I want to create a top-right border of a div like the following picture
I am pretty new to css. Could anyone give me a pointer to this?
You can use an absolutely positioned ::after pseudo element ( or an element in your markup ) to create the green area. Setting the upper right border radius and overflow: hidden; will finish the job.
body {
background: #ddd;
}
div {
background: white;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
}
.funky-border {
border-top-right-radius: 30px;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
.funky-border:after {
content:'';
background: green;
width: 20px;
height: 60px;
transform: rotate( 135deg );
position: absolute;
top: -20px;
right: 0;
}
<div class="funky-border"></div>
Here is an easy way with one element:
.box {
width:200px;
height:100px;
border-top-right-radius:30px;
background:
linear-gradient(to top right,transparent 49%,green 50%) top right/50px 50px no-repeat,
gray;
}
<div class="box">
</div>
Related
I've looked into this a fair bit but can't seem to find a good, solid answer to find how to make a responsive circle around a div element of variable height.
It's easy to make a simple responsive circle using vw units.
<div style="height:20vw; width:20vw"></div>
However, I'm looking to use a min-height of an element and have a circle around this div.
Another way to create a responsive circle is using something like the snippet below, but again I can't adapt this to work for a variable height (again, I can't use vh units as the div will change in height.
.square {
position: relative;
width: 10%;
background: gray;
border-radius: 50%;
}
.square:after {
content: "";
display: block;
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
<div class="square">
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
I am trying to create something like the below, where the circle will never cut into the corners of the div (with around a 10px padding). I personally was trying to avoid javascript and would have preferred a css only approach, but it seems it's unavoidable. Maybe the only solution is to use a jquery to calculate the height of the element in order to apply this to a wrapper element?
I was playing around with this:
.square {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
display: inline-block;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
min-height: 100px;
border-radius: 50%;
background: url('https://i.imgur.com/2dxaFs9_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium');
background-size: 100% 100%;
padding: 20px;
}
.content {
width: 300px;
min-height: 100px;
background: tomato;
}
<div class="square">
<div class="content">
Hello!<br>
<br><br><br>This has a variable height but fixed width<br><br><br>Hello
</div>
</div>
Clip-path can easily do this if you consider solid coloration.
Resize the element and the circle will follow:
.box {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
overflow: hidden;
resize: both;
background: blue;
box-shadow: 0 0 0 200vmax red;
clip-path: circle(71%);
margin: 100px auto;
}
<div class="box"></div>
Related question to understand the magic number 71%: clip-path:circle() radius doesn't seem to be calculated correctly
To use an image we can consider pseudo elements. You can also rely on calc() to add the offset:
.box {
width: 200px;=
resize: both;
clip-path: circle(calc(71% + 10px));
margin: 100px auto;
position: relative;
font-size:35px;
color:#fff;
}
/* the background layer */
.box::before {
content:"";
position: absolute;
z-index:-1;
top:0;
left:0;
right:0;
bottom:0;
background:blue;
}
/* the image layer */
.box::after {
content:"";
position: fixed; /* to make sure the image cover all the screen */
z-index:-2;
top:0;
bottom:0;
left:0;
right:0;
background:url(https://picsum.photos/id/1015/1000/1000) center/cover no-repeat;
}
<div class="box" contenteditable="true"> Edit this<br>text </div>
I tried my hardest to figure this out with pure css. Though the problem with css I could not figure out how to calculate the diameter of the circle based on the content div size; the length from top left corner to bottom right corner of the variable height div.
I'm not sure if can be done using the calc() css function.
But I did manage to do it with a little jquery (which could easily be changed to pure javascript if you are not using jquery).
See working resizable example below (follow my comments in code)
Note: If you are using internet explorer the resizable demo content div will not resize.
// circumscriber for variable size divs
function circumscriber() {
// for each variable size div on page
$(".variable-size").each(function() {
// get the variable size div content width and height
let width = $(this).outerWidth();
let height = $(this).outerHeight();
// get the diameter for our pefect circle based on content size
let diameter = Math.sqrt(width ** 2 + height ** 2);
// extra 15 pixel circle edge around variable size div
let edge = 15;
// add current circle size width css
$('.circle', this).css({
'width': (diameter + (edge * 2)) + 'px'
})
});
}
// run the circumscriber (you might wana do this on ready)
circumscriber();
// if the window is resized responsively
$(window).on('resize', function() {
circumscriber();
});
// for demo purpose to fire circumscriber when resizing content
// not needed for real thing
$('.content').on('input', function() {
this.style.height = "";
this.style.height = ( this.scrollHeight - 30 ) + "px";
circumscriber();
}).on('mouseup', function() {
circumscriber();
});
/* variable size container to be circumscribed by circle */
/* none of these styles are required, this just to center the variable size div in the window for demo purposes */
.variable-size {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
/* resizable text area for demo */
/* again not needed */
.variable-size .content {
padding: 15px;
background: #fff;
resize: both;
overflow: auto;
color: #000;
border: none;
width: 200px;
font-weight: bold;
}
.variable-size .content:focus {
outline: 0;
}
/* child circle div css */
.variable-size .circle {
position: absolute;
background-image: url('https://i.imgur.com/2dxaFs9_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium');
background-position: center center;
z-index: -1;
border-radius: 50%;
left: 50%;
top: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
transition: all 0.5s ease;
width: 0;
}
/* fast way to make circle height the same as current width */
.variable-size .circle:before {
display: block;
content: '';
width: 100%;
padding-top: 100%;
}
/* demo window css */
HTML,
BODY {
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
background: black;
position: relative;
font-family: "Lucida Console", Courier, monospace;
}
<div class="variable-size">
<textarea class="content" rows="1" placeholder="TYPE TEXT OR RESIZE ME ↘"></textarea>
<div class="circle"></div>
</div>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
See jsfiddle here... https://jsfiddle.net/joshmoto/6d0zs7uq/
var c = document.getElementById("myCanvas");
var ctx = c.getContext("2d");
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(100, 75, 50, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
ctx.stroke();
Source: https://www.w3schools.com/
You could use flex display and insert empty flex-items around the inner div and use flex-basis to fix their width.
Try this
.square {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
min-height: 100px;
border-radius: 50%;
background: black;
background-size: 100% 100%;
padding: 20px;
}
.content {
width: 300px;
min-height: 100px;
background: tomato;
}
.emptyDiv {
flex-basis: 120px
}
<div class="square">
<div class="emptyDiv"></div>
<div class="content">
Hello!<br>
<br><br><br>This has a variable height but fixed width<br><br><br>Hello
</div>
<div class="emptyDiv"></div>
</div>
I have tried few but is there a way to create an outline to right side of the div?
somthing like the purple line in the below image
https://unsee.cc/geduzopi/
use a pseudo element absolutely positioned to the right of the parent, then use translateX() to push it outside of the parent.
div {
display: inline-block;
width: 5em;
background: orange;
text-align: center;
position: relative;
}
div:after {
content: '';
width: .5em;
background: purple;
position: absolute;
right: 0; top: 0; bottom: 0;
transform: translateX(200%);
<div>1</div>
You can use border-right. For example
border-right: aqua 2pt solid;
See
https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_border-right.asp
If you want to create an outline on one side and NOT a border, you can use box-shadow with inset like I did in my codepen example below. My example is good to look at if you have a border radius.
https://codepen.io/drewkiimon/pen/qeWQVx
div {
background: pink;
height: 250px;
width: 250px;
box-shadow: inset 0 1px black;
}
<div>
</div>
This is what i am trying to achive
i have :
#image1 {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
align-self: auto;
background-color: #dc022e;
width: 340px;
height: 100px;
border-radius: 50% / 100%;
border-bottom-left-radius: 0;
/*transform: rotate(10deg);*/
border-bottom-right-radius: 0;
opacity: 0.8;
}
#image2 img {
width: 80%;
}
<div>
<div id="image2">
<img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcThtVuIQ7CBYssbdwtzZjVLI_uw09SeLmyrxaRQEngnQAked5ZB">
</div>
<div id="image1"></div>
</div>
Finally I don't know how to make it rotated and with the margins cut like in the picture
A Quick example of this would use a pseudo element and have the image set in the background.
div {
position: relative;
height: 300px;
width: 500px;
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/500/300);/*image path*/
overflow: hidden;/*hides the rest of the circle*/
}
div:before {
content: "";
position: absolute; /*positions with reference to div*/
top: 100%;
left: 50%;
width: 0;/*define value if you didn't want hover*/
height: 0;
border-radius: 50%;
background: tomato;/*could be rgba value (you can remove opacity then)*/
opacity: 0.5;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);/*ensures it is in center of image*/
transition: all 0.4s;
}
/*Demo Only*/
div:hover:before {/*place this in your pseudo declaration to remove the hover*/
height: 100%;
width: 150%;/*this makes the shape wider than square*/
transform: translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(5deg);/*ensures it is in center of image + rotates*/
}
div {/*This stuff is for the text*/
font-size: 40px;
line-height: 300px;
text-align: center;
}
<div>HOVER ME</div>
Instead of nested elements, you can just use a pseudo element. This is placed at the bottom of the container div. For this to work, you need position:relative and overflow:hidden on the container div. Also, pseudo elements always need the content declaration.
To modify the border radius, you just play around with left | width | height of the pseudo element. You don't need any rotation.
Instead of hex color and opacity you can as well use the "new" color space rgba(r,g,b,a) where a is the opacity value.
For the passepartout you simply use the border declaration.
#image2{
position:relative;
border:10px solid #888;
overflow:hidden;
box-shadow:0 0 4px #aaa;
}
#image2::after {
content:"";
display:block;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;left:-10%;
background-color: #dc022e;
width: 120%;
height: 60%;
border-radius: 100% 100% 0 0;
opacity: 0.8;
}
#image2 img {
width: 100%;
display:block;
position:relative;
}
<div id="image2">
<img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcThtVuIQ7CBYssbdwtzZjVLI_uw09SeLmyrxaRQEngnQAked5ZB">
</div>
You can just use position: absolute for your image and position: relative for your overlay, adjusting the top position and width according to your needs. Here's a Fiddle. Hope this helps!
Edit: Here's an updated version of the Fiddle demonstrating border and overflow properties on the img container. As CBroe mentioned, rotating a circle is probably not a good use of your time in this case. Also, I definitely agree that using a pseudo element is a much cleaner approach than nesting images.
I've tried the perspective solution here How to transform each side of a shape separately? but can't get it to work probably due to the irregularness of the shape. Only the top and right side columns are slanted, vertical and bottom are straight. How can I do this with CSS?
Using CSS borders you can create triangles and trapezoids.
You can achieve your shape joining a triangle and a trapezoid.
.triangle {
border: 0 solid red;
border-left-width: 500px;
border-top-width: 30px;
border-top-color: transparent;
}
.trapezoid {
border: 0 solid red;
width: 500px;
border-bottom-width: 150px;
border-right-width: 30px;
border-right-color: transparent;
}
<div class="triangle"></div>
<div class="trapezoid"></div>
Method 1: Clip path
You could make use of CSS clip-path feature to clip a rectangle into the required polygon shape.
div {
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 150px;
width: 250px;
background: red;
padding: 10px;
-webkit-clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 90% 10%, 100% 100%, 0% 100%);
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 90% 10%, 100% 100%, 0% 100%);
}
div#image {
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/400/200);
}
/* Just for demo */
div{
float: left;
margin: 10px;
transition: all 1s;
}
div:hover{
height: 200px;
width: 300px;
}
<div>Some text</div>
<div id="image"></div>
Pros:
Supports non-solid color fills inside the shape and also allow text to be present inside.
The shape is responsive and can adapt even if the container's dimensions change.
Cons:
Poor browser support for the CSS clip-path feature. This can be overcome by using inline SVG for the clip-path like in the below snippet as this has much better browser support.
div {
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 150px;
width: 250px;
padding: 10px;
background: red;
-webkit-clip-path: url(#clip);
clip-path: url(#clip);
}
div#image {
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/400/200);
}
/* Just for demo */
div{
float: left;
margin: 10px;
transition: all 1s;
}
div:hover{
height: 200px;
width: 300px;
}
<svg width="0" height="0">
<defs>
<clipPath id="clip" clipPathUnits="objectBoundingBox">
<path d="M0 0, 0.9 0.1, 1 1, 0 1z" />
</clipPath>
</defs>
</svg>
<div>
Some text
</div>
<div id="image"></div>
Method 2: CSS Transforms
Generally it is better not to use transforms when there is going to be content like image or text inside the shape (or) when the shape's background is not going to be a solid color because then we would either have to (a) reverse transform the child elements separately to make them look normal or (b) use absolute positioning.
For this particular shape, having text inside the shape is not a problem even while using transforms but having non solid background colors would be.
Option 1: Using two pseudo-elements
You could use a couple of pseudo-elements with skew transforms, position one on the top and the other on the right to produce the required shape. Hover the shape in snippet to see how it is created.
div {
position: relative;
height: 150px;
width: 250px;
background: red;
margin: 40px 40px 0px 0px;
}
div:after,
div:before {
position: absolute;
content: '';
background: red;
z-index: -1;
backface-visibility: hidden;
}
div:before {
height: 12.5%;
width: 100%;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
transform-origin: right top;
transform: skewY(3deg);
}
div:after {
height: 100%;
width: 12.5%;
right: -1px;
top: -1px;
transform-origin: right top;
transform: skewX(10deg);
}
/* Just for demo */
div{
transition: all 1s;
}
div:hover{
height: 250px;
width: 300px;
}
div:hover:after{
background: blue;
}
div:hover:before{
background: green;
}
<div>Some text</div>
Pros:
Shape can be created with a single element and can have text inside it without any trouble.
Cons:
Having gradients (or) images as background for the shape is complex because they would need reverse rotation as mentioned earlier.
Shape is not 100% scalable as dimensions of the container should change proportionately for the shape to be maintained (hover on the shape in the snippet to see what I mean). Reason is same as mentioned here.
Option 2: Using one pseudo-element
This is pretty similar to the previous option except that this uses a single pseudo-element along with a overflow: hidden on the parent.
div {
position: relative;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 200px;
width: 300px;
padding: 10px;
overflow: hidden;
}
div:after {
position: absolute;
content: '';
top: 0px;
left: -20px;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background: red;
transform-origin: left bottom;
transform: skewY(5deg) skewX(7.5deg);
z-index: -1;
}
div:hover {
height: 300px;
width: 500px;
transition: all 1s;
}
<div>Some text</div>
Pros:
Shape can be created with a single element and can have text inside it without any trouble.
Shape is responsive and can adapt even if the container's dimensions change .
Cons:
Same constraint as the previous option for gradient and image backgrounds.
Not suitable if the overflow: hidden on the parent is a constraint.
A solution is:
div {
width: 300px;
height: 100px;
margin:50px;
background-color: yellow;
border: 1px solid black;
}
.thisdiv {
-ms-transform: skewX(-20deg); /* IE 9 */
-webkit-transform: skewX(-20deg); /* Safari */
transform: skewX(-20deg); /* Standard syntax */
}
<div class="thisdiv">
This is the div I will skew
</div>
This is how to skew an element, if you want to make the shape you added, try using two overlaping div's, position, scale, rotate and skew, like this:
.outer-div{
position:relative;
margin:50px;
width:200px;
height:200px;
border:2px black dashed;
}
.inner-one{
position:absolute;
left:0;
bottom:0;
width:180px;
height:180px;
background:red;
}
.inner-two{
position:absolute;
bottom:2px;
right:0px;
width:200px;
height:195px;
background:red;
transform: rotate(7deg) skew(14deg) scale(0.905); /* Standard syntax */
}
<div class="outer-div">
<div class="inner-one">
</div>
<div class="inner-two">
</div>
</div>
2 Triangle Solution for Irregular Quadrilateral in CSS
In looking at your image, I notice that the skew at the top and right are really just long, narrow triangles overlaying the rectangle.
So what I did was create triangles using CSS border properties and absolutely position them over the rectangle.
#rectangle {
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
background-color: red;
margin-top: 25px;
position: relative;
}
#triangle-down {
border-left: 30px solid red;
border-right: 0;
border-top: 200px solid transparent;
position: absolute;
right: -30px;
top: 0;
}
#triangle-left {
border-top: 0;
border-bottom: 15px solid red;
border-right: 400px solid transparent;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: -15px;
}
<div id="rectangle">
<div id="triangle-down"></div>
<div id="triangle-left"></div>
</div>
jsFiddle demo
You could check out the clip-path property (see below from MDN), but support is very patchy. Chrome 24+ supports with prefix and FF, but only URL values, which reference a path in an SVG. You can read more about clip-path here.
Here's a basic pen - this will only work in Chrome.
From MDN
The clip-path CSS property prevents a portion of an element from getting displayed by defining a clipping region to be displayed i.e, only a specific region of the element is displayed. The clipping region is a path specified as a URL referencing an inline or external SVG, or shape method such as circle(). The clip-path property replaces the now deprecated clip property.
developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/clip-path (sorry, not enough rep to link)
I am working with a set HTML template that makes things a little tricky to customize exactly the way I want. So I am stuck with a structure that somewhat lacks flexibility.
I have a div that takes up 50% width of the page, but I want to center a containing div in the middle of the page. Due to other restrictions in other parts of the page, I really can't change the parent div being set to position: relative.
This is the effect I am after:
This is the code I have so far (which is not working):
HTML:
<div class="parent">
<div class="centerpage"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3f/Berlin_U-Bahn_Train_A3L71.jpg/220px-Berlin_U-Bahn_Train_A3L71.jpg"></div>
</div>
CSS:
.parent {
background-color: #85D782;
height: 400px;
width: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.centerpage {
position: absolute;
}
you can use the old method of absolute and negative margin :
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/Htpen
.parent {
background-color: #85D782;
height: 400px;
width: 50%;
position:relative;
}
.centerpage {
position: absolute;
left:100%;
top:50%;
vertical-align:middle;
margin :-80px 0 0 -110px;/* negative margin is equal to half height/width of image */
}
or use a background-image or gradient http://codepen.io/anon/pen/GDbtg :
.centerpage {
background:
linear-gradient(to right,
#85D782 0%,
#85D782 50%,
#ffffff 50%,
#ffffff
)
;
height: 400px;
text-align:center;
line-height:400px;
}
img{
display:inline-block;
vertical-align:middle;
}
put image into a div and apply class below
{
width: 100px /* with your width whatever it is */;
text-align: center;
padding: 0px;
height: 110px;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
}
and add one more class
.centerpage img {
width:100%;
}