I have an ASP.NET application accessing an Oracle 12 database. I have written a stored procedure using a global temp table to help.
The global temp table is created with 'ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS'.
Basically the stored procedure does the following:
Get some data. Add a char column. Insert to the global temp table.
Use a key (in each row) to call another stored procedure.
The stored procedure returns a 'Y' or 'N'.
The return value will be updated to the corresponding row in the global temp table.
Once done all rows, return like this: open refcursor for select * from global_temp_table
I test the stored procedure. It works fine.
I then in my ASP.NET project, add another function in web service (asmx). I try to involve, but it says: "object not found".
I have read some posts and say change to 'ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS'. I don't want to leave data around. Is there any way to fix this issue? I have searched for sometime already.
[Edit] Other team mates have added many other stored procedures in database. They don't have to grant any right to it. The stored procedures are correctly executed when calling from web service. Of course, their sp do not use global temp table.
I have searched the web. I have seen similar posts out there. Calling an Oracle stored procedure using global temp table within ASP.NET will show the same error - object not found.
Anyway, I have found a way round. That is to use the WITH clause. Here is a reference link: https://oracle-base.com/articles/misc/with-clause
[/Edit]
Related
I'm trying to use RJDBC to connect to a SAP HANA database and query for a temporary table, which is stored with a #-prefix:
test <- dbGetQuery(jdbcConnection,
"SELECT * FROM #CONTROL_TBL")
# Error in [...]: invalid table name: Could not find table/view #CONTROL_TBL in schema USER
If I execute the SQL statement in HANA, it works perfectly fine. I'm also able to query for permanent tables. Therefore I assume that R doesn't pass over the hashtag. Inserting escapes like "SELECT * FROM \\#CONTROL_TBL" however didn't solve my problem.
It's not possible to query for the data of a local or global temporary table from a different session, since they are by definition session-specific. In the case of a global temporary table one can query for the metadata of the table because they are shared across sessions.
Source: Tutorial for HANA temporary tables
You have to double-quote the table because it contains special characters, see SAP Help, identifiers for details.
test <- dbGetQuery(jdbcConnection,
'SELECT * FROM "#CONTROL_TBL"')
See also related discussion on stackoverflow.
Ok, local temporary tables are always only visible to the session in which they've been defined, while global temporary tables are visible just like normal tables, but the data is session private.
So, if you created the local temp. table (name starts with #) in a different session, then no wonder it cannot be found.
For your example, the question is: why do you need a temporary table in the first place?
Instead of that, you could e.g. define a view or a table function to select data from.
Creating a SQL Function in SSDT works smoothly. When I modify the function's SQL, I can generate the DACPAC, then publish the DACPAC and the database is automatically updated. My function SQL looks like:
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[foo]
(
...
)
RETURNS int
AS
BEGIN
...
END
This is a file called foo.sql with build action to Build.
When I need to add a database index, I add an Index file to my project and put in:
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [idxFoo]
ON [dbo].[tblFoo] ([id])
INCLUDE ([fooVal])
If I try to build it I get several SQL71501 errors.
I was forced to add all Indexes in a common file set to PostDeploy.
I have found numerous references to including a DACPAC reference to the project-which I did. This works for most items, but not Indexes. I have no idea why.
I needed to add Table definitions to the project of the "missing" referenced objects in the Indexes. In order to get the script to create the tables, I used the VS Sql Server Object Explorer. Right click on table and select View Code (includes the table's existing Indexes and other elements). NOT Script As->(table create sql only) If you don't SQLPackage.exe will delete the Indexes not defined in your project.
Please ensure that all referenced objects are defined in the project.
The definition of all referenced objects must be present in your database project. This is because the database project is intended to represent the database schema as a valid stand-alone entity. Having this allows the tools to verify that your objects are correct -- i.e. that any references contained in them refer to objects that exist.
I can run the 'guts' of my stored procedure as a giant query.. just fine from SQL Management Studio. Furthermore, I can even right click and 'execute' the stored procedure - .. y'know.. run it as a stored procedure - from SQL Management Studio.
When my ASP.NET MVC app goes to run this stored procedure, I get issues..
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Invalid object name '#AllActiveOrders'.
Does the impersonation account that ASP.NET runs under need special permissions? That can't be it.. even when I run it locally from my Visual Studio (under my login account) I also get the temp table error message.
EDIT: Furthermore, it seems to work fine when called from one ASP.NET app (which is using a WCF service / ADO.NET to call the stored procedure) but does not work from a different ASP.NET app (which calls the stored proc directly using ADO.NET)
FURTHERMORE: The MVC app that doesn't crash, does pass in some parameters to the stored procedure, while the crashing app runs the Stored Proc with default parameters (doesn't pass any in). FWIW - when I run the stored procedure in SQL Mgt. Studio, it's with default parameters (and it doesn't crash).
If it's of any worth, I did have to fix a 'String or Binary data would be truncated' issue just prior to this situation. I went into this massive query and fixed the temptable definition (a different one) that I knew to be the problem (since I had just edited it a day or so ago). I was able to see the 'String/Binary truncation' issue in SQL Mgt. Studio / as well as resolve the issue in SQL Mgt Studio.. but, I'm really stumped as to why I cannot see the 'Invalid Object name' issue in SQL Mgt. Studio
Stored procedures and temp tables generally don't mix well with strongly typed implementations of database objects (ado, datasets, I'm sure there's others).
If you change your #temp table to a #variable table that should fix your issue.
(Apparently) this works in some cases:
IF 1=0 BEGIN
SET FMTONLY OFF
END
Although according to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173839.aspx, the functionality is considered deprecated.
An example on how to change from temp table to var table would be like:
create table #tempTable (id int, someVal varchar(50))
to:
declare #tempTable table (id int, someval varchar(50))
There are a few differences between temp and var tables you should consider:
What's the difference between a temp table and table variable in SQL Server?
When should I use a table variable vs temporary table in sql server?
Ok. Figured it out with the help of my colleague who did some better Google-fu than I had done prior..
First, we CAN indeed make SQL Management Studio puke on my stored procedure by adding the FMTONLY option:
SET FMTONLY ON;
EXEC [dbo].[My_MassiveStackOfSubQueriesToProduceADigestDataSet]
GO
Now, on to my two competing ASP.NET applications... why one of them worked and one of them didn't? Under the covers, both essentially used an ADO.NET System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataAdapter to go get the data and each performed a .Fill(DataSet1)
However, the one that was crashing was trying to get the schema in advanced of the data, instead of just deriving the schema after the fact.. so, it was this line of code that was killing it:
da.FillSchema(DataSet1, SchemaType.Mapped)
If you're struggling with this same issue that I've had, you may have come across forums like this from MSDN which are all over the internets - which explain the details of what's going on quite adequately. It had just never occurred to me that when I called "FillSchema" that I was essentially tripping over this same issue.
Now I know!!!
Following on from bkwdesign's answer about finding the problem was due to ADO.NET DataAdapter.FillSchema using SET FMTONLY ON, I had a similar problem. This is how I dealt with it:
I found the simplest solution was to short-circuit the stored proc, returning a dummy recordset FillSchema could use. So at the top of the stored proc I added something like:
IF 1 = 0
BEGIN;
SELECT CAST(0 as INT) AS ID,
CAST(NULL AS VARCHAR(10)) AS SomTextCol,
...;
RETURN 0;
END;
The columns of the select statement are identical in name, data type and order to the schema of the recordset that will be returned from the stored proc when it executes normally.
The RETURN ensures that FillSchema doesn't look at the rest of the stored proc, and so avoids problems with temp tables.
I need to parameterize a view, and I am doing so by creating a TEMP TABLE which has the parameters for the view.
CREATE TEMP TABLE parms (parm1 INTEGER, parm2 INTEGER);
CREATE VIEW tableview AS ...
The VIEW is rather complex, but it basically uses these two parameters to kick start a recursive CTE, and there isn't any other way that I have found to express the view without these parameters.
The parameters must be stored in a temporary table because each connection should be able to have its own view with different parameters.
In any case, this works fine for creating the view itself, so long as I create the same TEMP TABLE at the start of any queries that use the view, e.g.:
CREATE TEMP TABLE parms (parm1 INTEGER, parm2 INTEGER);
INSERT INTO parms (parm1,parm2) VALUES (5,66);
SELECT * FROM tableview;
I am able to do the same thing to create a trigger to allow inserts on the view:
CREATE TEMP TABLE parms (parm1 INTEGER, parm2 INTEGER);
CREATE TRIGGER tableinsert INSTEAD OF INSERT ON tableview ...
However, when I try to do an actual INSERT (re-creating the TEMP TABLE first as before) I get an error:
no such table: main.parms
If I create a non-temporary table, I do not get this error, but then I have the problem that different connections can't have their own separate views.
I have review the documentation for triggers, and it mentions caveats of using temporary triggers on a non-temporary table, but I don't see anything regarding the reverse.
I did find a reference elsewhere that indicated that "the table... must exist in the same database as the table or view to which the trigger is attached". I thought a temporary table was part of the current database, is this not true? Is there some way to make this true?
I also tried accessing the parms table as temp.parms in the TRIGGER, but got the error:
qualified table names are not allowed on INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE
statements within triggers
If I can't use a temporary table, is there some way to work around it to accomplish the same thing?
Update: Ok, so it seems to be an SQLite limitation. After digging around a bit in the SQLite source code, it seems to be pretty trivial to allow SELECT access to a temporary table in a trigger. However, allowing UPDATE access appears to be a lot harder.
Temporary objects are created in a separate database named temp, so they are not accessible from triggers in other databases.
The remaining mechanism to get a connection-specific value into a trigger is to use a user-defined function.
I need to be able to run a query such as
SELECT * FROM atable WHERE MyFunc(afield) = "some text"
I've written MyFunc in a VB module but the query results in "Undefined function 'MyFunc' in expression." when executed from .NET
From what I've read so far, functions in Access VB modules aren't available in .NET due to security concerns. There isn't much information on the subject but this avenue seems like a daed end.
The other possibility is through the CREATE PROCEDURE statement which also has precious little documentation: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb177892%28v=office.12%29.aspx
The following code does work and creates a query in Access:
CREATE PROCEDURE test AS SELECT * FROM atable
However I need more than just a simple select statement - I need several lines of VB code.
While experimenting with the CREATE PROCEDURE statement, I executed the following code:
CREATE PROCEDURE test AS
Which produced the error "Invalid SQL statement; expected 'DELETE', 'INSERT', 'PROCEDURE', 'SELECT', or 'UPDATE'."
This seems to indicate that there's a SQL 'PROCEDURE' statement, so then I tried
CREATE PROCEDURE TEST AS PROCEDURE
Which resulted in "Syntax error in PROCEDURE clause."
I can't find any information on the SQL 'PROCEDURE' statement - maybe I'm just reading the error message incorrectly and there's no such beast. I've spent some time experimenting with the statement but I can't get any further.
In response to the suggestions to add a field to store the value, I'll expand on my requirements:
I have two scenarios where I need this functionality.
In the first scenario, I needed to enable the user to search on the soundex of a field and since there's no soundex SQL function in Access I added a field to store the soundex value for every field in every table where the user wants to be able to search for a record that "soundes like" an entered value. I update the soundex value whenever the parent field value changes. It's a fair bit of overhead but I considered it necessary in this instance.
For the second scenario, I want to normalize the spacing of a space-concatenation of field values and optionally strip out user-defined characters. I can come very close to acheiving the desired value with a combination of TRIM and REPLACE functions. The value would only differ if three or more spaces appeared between words in the value of one of the fields (an unlikely scenario). It's hard to justify the overhead of an extra field on every field in every table where this functionality is needed. Unless I get specific feedback from users about the issue of extra spaces, I'll stick with the TRIM & REPLACE value.
My application is database agnostic (or just not very religious... I support 7). I wrote a UDF for each of the other 6 databases that does the space normalization and character stripping much more efficiently than the built-in database functions. It really annoys me that I can write the UDF in Access as a VB macro and use that macro within Access but I can't use it from .NET.
I do need to be able to index on the value, so pulling the entire column(s) into .NET and then performing my calculation won't work.
I think you are running into the ceiling of what Access can do (and trying to go beyond). Access really doesn't have the power to do really complex TSQL statements like you are attempting. However, there are a couple ways to accomplish what you are looking for.
First, if the results of MyFunc don't change often, you could create a function in a module that loops through each record in atable and runs your MyFunc against it. You could either store that data in the table itself (in a new column) or you could build an in-memory dataset that you use for whatever purposes you want.
The second way of doing this is to do the manipulation in .NET since it seems you have the ability to do so. Do the SELECT statement and pull out the data you want from Access (without trying to run MyFunc against it). Then run whatever logic you want against the data and either use it from there or put it back into the Access database.
Why don't you want to create an additional field in your atable, which is atable.afieldX = MyFunc(atable.afield)? All what you need - to run UPDATE command once.
You should try to write a SQL Server function MyFunc. This way you will be able to run the same query in SQLserver and in Access.
A few usefull links for you so you can get started:
MSDN article about user defined functions: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc164062.aspx
SQLServer user defined functions: http://www.sqlteam.com/article/intro-to-user-defined-functions-updated
SQLServer string functions: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181984.aspx
What version of JET (now called Ace) are you using?
I mean, it should come as no surprise that if you going to use some Access VBA code, then you need the VBA library and a copy of MS Access loaded and running.
However, in Access 2010, we now have table triggers and store procedures. These store procedures do NOT require VBA and in fact run at the engine level. I have a table trigger and soundex routine here that shows how this works:
http://www.kallal.ca/searchw/WebSoundex.htm
The above means if Access, or VB.net, or even FoxPro via odbc modifies a row, the table trigger code will fire and run and save the soundex value in a column for you. And this feature also works if you use the new web publishing feature in access 2010. So, while the above article is written from the point of view of using Access Web services (available in office 365 and SharePoint), the above soundex table trigger will also work in a stand a alone Access and JET (ACE) only application.