I'm trying to build a dynamic type/class builder for C# using F#, from the following XML
<config target="string">
<protocol>string</protocol>
<about_path>string</about_path>
<about_content>
<name_path>string</name_path>
<id_path>string</id_path>
<version_path>string</version_path>
</about_content>
</config>
Using the code below I can parse the sample just fine
module XmlParser =
open FSharp.Data
open System.Globalization
open FSharp.Data.Runtime.BaseTypes
open System.Xml.Linq
[<Literal>]
let targetSchema = "<config target=\"string\">
<protocol>string</protocol>
<about_path>string</about_path>
<about_content>
<name_path>string</name_path>
<id_path>string</id_path>
<version_path>string</version_path>
</about_content>
</config>"
type Configuration = XmlProvider<targetSchema>
The problem now is that I can't get my head around retrieving the inner parts of the about_content tag.
After parsing the actual xml using
let parsedValue = Configuration.Parse(xmlIn)
I've tried to get my head around the recursion handling in F# but am stuck at the non-working code that looks like this (e would be parsedValue.XElement)
let rec flatten ( e : System.Xml.Linq.XElement) (out:List<string>) =
if e.HasElements
then for inner in e.Elements -> flatten(inner)
else e.Name.LocalName
What I would need is a hint on how to gather the e.Name.LocalName values into a sequence/List as a result of the recursion. I could also live with having a list of XElements at the end.
The function flatten needs to return a sequence, not a single thing.
For elements with subelements, you need to call flatten for each, then concat all results:
e.Elements() |> Seq.map flatten |> Seq.concat
(note that XElement.Elements is a method, not a property; therefore, you need to add () to call it)
For a single element, just return its name wrapped in a single-element sequence:
Seq.singleton e.Name.LocalName
Putting it all together:
let rec flatten (e : System.Xml.Linq.XElement) =
if e.HasElements
then e.Elements() |> Seq.map flatten |> Seq.concat
else Seq.singleton e.Name.LocalName
(also note that I have removed your out parameter, which, I assume, was meant to be not a parameter, but an attempt to declare the function's return type; it can be omitted; for reference, function return type in F# is declared after the function's signature with a colon, e.g. let f (x:int) : int = x + 5)
If you prefer a more imperative-looking style, you can use the seq computation expression. yield will yield a single element, while yield! will have the effect of yielding each element of another sequence:
let rec flatten (e : System.Xml.Linq.XElement) =
seq {
if e.HasElements then
for i in e.Elements() do
yield! flatten i
else
yield e.Name.LocalName
}
Related
If I have one or more recursive functions inside an Ocaml function how can I call them without exit from the main function taking their value as return of the main function?
I'm new in Ocaml so I'll try to explain me better...
If I have :
let function =
let rec recursive1 = ...
...
let rec recursive2 = ...
...
How can I call them inside function to tell it "Hey, do you see this recursive function? Now call it and takes its value."
Because my problem is that Ocaml as return of my functions sees Unit instead of the right return.
I will post the code below :
let change k v list_ =
let rec support k v list_ =
match list_ with
| [] -> []
| (i,value) :: tl -> if i = k
then (k,v) :: tl
else (i,value) :: support k v tl in
let inserted = support k v list_ in inserted
let () =
let k = [ (1,"ciao");(2,"Hola");(3,"Salut") ] in
change 2 "Aufwidersen" k
Change takes as input a key, a value and a (int * string )list and should return the same list of the input but changing the value linked to the key selected ( if in list ).
support, instead, makes the dirty job. It builds a new list and when k is found i = k it changes value and attach the tile, closing the function.
The return of change is unit when it should be (int * string) list. I think because inserted isn't taken as return of the function.
change does not return unit. The error in fact tells you exactly the opposite, that it returns (int * string) list but that it expects unit. And it expects unit because you're assigning it to a () pattern.
I don't know what you actually intend to do with the return value, as right now you don't seem to care about it, but you can fix the error by just assigning it to a name:
let result: (int * string) list =
let k = [ (1,"ciao");(2,"Hola");(3,"Salut") ] in
change 2 "Aufwidersen" k
Since it's not used I've added a type annotation to make sure we're getting what we expect here, as otherwise result could be anything and the compiler wouldn't complain. You don't typically need this if you're going to use result however, as you'd then get an error if the type doesn't unify with its usage.
Is there a constructor for Dictionary in F# (that takes a Seq/List as input, and output a Dictionary)? I have written the following code that does what I want, but I am just curious maybe it is already implemented (and so I don't need to implement it myself)
let DictionaryBuilder (keyFunc:'a->'b) (valueFunc:'a->'c) aList =
let dict = new Dictionary<'b,'c>()
aList
|> Seq.iter (fun a -> dict.Add(keyFunc a, valueFunc a ))
dict // return
I know that in C#, you can use .ToDictionary (using System.Linq)
// using System.Collections.Generic;
// using System.Linq;
List<string> example = new List<string> {"a","b","c"};
Dictionary<string,string> output = example.ToDictionary(x => x+"Key", x => x+"Value");
// Output: {"aKey": "aValue", "bKey": "bValue", "cKey": "cValue"}
Thank you very much.
The signature of the dict function it's as follows:
dict : seq<'Key * 'Value> -> IDictionary<'Key,'Value>
So it takes a key value sequence as input. The key here would be to give it a key value sequence. In your case, you could use map instead of iter. The lines of code will be similar but it's a more functional way.
aList
|> Seq.map (fun a -> keyFunc a, valueFunc a )
|> dict
Edit
As TheQuickBrownFox have noted in the comments, the dict function produces a read-only dictionary.
I would recommend that you just use LINQ:
open System.Linq
[1; 2; 3].ToDictionary(id, (*) 2)
Either use it directly or use it in your helper function if you'd rather use a function than an extension method.
module Seq =
open System.Linq
let toDictionary (f:'s -> 'k) (g:'s -> 'v) (xs:_ seq) = xs.ToDictionary(f, g)
How can I create a function called getFuncName that takes a function of type (unit -> 'a) and returns its name.
I was talking to one of the C# devs and they said you could use the .Method property on a Func type as shown in an example here.
I tried to convert this to F# :
for example convert (unit -> 'a) to a type Func<_> then call the property on it but it always returns the string "Invoke".
let getFuncName f =
let fFunc = System.Func<_>(fun _ -> f())
fFunc.Method.Name
let customFunc() = 1.0
// Returns "Invoke" but I want it to return "customFunc"
getFuncName customFunc
A bit of background to this problem is:
I have created an array of functions of type (unit -> Deedle.Frame). I now want to cycle through those functions invoking them and saving them to csv with the csv name having the same name as the function. Some hypothetical code is below:
let generators : (unit -> Frame<int, string>) array = ...
generators
|> Array.iter (fun generator -> generator().SaveCsv(sprintf "%s\%s.csv" __SOURCE_DIRECTORY__ (getFuncName generator)))
This is being used in a scripting sense rather than as application code.
Not sure how you searched for information, but the first query to the search engine gave me this response:
let getFuncName f =
let type' = f.GetType()
let method' = type'.GetMethods() |> Array.find (fun m -> m.Name="Invoke")
let il = method'.GetMethodBody().GetILAsByteArray()
let methodCodes = [byte OpCodes.Call.Value;byte OpCodes.Callvirt.Value]
let position = il |> Array.findIndex(fun x -> methodCodes |> List.exists ((=)x))
let metadataToken = BitConverter.ToInt32(il, position+1)
let actualMethod = type'.Module.ResolveMethod metadataToken
actualMethod.Name
Unfortunately, this code only works when F# compiler does not inline function body into calling method.
Taken from here
Although there may be a more simple way.
I'm a beginner in F# and I'm trying to write a function to subset a dictionary given list, and return the result.
I tried this, but it doesn't work.
let Subset (dict:Dictionary<'T,'U>) (sub_list:list<'T>) =
let z = dict.Clear
sub_list |> List.filter (fun k -> dict.ContainsKey k)
|> List.map (fun k -> (k, dict.TryGetValue k) )
|> List.iter (fun s -> z.Add s)
|> List.iter (fun s -> z.Add s);;
--------------------------------------^^^
stdin(597,39): error FS0039: The field, constructor or member 'Add' is not defined
Perhaps there is a native function in F# to do that ?
thanks
EDIT
thanks to #TheInnerLight for his answer below
can you just educate me a bit more, and tell me how i should adapt that function if i want to return the original variable being modified ?
(of course it would be possible to go from where we call that function, call it with a temp variable, and reassign)
You have written:
let z = dict.Clear
z is of type unit->unit yet you are calling z.Add.
I suspect you want to write
let subset (dict:Dictionary<'T,'U>) (sub_list:list<'T>) =
let z = Dictionary<'T,'U>() // create new empty dictionary
sub_list |> List.filter (fun k -> dict.ContainsKey k)
|> List.map (fun k -> (k, dict.[k]) )
|> List.iter (fun s -> z.Add s)
z
TryGetValue is going to return something of type bool*'U in F#, which I suspect you don't want if already filtering by ContainsKey so you probably want to look up directly with dict.[k].
Note that Dictionary is a mutable collection so if you were to actually call dict.Clear(), it wouldn't return a new empty dictionary, it would mutate the existing one by clearing all elements. The immutable F# data structure usually used for key-value relationships is Map, see https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee353880.aspx for things you can do with Map.
Here is a map version (this is the solution I recommend):
let subset map subList =
subList
|> List.choose (fun k -> Option.map (fun v -> k,v) (Map.tryFind k map))
|> Map.ofList
Edit (in response to the question edit about modifying the input variable):
It's possible to update an existing dictionary using the destructive update operator <- on a mutable variable.
Option 1:
let mutable dict = Dictionary<Key,Value>() // replace this with initial dictionary
let lst = [] // list to check against
dict <- sublist dict lst
Likewise, my first function could be changed to perform only a side effect (removing unwanted elements).
Option 2:
let subset (d : System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<'T,'U>) (sub_list : list<'T>) =
sub_list
|> List.filter (d.ContainsKey >> not)
|> List.iter (d.Remove >> ignore)
For an F# beginner I don't really recommend Option 1 and I really don't recommend Option 2.
The functional approach is to favour immutable values, pure functions, etc. This means you will be better off thinking of your functions as defining data transformations rather than as defining a list of instructions to be performed.
Because F# is a multi-paradigm language, it's easy to fall back on the imperative in the early stages but you will probably gain the most from learning your new language if you force yourself to adopt the standard paradigm and idioms of that language even if those idioms feel strange and uncomfortable to begin with.
The immutable data structures like Map and list are pretty efficient at sharing data as well as providing good time complexity so these are really the go-to collections when working in F#.
I'm trying to learn Haskell, specifically Snap, Blaze HTML5 and Persist. I would like to take every row in a table, select a single column from it, and then concatenate the values into a single string.
I've previously worked with C#'s LINQ quite extensively and under Entity Framework I could do it like this:
String.Join(", ", dbContext.People.Select(p => p.Name));
This would compile down to SELECT Name FROM People, with C# then concatenating those rows into a string with ", " in between.
To try and get the concatenation part right, I put this together, which seems to work:
intercalate ", " $ map show [1..10]
(it counts 1-9, concatenates with ", " in between the items)
However, I can't get this to work with Database.Persist.Sqlite. I'm not sure I quite understand the syntax here in Haskell. To contact the DB and retrieve the rows, I have to call: (as far as I understand)
runSqlite "TestDB" $ selectList ([] :: [Filter Person]) [] 0 0
The problem is that I'm not sure how to get the list out of runSqlite. runSqlite doesn't return the type I'm after, so I can't use the return value of runSqlite. How would I do this?
Thank you for reading.
To clarify:
Snap requires that I define a function to return the HTML I wish to send back to the client making the HTTP request. This means that:
page = runSqlite "TestDB" $ do
{pull data from the DB)
Is no-go as I can't return the data via the runSqlite call, and as far as I know I can't have a variable in the page function which is set within the runSqlite do block. All examples I can find just write to IO in the runSqlite do block, which is not what needs to be done here.
The type of runSqlite is:
runSqlite :: (MonadBaseControl IO m, MonadIO m) => Text -> SqlPersistT (NoLoggingT (ResourceT m)) a -> m a
And the type of selectList is:
[Filter val] -> [SelectOpt val] -> m [Entity val]
So, you can actually, use the nice do notation of Monad, to extract it:
runSqlite "TestDB" $ do
myData <- selectList ([] :: [Filter Person]) [] 0 0
-- Now do stuff with myData
The <- thing gets the list out of the monad. I would suggest you to go through this chapter to get an idea of how Persistent is used. Note that the chapters in the book assume a basic Haskell understanding.
The issue is that I want to use the selectList outside of runSqlite as
I need to pass the concatenated string to a Blaze HTML5 tag builder:
body $ do p (concatenated list...)
For this case, just define a function that does your intended task:
myLogic :: [SqlColumnData] -> String -- Note that SqlColumnData is hypothetical
myLogic xs = undefined
And then just call them appropriately in your main function:
main = runSqlite "TestDB" $ do
myData <- selectList ([] :: [Filter Person]) [] 0 0
let string = myLogic myData
-- do any other remaining stuff
It hadn't clicked that if I didn't use a do block with runSqlite, the result of the last call in the statement was the return value of the statement - this makes total sense.
https://gist.github.com/egonSchiele/5400694
In this example (not mine) the readPosts function does exactly what I'm after and cleared up some Haskell syntax confusion.
Thank you for your help #Sibi.