I'm trying to map column values of a data.frame object (consisting of large number of bilateral trade data among 161 countries) to a 161 x 161 adjacency matrix (also of data.frame class) such that each cell represents the dyadic trade flows between any two countries.
The data looks like this
# load the data from dropbox folder
library(foreign)
example_data <- read.csv("https://www.dropbox.com/s/hf0ga22tdjlvdvr/example_data.csv?dl=1")
head(example_data, n = 10)
rid pid TradeValue
1 2 3 500
2 2 7 2328
3 2 8 2233465
4 2 9 81470
5 2 12 572893
6 2 17 488374
7 2 19 3314932
8 2 23 20323
9 2 25 10
10 2 29 9026220
length(unique(example_data$rid))
[1] 139
length(unique(example_data$pid))
[1] 161
where rid is reporter id, pid is (trade) partner id, a country's rid and pid are the same. The same id(s) in the rid column are matched with multiple rows in the pid column in terms of TradeValue.
However, there are some problems with this data. First, because countries (usually developing countries) that did not report trade statistics have no data to be extracted, their id(s) are absent in the rid column (such as country 1). On the other hand, those country id(s) may enter into pid column through other countries' reporting (in which case, the reporters tend to be developed countries). Hence, the rid column only contains some of the country id (only 139 out of 161), while the pid column has all 161 country id.
What I'm attempting to do is to map this example_data dataframe to a 161 x 161 adjacency matrix using rid for row and pid for column where each cell represent the TradeValue between any two country id. To this end, there are a couple things I need to tackle with:
Fill in those country id(s) that are missing in the rid column of example_data and, temporarily, set all cell values in their respective rows to 0.
By previous step, impute those "0" cells using bilateral trade statistics reported by other countries; if the corresponding statistics are still unavailable, leave those "0" cells as they are.
For example, for a 5-country dataframe of the following form
rid pid TradeValue
2 1 50
2 3 45
2 4 7
2 5 18
3 1 24
3 2 45
3 4 88
3 5 12
5 1 27
5 2 18
5 3 12
5 4 92
The desired output should look like this
pid_1 pid_2 pid_3 pid_4 pid_5
rid_1 0 50 24 0 27
rid_2 50 0 45 7 18
rid_3 24 45 0 88 12
rid_4 0 7 88 0 92
rid_5 27 18 12 92 0
but on top of my mind, I could not figure out how to. It will be really appreciated if someone can help me on this.
df1$rid = factor(df1$rid, levels = 1:5, labels = paste("rid",1:5,sep ="_"))
df1$pid = factor(df1$pid, levels = 1:5, labels = paste("pid",1:5,sep ="_"))
data.table::dcast(df1, rid ~ pid, fill = 0, drop = FALSE, value.var = "TradeValue")
# rid pid_1 pid_2 pid_3 pid_4 pid_5
#1 rid_1 0 0 0 0 0
#2 rid_2 50 0 45 7 18
#3 rid_3 24 45 0 88 12
#4 rid_4 0 0 0 0 0
#5 rid_5 27 18 12 92 0
The secrets/ tricks:
use factor variables to tell R what values are all possible as well as the order.
in data.tables dcast use fill = 0 (fill zero where you have nothing), drop = FALSE (make entries for factor levels that aren't observed)
Related
I have a large data frame with over 1 million observations. Two of my independent variables A and B have 18 and 72 numerically labelled categories respectively. For simplicity sake, assume the categories are labelled 1-18 and 1-72. I'd like to partition all of my data into 36 groups of 6, (A 1-6 with B 1-6, A 1-6 with B 7-12, etc.)
Currently, I am using dplyr's mutate with 36 nested ifelse statements, such as mutate(partition = ifelse(A <= 6 & B <= 6, 1, ifelse(...))) but this is tedious and difficult to change should I want to make partitions of different sizes.
Another way of describing it is that there are 18 * 72 = 1296 unique combinations of parameter A and B, but I would like to partition these 1296 into 36 groups of 36 observations, with the flexibility to change the number of observations and groups.
I really feel like there should be a better way to partition my data, but nothing comes to mind immediately. The only other idea I have is to use expand.grid and use a join of sorts. What other methods exist that allow me to partition my data?
The below example is kind of how I would like my data to appear.
A B Partition
1 1 1
1 2 1
1 3 1
1 4 1
1 5 1
1 6 1
2 1 1
... ... ...
6 6 1
7 1 2
... ... ...
12 71 12
12 72 12
13 1 13
... ... ...
18 70 36
18 71 36
18 72 36
I have a three-column dataframe object recording the bilateral trade data between 161 countries, the data are of dyadic format containing 19687 rows, three columns (reporter (rid), partner (pid), and their bilateral trade flow (TradeValue) in a given year). rid or pid takes a value from 1 to 161, and a country is assigned the same rid and pid. For any given pair of (rid, pid) in which rid =/= pid, TradeValue(rid, pid) = TradeValue(pid, rid).
The data (run in R) look like this:
#load the data from dropbox folder
library(foreign)
example_data <- read.csv("https://www.dropbox.com/s/hf0ga22tdjlvdvr/example_data.csv?dl=1")
head(example_data, n = 10)
rid pid TradeValue
1 2 3 500
2 2 7 2328
3 2 8 2233465
4 2 9 81470
5 2 12 572893
6 2 17 488374
7 2 19 3314932
8 2 23 20323
9 2 25 10
10 2 29 9026220
The data were sourced from UN Comtrade database, each rid is paired with multiple pid to get their bilateral trade data, but as can be seen, not every pid has a numeric id value because I only assigned a rid or pid to a country if a list of relevant economic indicators of that country are available, which is why there are NA in the data despite TradeValue exists between that country and the reporting country (rid). The same applies when a country become a "reporter," in that situation, that country did not report any TradeValue with partners, and its id number is absent from the rid column. (Hence, you can see rid column begins with 2, because country 1 (i.e., Afghanistan) did not report any bilateral trade data with partners). A quick check with summary statistics helps confirm this
length(unique(example_data$rid))
[1] 139
# only 139 countries reported bilateral trade statistics with partners
length(unique(example_data$pid))
[1] 162
# that extra pid is NA (161 + NA = 162)
Since most countries report bilateral trade data with partners and for those who don't, they tend to be small economies. Hence, I want to preserve the complete list of 161 countries and transform this example_data dataframe into a 161 x 161 adjacency matrix in which
for those countries that are absent from the rid column (e.g., rid == 1), create each of them a row and set the entire row (in the 161 x 161 matrix) to 0.
for those countries (pid) that do not share TradeValue entries with a particular rid, set those cells to 0.
For example, suppose in a 5 x 5 adjacency matrix, country 1 did not report any trade statistics with partners, the other four reported their bilateral trade statistics with other (except country 1). The original dataframe is like
rid pid TradeValue
2 3 223
2 4 13
2 5 9
3 2 223
3 4 57
3 5 28
4 2 13
4 3 57
4 5 82
5 2 9
5 3 28
5 4 82
from which I want to convert it to a 5 x 5 adjacency matrix (of data.frame format), the desired output should look like this
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5
1 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 223 13 9
3 0 223 0 57 28
4 0 13 57 0 82
5 0 9 28 82 0
And using the same method on the example_data to create a 161 x 161 adjacency matrix. However, after a couple trial and error with reshape and other methods, I still could not get around with such conversion, not even beyond the first step.
It will be really appreciated if anyone could enlighten me on this?
I cannot read the dropbox file but have tried to work off of your 5-country example dataframe -
country_num = 5
# check countries missing in rid and pid
rid_miss = setdiff(1:country_num, example_data$rid)
pid_miss = ifelse(length(setdiff(1:country_num, example_data$pid) == 0),
1, setdiff(1:country_num, example_data$pid))
# create dummy dataframe with missing rid and pid
add_data = as.data.frame(do.call(cbind, list(rid_miss, pid_miss, NA)))
colnames(add_data) = colnames(example_data)
# add dummy dataframe to original
example_data = rbind(example_data, add_data)
# the dcast now takes missing rid and pid into account
mat = dcast(example_data, rid ~ pid, value.var = "TradeValue")
# can remove first column without setting colnames but this is more failproof
rownames(mat) = mat[, 1]
mat = as.matrix(mat[, -1])
# fill in upper triangular matrix with missing values of lower triangular matrix
# and vice-versa since TradeValue(rid, pid) = TradeValue(pid, rid)
mat[is.na(mat)] = t(mat)[is.na(mat)]
# change NAs to 0 according to preference - would keep as NA to differentiate
# from actual zeros
mat[is.na(mat)] = 0
Does this help?
I'm doing some cluster analysis on the MLTobs from the LifeTables package and have come across a tricky problem with the Year variable in the mlt.mx.info dataframe. Year contains the period that the life table was taken, in intervals. Here's a table of the data:
1751-1754 1755-1759 1760-1764 1765-1769 1770-1774 1775-1779 1780-1784 1785-1789 1790-1794
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1795-1799 1800-1804 1805-1809 1810-1814 1815-1819 1816-1819 1820-1824 1825-1829 1830-1834
1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3
1835-1839 1838-1839 1840-1844 1841-1844 1845-1849 1846-1849 1850-1854 1855-1859 1860-1864
4 1 5 3 8 1 10 11 11
1865-1869 1870-1874 1872-1874 1875-1879 1876-1879 1878-1879 1880-1884 1885-1889 1890-1894
11 11 1 12 2 1 15 15 15
1895-1899 1900-1904 1905-1909 1908-1909 1910-1914 1915-1919 1920-1924 1921-1924 1922-1924
15 15 15 1 16 16 16 2 1
1925-1929 1930-1934 1933-1934 1935-1939 1937-1939 1940-1944 1945-1949 1947-1949 1948-1949
19 19 1 20 1 22 22 3 1
1950-1954 1955-1959 1956-1959 1958-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984
30 30 2 1 40 40 41 41 41
1983-1984 1985-1989 1990-1994 1991-1994 1992-1994 1995-1999 2000-2003 2000-2004 2005-2006
1 42 42 1 1 44 3 41 22
2005-2007
14
As you can see, some of the intervals sit within other intervals. Thankfully none of them overlap. I want to simplify the intervals so intervals such as 1992-1994 and 1991-1994 all go into 1990-1994.
An idea might be to get the modulo of each interval and sort them into their new intervals that way but I'm unsure how to do this with the interval data type. If anyone has any ideas I'd really appreciate the help. Ultimately I want to create a histogram or barplot to illustrate the nicely.
If I understand your problem, you'll want something like this:
bottom <- seq(1750, 2010, 5)
library(dplyr)
new_df <- mlt.mx.info %>%
arrange(Year) %>%
mutate(year2 = as.numeric(substr(Year, 6, 9))) %>%
mutate(new_year = paste0(bottom[findInterval(year2, bottom)], "-",(bottom[findInterval(year2, bottom) + 1] - 1)))
View(new_df)
So what this does, it creates bins, and outputs a new column (new_year) that is the bottom of the bin. So everything from 1750-1754 will correspond to a new value of 1750-1754 (in string form; the original is an integer type, not sure how to fix that). Does this do what you want? Double check the results, but it looks right to me.
I am plotting a quantile-quantile plot for a certain data that I have. I would like to print only certain panels that satisfy a condition that I put in for panel.qq(x,y,...).
Let me give you an example. The following is my code,
qq(y ~ x|cond,data=test.df,panel=function(x,y,subscripts,...){
if(length(unique(test.df[subscripts,2])) > 3 ){panel.qq(x,y,subscripts,...})})
Here y is the factor and x is the variable that will be plotted on X and y axis. Cond is the conditioning variable. What I would like is, only those panels be printed that pass the condition in the panel function, which is
if(length(unique(test.df[subscripts,2])) > 3).
I hope this information helps. Thanks in advance.
Added Sample data,
y x cond
1 1 6 125
2 2 5 125
3 1 5 125
4 2 6 125
5 1 3 125
6 2 8 125
7 1 8 125
8 2 3 125
9 1 5 125
10 2 6 125
11 1 5 124
12 2 6 124
13 1 6 124
14 2 5 124
15 1 5 124
16 2 6 124
17 1 4 124
18 2 7 124
19 1 0 123
20 2 11 123
21 1 0 123
22 2 11 123
23 1 0 123
24 2 11 123
25 1 0 123
26 2 11 123
27 1 0 123
28 2 2 123
So this is the sample data. What I would like is to not have a panel for 123 as the number of unique values for 123 is 3, while for others its 4. Thanks again.
Yeah, I think it is a subset problem, not a lattice one. You don't include an example, but it looks like you want to keep only rows where there are more than 3 rows for each value of whatever is in column 2 of your data frame. If so, here is a data.table solution.
library(data.table)
test.dt <- as.data.table(test.df)
test.dt.subset <- test.dt[,N:=.N,by=c2][N>3]
Where c2 is that variable in the second column. The last line of code first adds a variable, N, for the count of rows (.N) for each value of c2, then subsets for N>3.
UPDATE: And since a data table is also a data frame, you can use test.dt.subset directly as the data source in the call to qq (or other lattice function).
UPDATE 2: Here is one way to do the same thing without data.table:
d <- data.frame(x=1:15,y=1:15%%2, # example data frame
c2=c(1,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,5,5,5,5,5))
d$N <- 1 # create a column for count
split(d$N,d$c2) <- lapply(split(d$x,d$c2),length) # populate with count
d
d[d$N>3,] # subset
I did something very similar to DaveTurek.
My sample dataframe above is test.df
test.df.list <- split(test.df,test.df$cond,drop=F)
final.test.df <- do.call("rbind",lapply(test.df.list,function(r){
if(length(unique(r$x)) > 3){r}})
So, here I am breaking the test.df as a list of data.frames by the conditioning variable. Next, in the lapply I am checking the number of unique values in each of subset dataframe. If this number is greater than 3 then the dataframe is given /taken back if not it is ignored. Next, a do.call to bind all the dfs back to one big df to run the quantile quantile plot on it.
In case anyone wants to know the qq function call after getting the specific data. then it is,
trellis.device(postscript,file="test.ps",color=F,horizontal=T,paper='legal')
qq(y ~ x|cond,data=final.test.df,layout=c(1,1),pch=".",cex=3)
dev.off()
Hope this helps.
I have a dataframe that contains 7 p-value variables.
I can't post it because it is private data but it looks like this:
>df
o m l c a aa ep
1.11E-09 4.43E-05 0.000001602 4.02E-88 1.10E-43 7.31E-05 0.00022168
8.57E-07 0.0005479 0.0001402 2.84E-44 4.97E-17 0.0008272 0.000443361
0.00001112 0.0005479 0.0007368 1.40E-39 3.17E-16 0.0008272 0.000665041
7.31E-05 0.0006228 0.0007368 4.59E-33 2.57E-13 0.0008272 0.000886721
8.17E-05 0.002307 0.0008453 4.58E-18 5.14E-12 0.0008336 0.001108402
Each column has values from 0-1.
I would like to subset the entire data frame by extracting all the values in each column less than 0.009 and making a new data frame. If I were to extract on this condition, the columns would have very different lengths. E.g. c has 290 values less than 0.009, and o has 300, aa has 500 etc.
I've tried:
subset(df,c<0.009 & a<0.009 & l<0.009 & m<0.009& aa<0.009 & o<0.009)
When I do this I just end up with a very small number of even columns which isn't what I want, I want all values in each column fitting the subset criteria in the data.
I then want to take this data frame and bin it into p-value range groups by using something like the summary(cut()) function, but I am not sure how to do it.
So essentially I would like to have a final data frame that includes the number of values in each p-value bin for each variable:
o# m# l# c# a# aa# ep#
0.00-0.000001 545 58 85 78 85 45 785
0.00001-000.1 54 77 57 57 74 56 58
0.001-0.002 54 7 5 5 98 7 5 865
An attempt:
sapply(df,function(x) table(cut(x[x<0.009],c(0,0.000001,0.001,0.002,Inf))) )
# o m l c a aa ep
#(0,1e-06] 2 0 0 5 5 0 0
#(1e-06,0.001] 3 4 5 0 0 5 4
#(0.001,0.002] 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
#(0.002,Inf] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0