I made an RShiny app with a lengthy computation.
The lengthy computation leaves the screen at a standstill, and I am worried that either the computation came up blank, or that the connection timed out, or something else might have happened.
Is there a way to show an indicator (ie rotating hour glass, etc) on the screen to show the user that processing is ongoing.
You could add a progress bar. http://shiny.rstudio.com/reference/shiny/1.2.0/Progress.html.
This might take a bit of refactoring, but it improves the UX and would give you an idea of where the failure is occurring(Connection, computation, etc.).
Related
I'm trying to make a tetris game in ocaml and i need to have a piece move through the graphics screen at a certain speed.
I think that the best way to do it is to make a recursive function that draws the piece at the top of the screen, waits half a second or so, clears that piece from the screen and redraws it 50 pixels lower. I just don't know how to make the programm wait. I think that you can do it using the Unix module but idk how..
Let's assume you want to take a fairly simple approach, i.e., an approach that works without multi-threading.
Presumably when your game is running it spends virtually all its time waiting for input from the user, i.e., waiting for the user to press a key. Most likely, in fact, you're using a blocking read to do this. Since the user can take any amount of time before typing anything (up to minutes or years), this is incompatible with keeping the graphical part of the game up to date.
A very simple solution then is to have a timeout on the read operation. Instead of waiting indefinitely for the user to press a key, you can wait at most (say) 10 milliseconds.
To do this, you can use the Unix.select function. The simplest way to do this is to switch over to using a Unix file descriptor for your input rather than an OCaml channel. If you can't figure out how to make this work, you might come back to StackOverflow with a more specific question.
I am developing a Qt desktop application now. I need to show user indeterminate progress bar while my program is computing. I can't determine time of computing and can't determine number of steps, that's why in my realization using of an indeterminate progress bar is the only option.
I tried to use QProgressDialog. The only variant that worked (I mean showed user progress bar) was something like that:
QProgressDialog dialog("Computing", "Cancel", 0, 0);
dialog.setWindowModality(Qt::WindowModal);
dialog.exec();
//further code
But as you can understand, that further code didn't work while dialog was executing.
I also tried to use method show(), but Qt didn't render the dialog window, I mean during calculation window was transparent.
So, could you suggest some solutions that will help me to show user progress bar and compute at the same time? Computing time may vary very much.
To show the progress of some work in parallel to responsive UI we usually have to have:
UI thread not blocked by that parallel job
The worker thread (QThread) performing the job
UI should have Cancel button to stop the job
UI progress bar shows fixed steps [0...X] or looping
If the goal is to show 'floating' progress: How to show an 'infinite floating' progressbar in Qt without knowing the percentage?
If the goal is to create the progress bar showing some 'realistic' degree of work done:
You have to estimate the full time somehow then. Do the experiment calculation and measure the full time. Assume that will be average time. Then make the progress driven by timer so it is going for 1/2 of progress length and if not done then it assumes the remaining time is twice longer. And then check at remaining 1/4 again and again expect twice longer. Do that until very small fraction of progress remains, say, around 1% but visible for the user and make it stay there until full calculation done. As you can guess when the job is done you advance the progress to the end showing the user that results ready.
To completely answer this question you will likely have to break it to several less "heavy" questions. Try the progress driven by timer first. Then try to create your math calculation job on a separate thread and make it signal to UI. When you have more specifics on certain implementation parts then C++/Qt programmers will likely be able to answer.
Here are some examples: tutorial #1, tutorial #2 on timer-driven Qt progress.
In MXML-based apps, you set the target framerate for the app and I believe this is a core part of Flash as well.
Two questions...
In many games you want the game to run as fast as it can for graphical smoothness, with some upper cap like 50-100Hz. How can you have variable framerates in Flash, or is it really not how things work?
What happens when an app cannot run at the target framerate? Do updates 'stack up' leading to other problems, or does Flash discard them?
I've a simple case where I'm moving a sprite from left to right at 100px/s, at 20fps it looks un-smooth. It's not jerky or anything, but you can clearly see the stepped motion, the artwork is black/white which accentuates it I think. I reckon a higher FPS is needed ideally, but on slower systems it might be too much and I don't want to run into nasty issues where I try to drive it too fast.
If the ActionScript takes too much time and the player can't maintain the frame rate that was specified, the frame rate just drops. There's nothing to stack up, you just get frames generated less often. For this reason when frame rate is important it's critical to make sure the AS code is not taking more time than you have available given the desired frame rate. Also make sure all calculates for movement are based on time and not frames.
As far as animation as 20fps, yeah, it will not look smooth. Bump up the frame rate. :-)
http://www.morearty.com/blog/2006/07/17/flex-tip-a-higher-frame-rate-even-makes-text-entry-look-better/
If Flash is unable to execute at the desired framerate, it will begin dropping frames. You can read the details of this here.
If you are dealing with framerates in Flash a lot, it can be helpful to understand the 'elastic racetrack' model that Flash uses. You can see details about it here, but the basic idea is that the amount of time spend executing code or rendering a frame can vary on a frame by frame basis.
I am attempting to use DirectShow to play two AVI files consecutively (one after the other) so that there is no interruption in the audio or video when the player transitions from one file to the next.
I have two custom controls on my form. Each one is pre-loaded with an AVI file, and before playback begins I set up all the DirectShow interfaces, set the video windows and resize them, call IMediaControl.Run(), then IMediaControl.Pause(), then IMediaSeeking.SetPositions to reset to frame 0, on both controls. On the form, you can see that both files are paused at their initial frames.
I then call IMediaControl.Run() on the first control, and wait for it to complete before calling Run() on the second control. Initially, I hooked into the first video's EC_COMPLETE notification message, and used this to start the second. Thinking that this event might be slow to arrive (turns out it is, but for a weird reason), I tried two other approaches:
Check the first video's current position inside a timer that goes off every second or so (using IMediaPosition.get_CurrentPosition). When the current position is within a second of the video's stop time (known in advance from IMediaPosition.get_StopTime), I go into a tight while loop and wait for the current position to equal the stop time, and then call Run() on the second video.
Same as the first, except I replace the while loop with a call to timeSetEvent from winmm.dll, with a delay set so that it fires right when the first file is supposed to end. I use the callback to Run() the second file.
Either of these two methods substantially cuts down the delay between the end of the first file and the beginning of the second, indicating that the EC_COMPLETE message doesn't arrive immediately after the file is complete (I also tried hooking the EC_SEGMENT_COMPLETE message, which is supposed to be used for looping within a file, but apparently nobody supports this - it never occurs on my machine, at least).
Doing all of the above has cut the transition delay from as much as a second, down to a barely perceptible glitch; about a third of the time the files transition with no interruption at all, which suggests there's no fundamental reason I can't get this to work all the time.
The slight delay is still unacceptable, unfortunately. I assume (and I could easily be wrong) that the remaining delay is due to a slight variable delay between the call to IMediaControl.Run() and when the video actually starts playing.
Does anybody know anything I can do to eliminate this little lag? It would also help to be told this is fundamentally impossible for whatever reason, which wouldn't surprise me. I've never encountered a video player in Windows that doesn't have this problem, so it may not be doable.
More info: the AVI files I'm playing are completely uncompressed (video and audio are uncompressed), so I don't think the lag is due to DirectShow's having to uncompress the video ahead of play start, although it may still buffer ahead as matter of course (and this may be the source of the problem). I would have though that starting play, pausing and then rewinding to the beginning would fix this.
Also, the way I'm handling the transition is to actually have the second control underneath the first; when the first completes playing, I start the second and then call BringToFront on it, creating the appearance of a single video transitioning between the two originals. I don't think the glitch is due to this, because it works perfectly some of the time, and even if this were problematic, it wouldn't explain the matching audio glitch.
Even more: I just tried starting the second video 30-50 milliseconds "early" and that seemed to eliminate even more of the gap, so I'm guessing that the lag in Run() is about that long. It appears to be variable, though, so this is still not where I need it to be.
Still more: perhaps I could eliminate this delay by loading the AVIs from memory rather than from a file. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to do this. IMediaControl only has a RenderFile() method, not something like a RenderStream or RenderMemory method.
If you call IMediaControl::Run on a stopped graph, the graph manager will post the call to a worker thread (so there's some variability). On the worker thread, the graph will be paused. Render filters only complete a pause transition once they have received data, so once GetState() returns S_OK, the graph manager knows that the graph is fully cued. At this point, it picks a time roughly 10ms into the future, and calls Run on each filter with that time as the start point. Since it takes time to tell each filter to Run, the dshow Run method has a parameter which is the refclock time at which a sample timestamped zero should be played -- i.e. the time at which the actual transition to run mode should take place.
To synchronise this with another graph, you first have to ensure that both graphs have the same clock. Query the graph (not the filter) for IMediaFilter, and call GetSyncSource on one graph and SetSyncSource on the other. Then you need to pause the second graph, so that it is cued and ready. When you want to start it, call IMediaFilter::Run instead of IMediaControl::Run, and you can pass your own start time. This still has to be a few milliseconds into the future, so the best thing might be to set the start time of the second graph to be the first graph's start time plus its duration (for an indexed container of uncompressed streams, the duration should be accurate).
Another approach is to use multiple graphs. Separating source from rendering would allow you to switch seamlessly between sources since they feed into a common render graph. There is sample source code for this approach at www.gdcl.co.uk/gmfbridge.
G
I have been involved in building a custum QGIS application in which live data is to be shown on the viewer of the application.
The IPC being used is unix message queues.
The data is to be refreshed at a specified interval say, 3 seconds.
Now the problem that i am facing is that the processing of the data which is to be shown is taking more than 3 seconds,so what i have done is that before the app starts to process data for the next update,the refresh QTimer is stopped and after the data is processed i again restart the QTimer.The app should work in such a way that after an update/refresh(during this refresh the app goes unresponsive) the user should get ample time to continue to work on the app apart from seeing the data being updated.I am able to get acceptable pauses for the user to work-- in one scenario.
But on different OS(RHEL 5.0 to RHEL 5.2) the situation is something different.The timer goes wild and continues to fire without giving any pauses b/w the successive updates thus going into an infinite loop.Handling this update data definitely takes longer than 3 sec,but for that very reason i have stopped-restarted the timer while processing..and the same logic works in one scenario while in other it doesnt.. The other fact that i have observed is that when this quick firing of the timer happens the time taken by the refreshing function to exit is very small abt 300ms so the start-stop of the timer that i have placed at the start-and-end of this function happens in that small time..so before the actual processing of the data finishes,there are 3-4 starts of the timer in queue waiting to be executed and thus the infinite looping problem gets worse from that point for every successive update.
The important thing to note here is that for the same code in one OS the refresh time is shown to be as around 4000ms(the actual processing time taken for the same amount of data) while for the other OS its 300ms.
Maybe this has something to do with newer libs on the updated OS..but I dont know how to debug it because i am not able to get any clues why its happening as such... maybe something related to pthreads has changed b/w the OSs??
So, my query is that is there any way that will assure that some processing in my app is timerised(and which is independent of the OS) without using QTimer as i think that QTimer is not a good option to achieve what i want??
What option can be there?? pthreads or Boost threads? which one would be better if i am to use threads as an alternate??But how can i make sure atleast a 3 second gap b/w successive updates no matter how long the update processing takes?
Kindly help.
Thanks.
If I was trying to get an acceptable, longer-term solution, I would investigate updating your display in a separate thread. In that thread, you could paint the display to an image, updating as often as you desire... although you might want to throttle the thread so it doesn't take all of the processing time available. Then in the UI thread, you could read that image and draw it to screen. That could improve your responsiveness to panning, since you could be displaying different parts of the image. You could update the image every 3 seconds based on a timer (just redraw from the source), or you could have the other thread emit a signal whenever the new data is completely refreshed.