Implementing cookies on a dismissible slide-in panel with AMP - wordpress

I'm implementing a slide-in-on-scroll newsletter signup form on our site, which is built as AMP-native.
I added a button that hides the div on tap using amp-bind, but I'm struggling to get my head around how to save the closed state with cookies/localStorage in AMP.
I've gone through the favorite button example code - https://ampbyexample.com/advanced/favorite_button/ (as recommended here on SE), but I don't see how it relates to this particular use-case, especially with the use of amp-list.
Based on what I've read and few examples I found the credentials="include" attribute is needed, as is a valid CORS json endpoint and an auto generated client id appended to the endpoint url using AMPs variable substitution, but I'm not sure how to put it all together.
I took a stab hacking something together using the favorite button example, but the tutorial doesn't say much about how to setup the CORS endpoint and that particular example is for storing multiple likes to a single endpoint, as apposed to storing a specific users viewing preferences.
Here is my rough (poking-around-in-the-dark) stab at the code:
<form method="post"
id="side-newsletter-wrap"
action-xhr="/prefs&clientId=CLIENT_ID(prefs)"
target="_top"
on="submit:AMP.setState({
showSideNewsletter: !showSideNewsletter
});
submit-error:AMP.setState({
showSideNewsletter: !showSideNewsletter
});">
<button on="tap:side-newsletter-wrap.hide" class="close-button"><i
class="fa fa-times"></i></button>
<amp-list width="320"
height="360"
credentials="include"
items="."
single-item
src="/prefs&clientId=CLIENT_ID(prefs)">
<template type="amp-mustache">
{{#.}}
<?php winefolly_load_fragment('newsletter-embed'); ?>
{{/.}}
{{^.}}{{/.}}
</template>
</amp-list>
</form>
For the prefs endpoint, I'm guessing I'd need to register a new endpoint in WordPress that outputs simple array with the preferences?
Something along the lines of:
{
showSideNewsletter: "true",
winesIndexView: "grid",
winesIndexSort: "title"
}
I also tried the amp-user-notification component (which has the closed state built in) but that felt a bit hacky and the newsletter embed code (via iframe) doesn't get loaded due to a known bug - https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/issues/18995).
Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Chris

You're right amp-user-notification is the correct approach. Is there a way to implement the newsletter form in AMP until the amp-iframe bug is fixed?
Another way is to use amp-access, which allows you to change the layout of the page on page load. You have to store the user preference server-side though using the READER_ID to identify the user. Storing this server-side is required as you might not be able to write cookies if the page is served from the AMP Cache due to ITP 2.0.

Related

Trouble adding second reCAPTCHA. Have Contact Form 7 w/ reCAPTCHA

I have a Wordpress site, that uses the Contact Form 7 plugin and the reCAPTCHA functionality that comes with that, and that works great. I just put that part in place, everything is automatic. But now I'm trying to add a reCAPTCHA to another form (on page form1.php) that isn't set up with Contact Form 7. This is on a PHP page that basically includes the Wordpress header and footer, but does its own thing in the middle. One key point is that the footer includes one of the forms from Contact Form 7, so it's on every page on the site.
I followed Google's instructions, forgetting I had the footer form. Then I saw an error in Firebug Error: ReCAPTCHA placeholder element must be empty
That brought me to this StackOverflow topic here. The only answer there by user easy going says that they had the same error when they realized they had imported the library twice.
Ok, that's what I did too I realized. So, I can remove the script inclusion of https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js in my code since it's already included by Contact Form 7 (I see it in the source). I noticed Google had instructions for rendering multiple widgets, I checked it out. But the problem is that the script include line specifies the onload callback function. Big problem. I can't change that because Contact Form 7 puts that in, and I can't make a callback function of the same name since it's already used. Of course I don't want to mess with anything that Contact Form 7 does. But as a result, I don't know how to get it to call my callback function in form1.php which is where my HTML element is specified to render the captcha.
Do you see any way around this issue? Any help is greatly appreciated!
Here is the resolution:
Contact Form 7 supports multiple reCaptcha, just need the right HTML markup to use it.
As you can see in the wp-content\plugins\contact-form-7\modules\recaptcha.php, and also in the HTML, the trick is:
Your non-CF7 reCaptcha must be just inside a form element, like this:
var verifyCallbackY = function(response) {
/** your stuff... */
alert(response);
};
<form id="recaptcha-cf7-migr"> <!-- the form element is important! This is what CF7 fetch one by one to find recaptchas... -->
<div
id='yRecaptcha'
class="wpcf7-form-control g-recaptcha wpcf7-recaptcha captcha-hfs"
data-sitekey="*********************************qkuila"
data-callback="verifyCallbackY"></div>
</form>

jquery mobile 1.4.5 single-page template href querystring ajax

I am a newbie to JQM (I use 1.4.5) and my webapp (asp.net C# apache Cordova) contains many separate pages of .cshtml (single-page template) only. I am testing my webapp on a Samsung Galaxy Grand using Android 4.2.2
A.
I am not sure about my understanding of 'linking pages', even after reading all the JQM docs on this and also after reading up many, many posts on this topic about passing querystring values to another page; mainly because I find that ALMOST ALL the examples are directed towards providing answers for internal pages (Multi-Page template) within a single html page.
So I request some of you JQM experts to confirm or correct the following understanding of mine....
From the JQM docs I understood that
I could use in any link (e.g button), href="page2.cshtml?par1=1&par2=2"; and JQM will automatically use Ajax for this link to work.
I also understood that use of querystring is always allowed in such cases of different html pages of the same domain and it will work via Ajax automatically ; so long as the attr such as rel="external", data-ajax="false" etc. are not used in the same link.
but querystrings are not allowed in case of the internal pages (multi-page template) only....;
and if I need to use the above href to link to a page in another domain e.g. www.anotherdomain.com/page2.cshtml?par1=1&par2=2, then I need to use rel="external".
Are all my above points (that reflect my understanding) CORRECT? KIndly confirm ro please correct me ...
B.
In my app, I find that most of the links work according to my understanding as above, to connect to different pages in the same domain; and I assume it happens via Ajax. Is it correct? I am also able to use the querystring params in page2 ( i.e. To-Page).
But in one case, though it works, in the To-Page the Panel features do not operate correctly, unless I introduce rel="external' in the href link !!! I suppose it means it IS NOT AJAX anymore? Also I am unable to find the reason..
Further independent of the above topic, I face another issue. The loading time (i.e. Time taken to display the To-Page) varies.
Mostly it is OK, but at times the loading-circle goes on forever.... and I presume it has crashed....??? then If I go back using the back button and come forward again, many times it loads immediately...!!!!!
Any thoughts or suggestions.....?
Thanks in anticipation...
Ratna
Before you can worry about how to pass attributes from one page to another you need to understand the difference between multi-page and multi-HTML templates.
Multi HTML page template
Smaller and lighter, each data-role=”page” is inside a separate HTML file and page structure is much more modular.
Can become even smaller if every subsequent HTML page is stripped from HEAD content, or anything that isn’t data-role=”page” div. Unfortunately in this case fallback if JavaScript is not supported is out of question.
DOM size is relatively small, only first page is permanently loaded into the DOM, any other page will also be loaded into the DOM but at the same time it will also be removed when not used actively, basically each time you move from it.
Better fallback if JavaScript is not supported. Works great in desktop browsers after a page refresh, mainly because every HTML page has an existing HEAD content. This also allows your app to behave like normal web app mainly because AJAX can be turned off.
Multipage template
Since all pages are already loaded, no additional requests are generated for navigating between pages.
First load is slower as the file size is larger, but subsequent page navigation is fast, thus making transitions much more smooth. Almost native-like smooth, emphasize on almost.
Suitable for relatively smaller applications and situations where you know the capabilities of your target platforms including presence of JavaScript support, thus making it a great solution for a hybrid app. It works much better as a Phonegap app then multi HTML template.
The “page” data-role element is required.
More about this topic can be found here: Multipage template vs Multi HTML template in jQuery Mobile
Now let's talk about how to properly pass data between jQuery Mobile pages.
jQuery Mobile uses AJAX by default
You can turn off AJAX using rel="external"
If you turn off AJAX you will lose almost everything good about jQuery Mobile, including animations. So if you don't want AJAX page handling better find some other responsive framework like Bootstrap or Foundation.
If you don't want to use AJAX you can still use querystrings but inside a href or via changePage function.
Better querystrings alternatives:
Global object.
If you're using AJAX you can simply use a global object(s) to store all of your data.
Something like this:
// Store object
var storeObject = {
parameter1: null,
parameter2 : null
}
Access data from the previous page
Again if you're using AJAX you don't need to pass any data because all that data is till in the DOM.
// Store object
$(document).on('pagebeforeshow', '#second', function(e, data){
alert("My name is " + data.prevPage.find('#test-input').val());
});
Localstorage or Sessionstorage
This solution will work no matter if you use AJAX or not.
$(document).on('pagebeforeshow', '#index', function(){
$(document).on('click', '#change-page-button', function(){
// store some data
if(typeof(Storage)!=="undefined") {
localStorage.firstname="Dragan";
localStorage.lastname="Gaic";
}
// Change page
$.mobile.changePage("#second");
});
});
$(document).on('pagebeforeshow', '#second', function(){
alert('My name is ' + localStorage.firstname + ' ' + localStorage.lastname);
// Lets change localStorage data before we go to the next page
localStorage.firstname="NewFirstNeme";
localStorage.lastname="NewLastName";
});
$(document).on('pagebeforeshow', '#third', function(){
alert('My name is ' + localStorage.firstname + ' ' + localStorage.lastname);
});
Send data through changePage function or via href
// Send
$.mobile.changePage('page2.html', { dataUrl : "page2.html?paremeter=123", data : { 'paremeter' : '123' }, reloadPage : true, changeHash : true});
or
Send parameter
receive that same data:
$(document).on('pagebeforeshow', "#index", function (event, data) {
var parameters = $(this).data("url").split("?")[1];;
parameter = parameters.replace("parameter=","");
alert(parameter);
});
If you need more information about this solutions including working examples find them here: Passing data between jQuery Mobile pages
Several methods mentioned here are deprecated (still usable) in the version 1.4. Though you don't need to worry about that, almost everything here will be unusable in version 1.5. This new version will overhaul jQuery Mobile from the bottom to the top.
Update
Yes, you can use any such link and jQuery Mobile will use AJAX. If you take a look at my previous examples you will find a working one.
If you want AJAX you CAN'T use rel="external", data-ajax="false" though stringquerys will work in bot cases.
Correct they will only work in multi-HTML template. Though there used to be a 3rd party plugin that allowed this to work with multi-page template but I don't think it works with newer jQuery Mobile versions.
Correct, if you want to link external page you need to use rel="external".

Going "Stateless" and loading scripts dynamically

What I want to know is if I am approaching this from the right angle.
I have an asp.net app I am building. I am using a Masterpage for the overall look of the app (below you can see the code).
I'd like to have the menu system use a dynamic load like jQuery's .load() function to load the content. That is fine and I have that down. The .load() function uses innerHTML to pump that content into the page. This is a problem if on that page you want to load module specific scripts and styles.
My question is, in an environment such as this, how do you guys load your scripts for these modules? Should I load every script on the initial load of the app? This app will not ever be "that big" however I want to make sure I do it right just in case.
MasterSheet
<div id="primaryNavigation">
<ul>
<li class="current">Main</li>
<li>Some Overview</li>
<li>Reporting</li>
<li>More Reporting</li>
<li>About</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="mainContentContainer">
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="cphBody" runat="server" />
</div>
Example Module inside of the Content tag
<div id="container">
Inside a page
<script id="scriptToLoad" type="text/javascript">
alert('Something');
head.ready(function () { console.log('please print'); });
</script>
</div>
<div id="includeScripts">
../Files/Javascript/SomeModuleSpecificJs.js
../Files/Javascript/SomeModuleSpecificJs1.js
</div>
My idea was to set up a div in each module that would have the id of "includeScripts" and load those from a method within the mastersheet like this. This method works (needs some tweeking obviously) however if the user keeps clicking on modules eventually every file will be loaded. If thats the case I might as well load them all on the mastersheet.
JS to be ran when the MasterPage is loaded
$navigation = $("#primaryNavigation").delegate('ul li a', 'click', function () {
$('#primaryNavigation').find('li').removeClass('current');
$(this).parent().addClass('current');
$('#mainContentContainer').load($(this).attr('href') + ' #container');
// Obviously this would overwrite the content from the container, this is merely proof of concept
$('#mainContentContainer').load($(this).attr('href') + ' #includeScripts');
var jsArray = $('#includeScripts').text().trim().split("\n");
$.each(jsArray, function (index, value) {
$.getScript(value);
});
return false;
});
I don't know about .load(), but JQuery's .html(), .append(), and a few other related functions will automatically run any script tags that they find in the given HTML. If load() doesn't do that for you, it should be easy enough to use $.get(..., function(){$('#myElement').html();}); instead. You could even write your own extension specifically for this purpose.
Style sheets may be a different story. I've typically just used a single style sheet per page.
Edit
I just spent some more time reading your question, and I realized that I didn't answer it fully.
Should I load every script on the initial load of the app?
It really depends on the size of your scripts and the way you expect users to interact with your system. In this seminar, the people who made Google Wave talk about how they addressed this issue. At one point the speaker says, "Perceived latency is the most important thing to optimize for." The problem was, in an early version, their javascript file (optimized and compiled by GWT) was a few megabytes in size. People with a slow connection (a cell phone browser, e.g.) would have to wait a long time for all this code to download before they could see what was in their Inbox. Their solution was to create "split points" in their code so that it could be loaded in chunks. The code necessary for displaying the Inbox could be loaded first, whereas the Contacts panel could wait until the user clicks "Contacts."
But you can take this too far. The other speaker in this video says the time spent in loading falls largely under one of two categories:
Fetching data you don't need, and
Too many HTTP requests
Each HTTP round-trip involves a certain amount of overhead, so it can be worthwhile to load some code you don't need yet in order to avoid having to make another round-trip in a few milliseconds when you realize you need it.
Since you say:
This app will not ever be "that big"
... I'm guessing that you'll probably fall mostly under the latter category (too many HTTP requests). The best thing to do in that case is:
Use a tool like Chirpy to consolidate all your javascript files into a single file (which can be automatically minified when not in Debug mode).
If your application has a login page that doesn't use all this javascript functionality, add a script tag for this javascript file at the bottom of the login page so that the user's browser will download the file behind the scenes while the user is busy entering their username and password. The master page for the rest of the site should simply include the script file once in a standard script tag.
Make sure your site's caching rules are set up properly so that user's browser will only request this file once.
Make sure your site is set to compress this javascript file since javascript (especially minified javascript) lends itself to gzip compression very nicely.
Once you've done this, you should find that there is no "perceived latency" from loading your javascript file.
If your application does eventually become "that big," you'll want to break your program down into modules like the Google Wave team did. But choose your modules based on how you expect the system to be used. If only a small handful of users is likely to use your admin interface, for example, you'll want to put all of your admin UI code into a separate module that "normal" users will never have to download.
When deciding where to draw the line, UI experts basically say one-fifth of a second is the point where the typical human's brain starts wondering, "Did that work?" If a user clicks a button and has to wait longer than that before they see something happen, you've reached the point of "perceived latency." Anything beyond that will become increasingly annoying to the user.

How to include HTML contents from another site? I have access to both sites

I have a site which is using DNN (DotNetNuke) as a content management system. I am using another site for my event registrations. I have sent them my template; which displays the basics including a hover menu with many different items in it.
Issue is - as I update the menu on my site using DNN, I need it to be reflected on the site using my template - without me having to send them a new file. Anyone have suggetsions on how to approach this?
I don't want to send the events provider all of the DNN DLLs as well as my database login information in order to render the menu.
I created a page on my site that is something like 'menu.aspx' - this produces the menu in HTML format, however it has tags like in it that I'd like to remove before serving it to them.
What is the best approach for this? Do I need to write a custom server control using XMLHttp? Can I accomplish this in Javascript?
Any advice much appreciated.
Thank you!
If both sites are hosted on the same domain (eg site1.domain.com and site2.domain.com) you can use JavaScript and XmlHttpRequest to insert code from one site to another. Otherwise, the Same Origin Policy prevents you from using AJAX.
If they're not on the same domain but you have access to the page on their website, you can simply include there a JS script from your site :
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://yoursite.com/code.js"></script>
In the JS, simply document.write() what you want on the page. This way, you can easily change the content of the page on their site without having to send them a new file.
Finally, you can also use an iframe on their site, pointing to a page on yours.
EDIT: As Vincent E. pointed out, this will only work if they're on the same domain - my bad.
If you are unwilling or unable to use frames, then I would set up an ashx on your DNN server which renders the menu (if you've got it in a user control all the better, as you can just instatiate it and Render it directly to the output stream) and then just make an Ajax call to that from your events page and insert it directly into the DOM.
Here's a quick and hacky jquery-based example of the events page end of things:
<script type="text/javascript">
function RenderMenu(data)
{
$('#Menu').html(data);
}
$(document).ready(function() {
$.ajax({
type : 'GET',
url : 'http://localhost/AjaxHandlers/Menu.ashx',
data : '',
success : RenderMenu,
});
});
</script>
You'll want an empty div with the ID 'Menu' on the page where you want your menu to sit, but apart from that you're good to go.
If for whatever reason you can't get the menu HTML in an isolated way, then you'll need to do some text processing in RenderMenu, but it's still do-able.
I am not a web expert, so don't shoot me.
Can't you just put their registration form into an iFrame in DNN ?

How do I use Google Analytics with Sitecore 6?

I know that I need to add the tracking code snippet at the bottom of all my pages, but is there a central location to do this?
Or do I need to add this tracking code to all of my templates?
I guess that I could wrap the snippet in a user control, or external .js file, and reference it on each page, but is there a global footer somewhere? The site I'm working on has about 30-40 layouts, and adding it to each one would be a pain!
Thanks in advance!
Actually, the role of a Sitecore layout is exactly this; to act as a global file that all individual page templates "derive" from.
Normally you'd stick the analytics code into the master layout, and use Sitecore sublayout/placeholder techniques to construct the various page templates you need. You would not normally need more than perhaps one or two layouts for any device you are serving content to. And I guess for most sites, the only device in use is regular web content delivery.
That being said, what you could do, is have all the layouts inherit their codebase from a common base class (inheriting from Page), and inject the google code centrally from here. Would still require you to go through all layout files however.
I have not tried the module, I think that is codebehind version. I have made this in XSLT, its pretty fast and easy to make. I have footer.xslt where I put the code that simply checks if page you are standing on uses template that I want to index and does not belong to page names that I want to exclude. Then I have an item with a custom template for Google Analytics with following memo fields.
IncludeTemplates -field contains list of templates that I want to include for analytics :
ExcludeItemsNames -field for excluding pages by item name
contains($includeTemplates, concat('|',./#template,'|')) and not(contains($excludeItemNames, concat('|',./#template,'|')))
Remember #key and #template is always in small letters
If you run many domains don't forget to add pageTracker._setDomainName("www.example.com"); in analytics script so you can separate sub-domains etc. if they use same footer.xslt
Normally we consider the actual Google code as content. Within Sitecore we normally have a settings folder, something like /sitecore/content/settings. This exists outside the root of the site. Beneath this have a settings item with a plain multi-line text field, I think the field type is memo or something similar.
Afterwards create an XSLT that renders out the content of this settings item. Something like (assuming the field is called value in the setting item):
<xsl:value-of select="sc:fld('Value','/sitecore/content/settings/footerJavaScript')" />
You may or may not need to set the disable-output-escaping attribute.
Then on the aspx page that your pages use as the template add a control that looks at the xslt rendering:
<sc:XslFile runat="server" Path="/xsl/footerJavaScript" />
The reason that we normally keep the javascript as content is this allows the client to change the analytics code without having to contact us.

Resources