procureure.com/types-de-droits
Here's how it looks via customize.php
Link
I was not doing any major changes. Cleared cache and changed stuff in customize.php but thats it.
I've been working for 2 straight days to get a decent gtmetrix score and overall design. Help would be greatly appreciated.
Just a quick note: GTmetrix score/ Pingdom or google page speed test
are just recommended approach and the speed they show does not
necessarily mean real world differences. Those scores do not cover the
complexity of code of the server side (which also delays the page load
time). So there are scenarios where you have to ignore few of the
recommendations to make sure everything works fine.
Although in your case i can see that there are no css on you page applied externally nor internally. Kindly tweak the css rendering settings to see if it works. The theme is working fine on customize.php because the changes do not affect the back end of the website it's only the front end which gets affected. So CSS are rendering on back end but not of the frontend. It maybe of theme issue if css are not enqueued properly. there can be serveral reasons. Switch to one of the default themes and see if the plugin is working properly. This will help you find out where exactly the problem exists.
Related
I am running a light wordpress installation, with a light theme (neve). I am running a CDN (cloudflare), I am making most optimizations that I can think of with some room around images and custom code stripping.
However I am not even close for my pages and even if I test AMP pages which are stripped down I don't get a passing score which concerns me. Can anyone help me out, for example 1 of my blog post pages:
Amp report:
https://pagespeed.web.dev/report?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.culturalistpress.com%2Fanycubic-photon-mono-3d-printer-is-it-good-what-materials-can-it-use-what-software-does-it-use-and-how-does-it-compare-to-the-anycubic-mega-series%2F%3Famp%3D1
Not amp report:
https://pagespeed.web.dev/report?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.culturalistpress.com%2Fanycubic-photon-mono-3d-printer-is-it-good-what-materials-can-it-use-what-software-does-it-use-and-how-does-it-compare-to-the-anycubic-mega-series%2F
In both cases my main thread processing is too much and too much JS - short of that I don't see a lot of savings. Most the JS comes from ads which I don't understand why they are blocking in this case.
I have checked your both reports, the man issue is with Javascript. As your website has developed in WordPress use some 3rd party plugin like WProcket and perfmatters to reduce unused Javascript. Your page DOM size, it is created when you have too many sections in your page. Try to reduce those sections to reduce the page size, minimize the gap between paragraphs.
Adjust the images size and try to use WEBP format of images. Also check the compatibility of third party plugins with you WordPress version which you have installed.
my site seems to be downloading very slowly. I recently changed the CSS and HTML to improve the layout, but I think I might have messed it up somehow.
Can anyone give me feedback on things I could do to speed it up?
Thanks.
www.aerlawgroup.com
There are many online Web Optimization sites that you can use.
I've attached some optimized results for your page.
From http://www.webpagetest.org/
See The Result
and you can use Google Page Speed Link
Simply, I would suggest one thing based on your page design and the code is..., use CSS Simplify Tool and the HTML Symplify Tool. It reduces the Page Loading time dramatically. and as well as some Image Compression Tool too.
One thing that really reduces the page speed is Flash contents or Images. so be focus on that primarily
http://csslint.net/ for linting
http://csscomb.com/ for ordering attributes
http://prefixr.com/ for adding browser prefixes
There are many many factors that come in play with a slow page besides CSS/HTML. The size of the images, whether they are optimized, how fast the server delivers, caching, etc...
I would recommend using Google PageSpeed Insights or similar service - they show you a lot of info.
Go to https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
Edit: Your URL loads this JS file which has an anonymous function that runs again and again:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/scripts.hellobar.com/bfa7653204b92054d559e0d8dd1ba2dd6fbdc183.js
You can view for yourself by using a web inspector - I am in Safari 7 and under Timelines on the Inspector panel - select "Layout & Rendering" from leftside menu and reload page. You can see that the HelloBar is doing some kind of adjusting over and over.
Currently, I'm investigating several tips/recommendations for improving the performance of web sites. So, I've started with Steve Souders' excellent books (High performance web sites and even faster web sites), but I've got a couple of questions regarding some of the rules that are presented. FOr instance, chapter 5 of High performance web sites say that CSS stylesheets should be put at the top of the page because putting them at the bottom stops the progressive rendering that is performed by the browsers. According to Steve, some browsers (most notably IE) do get stuck with it and show a blank page instead of showing the items progressively. Here's the url for that test page:
http://stevesouders.com/hpws/css-bottom.php
Now, I do understand that we're talking about a book with a couple of years and that browsers (including IE) have been updated and improved. The reason I'm asking this is because I can't reproduce the behavior he mentions with any current version of FF, Chrome or IE.
Well, the thing is that Yahoo (http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#css_top) and google (https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/best-practices/rendering#PutCSSInHead) still say that.
So, what I'd like to know is if browsers have evolved in this area and this is only problematic for, say IE 8? If that is the case, why haven't yahoo and google updated their recommendations? (btw, I've tried simulating IE7 from within IE11 and still don't see the expected result that is described in the book...)
*UDPATE*One more final note: I've decided to reproduce Steve's cgi script in asp.net and I've created a simple generic handler that does the same thing as the sleep.cgi script. what I'm seeing here is that putting a stylesheet reference (which takes some time to load - I've went with 10 seconds) inside the head ends up producing the blank page problem that is reported in the book. If you put at the end, the browser ends up rendering everything and making a second pass for applying the styles after they have been loaded. In my opinion, this makes sense because when you put the style in the header element, the browser is holding up until it gets the styles before rendering (notice that the other referenced components are still being downloaded on the background, but they're not being shown in the screen). On the other hand, when they're at the bottom, the browser will simply apply the current styles until it gets stuck in the stylesheet. WHen that happens, it will only show the html it has loaded until the stylesheet (if there are any images below it, the browser will still download them but it will only render them after the styles have been loaded).
So, after these tests, I'm starting to think that 1.) I'm missing something here or 2.) yahoo and google recommendations are no longer valid today.
Thoughts?
Thanks guys!
Simply inserting a <link> tag in the footer is not the way to defer stylesheets. The currently accepted method is to attach it using javascript:
<script>
function loadStyleSheet(e){if(document.createStyleSheet)try{document.createStyleSheet(e)}catch(t){}else{var l;l=document.createElement("link"),l.rel="stylesheet",l.type="text/css",l.media="all",l.href=e,document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0].appendChild(l)}}loadStyleSheet("/your/stylesheet.css");
</script>
Optimizing your page for speed involves determining what CSS is above the fold, inlining that part in the header, and loading the main stylesheet later using the above method.
I recommend doing some searches for "above the fold css" and check out Google Pagespeed Insights.
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
We have a WordPress website which loads sufficiently in every browser I've tried, except for IE. For some reason in IE, it seems to freeze the browser for a few seconds every single time the page is loaded, doubly so if it has to load a page with an iframe of another page. The user has to wait awhile before they can interact with anything on the page.
Here's the site.
Someone suggested we could use WP Supercache to solve the issue, but I've had problems with this plugin in the past and am reluctant to rely on it, especially since this seems to be only a problem in IE.
What is the best way I can troubleshoot this issue? How do I find out which scripts in the header, or footer, etc. is causing it? Is there a quick way to do so, or do I just need to start eliminating variables within the theme?
I'd don't quite understand why but in IE9 style.css is being pushed right down the page load order - see request #35 http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130327_Y9_f1d5796658d8475b68e2e537644173f1/1/details/
As a browser won't render until it's downloaded the applicable CSS this blocks rendering.
Chrome on the other hand prioritises downloads so that resources that can block rendering are downloaded ahead of images.
Here's a side-by-side video of the two loading experiences.
(If you want help looking at this further my contact details are in my profile)
Thanks to this thread I just found, the answer appears to be fancybox: Fancybox causing slow load times in IE?
Specifically, the IE-specific filters in the CSS file for fancybox. I removed those filter styles, and it loads fine now.
Sorry, I don't seem to be able to give just a comment. Anyway, in Opera 12.14 it works fine. And in Explorer (8) it works just as well, no errors in the console. Just my .1 cent.
I have a program that works fine on my development machine and on QA but it does not work properly on Stage.
The issue seems to be that Stage is a much slower box and it takes a long time for the web page to come up. When it does come up most of the various sections of the page look fine, but there is one section of code that comes up "raw"...but this I mean that the stylesheet has not been applied to it.
Is there a way to "force" this stylesheet to be applied to the page first?
Thanks