I'm switching over to using the Auto-IVC component as opposed to the IndepVar component. I'd like to be able to get a list of the promoted output names of the Auto-IVC component, so I can then use them to go and pull the appropriate value out of a configuration file and set the values that way. This will get rid of some boilerplate.
p.model._auto_ivc.list_outputs()
returns an empty list. It seems that p.model__dict__ has this information encoded in it, but I don't know exactly what is going on there so I am wondering if there is an easier way to do it.
To avoid confusion from future readers, I assume you meant that you wanted the promoted input names for the variables connected to the auto_ivc outputs.
We don't have a built-in function to do this, but you could do it with a bit of code like this:
seen = set()
for n in p.model._inputs:
src = p.model.get_source(n)
if src.startswith('_auto_ivc.') and src not in seen:
print(src, p.model._var_allprocs_abs2prom['input'][n])
seen.add(src)
assuming 'p' is the name of your Problem instance.
The code above just prints each auto_ivc output name followed by the promoted input it's connected to.
Here's an example of the output when run on one of our simple test cases:
_auto_ivc.v0 par.x
I was wondering if there was a way to modify Jupyter Lab or Notebook's tab-complete functionality. For example, if I type "\alpha", and then press the tab key, I will get the UTF-8 character "α" in the cell.
Is there any way that I can do a custom "[string without spaces]" to tab-complete into some specific UTF-8 character or string?
e.g. "\implies" + tab -> "⇒"
I can see a large number of use cases for this in my programming life, so I was wondering if Jupyter (Lab or Notebook) offered the ability to modify some settings (or load in a file) that maps strings to a tabbed output. Or is there a different idea that you could use to implement this?
Thanks!
Jupyter is (based on) IPython and it's completion engine - we can make use of it.
Update: you can override latex_symbols dict to get the behavior you want:
from IPython.core.latex_symbols import latex_symbols
latex_symbols['\\implies'] = '⇒'
You should be able to build upon this example to make it work with a whole range of characters.
Initial answer/another solution: you can hook into IPython completers, though it would not work exactly as you wish: it won't replace the text, but just append a special character. Here is an example:
from IPython import get_ipython
def implies_competer(ipython, event):
return ['⇒']
ipython = get_ipython()
ipython.set_hook('complete_command', implies_competer, re_key='.*implies')
Then when you type (the space after the keyword is important):
and then press tab, you will get:
I have read these SO posts on getting rstudio to print out without truncating:
list output truncated - How to expand listed variables with str() in R
avoid string printed to console getting truncated (in RStudio)
The answers there involve making a adjustment to studio settings which would then cover all future outputs to the console.
Is there a ad hoc way to get r to print an entire string to the console?
I tried:
library(tidyverse)
library(foreach)
mystring <- foreach(i = 1:52) %do% {
paste0("'_gaWeek",i,"'!A16:B;")
} %>% unlist %>% toString()
print(mystring, len = length(mystring))
> print(mystring, len = length(mystring))
[1] "'_gaWeek1'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek2'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek3'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek4'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek5'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek6'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek7'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek8'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek9'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek10'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek11'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek12'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek13'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek14'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek15'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek16'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek17'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek18'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek19'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek20'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek21'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek22'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek23'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek24'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek25'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek26'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek27'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek28'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek29'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek30'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek31'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek32'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek33'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek34'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek35'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek36'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek37'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek38'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek39'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek40'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek41'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek42'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek43'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek44'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek45'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek46'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek47'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek48'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek49'!A16:B;, '_gaWeek50'!A16:B;, '_ga... <truncated>
It's truncated. Is there an ad hoc way around this without changing rstudio settings? Such as by a function argument? I tried print() here.
Also, how do I get rid of the comma separator in between each instance above?
The short answer is "no" since, the option limiting the print is in the IDE itself, which you can't control from your program itself (I'm assuming you're not some crazy hacker here), and not a language feature. It's like trying to stop "WINDOWS" from doing things (although not).
Seems to me the easiest way (ad hoc) is to turn it on, do whatever, then turn it off. If you insist on not doing that, you need to write your own function:
myprint<- function(somestring,idelimit=100) {
for(i in seq(1,nchar(somestring),idelimit+1)) {
print(substr(somestring,i,i+idelimit));
}
}
I'm not a fluent R coder so let me know if you catch a syntax error. The idea is simple - idelimit should be wherever studio truncates (I chose 100 arbitrarily), and basically you're doing the splitting yourself so string is printed line after line without truncation. Each time you take a portion at most idelimit long from somestring and print it.
I have a unit test for a function that adds data (untransformed) to the database. The data to insert is given to the create function.
Do I use the input data in my asserts or is it better to specify the data that I’m asserting?
For eample:
$personRequest = [
'name'=>'John',
'age'=>21,
];
$id = savePerson($personRequest);
$personFromDb = getPersonById($id);
$this->assertEquals($personRequest['name'], $personFromDb['name']);
$this->assertEquals($personRequest['age'], $personFromDb['age']);
Or
$id = savePerson([
'name'=>'John',
'age'=>21,
]);
$personFromDb = getPersonById($id);
$this->assertEquals('John', $personFromDb['name']);
$this->assertEquals(21, $personFromDb['age']);
I think 1st option is better. Your input data may change in future and if you go by 2nd option, you will have to change assertion data everytime.
2nd option is useful, when your output is going to be same irrespective of your input data.
I got an answer from Adam Wathan by e-mail. (i took his test driven laravel course and noticed he uses the 'specify' option)
I think it's just personal preference, I like to be able to visually
skim and see "ok this specific string appears here in the output and
here in the input", vs. trying to avoid duplication by storing things
in variables." Nothing wrong with either approach in my opinion!
So i can't choose a correct answer.
Say I print something which is huge, like str("dataset with 100 columns"). This output is too large to see in one shot. Is it possible to get the output in a page like form where whatever fits the screen comes in one shot then on pressing return, the next batch comes up?
Something like "more" in a linux console?
The page command might do what you're looking for:
page("dataset with 100 columns")
If I read the documentation correctly, this should call file.show, which pipes the data to the default pager (less on Unix/Linux systems).