How to set up multiple account code commit?
I am able to set for the only single user.
I am getting below error
Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository
exists
Sorry to hear about that. Can you describe more about the workflow you're trying to achieve through multi account access?
In the meantime, here's a link that explains how to achieve cross account access to CodeCommit if that helps: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/cross-account.html
Related
I am working on aws cloud and using codecommit service. I want to set up git-remote-codecommit tool on my ubuntu OS. but it give me error.
Here I was trying to follow following document.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/setting-up-git-remote-codecommit.html as federated user.
I added version information about OS and other required tools.
But after doing all this when try to execute
git clone codecommit: command it throws fatal error.
Can someone help me, what is root cause for this and how can I solve this issue.
Welcome to AWS Codecommit, it is a great service but has its quirks.
First question for you is have you configured your IAM role properly to have STS Assume role access? If you have not done that this role will not work with the federation. I would need to see a sample of your IAM role before I can help you debug the issue.
Additionally i am providing this link which walks you through the setup for federated roles: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/devops/using-federated-identities-with-aws-codecommit/
I have an open-source project that uses two separate Firebase projects for a test environment and the production one.
Ultimately, I want to have other developers be able to pull down the project and actually be able to run it WITHOUT me needing to give each individual developer access.
I see a number of solutions in this question: How to add collaborators to a Firebase app?. Those all seem to require each person's email.
I understand why it maybe isn't a thing, but I am wondering if there is a way to just give access to everyone for only the test project so that contributing is super low-friction. Something similar to Firestore database rules that allow read/write in a public fashion to get started for testing.
I've tried making a new IAM account in the Google Cloud Console, and I think that partially worked for the Firebase Cloud Functions access to Admin SDK, but my collaborators get hung up trying to run firebase use <test-firebase-project> saying that they don't have access.
I see a lot of other config options for IAM, but nothing sticking out to me for this public access scenario.
Can anyone confirm this either is or isn't a thing?
Thanks!
EDIT
To add some more detail to my project...
I am using Authentication, Firestore, and Cloud Functions. The only js package I will use is the Auth one, which will be loaded from a CDN (so I believe that doesn't apply to my question).
I want to give access to people to run the Cloud Functions locally. There is a pre-build step that I have made in vanilla Node that calls a Cloud Function (running locally), which uses the Firebase Admin SDK to call my Firestore database. I then write that response to a JSON file that my front end uses.
When my collaborators pull down the project, and install the Firebase CLI, when they try to serve the Cloud Functions locally, they get hit with a "no access" type of error. I was trying to resolve this by adding a service account into the /functions directory, but apparently that didn't help.
My collaborators don't need access to the console at all. I basically just need them to be able to run the Cloud Function locally (and make sure they can't access my production Firebase project).
I am happy to add more detail, but I kind of feel like I am just rambling. Thanks again.
There is no way to grant everyone contributor access to your Firebase console. You will either have add each individual user, or create your own dashboard that uses the API to show the relevant data.
I'm using Nexus Repository Manager OSS 3.13-0.0.1 and I'm trying to find the minimal privileges to use the Search API.
In the documentation the admin account is used : Search API Documentation
I've tried the nx-search-read privilege but is always return an empty result (this is not the case with the admin account).
Do I have to add more privileges in order to be able to use the Search API ?
The only other thing that should be needed is to grant read permissions to the components they should be able to search. E.g. nx-repository-view-maven2-*-read
Google's App Maker Setup Instruction seem to be inaccurate!
I am closely following the instructions found on https://developers.google.com/appmaker/models/cloudsql
For: Create a custom Google Cloud SQL database for your app/
Second Generation
Step 6a is not valid
There is No Database Found in the Settings
Note I have followed all of the previous steps without issue.
Does anyone know what I can do to follow those intructions listed on the url above if Step 6a appears to be incorrect?
Note: This is my first ever post on stackoverflow, please be kind to my ignorance if obvious.
Thanks!
This is how to set it up:
Connection from App Maker to Cloud SQL is locked
Basically, you need to assign the default instance within the Admin Console.
Mike
I'm running devstack (master from github as of 11/21/2014) with the Horizon v2 api (default) and I want to create a read-only user account/role for viewing a single tenant's resources. I'm fairly new to things, and /etc/nova/policy.json and /etc/keystone/policy.json make very little sense right now.
Has anyone created a role that permits just viewing things and no edits/updates/changes? If so, any advice on how to accomplish that?
Rocky Release of Openstack have introduced Reader role.
refer:- https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/latest/admin/service-api-protection.html