This question already has answers here:
Lower z-indexed parent's child upon higher z-indexed element?
(2 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I am trying to render an element between two nested elements. This is probably best explained with an example:
#parent {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
z-index: 0;
background-color: red;
}
#child {
position: fixed;
top: 50px;
left: 50px;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
z-index: 2;
background-color: blue;
}
#other {
position: fixed;
top: 25px;
left: 25px;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
z-index: 1;
background-color: green;
}
<div id="parent">
<div id="child"></div>
</div>
<!-- I want to have this element in between the "parent" and "child". -->
<div id="other"></div>
In this case, I want the green ("#other") element to be rendered in between (z-depth wise) the red parent ("#parent") and blue child ("#child") elements. In other words, I want the blue element to be on top.
From my understanding this is not possible using CSS's z-depth (like I attempted) since the elements are nested, but I can't seem to figure out a different way.
I would like to keep the HTML how it is, if possible, and do this entirely in CSS.
Thanks in advance!
just removed the position:fixed from #parent. You can add position: static; for #parent.
Please check this demo: https://codepen.io/anon/pen/dwZRMe
Your question is still not clear, so I'll recommend existing solutions.
First, you can move around elements using js, if you wish to not touch html. Refer this link.
Secondly, this kind of functionality is closely related to wrapping of elements. This is present in jquery as well.
Thirdly, you may want to check out :before and :after psuedo elements.Checkout this link.
Nesting plays a big role for z-index. If #other element sits on top of #parent element, a #child element of #parent can never be higher than #other element. This is an important rule for z-index.
In this case, you can change your HTML code in the following ways to create the shape you want.
#parent {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
z-index: 0;
background-color: red;
}
#child {
position: fixed;
top: 50px;
left: 50px;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
z-index: 2;
background-color: blue;
}
#other {
position: fixed;
top: 25px;
left: 25px;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
z-index: 1;
background-color: green;
}
<div id="parent">
<div id="child"></div>
<div id="other"></div>
</div>
#parent {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
z-index: 0;
background-color: red;
}
#child {
position: fixed;
top: 50px;
left: 50px;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
z-index: 2;
background-color: blue;
}
#other {
position: fixed;
top: 25px;
left: 25px;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
z-index: 1;
background-color: green;
}
<div id="parent"></div>
<div id="child"></div>
<div id="other"></div>
EDIT: To keep the HTML, no need to use any position style for #parent and remove top|left|z-index values too in it.
#parent {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
background-color: red;
}
#child {
position: fixed;
top: 50px;
left: 50px;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
z-index: 2;
background-color: blue;
}
#other {
position: fixed;
top: 25px;
left: 25px;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
z-index: 1;
background-color: green;
}
<div id="parent">
<div id="child"></div>
</div>
<div id="other"></div>
Related
I have 3 HTML elements that I want to order on the z plane:
.bank {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
background-color: grey;
position: absolute;
z-index: 100;
transform: translateY(10%);
}
.card {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: red;
position: absolute;
left: 50px;
top: 50px;
z-index: 300;
}
.button {
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
background-color: green;
position: absolute;
left: 30px;
top: 50px;
z-index: 200;
}
<div class="bank">
bank
<div class="card">card</div>
</div>
<div class="button">button</div>
I want the button to be on top of the bank but behind the card. But the button is always on top of both the bank and the card no matter what I try.
Edit: I noticed that removing z-index and transform from '.bank' solves it, but I need the transform property. What can I do?
What may cause it not to work? Thanks
Don't specify any z-index to .bank to avoid creating new stacking context and simply adjust the z-index of the other elements. This will work because all the 3 elements belong to the same stacking context so you can specify any order you want.
.bank {
position:relative;
background: red;
width: 500px;
height: 200px;
}
.card {
position: absolute;
top:0;
z-index: 2;
height: 100px;
width: 400px;
background: blue;
}
.button {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
z-index: 1;
height: 150px;
width: 450px;
background: yellow;
}
.container {
position: relative;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="bank">
<div class="card"></div>
</div>
<div class="button"></div>
</div>
UPDATE
Considering you code, the only way is to remove the z-index and transform from .bank or it will be impossible because your elements will never belong to the same stacking context. As you can read in the previous link:
Each stacking context is self-contained: after the element's contents
are stacked, the whole element is considered in the stacking order of
the parent stacking context.
Related for more details: Why can't an element with a z-index value cover its child?
You can do this by adding z-index only to card class and placing the elements in absolute.
.bank {
width: 150px;
background: red;
height: 150px;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
.card {
width: 50px;
background: black;
height: 50px;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: 1;
}
.button {
width: 100px;
background: blue;
height: 100px;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
<div class="bank">
<div class="card"></div>
</div>
<div class="button"></div>
I have the following markup
<button class="filter"><div class="radio"><div class="circle"></div></div> <span>Account Management</span></button>
and CSS
.filter {
font-size: 3vw;
text-align: left;
line-height: 1.6;
padding: 0px;
display: block;
height:auto;
overflow: hidden;
margin-bottom: 3px;
}
.filter span {
background: $leithyellow;
height: 100%;
overflow:auto;
display: block;
width: calc(100% - 60px);
float: left;
margin-left:10px;
padding-left:20px;
}
I cannot get the span to expand to 100% height of the button. Can this be done?
Heights apply only if the heights are defined properly for the ancestors. If you want the height to work, that's a tricky one. You can use one of my favourites, but you need to make sure it works in all the cases:
Give position: relative; to the parent.
Give position: absolute; to the element that needs full height and width.
Give the element, 0 values for all the sides.
Snippet
.parent {
position: relative;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
background: red;
}
.parent .child {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
background: skyblue;
}
<div class="parent">
<span class="child"></span>
</div>
In the above snippet, it is noted that this can also work, if you give:
.parent {
position: relative;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
background: red;
}
.parent .child {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: skyblue;
}
<div class="parent">
<span class="child"></span>
</div>
One good part about this approach is, you don't need to use the dangerous calc:
.parent {
position: relative;
width: 150px;
height: 50px;
background: red;
}
.parent .child {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 60px;
background: skyblue;
}
<div class="parent">
<span class="child"></span>
</div>
Note: On a related note, you can also have a look at this question and answer: Calc() alternative to fixed side bar with content?
Set display: flex to the parent
Set align-self: stretch for the child
This will stretch the height of the child div/button to fit the height of its parent without doing any trick.
By using position: absolute instead of flex-box, it won't be very nice eventually when you have more stuff added or re-arrange later on would be the nightmare.
I have read here in stackover flow and elsewhere that if we have a parent div with relative position, the child tags with absolute position will not relocate when zooming. But in my following example, it does not obey this rule.
In the main file, I have <img> tags instead of div with ids img1 to
img3
Any advice will be appreciated.
#container {
position: relative;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border: 3px solid green;
}
#img1 {
position: absolute;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: red;
left: 25%;
}
#img2 {
position: absolute;
width: 20px;
height: 100px;
background: blue;
left: 30%;
}
#img3 {
position: absolute;
width: 20px;
height: 100px;
background: yellow;
left: 60%;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="img1"></div>
<div id="img2"></div>
<div id="img3"></div>
</div>
This is driving me nuts.
The situation is as follows.
I have 1 wrapper div that needs to span the entire width / height of the screen.
I need 1 div that is positioned on the right hand of the screen and has a fixed width (eg. 100px;).
Then the other div needs to span the remaining left half of the screen (no further !).
Note: I don't want to float the elements, I really need the divs to span the entire height of the screen, because a Google Map will be loaded into the div.
I am aware of the calc function in css, but I don't want to use it, because IE8 doesn't support it.
http://jsfiddle.net/gze4vcd2/
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="left"></div>
<div id="right"></div>
</div>
#wrapper{
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: greenyellow;
}
#left{
position: absolute;
left: 0;
width: auto;
background: blue;
}
#right{
position: absolute;
right: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 200px;
background: yellow;
}
This doesn't work at all.
I have tried all sorts of things, but I just can't get it to work.
Have you tried to use position: fixed for your #Wrapper
#wrapper{
position: fixed;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
left: 0;
background: greenyellow;
}
#left{
background: red;
position: fixed;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
right: 100px;
}
#right{
background: blue;
position: fixed;
width: 100px;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
right: 0px;
bottom: 0px
}
Above is the updated code that works for me
I want to create the following shape:
Important: if I use "Border Radius" I get this (and I do not want this result):
Here are DEMO
HTML:
<div id="gray">
<div id="red"></div>
</div>
CSS:
#gray{
height: 100%;
background-color: #ccc;
overflow: hidden;
}
#red{
width: 150%;
height: 150%;
background-color: #f00;
border-radius: 100%;
top: 50%;
left: -25%;
right: 0;
position: relative;
}
Something like this would be roughly equivalent:
http://jsfiddle.net/ny4Q9/
css:
.curvetop {
position: relative;
margin-top: 80px;
background: red;
width: 100%;
height: 400px;
z-index: 1;
}
.curvetop:after {
top: -80px;
display: block;
position: absolute;
content: '';
border-radius: 50%;
background: red;
width: 100%;
height: 170px;
}
markup:
<div class="curvetop"></div>
By using border-radius with a value of 50% you can create a circle.. which, as per your question you can attach to the top of another element by way of a pseudo element.
You can use border radius
http://jsfiddle.net/wULyB/
<div id="out">
<div id="in"></div>
</div>
CSS
#out{
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
overflow: hidden;
background: green;
position: relative;
}
#in{
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border-radius: 100px;
background: black;
position: absolute;
left: -50px;
top: 30px;
}
You can play around with the numbers but you get the idea