I am trying to get a final speech transcription/recognition result from a Fleck websocket audio stream. The method OnOpen executes code when the websocket connection is first established and the OnBinary method executes code whenever binary data is received from the client. I have tested the websocket by echoing the voice into the websocket and writing the same binary data back into the websocket at the same rate. This test worked so I know that the binary data is being sent correctly (640 byte messages with a 20ms frame size).
Therefore, my code is failing and not the service. My aim is to do the following:
When the websocket connection is created, send the initial audio config request to the API with SingleUtterance == true
Run a background task that listens for the streaming results waiting for isFinal == true
Send each binary message received to the API for transcription
When background task recognises isFinal == true, stop current streaming request and create a new request - repeating steps 1 through 4
The context of this project is transcribing all single utterances in a live phone call.
socket.OnOpen = () =>
{
firstMessage = true;
};
socket.OnBinary = async binary =>
{
var speech = SpeechClient.Create();
var streamingCall = speech.StreamingRecognize();
if (firstMessage == true)
{
await streamingCall.WriteAsync(
new StreamingRecognizeRequest()
{
StreamingConfig = new StreamingRecognitionConfig()
{
Config = new RecognitionConfig()
{
Encoding = RecognitionConfig.Types.AudioEncoding.Linear16,
SampleRateHertz = 16000,
LanguageCode = "en",
},
SingleUtterance = true,
}
});
Task getUtterance = Task.Run(async () =>
{
while (await streamingCall.ResponseStream.MoveNext(
default(CancellationToken)))
{
foreach (var result in streamingCall.ResponseStream.Current.Results)
{
if (result.IsFinal == true)
{
Console.WriteLine("This test finally worked");
}
}
}
});
firstMessage = false;
}
else if (firstMessage == false)
{
streamingCall.WriteAsync(new StreamingRecognizeRequest()
{
AudioContent = Google.Protobuf.ByteString.CopyFrom(binary, 0, 640)
}).Wait();
}
};
.Wait() is a blocking call being called in an async/await. They don't mix well and can lead to deadlocks.
Simply keep the code async all the way through
//...omitted for brevity
else if (firstMessage == false) {
await streamingCall.WriteAsync(new StreamingRecognizeRequest() {
AudioContent = Google.Protobuf.ByteString.CopyFrom(binary, 0, 640)
});
}
Related
I'm using node.js as a backend server for sending push notification from the Firebase Cloud Messaging service. The notifications are working fine with local server but on live server, I get this error:
Error while making request: socket hang up. Error code: ECONNRESET
Things to consider are that...
Number of users are in the thousands on live server
Firebase version is firebase-admin#6.5.1
Previously unregistered tokens are still there. But now registered tokens are being stored.
This is my code for sending notifications:
for (let c = 0; c < tokens.length; c++)
{
let notifyTo = tokens[c];
const platform = platforms[c];
let payload;
if (platform === "ios") {
payload = {
notification: {
title: "title",
subtitle :"messgae",
sound: "default",
badge: "1"
},
data: {
sendFrom: "",
notificationType: "",
flag: "true"
}
};
} else if (platform === "android") {
payload = {
data: {
title: "",
message : "",
flag: "true"
}
};
}
const registrationtoken = notifyTo;
await admin.messaging().sendToDevice(registrationtoken, payload)
.then(function (response) {
console.log("Successfully sent message:");
})
.catch(function (error) {
console.log("Error sending message: ");
});
}
Your issue is caused by your function taking too long to respond to the client (more than 60 seconds) and is caused by the following line:
await admin.messaging().sendToDevice(registrationtoken, payload)
Because you are waiting for each call of sendToDevice() individually, you are running your for-loop in synchronous sequential order, rather than asynchronously in parallel.
To avoid this, you want to make use of array mapping and Promise.all() which will allow you to build a queue of sendToDevice() requests. As in your current code, any failed messages will be silently ignored, but we will also count them.
Your current code makes use of two arrays, tokens and platforms, so in the code below I use a callback for Array.prototype.map() that takes two arguments - the current mapped value (from tokens) and it's index (your for-loop's c value). The index is then used to get the correct platform entry.
let fcmPromisesArray = tokens.map((token, idx) => {
let platform = platforms[idx];
if (platform === "ios") {
payload = {
notification: {
title: "title",
subtitle :"messgae",
sound: "default",
badge: "1"
},
data: {
sendFrom: "",
notificationType: "",
flag: "true"
}
};
} else if (platform === "android") {
payload = {
data: {
title: "",
message : "",
flag: "true"
}
};
}
return admin.messaging().sendToDevice(token, payload) // note: 'await' was changed to 'return' here
.then(function (response) {
return true; // success
})
.catch(function (error) {
console.log("Error sending message to ", token);
return false; // failed
});
});
let results = await Promise.all(fcmPromisesArray); // wait here for all sendToDevice() requests to finish or fail
let successCount = results.reduce((acc, v) => v ? acc + 1 : acc, 0); // this minified line just counts the number of successful results
console.log(`Successfully sent messages to ${successCount}/${results.length} devices.`);
After this snippet has run, don't forget to send a result back to the client using res.send(...) or similar.
So I've been working on experimenting with DART (whereby my core languages are C++, and embedded C derivates). Hence my code is probably not pretty as I'm more of a procedural programmer, but I'm getting by and learning... I've been struggling around Futures pertaining to await sync, and basically, I simply can't get DART to WAIT. The following code establishes a socket connection to a small embedded device and extracts info. That all works, but notice the order of operations SHOULD be main() gets some info from the console, then should call the method cardStatus to run off and get the info from the embedded device via the socket connection. This is where the await should occur. When the Future is returned, it should go off to the printstuff() method. I've added print statements that should go in order and read:
This should print 1st
This should print 2nd
This should print 3rd
Instead since the wait is not occurring on the cardstatus call (which is time consuming), I get:
This should print 1st
This should print 3rd
This should print 2nd
I've followed another thread on the use of async, and seem to be at least following one solid way of using this Other thread (I tried a .then with a completer with a similar result, so there is something core I feel I'm missing).. but I've been stuck on this for a week.
Code below, along with the console output.
import 'dart:io';
import 'dart:async' show Future;
const String STATUS = "#111111;";
String defaultIP = "10.1.14.202";
int defaultConfigPort = 5111;
int defaultControlPort = 6722;
var card = new Map();
getInput(String defaults) {
String takenin = stdin.readLineSync();
if (takenin == '') takenin = defaults;
return takenin;
}
Future main() async {
stdout.write('What is the IP address of the card ($defaultIP): ');
String ipaddress = getInput(defaultIP);
defaultIP = ipaddress;
print ("This should print 1st");
stdout.writeln("Connecting to $defaultIP");
await cardStatus(defaultIP, defaultConfigPort, STATUS, card);
printstuff();
}
printstuff() {
stdout.writeln(card['subnet']);
print ("This should print 3rd");
}
Future cardStatus(String ip, int port, String message, Map card) {
return new Future.delayed(Duration.ZERO, () {
Socket.connect(ip, port).then((socket) {
print('Connected to: '
'${socket.remoteAddress.address}:${socket.remotePort}');
socket.listen((data) {
print(new String.fromCharCodes(data).trim());
List str1 = (new String.fromCharCodes(data).trim().split(','));
print(str1);
print ("This should print 2nd");
//var card = new Map();
card['ip'] = str1[0];
card['subnet'] = str1[1];
card['gateway'] = str1[2];
card['unknown'] = str1[3];
card['persist'] = str1[4] == 'true';
card['build'] = str1[5];
card['serial'] = str1[6].substring(0, 14);
card['cloudpassword'] = str1[6].substring(14, 20);
card['DNS'] = str1[7];
card['cloudhost'] = str1[8];
card['cloudenabled'] = str1[9] == 'true';
print(card['ip']);
},
onDone: () {
print("Done");
socket.destroy();
});
//Send the request
socket.write(message);
});
});
}
and this is the current console output. notice the null shouldn't be a null if the cardStatus would have completed it would be printed str1.
What is the IP address of the card (10.1.14.202):
This should print 1st
Connecting to 10.1.14.202
null
This should print 3rd
Connected to: 10.1.14.202:5111
>10.1.14.202,255.255.255.0,10.1.14.1,,0,435,F44900A60040F8000000,192.168.1.1,connect.tutuuu.com,0;
[>10.1.14.202, 255.255.255.0, 10.1.14.1, , 0, 435, F44900A60040F8000000, 192.168.1.1, connect.tutuuu.com, 0;]
This should print 2nd
10.1.14.202
Done
Process finished with exit code 0
Thanks for all the help!
You are missing return before Socket.connect. As it stands now your code just starts connecting but never awaits it through future. I would highly recommend using as much as possible the new await / async syntax.
Here is a running example that does get google homepage:
import 'dart:io';
import 'dart:async' show Future;
Future main() async {
print("This should print 1st");
await cardStatus('www.google.com', 80, 'GET /\nHTTP 1.1\n\n');
printstuff();
}
printstuff() {
print("This should print 3rd");
}
Future cardStatus(String ip, int port, String message) {
return new Future.delayed(Duration.ZERO, () {
return Socket.connect(ip, port).then((socket) {
print('Connected to: '
'${socket.remoteAddress.address}:${socket.remotePort}');
socket.listen((data) {
List str1 = (new String.fromCharCodes(data).trim().split(','));
print(str1.first);
print("This should print 2nd");
}, onDone: () {
print("Done");
socket.destroy();
}, onError: (e) {
print("Error while listening: $e");
});
socket.write(message);
});
});
}
Below slightly redacted version that uses awaits, and try / catch to handle errors:
import 'dart:io';
import 'dart:async' show Future;
Future main() async {
print("This should print 1st");
await cardStatus('www.google.com', 80, 'GET /\nHTTP 1.1\n\n');
print("This should print 3rd");
}
Future<String> cardStatus(String ip, int port, String message) async {
var socket = await Socket.connect(ip, port);
print('Connected to: '
'${socket.remoteAddress.address}:${socket.remotePort}');
socket.write(message);
print("Sent request");
try {
var response = await socket.fold(
'',
(String acc, List<int> data) =>
acc + new String.fromCharCodes(data).trim());
print("Received response: ${response.substring(0, 10)}");
return response;
} finally {
socket.close();
}
}
I know it was answered but the question is great and I struggled myself with the concept so here is another element that got me to understand. in the dartpad (https://dartpad.dartlang.org/) try this (comments are in the code):
import 'dart:async';
//Just creating a duration to use later
Duration duration = new Duration(milliseconds: 500);
void main() {
//This is what tricked me, printStuff is async so running in parallel processing by default
//There is no need to call the function in a certain way (like a go xxx for a goroutine)
//there is an await in the function so it will wait inside the function only
//i.e. printStuff('a') starts then printStuff('b') starts straight away...already in prallel processing
//Run it and check the output
printStuff('a');
printStuff('b');
//Basically the await is in the function so printStuff is still returning a Future
//i.e. printStuff('a') starts but doesn't wait to complete to start printStuff('b')
}
Future<void> printStuff(String id) async {
for(int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i) {
//this await is waiting for the command to complete to move to the next iteration...
//the i iterations are done one after the other
await new Future.delayed(duration, () {
print(id + i.toString());
});
}
}
Then try this:
import 'dart:async';
Duration duration = new Duration(milliseconds: 500);
//becuase I use await in main now, I must make it return a future and be async
Future main() async {
//to make it happen one after the other, you need await at a call function level
await printStuff('a');
await printStuff('b');
//Basically this says complete printStuff('a'), then start printStuff('b')...
//and yes technically one doesn't need the second await becuase there is nothing after
}
Future<void> printStuff(String id) async {
for(int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i) {
await new Future.delayed(duration, () {
print(id + i.toString());
});
}
}
So my personal misunderstanding was that an async function is called in parallel straight away and an await in a function waits for real but in the function itself, with no impact on other parallel processing happening.
we have a group in telegram and we have a rule says no one must leave a message in group between 23 to 7 am , I wanna delete messages comes to group between these times automatically . could anyone tell me how I can do that with telegram cli or any other telegram client?
Use new version of telegram-cli. It's not fully open source, but you can download a binary from its site. Also you can find some examples there.
I hope the following snippet in JavaScript will help you to achieve your goal.
var spawn = require('child_process').spawn;
var readline = require('readline');
// delay between restarts of the client in case of failure
const RESTARTING_DELAY = 1000;
// the main object for a process of telegram-cli
var tg;
function launchTelegram() {
tg = spawn('./telegram-cli', ['--json', '-DCR'],
{ stdio: ['ipc', 'pipe', process.stderr] });
readline.createInterface({ input: tg.stdout }).on('line', function(data) {
try {
var obj = JSON.parse(data);
} catch (err) {
if (err.name == 'SyntaxError') {
// sometimes client sends not only json, plain text process is not
// necessary, just output for easy debugging
console.log(data.toString());
} else {
throw err;
}
}
if (obj) {
processUpdate(obj);
}
});
tg.on('close', function(code) {
// sometimes telegram-cli fails due to bugs, then try to restart it
// skipping problematic messages
setTimeout(function(tg) {
tg.kill(); // the program terminates by sending double SIGINT
tg.kill();
tg.on('close', launchTelegram); // start again for updates
// as soon as it is finished
}, RESTARTING_DELAY, spawn('./telegram-cli', { stdio: 'inherit' }));
});
}
function processUpdate(upd) {
var currentHour = Date.now().getHours();
if (23 <= currentHour && currentHour < 7 &&
upd.ID='UpdateNewMessage' && upd.message_.can_be_deleted_) {
// if the message meets certain criteria, send a command to telegram-cli to
// delete it
tg.send({
'ID': 'DeleteMessages',
'chat_id_': upd.message_.chat_id_,
'message_ids_': [ upd.message_.id_ ]
});
}
}
launchTelegram(); // just launch these gizmos
We activate JSON mode passing --json key. telegram-cli appends underscore to all fields in objects. See all available methods in full schema.
I have a form that was created on it's own UI thread running in the system tray which I need to manipulate with a signalR connection from the server which I believe to be running on a background thread. I'm aware of the need to invoke controls when not accessing them from their UI thread. I am able to manipulate (make popup in my case) using the following code that is called on form load but would like a sanity check as I'm fairly new to async:
private void WireUpTransport()
{
// connect up to the signalR server
var connection = new HubConnection("http://localhost:32957/");
var messageHub = connection.CreateProxy("message");
var uiThreadScheduler = TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext();
var backgroundTask = connection.Start().ContinueWith(task =>
{
if (task.IsFaulted)
{
Console.WriteLine("There was an error opening the connection: {0}", task.Exception.GetBaseException());
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("The connection was opened successfully");
}
});
// subscribe to the servers Broadcast method
messageHub.On<Domain.Message>("Broadcast", message =>
{
// do our work on the UI thread
var uiTask = backgroundTask.ContinueWith(t =>
{
popupNotifier.TitleText = message.Title + ", Priority: " + message.Priority.ToString();
popupNotifier.ContentText = message.Body;
popupNotifier.Popup();
}, uiThreadScheduler);
});
}
Does this look OK? It's working on my local machine but this has the potential to be rolled out on every user machine in our business and I need to get it right.
Technically you should hook up to all notifications (using On<T>) before you Start listening. As far as your async work I'm not quite sure what you were trying to do, but for some reason your chaining the notification to your UI in On<T> to the backgroundTask variable which is the Task that was returned to you by the call to Start. There's no reason for that to be involved there.
So this is probably what you want:
private void WireUpTransport()
{
// connect up to the signalR server
var connection = new HubConnection("http://localhost:32957/");
var messageHub = connection.CreateProxy("message");
var uiTaskScheduler = TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext();
// subscribe to the servers Broadcast method
messageHub.On<Domain.Message>("Broadcast", message =>
{
// do our work on the UI thread
Task.Factory.StartNew(
() =>
{
popupNotifier.TitleText = message.Title + ", Priority: " + message.Priority.ToString();
popupNotifier.ContentText = message.Body;
popupNotifier.Popup();
},
CancellationToken.None,
TaskCreationOptions.None,
uiTaskScheduler);
});
connection.Start().ContinueWith(task =>
{
if (task.IsFaulted)
{
Console.WriteLine("There was an error opening the connection: {0}", task.Exception.GetBaseException());
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("The connection was opened successfully");
}
});
}
I'm creating a Firefox add-on which contains server listening for TCP connections on one port. The problem is that it does not always close the connection: after sending a FIN-ACK, and receiving an ACK, the TCP session is left open if the client does not send in return a FIN-ACK.
Only some connections are not closed completely. But after a while, they are too many TC connections hanging, and Firefox cannot open an new file handle, or receive any new connection.
TCP localhost.localdomain:commtact-https->localhost.localdomain:46951 (CLOSE_WAIT)
I could not find a way, preferably in the add-on (but I also tried on the client side) to make sure all TCP connections are closed correctly. Here is what the server functionality looks like in the add-on:
init_server: function(port) {
server.result = {};
server.listener = {
onSocketAccepted : function(serverSocket, transport) {
server.result.sout = transport.openOutputStream(0,0,0);
var instream = transport.openInputStream(0,0,0);
server.result.sin = Components.classes["#mozilla.org/binaryinputstream;1"].
createInstance(Components.interfaces.nsIBinaryInputStream);
server.result.sin.setInputStream(instream);
server.debug("New incoming connection");
var dataListener = {
onStartRequest: function(request, context) {
server.debug("onStartRequest");
},
onStopRequest: function(request, context, status) {
server.debug("onStopRequest");
// instream.close();
// delete instream;
// server.result.sout.close();
// server.result.sin.close();
},
onDataAvailable: function(request, context, inputStream, offset, count) {
var sis = Components.classes ["#mozilla.org/scriptableinputstream;1"].createInstance (Components.interfaces.nsIScriptableInputStream);
sis.init(inputStream);
var str = sis.read(count);
var suc = Components.classes ["#mozilla.org/intlscriptableunicodeconverter"].createInstance(Components.interfaces.nsIScriptableUnicodeConverter);
suc.charset = "utf-8";
var line = suc. ConvertToUnicode (str);
server.debug(line);
[ ... process data ... ]
// instream.close();
// server.result.sout.close();
// server.result.sin.close();
// delete instream;
},
};
// Listen to new data
var pump = Components.classes["#mozilla.org/network/input-stream-pump;1"].createInstance(Components.interfaces.nsIInputStreamPump);
pump.init(instream, -1, -1, 0, 0, false); //screenserver.result.sin
pump.asyncRead(dataListener, null);
},
onStopListening : function(serverSocket, status){
server.debug("Client dead?");
server.init_server(server.PORT);
},
};
server.socket = null;
server.socket = Components.classes["#mozilla.org/network/server-socket;1"].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIServerSocket);
server.socket.init(port, true, -1);
server.socket.asyncListen(server.listener);
}
I think you need to save the transport you're passed in call onSocketAccepted and then invoke close() on that.