I have a dataset with more than 300 variables in the following manner:
create example data:
id <- c('a','b','c', 'd', 'e', 'f')
type <- c(1,2,3,1,2,3)
x_97 <- c(1,2,3,4,5,6)
y_97 <- c('q','w','r','t', 'y', 'i')
z_97 <- c(80,90,70,50,60,40)
x_98 <- c(7,8,9,4,5,6)
y_98 <- c('y', 'i', 'r','t','q','w')
x_99 <- c(4,5,5,6,1,2)
z_99 <- c(20,10,40,50,20,50)
w_99 <- c(8,9,7,4,5,NA)
my.data <- data.frame(id, type, x_97, y_97, z_97, x_98, y_98, x_99, z_99)
Please note: _97, _98, _99 are years 1997, 1998 and 1999.
expected outcome:
I want to split this big data frame into 3 smaller data frames by year on the basis of id and type.
initial thoughts:
I am creating a list:
my.list <- c("_97", "_98", "_99")
And now I want to write something like this:
newdata97 <- subset(my.data, all variables with the 1st object of my.list)
newdata98 <- subset(my.data, all variables with the 2nd object of my.list)
and so on.
question
I am not sure how to achieve the newdata frames as above. Can anyone please help?
Moreover, I think there must be a more elegant solution to this with something from apply family. Any idea?
Thank you very much for your help.
We can use loop through the 'my.list', use grep to extract the column names that match the substring in 'my.list', cbind with the first two column to create a list of data.frames
lst1 <- lapply(my.list, function(x) cbind(my.data[1:2],
my.data[grep(x, names(my.data))]))
If there is one of the columns among 'x', 'y', 'z' are missing, then can assign it to NA
lst1 <- lapply(lst1, function(x) {nm1 <- setdiff(paste0(c('x', 'y',
'z'), substring(names(x)[3], 2)), names(x)[-(1:2)]); x[nm1] <- NA; x})
Or instead of creating columns later, create NA columns in the 'my.data'
my.data[setdiff(paste0(rep(c("x_", "y_", "z_"), each = 3),
97:99), names(my.data)[-(1:2)])] <- NA
and then use grep as above into creating a list of data.frames
Or another option is split based on the substring of the column names
lst1 <- lapply(split.default(my.data[-(1:2)],
sub(".*_", "", names(my.data)[-(1:2)])), function(x) cbind(my.data[1:2], x))
It is better to keep it as a list, but if we need individual data.frames in the global env, then name the list elements and use list2env (not recommended though)
names(lst1) <- paste0("newdata", substring(my.list, 2))
list2env(lst1, envir = .GlobalEnv)
Related
I have a list with dataframes:
df1 <- data.frame(id = seq(1:10), name = LETTERS[1:10])
df2 <- data.frame(id = seq(11:20), name = LETTERS[11:20])
mylist <- list(df1, df2)
I want to remove rows from each dataframe in the list based on a condition (in this case, the value stored in column id). I create an empty vector where I will store the ids:
ids_to_remove <- c()
Then I apply my function:
sapply(mylist, function(df) {
rows_above_th <- df[(df$id > 8),] # select the rows from each df above a threshold
a <- rows_above_th$id # obtain the ids of the rows above the threshold
ids_to_remove <- append(ids_to_remove, a) # append each id to the vector
},
simplify = T
)
However, with or without simplify = T, this returns a matrix, while my desired output (ids_to_remove) would be a vector containing the ids, like this:
ids_to_remove <- c(9,10,9,10)
Because lastly I would use it in this way on single dataframes:
for(i in 1:length(ids_to_remove)){
mylist[[1]] <- mylist[[1]] %>%
filter(!id == ids_to_remove[i])
}
And like this on the whole list (which is not working and I don´t get why):
i = 1
lapply(mylist,
function(df) {
for(i in 1:length(ids_to_remove)){
df <- df %>%
filter(!id == ids_to_remove[i])
i = i + 1
}
} )
I get the errors may be in the append part of the sapply and maybe in the indexing of the lapply. I played around a bit but couldn´t still find the errors (or a better way to do this).
EDIT: original data has 70 dataframes (in a list) for a total of 2 million rows
If you are using sapply/lapply you want to avoid trying to change the values of global variables. Instead, you should return the values you want. For example generate a vector if IDs to remove for each item in the list as a list
ids_to_remove <- lapply(mylist, function(df) {
rows_above_th <- df[(df$id > 8),] # select the rows from each df above a threshold
rows_above_th$id # obtain the ids of the rows above the threshold
})
And then you can use that list with your data list and mapply to iterate the two lists together
mapply(function(data, ids) {
data %>% dplyr::filter(!id %in% ids)
}, mylist, ids_to_remove, SIMPLIFY=FALSE)
Using base R
Map(\(x, y) subset(x, !id %in% y), mylist, ids_to_remove)
I'm trying to add different suffixes to my data frames so that I can distinguish them after I've merge them. I have my data frames in a list and created a vector for the suffixes but so far I have not been successful.
data2016 is the list containing my 7 data frames
new_names <- c("june2016", "july2016", "aug2016", "sep2016", "oct2016", "nov2016", "dec2016")
data2016v2 <- lapply(data2016, paste(colnames(data2016)), new_names)
Your query is not quite clear. Therefore two solutions.
The beginning is the same for either solution. Suppose you have these four dataframes:
df1x <- data.frame(v1 = rnorm(50),
v2 = runif(50))
df2x <- data.frame(v3 = rnorm(60),
v4 = runif(60))
df3x <- data.frame(v1 = rnorm(50),
v2 = runif(50))
df4x <- data.frame(v3 = rnorm(60),
v4 = runif(60))
Suppose further you assemble them in a list, something akin to your data2016using mgetand ls and describing a pattern to match them:
my_list <- mget(ls(pattern = "^df\\d+x$"))
The names of the dataframes in this list are the following:
names(my_list)
[1] "df1x" "df2x" "df3x" "df4x"
Solution 1:
Suppose you want to change the names of the dataframes thus:
new_names <- c("june2016", "july2016","aug2016", "sep2016")
Then you can simply assign new_namesto names(my_list):
names(my_list) <- new_names
And the result is:
names(my_list)
[1] "june2016" "july2016" "aug2016" "sep2016"
Solution 2:
You want to add the new_names literally as suffixes to the 'old' names, in which case you would use pasteor paste0 thus:
names(my_list) <- paste0(names(my_list), "_", new_names)
And the result is:
names(my_list)
[1] "df1x_june2016" "df2x_july2016" "df3x_aug2016" "df4x_sep2016"
You could use an index number within lapply to reference both the list and your vector of suffixes. Because there are a couple steps, I'll wrap the process in a function(). (Called an anonymous function because we aren't assigning a name to it.)
data2016v2 <- lapply(1:7, function(i) {
this_data <- data2016[[i]] # Double brackets for a list
names(this_data) <- paste0(names(this_data), new_names[i]) # Single bracket for vector
this_data # The renamed data frame to be placed into data2016v2
})
Notice in the paste0() line we are recycling the term in new_names[i], so for example if new_names[i] is "june2016" and your first data.frame has columns "A", "B", and "C" then it would give you this:
> paste0(c("A", "B", "C"), "june2016")
[1] "Ajune2016" "Bjune2016" "Cjune2016"
(You may want to add an underscore in there?)
As an aside, it sounds like you might be better served by adding the "june2016" as a column in your data (like say a variable named month with "june2016" as the value in each row) and combining your data using something like bind_rows() from the dplyr package, running it "long" instead of "wide".
Say I have 30 dataframes all named with a date from 01/01/2000 to 30/01/2000 in the format of ddmmyy (code below) :
Season <- seq(as.Date("2000-01-01"),as.Date("2000-01-30"),1)
Season <- format(Season,"%d%m%y")
for (s in Season) {
df <- data.frame(X=1:10, Y=1:10)
aa <- paste(s,"tests",s ,sep = "_")
assign(aa,df)
}
Each name, you cans see, has the word tests added to it.I want to combine (rbind?) the data.frames based on the date. In this case, combine data.frames that contain the dates from 01-01-00 to 10-01-00.
I have the below code to combine all dataframes but what if I only want to select the ones shown above?
All_dfs <- do.call(rbind, eapply(.GlobalEnv,function(x) if(is.data.frame(x)) x))
Is it better to create a list first?
We can use mget to get the values of 'Season' in a list and then rbind the list of data.frames. As there is a suffix "tests" followed by "Season" concatenated to the "Season", we can use paste to get the string, then use mget.
res <- do.call(rbind, mget( paste0(Season[1:10], "_tests_", Season[1:10])))
dim(res)
#[1] 100 2
Implemented some code from previous question:
Lapply to Add Columns to Each Dataframe in a List
Using the method above, I receive corrupt data. While I cannot provide actual data, I am wondering if additional arguments need to be implemented to prevent shuffling.
Basically, this:
Require: data.table
df1 <- data.frame(x = runif(3), y = runif(3))
df2 <- data.frame(x = runif(3), y = runif(3))
dfs <- list(df1, df2)
years <- list(2013, 2014)
a<-Map(cbind, dfs, year = years)
final<-rbindlist(a)
But applied to a list of thousands of data frame lists has incorrect results. Assume that some data frames, say df 1.5 somewhere between two above data frames, are empty. Would that affect the order in which the Map binds the years to the dfs? Essentially, I have an output with some data belonging to different years than the Map attached it to. I tested the length and order of years list, and compared it to the output year in final. They are identical. Any thoughts?
We create a logical index based on the length of each element in 'dfs', use that to subset both the 'dfs' and the 'years' and then do the cbind with Map
i1 <- sapply(dfs, length)>1
Or to make it more stringent
i1 <- sapply(dfs, function(x) is.data.frame(x) & !is.null(x) & length(x) >0 )
a <- Map(cbind, dfs[i1], year = years[i1])
and then do the rbindlist with fill = TRUE in case the number of columns are not the same in all the data.frames in the `list.
rbindlist(a, fill = TRUE)
data
dfs[[3]] <- list(NULL)
dfs[[4]] <- data.frame()
years <- 2013:2016
Use the idcol argument to rbindlist and add the year column afterwards:
res = rbindlist(dfs, idcol=TRUE)
res[.(.id = 1:2, year = 2013:2014), on=".id", year := i.year]
X[i, on=cols, z := i.z] merges X with i on cols and then copies z from i to X.
I have the following named list output from a analysis. The reproducible code is as follows:
list(structure(c(-213.555409754509, -212.033637890131, -212.029474755074,
-211.320398316741, -211.158815833294, -210.470525157849), .Names = c("wasn",
"chappal", "mummyji", "kmph", "flung", "movie")), structure(c(-220.119433774144,
-219.186901747536, -218.743319709963, -218.088361753899, -217.338920075687,
-217.186050877079), .Names = c("crazy", "wired", "skanndtyagi",
"andr", "unveiled", "contraption")))
I want to convert this to a data frame. I have tried unlist to data frame options using reshape2, dplyr and other solutions given for converting a list to a data frame but without much success. The output that I am looking for is something like this:
Col1 Val1 Col2 Val2
1 wasn -213.55 crazy -220.11
2 chappal -212.03 wired -219.18
3 mummyji -212.02 skanndtyagi -218.74
so on and so forth. The actual out put has multiple columns with paired values and runs into many rows. I have tried the following codes already:
do.call(rbind, lapply(df, data.frame, stringsAsFactors = TRUE))
works partially provides all the character values in a column and numeric values in the second.
data.frame(Reduce(rbind, df))
didn't work - provides the names in the first list and numbers from both the lists as tow different rows
colNames <- unique(unlist(lapply(df, names)))
M <- matrix(0, nrow = length(df), ncol = length(colNames),
dimnames = list(names(df), colNames))
matches <- lapply(df, function(x) match(names(x), colNames))
M[cbind(rep(sequence(nrow(M)), sapply(matches, length)),
unlist(matches))] <- unlist(df)
M
didn't work correctly.
Can someone help?
Since the list elements are all of the same length, you should be able to stack them and then combine them by columns.
Try:
do.call(cbind, lapply(myList, stack))
Here's another way:
as.data.frame( c(col = lapply(x, names), val = lapply(x,unname)) )
How it works. lapply returns a list; two lists combined with c make another list; and a list is easily coerced to a data.frame, since the latter is just a list of vectors having the same length.
Better than coercing to a data.frame is just modifying its class, effectively telling the list "you're a data.frame now":
L = c(col = lapply(x, names), val = lapply(x,unname))
library(data.table)
setDF(L)
The result doesn't need to be assigned anywhere with = or <- because L is modified "in place."