My department is planning to switching to using NMT V3 soon, but we will need the dictionary feature (adding glossary and Do-Not-Translate list) for training.
This might have been asked before but I don't see any recent post asking for it, would you be able to advise when this feature will be released? A rough estimation will do (2019 Q1 for example)
Many thanks,
Simon
The dictionary feature should be available in Custom Translator within the next month. Please be sure to follow the Microsoft Translator blog (http://aka.ms/TranslatorBlog) and Twitter (http://aka.ms/TranslatorTwitter) to stay up to date with major Translator releases.
Related
I am trying to implement the SCORM 1.2 in one of my LMS using the following site as a reference:
www.vsscorm.net
It is running perfectly. But I am not able to save the Quiz question text into the database.
The following information gets stored in database:
cmi.interactions.0.type
cmi.interactions.0.student_response
cmi.interactions.0.correct_responses.0.pattern
cmi.interactions.0.result
cmi.interactions.0.weighting
cmi.interactions.0.latency
cmi.interactions.0.objectives.0.id
I googled and get to know that the question text is stored in cmi.interactions.n.text, which is somehow not storing in the database.
Or maybe SCROM 1.2 doesn't support it. Since I am a newbie in SCORM, any expert advice will be highly appreciated. Thank you.
cmi.interactions.n.text does not appear to be part of the RTE specification (see "technical specification here: https://adlnet.gov/adl-research/scorm/scorm-1-2/), so is unlikely to work in a lot of LMSs. (Also see https://support.scorm.com/hc/en-us/articles/206166436-Question-Descriptions-in-SCORM-1-2 and https://support.scorm.com/hc/en-us/articles/206166696-Questions-Answers-and-how-much-you-can-report-in-SCORM-1-2-and-2004)
There isn't a great way to store this data using the SCORM 1.2 interaction model. SCORM 2004 added a "description" data point that is commonly used to store this value.
The couple of references to the .text element that I saw were customizations for a particular LMS.
Is thegraphpackage still available in Roo? I would like to create graphs with Neo4J but i can't find any recent documentation or examples about the feature.
No, the graph package Neo4j is not available in the current, 1.2.5, release of Roo and history informs us that any promise to restore support should be viewed skeptically
This antiquated exchange suggests, along with 3-4 others dated as recently as one year ago, that there is little ground for hope. Moreover, the GitHub activity charts (Sorry, my SO "reputation" is not adequate to post another link. You'll have to figure this one out without help.) show zero development activity related to Spring Roo during the last month. I didn't dig much deeper but the front page shows essentially no activity in the last six months. That's not a good sign. I did read that a new development partner has just signed on, so maybe things will improve. I'm very new to Roo but I'm finding bug after bug, and problem after problem, many of them outstanding, like the absence of Neo4j, for years. I really like Roo's ideas and design but I'm not sure that I'm willing to bet on its robustness let alone its longevity. I don't seem to be alone. I searched the web and asked here but can't find direct evidence (that is, code that I can examine) that it's being used on real-world projects. Folks pick it up and toy around with it. But if they write more than 40 lines or so of code they don't open their source. (Please understand that I'm no deliberate detractor; I'd be delighted to be proven wrong on this point!)
One of the saddest consequences of not having Neo4j is that one of the three existing Roo books, Getting Started with Roo, takes it on the chin beginning near the end of the first chapter. This is otherwise an outstanding book. But the absence of Neo4j kicks its ongoing-project model right upside the head. I know the labor entailed by writing a book. Josh Long must be severely disappointed.
More generally, it seems that tech authors are being implicitly encouraged to write small chunks of code that stand on their own, so that their book won't be damaged overall by one or two technological changes. Of course, readers then never get to see code of significant size. I don't have a solution to offer but I'm definitely feeling the problem.
Edited: Because at least one passerby is demonstrably incapable of understanding the implications of repeatedly broken promises to restore support for Neo4j "in the next few days" several years ago I have explicitly spelled out the fact that support is not currently available and no credible promise of soon restoration is to be found. Please note that a broken promise to restore support implies that support was not restored and subsequent promises to restore support should be treated with some degree of skepticism. So, those who suppose that this answer is "not useful" would likely benefit from the web site. readingcomprehensionconnection.com. Or perhaps the problem is one of attention deficit, which makes it difficult to read more than a few phrases before forming a necessarily hasty conclusion. In that case, one might consider cutting back on the comic books in favor of some reading material without speech balloons. I suppose that I am not alone in finding it difficult to incorporate speech balloons in my merely textual SO comments. Perhaps a future release of SO will support a communication style more familiar and therefore more to one's liking.
Demonstration that Neo4j Is Currently Absent from the Upcoming Release, 1.2.6
The method of search follows the instructions given in (Long & Mayzak, 2011), apparently by Michael Hunger of Neo Technology, Inc., the company that developed Neo4j.
/_/ |_|\____/\____/ 1.2.6.BUILD-SNAPSHOT [rev 32b413d]
Welcome to Spring Roo. For assistance press TAB or type "hint" then hit ENTER.
roo> project --topLevelPackage org.hagiasmon.gswr --projectName gswr
Created ROOT/pom.xml
Created SRC_MAIN_RESOURCES
Created SRC_MAIN_RESOURCES/log4j.properties
Created SPRING_CONFIG_ROOT
Created SPRING_CONFIG_ROOT/applicationContext.xml
roo> pgp trust -keyId 0x29c2d8fd
You must specify option 'keyId' for this command
roo> pgp trust --keyId 0x29c2d8fd
Added trust for key:
>>>> KEY ID: 0x29C2D8FD <<<<
More Info: http://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?fingerprint=on&op=index&search=0x29C2D8FD
Created: 2011-Jan-06 10:48:11 +0000
Fingerprint: 558eb0489fe5500c68fa8a306107f33d29c2d8fd
Algorithm: RSA_GENERAL
User ID: Michael Hunger <Michael.Hunger#jexp.de>
Signed By: Key 0x29C2D8FD (Michael Hunger <Michael.Hunger#jexp.de>)
Subkey ID: 0xDEFB5FB1 [RSA_GENERAL]
roo> addon search graph
0 found, sorted by rank; T = trusted developer; R = Roo 1.2 compatible
ID T R DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[HINT] use 'addon info id --searchResultId ..' to see details about a search result
[HINT] use 'addon install id --searchResultId ..' to install a specific search result, or
[HINT] use 'addon install bundle --bundleSymbolicName TAB' to install a specific add-on version
roo>
P.S. I initiated Facebook correspondence with Josh Long, who along with Michael Hunger, are the two folks driving the Roo - Neo4j interface, as far as I can tell. If he responds, I'll update this comment.
I'm developing Flash module with AS3 now. I need to package it with SCORM 1.2.
I want to track percentage of the user when accessing my flash module. My flash module consist of single file that loads swfs. Let's say I should loads 10 swfs. When the user load 1-5, i hope it tracked as 50%.
Is it possible to do with SCORM 1.2?
I'm fairly familiar with flash but new to SCORM. I've stumble upon the Philip Hutchison's tutorials and several SCORM 1.2 document for from ADL for several days. So far haven't manage a success.
Since SO doesn't allow someone with as little rep as I to comment and ask for clarification, I'm going to have to go by assumption for some of this. The short answer is no. However, it depends what you plan to do with that progress percentage in the end.
If it is to be used in some sort of report or display within an LMS, you'll need to use an official element for just such a thing, and hope your LMS can use it. Unfortunately, SCORM 1.2 won't cut it for you there. In SCORM 2004, however, you can utilize the "cmi.progress_measure" element. See section 4.2.18 in the SCORM 2004 4th Edition RTE specification. Note: It is common to see completion percentage in an LMS related to multi-SCO packages, where the percentage of completed SCO's within a package is displayed - especially in the case of SCORM 1.2.
If the requirement is to simply store the current slide number or total number of slides viewed for the sole purpose of having this percentage value available to the SCO itself, you can simply store and retrieve this value using the "cmi.suspend_data" element in either 1.2 or 2004.
Now, using Flash's ExternalInterface to communicate between Flash and Javascript is a different question entirely. And so is how to utilize the SCORM API once you have the rest in place. Again, I cannot comment to request clarification, so I cannot say for certain what the question is exactly.
I have an old application that I manage that runs on top of a progress database. I'm trying to gather some information, for various reasons. At a minimum, I need to know when Progress 9.1 and 9.1D were released. I mention these two versions because we are using 9.1D and, I assume, the "D" revision is probably just the fourth iteration in miner updates since the initial release of 9.1.
Optimally, I'd like to find a source-link to a Progress DB change log. However, questions for documentation aren't typically acceptable around here. Instead, I'm asking for the date these versions were released and requesting that you provide a source that I can explore further.
9.1A was 1999, 9.1D was 2002.
9.1E SP04, the very last release of version 9, was released in 2004.
With version 10 the product name changed to "OpenEdge". Which is much easier to google than "progress" ;)
If you actually have a given release of Progress installed you can look in the "version" file. It will tell you what the build date was.
For a general idea: http://www.oehive.org/VersionHistory
Why does Flyway use version numbers rather than timestamps?
How is that supposed to work with larger and possibly distributed teams?
Do I have to send and e-mail to all team members announcing that I am now reserving version number xy for me?
What happens if two developers both use the same version number?
What if a lower version number is checked into version control (and executed by the build server on the integration database) after another higher number has already been checked in?
I am used to mybatis-migrations that is closely modeled after the migrations in rails (>=2.1) where timestamps are used instead of version numbers.
Right now I think timestamps make a lot more sense: I don't have to worry about version numbers and out of order migrations are easily detected.
Quite a few questions here. I'll do my best to answer them.
Flyway's versioning system is flexible. It doesn't care whether your version is called 1.0, 20120816115123 or 2012.8.16.11.51.23. You are therefore free to use timestamps if you wish.
Reserving a version number can be a simple as adding your name next to a number on a whiteboard, a sheet of paper or a wiki page.
Flyway will detect multiple migrations with the same version and report an error.
Out of order migration support is currently the #1 requested issue and will be included in the upcoming 1.8 release.