalue, final Number newvalue)
{
if (comboBoxRemovingMode) {
return;
}
if ((newvalue == null) || (newvalue.intValue() < 0) || (myComboBox.getItems().get(newvalue.intValue()).equalsIgnoreCase("prompt_txt"))) {
return;
}
synchronized (comboBoxRemovingMode) {
comboBoxRemovingMode = myComboBox.getItems().remove("prompt_txt");
// .... some actions
myComboBox.getSelectionModel().select(newvalue.intValue() - 1);
comboBoxRemovingMode = false;
}
}
});
return myComboBox;
}
public static void main(final String args[])
{
final ComboboxTest t = new ComboboxTest();
final ComboBox<String> box = t.createCombo();
box.getSelectionModel().select(1); // select A
System.out.println(box.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem()); // it should be select "A", but it's B
}
}
From your code it looks like you have an item functioning as the prompt text of the ComboBox. When a new item is selected you want to remove the prompt text item while keeping the newly selected item selected1. To do this you only have to remove the prompt text item; there's no need to try and manually call select on the selection model—the new item is already selected by this point.
comboBox.getSelectionModel().selectedIndexProperty((obs, oldVal, newVal) -> {
int oldIndex = oldVal.intValue();
var items = comboBox.getItems();
if (oldIndex >= 0 && oldIndex < items.size() && items.get(oldIndex).equalsIgnoreCase("prompt_txt")) {
items.remove(oldIndex);
}
});
Here I use the old index assuming you have the "prompt_txt" item as the initially selected item.
This code will still result in two changes being fired since removing the "prompt_txt" item will change the indices of all the remaining items. This does not matter. The listener won't do anything for any subsequent notifications and the newly selected item remains the same. As the listener's only job appears to be to remove the "prompt_txt", however, it may be prudent to remove the listener after the first notification. One way of doing this is the following:
comboBox.getSelectionModel().selectedIndexProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<>() {
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends Number> obs, Number oldVal, Number newVal) {
int oldIndex = oldVal.intValue();
var items = comboBox.getItems();
if (oldIndex >= 0 && oldIndex < items.size() && items.get(oldIndex).equalsIgnoreCase("prompt_txt")) {
obs.removeListener(this); // Needed anonymous class to reference "this"
items.remove(oldIndex);
}
}
});
In this case, since I remove the listener before calling remove(oldIndex), the listener is only notified once.
However
All that said, there's no need to add a special item to represent the prompt text. The ComboBoxBase class, which ComboBox inherits from, has the promptText property. Here's the documentation:
The ComboBox prompt text to display, or null if no prompt text is displayed. Prompt text is not displayed in all circumstances, it is dependent upon the subclasses of ComboBoxBase to clarify when promptText will be shown. For example, in most cases prompt text will never be shown when a combo box is non-editable (that is, prompt text is only shown when user input is allowed via text input).
Some quick testing shows ComboBox displays the prompt text even when not editable (as long as no items are selected).
1. You have // some actions... between remove("prompt_text") and select(newvalue.intValue() - 1). What those actions are may completely invalidate my answer.
Related
I have a TableView which is updated from an ObservableList. It has two columns. When a file is loaded, the list is populated and the table updates, (initially just the first column is populated). After validation of the items in the list the second column is populated with a success or failure flag. Using the setRowFactory I update the background style of the row to either green for success or red for failure. Some items don't get validated and are styled with "". The table has about a dozen rows visible out of a couple of thousand rows total. The problem I have is that the visible rows don't get their background style updated until they're scrolled out of view and then back in again.
I've been able to overcome this by using the table's refresh() method, but that causes another problem. The first column is editable to allow the data to be corrected before re-validation. If the refresh() method is used then it breaks the ability to edit a cell. The textfield still appears, but is disabled, (no focus border and no ability to highlight or edit its content).
If I leave out the refresh() method editing works just fine. Include the refresh() and the table displays correctly without the need for scrolling, but editing is broken.
So I can either have editable cells or properly displayed rows, but not both. Apart from this problem the code works fine. I've read countless examples and TableView issues, and associated solutions, and nothing I've tried has fixed the problem. In my efforts I can see that the overriden updateItem method is only ever called when the row is redrawn after becoming visible again. My thinking is that I need another mechanism to style the rows on the validationResponse change but this is where I get stuck.
So my question is how to have the visible table rows get their style updated without scrolling while not breaking cell editing? Thanks!!
Edit:
Reproducible code example follows. Click the first button to populate the table with initial data. Click the second button to simulate validation. The second column will update with the validation response, but the styling doesn't take effect until the rows are scrolled out of view and then back in to view. At this point first column is editable. If you uncomment the tblGCode.refresh() line and re-run the test the styling is applied immediately without scrolling, but editing a cell in the first column no longer works.
Main class:
public class TableViewTest extends Application {
private final ObservableList<GCodeItem> gcodeItems = FXCollections.observableArrayList(
item -> new Observable[]{item.validatedProperty(), item.errorDescriptionProperty()});
private final TableView tblGCode = new TableView();
#Override
public void start(Stage stage) {
TableColumn<GCodeItem, String> colGCode = new TableColumn<>("GCode");
colGCode.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("gcode"));
TableColumn<GCodeItem, String> colStatus = new TableColumn<>("Status");
colStatus.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("validationResponse"));
// Set first column to be editable
tblGCode.setEditable(true);
colGCode.setEditable(true);
colGCode.setCellFactory(TextFieldTableCell.forTableColumn());
colGCode.setOnEditCommit((TableColumn.CellEditEvent<GCodeItem, String> t) -> {
((GCodeItem) t.getTableView().getItems().get(t.getTablePosition().getRow())).setGcode(t.getNewValue());
});
// Set row factory
tblGCode.setRowFactory(tbl -> new TableRow<GCodeItem>() {
private final Tooltip tip = new Tooltip();
{
tip.setShowDelay(new Duration(250));
}
#Override
protected void updateItem(GCodeItem item, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(item, empty);
if(item == null || empty) {
setStyle("");
setTooltip(null);
} else {
if(item.isValidated()) {
if(item.hasError()) {
setStyle("-fx-background-color: #ffcccc"); // red
tip.setText(item.getErrorDescription());
setTooltip(tip);
} else {
setStyle("-fx-background-color: #ccffdd"); // green
setTooltip(null);
}
} else {
setStyle("");
setTooltip(null);
}
}
//tblGCode.refresh(); // this works to give desired styling, but breaks editing
}
});
tblGCode.getColumns().setAll(colGCode, colStatus);
tblGCode.setColumnResizePolicy(TableView.CONSTRAINED_RESIZE_POLICY);
// buttons to simulate issue
Button btnPopulate = new Button("1. Populate Table");
btnPopulate.setOnAction(eh -> populateTable());
Button btnValidate = new Button("2. Validate Table");
btnValidate.setOnAction(eh -> simulateValidation());
var scene = new Scene(new VBox(tblGCode, btnPopulate, btnValidate), 640, 320);
stage.setScene(scene);
stage.show();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
launch();
}
private void populateTable() {
// simulates updating of ObservableList with first couple of dozen lines of a file
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("(1001)"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("(T4 D=0.25 CR=0 - ZMIN=-0.4824 - flat end mill)"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G90 G94"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G17"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G20"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G28 G91 Z0"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G90"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem(""));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("(Face1)"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("T4 M6"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("S5000 M3"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G54"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("M8"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G0 X1.3842 Y-1.1452"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("Z0.6"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("Z0.2"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G1 Z0.015 F20"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G18 G3 X1.3592 Z-0.01 I-0.025 K0"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G1 X1.2492"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("X-1.2492 F40"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("X-1.25"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G17 G2 X-1.25 Y-0.9178 I0 J0.1137"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G1 X1.25"));
gcodeItems.add(new GCodeItem("G3 X1.25 Y-0.6904 I0 J0.1137"));
// Add list to table
tblGCode.setItems(gcodeItems);
}
private void simulateValidation() {
// sets validationResponse on certain rows (not every row is validated)
gcodeItems.get(2).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(3).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(4).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(5).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(6).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(9).setValidationResponse("error:20");
gcodeItems.get(10).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(11).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(12).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(13).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(14).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(15).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(16).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(17).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(18).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(19).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(20).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(21).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(22).setValidationResponse("ok");
gcodeItems.get(23).setValidationResponse("ok");
}
}
GCodeItem model:
public class GCodeItem {
private final SimpleStringProperty gcode;
private final SimpleStringProperty validationResponse;
private ReadOnlyBooleanWrapper validated;
private ReadOnlyBooleanWrapper hasError;
private ReadOnlyIntegerWrapper errorNumber;
private ReadOnlyStringWrapper errorDescription;
public GCodeItem(String gcode) {
this.gcode = new SimpleStringProperty(gcode);
this.validationResponse = new SimpleStringProperty("");
this.validated = new ReadOnlyBooleanWrapper();
this.hasError = new ReadOnlyBooleanWrapper();
this.errorNumber = new ReadOnlyIntegerWrapper();
this.errorDescription = new ReadOnlyStringWrapper();
validated.bind(Bindings.createBooleanBinding(
() -> ! "".equals(getValidationResponse()),
validationResponse
));
hasError.bind(Bindings.createBooleanBinding(
() -> ! ("ok".equals(getValidationResponse()) ||
"".equals(getValidationResponse())),
validationResponse
));
errorNumber.bind(Bindings.createIntegerBinding(
() -> {
String vResp = getValidationResponse();
if ("ok".equals(vResp)) {
return 0;
} else {
// should handle potential exceptions here...
if(vResp.contains(":")) {
int en = Integer.parseInt(vResp.split(":")[1]);
return en ;
} else {
return 0;
}
}
}, validationResponse
));
errorDescription.bind(Bindings.createStringBinding(
() -> {
int en = getErrorNumber() ;
return GrblDictionary.getErrorDescription(en);
}, errorNumber
));
}
public final String getGcode() {
return gcode.get();
}
public final void setGcode(String value) {
gcode.set(value);
}
public SimpleStringProperty gcodeProperty() {
return this.gcode;
}
public final String getValidationResponse() {
return validationResponse.get();
}
public final void setValidationResponse(String value) {
validationResponse.set(value);
}
public SimpleStringProperty validationResponseProperty() {
return this.validationResponse;
}
public Boolean isValidated() {
return validatedProperty().get();
}
public ReadOnlyBooleanProperty validatedProperty() {
return validated.getReadOnlyProperty();
}
// ugly method name to conform to method naming pattern:
public final boolean isHasError() {
return hasErrorProperty().get();
}
// better method name:
public final boolean hasError() {
return isHasError();
}
public ReadOnlyBooleanProperty hasErrorProperty() {
return hasError.getReadOnlyProperty();
}
public final int getErrorNumber() {
return errorNumberProperty().get();
}
public ReadOnlyIntegerProperty errorNumberProperty() {
return errorNumber.getReadOnlyProperty() ;
}
public final String getErrorDescription() {
return errorDescriptionProperty().get();
}
public ReadOnlyStringProperty errorDescriptionProperty() {
return errorDescription.getReadOnlyProperty();
}
}
Supporting dictionary class (abridged):
public class GrblDictionary {
private static final Map<Integer, String> ERRORS = Map.ofEntries(
entry(1, "G-code words consist of a letter and a value. Letter was not found."),
entry(2, "Numeric value format is not valid or missing an expected value."),
entry(17, "Laser mode requires PWM outentry."),
entry(20, "Unsupported or invalid g-code command found in block."),
entry(21, "More than one g-code command from same modal group found in block."),
entry(22, "Feed rate has not yet been set or is undefined.")
);
public static String getErrorDescription(int errorNumber) {
return ERRORS.containsKey(errorNumber) ? ERRORS.get(errorNumber) : "Unrecognized error number.";
}
}
Edit #2:
If I replace the TableView.setRowFactory code with TableColumn.setCellFactory as shown below I get the desired effect and editing still works. Is this a sensible solution, or should I really be using setRowFactory and getting the list changes recognised correctly by setRowFactory? In my testing it only ever seemed like the overriden updateItem method was being called when rows scrolled in to view.
colStatus.setCellFactory(tc -> new TableCell<GCodeItem, String>() {
private final Tooltip tip = new Tooltip();
{
tip.setShowDelay(new Duration(250));
}
#Override
protected void updateItem(String item, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(item, empty);
TableRow<GCodeItem> row = this.getTableRow();
GCodeItem rowItem = row.getItem();
if(item == null || empty) {
row.setStyle("");
row.setTooltip(null);
} else {
if(rowItem.isValidated()) {
if(rowItem.hasError()) {
row.setStyle("-fx-background-color: #ffcccc"); // red
tip.setText(rowItem.getErrorDescription());
row.setTooltip(tip);
} else {
row.setStyle("-fx-background-color: #ccffdd"); // green
row.setTooltip(null);
}
} else {
row.setStyle("");
row.setTooltip(null);
}
setText(item);
}
}
});
Edit #3:
Many thanks to kleopatra and James_D I now have a solution. Overriding isItemChanged() in the row factory has solved my issue.
The place to install conditional row styling is a custom TableRow - nowhere else. As always, contained nodes - like tableCells here - must not interfere with their parent's state, never-ever!.
The base problem with such styling in a tableRow is that row.updateItem(...) is not called when we might expect it, in particular, not after an update of a property. There are two options to solve (apart from making sure that the table is notified at all on updates of properties not shown in columns by using an extractor as already suggested by James)
A quick option is to unconditionally force an update always, by overriding isItemChanged:
#Override
protected boolean isItemChanged(GCodeItem oldItem,
GCodeItem newItem) {
return true;
}
Another option is to update the styling in both updateItem(...) and updateIndex(...) (the latter is called always when anything chances in the data)
#Override
protected void updateIndex(int i) {
super.updateIndex(i);
doUpdateItem(getItem());
}
#Override
protected void updateItem(CustomItem item, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(item, empty);
doUpdateItem(item);
}
protected void doUpdateItem(CustomItem item) {
// actually do the update and styling
}
Choosing between both depends on context and requirements. Have seen contexts where the one or other didn't work properly, without a clean indication when/why that happened (too lazy to really dig ;)
Aside - a couple of comments to the question which did improve considerably over time but still is not quite a [MCVE]:
the data item is both too complex (for basic styling, there's no need for several direct/indirect intertwined conditions) and not complete enough to really demonstrate the requirements (like update after editing the value that drives the error condition)
the data item exposes properties (good thing!) - so use those (vs. PropertyValueFactory, bad thing!)
with a writable property a custom edit commit handler is not needed
TableColumn is editable by default, making col.setEditable(true) a no-op. If only some columns should editable, the others must be set to false
The basic issue is that the table is not forcing updates on the table row when the relevant properties change. Using the "extractor" as you do with
private final ObservableList<GCodeItem> gcodeItems = FXCollections.observableArrayList(
item -> new Observable[]{item.validatedProperty(), item.errorDescriptionProperty()});
should work, but it seems the table does not force row updates when the underlying data list fires updated type changes. (I'd consider this a bug; it's possible the JavaFX team simply doesn't consider this a supported feature.)
One approach here is to have the TableRow register a listener with the current item's validationResponseProperty() (or any other desired property), and update the row when it changes. A little care is needed here, because the current item that the row displays can change (e.g. when scrolling or when the data in the list change), so you need to observe the itemProperty() and ensure the listener is registered with the property in the correct item. This looks like:
// Set row factory
tblGCode.setRowFactory(tbl -> new TableRow<GCodeItem>() {
private final Tooltip tip = new Tooltip();
private final ChangeListener<String> listener = (obs, oldValidationResponse, newValidationResponse) ->
updateStyleAndTooltip();
{
tip.setShowDelay(new Duration(250));
itemProperty().addListener((obs, oldItem, newItem) -> {
if (oldItem != null) {
oldItem.validationResponseProperty().removeListener(listener);
}
if (newItem != null) {
newItem.validationResponseProperty().addListener(listener);
}
updateStyleAndTooltip();
});
}
#Override
protected void updateItem(GCodeItem item, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(item, empty);
updateStyleAndTooltip();
}
private void updateStyleAndTooltip() {
GCodeItem item = getItem();
if(item == null || isEmpty()) {
setStyle("");
setTooltip(null);
} else {
if(item.isValidated()) {
if(item.hasError()) {
setStyle("-fx-background-color: #ffcccc"); // red
tip.setText(item.getErrorDescription());
setTooltip(tip);
} else {
setStyle("-fx-background-color: #ccffdd"); // green
setTooltip(null);
}
} else {
setStyle("");
setTooltip(null);
}
}
}
});
Note now you no longer need the list created with the extractor:
private final ObservableList<GCodeItem> gcodeItems = FXCollections.observableArrayList();
and indeed this would work without the dependent properties being implemented as JavaFX (bound) properties (as long as they are kept consistent with the other data); though I still consider the version you currently have to be the better implementation.
BTW, as a brief aside, your style will work better if you use -fx-background instead of -fx-background-color. By default, the background color (-fx-background-color) of a row is set equal to -fx-background. However, the color of the text is made dependent on -fx-background: if -fx-background is light, then a dark text is used, and vice-versa. By default, selecting a row changes -fx-background, which results in a change in text color, so in your implementation you'll notice the text is hard to read in a selected (validated or error) row. In short, modifying -fx-background will play better with selection than modifying -fx-background-color.
I have following problem in javafx tableview, my table view is connected to certain model, and normal CRUD operations work with no issues, I also added a column which is not connected to ANY data model, and it just contains a hyperlink on which user can click, and he is prompted with a pop up.
All of this work, what it does not work is, when I click on hyperlink I want to also pass the row value, and normally it works like
tableview.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem();
But now it does not work, since i am not clicking directly a cell, but I click a hyperlink, and if I click first some row and then hyperlink, I get that row that I highlighted. Is there any way to select row when clicking hyperlink,so I don't have to first click row then hyperlink in same row.
public class RemoveCell<T> extends TableCell<T, Void> {
private final Hyperlink link;
private final Hyperlink link1;
private final HBox pane = new HBox();
public RemoveCell() {
link = new Hyperlink("Remove");
link1 = new Hyperlink("Edit");
pane.getChildren().addAll(link,link1);
link1.setOnAction(evt -> {
//lagerRet();
if(tableView.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem()!=null) {
System.out.println("not null");
}
else {
System.out.println("null");
}
// remove row item from tableview
// ap.getChildren().removeAll();
//ap.getChildren().setAll(mcon.loadParent(FxmlView.CHART));
PopOver popsy = new PopOver();
try {
popsy.setContentNode(control.loadUni(FxmlView.POP));
} catch (IOException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
//popsy.setContentNode(panemain);
popsy.headerAlwaysVisibleProperty().set(true);;
popsy.show(link);
});
link.setOnAction(evt -> {
// remove row item from tableview
System.out.println("a quick test");
});
}
#Override
protected void updateItem(Void item, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(item, empty);
setGraphic(empty ? null : pane );
//setGraphic(empty ? null : link1 );
}
}
and lastly this how I populate column
testColumn.setCellFactory(tc -> new RemoveCell<>());
It's possible to access the row item via TableRow containing the TableCell.
T item = getTableRow().getItem();
It's also possible to get the index in TableView.items using TableCell.getIndex which allows for removal without searching for the item in the list first.
int itemIndex = getIndex();
getTableView().getItems().remove(itemIndex);
I am writing a JavaFX app where a series of messages appear in a TableView. When a new message appears, its row in the table should be highlighted, meaning its background color should be orange or something. Once the user clicks it, the background color should clear, acknowledging the message was read. Should be simple.
I've done enough research to realize that I need to use a rowFactory to set or clear a row's background. But I'm struggling with the mechanics of setRowFactory(). The documentation on Oracle is over my head, and every example I pull up online seems radically different than the last one.
Here's what I have:
public class Message {
private boolean readOnce;
private int date;
private String msg;
public Message(int date, String msg, String msg2){
this.readOnce = false;
this.date = date;
this.msg = msg;
}
public boolean isReadOnce() {
return readOnce;
}
public void setReadOnce(){
readOnce = true;
}
// ...and more standard getters & setters here...
}
The TableView is set up in the main controller:
#FXML TableView<Message> messageTable;
#FXML TableColumn<Message, Integer> Col1;
#FXML TableColumn<Message, String> Col2;
ObservableList<Message> tableItems;
// ...
// Setting up the Table:
PropertyValueFactory<Message, Integer> dateProperty = new PropertyValueFactory<Message, Integer>("date");
PropertyValueFactory<Message, String> msgProperty = new PropertyValueFactory<Message, String>("msg");
Col1.setCellValueFactory( dateProperty );
Col2.setCellValueFactory( msgProperty );
messageTable.setItems( tableItems );
// If we click an item in the table: messageTable.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty().addListener((obs, oldSelection, newSelection) -> {
if (newSelection != null) {
System.out.println("Troubleshoot: You clicked: "+newSelection.getMsg());
newSelection.setReadOnce(true);
}
});
And if I want to add a new message to the table, I just add it into the observable list:
public void addMsg(int num, String msg){
tableItems.add(new Message(num, msg));
}
So far, pretty easy. But I'm all thumbs when it comes to the rowFactory:
messageTable.setRowFactory(messageTable -> {
TableRow<Message> row = new TableRow<>();
ObjectProperty<Message> opMsg = row.itemProperty();
Message tmpMsg = opMsg.get();
if(!tmpMsg.isReadOnce()){
row.getStyleClass().add("highlight-message"); // defined in CSS
} else {
row.getStyleClass().add("clear-message"); // defined in CSS
}
return row;
});
To be very honest, I have no idea what I'm doing here. I understand that the rowFactory takes in the entire table and regenerates each row one-by-one. What I don't understand is how does the RowFactory code examine each Message in the table and how can I access them? Originally I thought these line might allow me to see the Message within the row:
TableRow<Message> row = new TableRow<>();
ObjectProperty<Message> opMsg = row.itemProperty();
Message tmpMsg = opMsg.get();
But when I debug the code, tmpMsg == NULL. So that's a big fat dead end.
Anyone see what I'm doing wrong? I've been researching this for about a week, getting absolutely no-where. Any help anyone can offer is wildly appreciated.
Many thanks,
-RAO
TableRows are created by TableView to fill it's viewport and contain TableCells. At the time they are created the item property still contains the default value null. You could register a listener to that property but usually I prefer overriding the updateItem method of a cell.
Also using PseudoClass is simpler than using style classes. New items can be assigned to a row; this could result in the same style class being added multiple times and even both style classes could be added to the same cell. PseudoClasses however can be switched on/of without the need to take care of removing other classes.
final PseudoClass highlightMessage = PseudoClass.getPseudoClass("highlight-message");
messageTable.setRowFactory(messageTable -> new TableRow<Message>() {
{
selectedProperty().addListener((o, oldVal, newVal) -> {
if (newVal) {
Message item = getItem();
if (item != null) {
item.setReadOnce();
pseudoClassStateChanged(highlightMessage, false);
}
}
});
}
#Override
protected void updateItem(Message item, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(item, empty);
pseudoClassStateChanged(highlightMessage, item != null && !item.isReadOnce());
}
});
In a CSS stylesheet you could use rules like this:
.table-row-cell:filled {
/* style for non-highlighted rows */
}
.table-row-cell:filled:highlight-message {
/* style for highlighted rows */
}
Note that this does not allow you to programmatically alter the read state. It updates the state on selecting a cell. You could add a BooleanProperty to Message or use a ObservableSet to store the highlighted messages and update the state of cells from a listener if you need to programmatically update the readOnce property. In the latter case you do not need to store a readOnce property in the Message itself...
I've created a simple TableView that is fed with data from a database, and what I want is just to be able to easily change the value of a numeric column of that table with JavaFx.
But... since I have some mental issue or something, I can't make it work.
Below it's the "SpinnerCell" component, and the issue I've been having is that even after the commitEdit is fired, when I get the items from the TableView, no values were altered. What am I missing from this update lifecycle?
import javafx.scene.control.Spinner;
import javafx.scene.control.TableCell;
public class SpinnerTableCell<S, T extends Number> extends TableCell<S, T> {
private final Spinner<T> spinner;
public SpinnerTableCell() {
this(1);
}
public SpinnerTableCell(int step) {
this.spinner = new Spinner<>(0, 100, step);
this.spinner.valueProperty().addListener((observable, oldValue, newValue) -> commitEdit(newValue));
}
#Override
protected void updateItem(T c, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(c, empty);
if (empty || c == null) {
setText(null);
setGraphic(null);
return;
}
this.spinner.getValueFactory().setValue(c);
setGraphic(spinner);
}
}
Because your table cell is always showing the editing control (the Spinner), you bypass the usual table cell mechanism for beginning an edit. For example, in the TextFieldTableCell, if the cell is not in an editing state, then a label is shown. When the user double-clicks the cell, it enters an editing state: the cell's editingProperty() is set to true, and the enclosing TableView's editingCellProperty() is set to the position of the current cell, etc.
In your case, since this never happens, isEditing() is always false for the cell, and as a consequence, commitEdit() becomes a no-op.
Note that the CheckBoxTableCell is implemented similarly: its documentation highlights this fact. (The check box table cell implements its own direct update of properties via the selectedStateCallback.)
So there are two options here: one would be to enter an editing state when the spinner gains focus. You can do this by adding the following to the cell's constructor:
this.spinner.focusedProperty().addListener((obs, wasFocused, isNowFocused) -> {
if (isNowFocused) {
getTableView().edit(getIndex(), getTableColumn());
}
});
Another option would be to provide a callback for "direct updates". So you could do something like:
public SpinnerTableCell(BiConsumer<S,T> update, int step) {
this.spinner = new Spinner<>(0, 100, step);
this.spinner.valueProperty().addListener((observable, oldValue, newValue) ->
update.accept(getTableView().getItems().get(getIndex()), newValue));
}
and then given a model class for the table, say
public class Item {
private int value ;
public int getValue() { return value ;}
public void setValue(int value) { this.value = value ;}
// ...
}
You could do
TableView<Item> table = ... ;
TableColumn<Item, Integer> valueCol = new TableColumn<>("Value");
valueCol.setCellValueFactory(cellData -> new SimpleIntegerProperty(cellData.getValue().getValue()).asObject());
valueCol.setCellFactory(tc -> new SpinnerTableCell<>(Item::setValue, 1));
A JavaFX MenuItem can respond to most KeyPress events by setting an ActionEvent EventHandler. However, while the event handler does catch a KeyPress of KeyCode.ENTER, it does not catch a KeyCode.TAB KeyPress event. Apparently, some key events like TAB are handled at a deeper level. For example, the arrow keys enable traversal of the menu.
My ContextMenu is a list of completions of an email address string the user has started typing in a TextField. The users want to press the arrow keys to select the desired item, and the TAB key to execute the completion.
I can attach an event handler to the ContextMenu itself and catch the TAB keypress. But the event's Source is then the ContextMenu, and I can find no variables in the ContextMenu indicating which MenuItem was highlighted when the TAB key was pressed. MenuItem allows css style to control appearance of the menu item in focus, but it does not have any properties telling whether it is in focus or not.
I have tried futzing with the EventDispatchChain via MenuItem buildEventDispatchChain() to no avail. There seems to be no way to intercept the TAB KeyPress or otherwise determine which menu item was in focus when the TAB key was pressed.
Any suggestions?
If I get this right, you want to override the default keypressed listener to add your own response, so for that we have to find where it's applied.
To get this working, we've got to get our hands dirty with private API...
ContextMenu skin (ContextMenuSkin) uses a ContextMenuContent object, as a container with all the items. Each of these items are also in a ContextMenuContent.MenuItemContainer container.
We can override the keypressed listener on the parent container, while we can add a focusedProperty listener to the items on the items container.
Using this private API
import com.sun.javafx.scene.control.skin.ContextMenuContent;
this is working for me:
private ContextMenuContent.MenuItemContainer itemSelected=null;
#Override
public void start(Stage primaryStage) {
MenuItem cmItem1 = new MenuItem("Item 1");
cmItem1.setOnAction(e->System.out.println("Item 1"));
MenuItem cmItem2 = new MenuItem("Item 2");
cmItem2.setOnAction(e->System.out.println("Item 2"));
final ContextMenu cm = new ContextMenu(cmItem1,cmItem2);
Scene scene = new Scene(new StackPane(), 300, 250);
scene.setOnMouseClicked(t -> {
if(t.getButton()==MouseButton.SECONDARY || t.isControlDown()){
cm.show(scene.getWindow(),t.getScreenX(),t.getScreenY());
ContextMenuContent cmc= (ContextMenuContent)cm.getSkin().getNode();
cmc.setOnKeyPressed(ke->{
switch (ke.getCode()) {
case UP: break;
case DOWN: break;
case TAB: ke.consume();
if(itemSelected!=null){
itemSelected.getItem().fire();
}
cm.hide();
break;
default: break;
}
});
VBox itemsContainer = cmc.getItemsContainer();
itemsContainer.getChildren().forEach(n->{
ContextMenuContent.MenuItemContainer item=(ContextMenuContent.MenuItemContainer)n;
item.focusedProperty().addListener((obs,b,b1)->{
if(b1){
itemSelected=item;
}
});
});
}
});
primaryStage.setScene(scene);
primaryStage.show();
}
Excellent! Thank you #jose! I ended up writing somewhat different code but
the key is using com.sun.javafx.scene.control.skin.ContextMenuContent, which provides
access to the ContextMenuContent.MenuItemContainer objects that hold the MenuItems.
In order to not break the existing UP/DOWN key behavior, I added a new handler
to the ContextMenuContent object; this handler only consumes the TAB KeyPress and
everthing else passes through to their normal handlers.
Looking at the ContextMenuContent class, I borrowed their existing method for
finding the focused item, so didn't have to add focusedProperty listeners.
Also, I'm on Java 1.7 and don't have lambdas and I use a very basic programming style.
public class MenuItemHandler_CMC <T extends Event> implements EventHandler {
public ContextMenuContent m_cmc;
public AddressCompletionMenuItemHandler_CMC(ContextMenuContent cmc){
m_cmc = cmc;
}
#Override
public void handle(Event event){
KeyEvent ke = (KeyEvent)event;
switch(ke.getCode()){
case TAB:
ke.consume();
MenuItem focused_menu_item = findFocusedMenuItem();
if(focused_menu_item != null){
focused_menu_item.fire();
}
break;
default: break;
}
}
public MenuItem findFocusedMenuItem() {
VBox items_container = m_cmc.getItemsContainer();
for (int i = 0; i < items_container.getChildren().size(); i++) {
Node n = items_container.getChildren().get(i);
if (n.isFocused()) {
ContextMenuContent.MenuItemContainer menu_item_container = (ContextMenuContent.MenuItemContainer)n;
MenuItem menu_item = menu_item_container.getItem();
return menu_item;
}
}
return null;
}
}
...Attach the additional handler
if(m_context_menu.getSkin() != null){
ContextMenuContent cmc = (ContextMenuContent)m_context_menu.getSkin().getNode();
MenuItemHandler_CMC menu_item_handler_cmc = new MenuItemHandler_CMC(cmc);
cmc.addEventHandler(KeyEvent.KEY_PRESSED, menu_item_handler_cmc);
}