I'm using MkDocs to generate docs using Markdown, and the theme Read the Docs.
However, I'm having trouble getting small images from scaling up on mobile phones.
I think this is linked to the Read the Docs CSS, but I'm having trouble understanding what should I do to override the behavior of setting width:100% on small screens.
The CSS applied to a certain image on a big screen (using chrome inspection) is:
.rst-content img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto !important;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
But if I reduce the screen, I get this extra CSS:
#media screen and (max-width: 768px)
img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
I'm able to manually set the image size, for example:
<img src="/something.png" style="width: 25px">
But I would prefer if I could create some CSS to ensure that this is applied to all images, so I don't have to add this HTML tag on the middle of the Markdown file each time I want to add a small image.
Simply modify the media query (or create a new rule with higher specificity) to set the width of the images to auto for narrow viewports:
#media screen and (max-width: 768px) {
img {
width: auto;
}
}
Related
I am having trouble developing a website using Bootstrap. I am currently trying to have a margin on the side, when the screen or viewport is too big. But when I finally got it, it broke the responsiveness of the page.
The whole body is inside this div to create the margins:
div style="width:1300px; margin:auto;"
Add this media query to your CSS and make sure it's referenced after any other CSS:
#media screen and (min-width: 1300px) {
body {
max-width: 1300px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
}
I'm using bootstrap carousel on my site. When opened in a phone the images are huge. Take a look at www.nwberryfoundation.org to see what I mean. Is there a way to reduce the carousel in that view?
I've tried
#media screen and (max-width: 400px) {
.carousel {
width: 75%;
}
}
Doesn't seem to make a difference.
Just use below code no need for media query and dont apply width instead try max-width
.carousel{
max-width: 300px; // u can changed it based on ur need or play with %
margin: 0 auto; // required to center div horizontally
}
I'm not a css expert and struggling a bit with this need.
Consider this site
Right now the logo image is sized nicely for mobile but looks way too small for desktop browser.
If I change the size to look good on desktop browser it doesn't size down for mobile and consequently blows out to the right.
I feel these are the css settings involved but of course open to further instruction.
So the image size is 3800 X 1200
The actual image style I THINK should remain at 100% and not exceed 240px.
These settings will make it look acceptable for the mobile but then too small for desktop.
<img alt="Northern Legacy Auto" title="Northern Legacy Auto" src="http://localhost:15536/content/images/thumbs/0000020.png">
#media (min-width: 240px)
.header-logo a img {
max-width: 100%;
}
....
#media (min-width: 240px)
.header-logo a {
display: inline-block;
/* width: 195px; */
height: 118px;
line-height: 0;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
If I reverse the settings then it will look great on the desktop and blowout (not dynamically resize) on the mobile?
Thanks
Are you sure you are looking for the media query solution? You might can just get away with a responsive image. JSFiddle
HTML
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x100">
CSS
img {
width: 90%;
max-width: 240px;
margin: 0 auto;
display: block;
}
I'm currently working on a project where we use a slider with images. This slider is displayed with width 100%, and currently we're adjusting the height to make the slider responsive, in case the user resizes the browser window or visits the website using their phone.
However, the website is for an artist who obviously does not want the image to be altered in any way, especially not altering with the aspect ratio. So what we're looking into is having height: auto to adjust the image height correctly according to the width: 100%, without altering the image (aspect ratio) itself.
This does not work like intended however, using the following code:
#media (min-width:1600px) {
#header{
height:auto;
width: 100%;
min-height: 630px;
background-size: 100% auto;
}
#slidershadow {
height: 630px;
}
}
We need to have some min-height, otherwise we cannot display the slider controls correctly. Here is a picture of our current situation (first image) and the expected behaviour (second picture).
Is there a way to resize our slider responsive, but keeping the following in mind:
The aspect ratio of the image cannot be altered;
We cannot crop images too much (only slightly);
There is a minimum height to keep in mind;
If it helps, all images in the slider have the same size.
You have to give a max-width:100% to your img.
Plus background-size only works when you are working with background-images.
Since you are applying max-width to your img there is no need to apply max-width to its parent #header
Last, but not least try not use min-height and height:auto at same time in the same selector.
Below is a working snippet according to the above comments:
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto
}
#media (min-width: 1280px) {
#header {
min-height: 500px;
}
}
#media (min-width: 1600px) {
#header {
min-height: 630px;
}
}
<div id="header">
<img src="http://placehold.it/1920x630" />
</div>
I have a website with all content centered. The content has a width of 500px.
I'm only concerned about the content (the 500px) to be visible, how much of the gutter doesn't matter.
For desktop displays I have the following CSS rules:
margin: 0 auto;
width: 500px;
What should be applied so that the content area gets displayed in it's entirety on as many screen sizes as possible (i.e. as small as 320px)?
to support different screen sizes you should use percentage, not pixel. But in case you are more comfortable using fixed width (using pixel) you can use media queries to achieve that.
.container { //start with the smallest screen width
width: 300px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#media screen and (min-width: 40em) { // 640px
.container {
width: 500px;
}
}
But I do recommend you to use percentage instead of pixel. Hope you find this useful.